Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling

Machine Learning Modelling

Background

Early Incident Identification

Disc Consulting Enterprises (DCE) has identified some potentially suspicious attacks on their network and computer systems. The attacks are thought to be a new type of attack from a skilled threat actor. To date, the attacks have only been identified ‘after the fact’ by examining post-exploitation activities of the attacker on compromised systems.

Unfortunately, the attackers are skilled enough to evade detection and the exact mechanisms of their exploits have not been identified.

The incident response team, including IT services, security operations, security architecture, risk management, the CISO (Chief Information Security Officer), and the CTO (Chief Technology Officer) have been meeting regularly to determine next steps.

It has been suggested that the security architecture and operations teams could try to implement some real-time threat detection using machine learning models that build on earlier consultancy your firm has completed (i.e., building upon your Assessment 1 work).

Data description

The data have already been provided (in Assessment 1), and the ML team (you) have undertaken some initial cleaning and analysis.

Things to keep in mind:

  • Each event record is a snapshot triggered by an individual network ‘packet’. The exact triggering conditions for the snapshot are unknown. But it is known that multiple packets are exchanged in a ‘TCP conversation’ between the source and the target before an event is triggered and a record created. It is also known that each event record is anomalous in some way (the SIEM logs many events that may be suspicious).
  • The malicious events account for a very small amount of data. As such, your training needs to consider the “imbalanced” data and the effect these data may have on accuracy (both specificity and sensitivity).

A very small proportion of the data are known to be corrupted by their source systems and some data are incomplete or incorrectly tagged. The incident response team indicated this is likely to be less than a few hundred records.

Assembled Payload Size (continuous)The total size of the inbound suspicious payload. Note: This would contain the data sent by the attacker in the “TCP conversation” up until the event was triggered
DYNRiskA Score (continuous)An un-tested in-built risk score assigned by a new SIEM plug-in
IPV6 Traffic (binary)A flag indicating whether the triggering packet was using IPV6 or IPV4 protocols (True = IPV6)
Response Size (continuous)The total size of the reply data in the TCP conversation prior to the triggering packet
Source Ping Time (ms) (continuous)The ‘ping’ time to the IP address which triggered the event record. This is affected by network structure, number of ‘hops’ and even physical distances.   E.g.: < 1 ms is typically local to the device1-5ms is usually located in the local network5-50ms is often geographically local to a country~100-250ms is trans-continental to servers250+ may be trans-continental to a small network. Note, these are estimates only and many factors can influence ping times.
Operating System (Categorical)A limited ‘guess’ as to the operating system that generated the inbound suspicious connection. This is not accurate, but it should be somewhat consistent for each ‘connection’
Connection State (Categorical)An indication of the TCP connection state at the time the packet was triggered.
Connection Rate (continuous)The number of connections per second by the inbound suspicious connection made prior to the event record creation
Ingress Router (Binary)DCE has two main network connections to the ‘world’. This field indicates which connection the events arrived through
Server Response Packet Time (ms) (continuous)An estimation of the time from when the payload was sent to when the reply
 packet was generated. This may indicate server processing time/load for the event
Packet Size (continuous)The size of the triggering packet
Packet TTL (continuous)The time-to-live of the previous inbound packet. TTL can be a measure of how many ‘hops’ (routers) a packet has traversed before arriving at our network.
Source IP Concurrent Connection (Continuous)How many concurrent connections were open from the source IP at the time the event was triggered
Class (Binary)Indicates if the event was confirmed malicious, i.e. 0 = Non-malicious, 1 = Malicious

The needle in the haystack

The data were gathered over a period of time and processed by several systems in order to associate specific events with confirmed malicious activities. However, the number of confirmed malicious events was very low, with these events accounting for less than 1% of all logged network events.

Because the events associated with malicious traffic are quite rare, rate of ‘false negatives’ and ‘false positives’ are important.

Scenario

Following the meetings of the security incident response team, it has been decided to try to make an ‘early warning’ system that extends the functionality of their current SIEM. It has been proposed that DCE engage 3rd party developers to create a ‘smart detection plugin’ for the SIEM.

The goal is to have a plug-in that would extract data from real-time network events, send it to an external system (your R script) and receive a classification in return.

However, for the plugin to be effective it must consider the alert-fatigue experienced by security operations teams as excessive false-positives can lead to the team ignoring real incidents. But, because the impact of a successful attack is very high, false negatives could result in attackers overtaking the whole network.

You job

Your job is to develop the detection algorithms that will provide the most accurate incident detection. You do not need to concern yourself about the specifics of the SIEM plugin or software integration, i.e., your task is to focus on accurate classification of malicious events using R.

You are to test and evaluate two machine learning algorithms to determine which supervised learning model is best for the task as described.

Task

You are to import and clean the same MLData2023.csv, that was used in the previous assignment. Then run, tune and evaluate two supervised ML algorithms (each with two types of training data) to identify the most accurate way of classifying malicious events.

Part 1 – General data preparation and cleaning

  1. Import the MLData2023.csv into R Studio. This version is the same as Assignment 1.
  2. Write the appropriate code in R Studio to prepare and clean the MLData2023 dataset as follows:
    1. Clean the whole dataset based on what you have suggested / feedback received for Assignment 1.
    1. Filter the data to only include cases labelled with Class = 0 or 1.
    1. For the feature Operating.System, merge the three Windows categories together to form a new category, say Windows_All. Furthermore, merge iOS, Linux (Unknown), and Other to form the new category named Others. Hint: use the forcats:: fct_collapse(.) function.
    1. Similarly, for the feature Connection.State, merge INVALID, NEW and RELATED for form the new category named Others.
    1. Select only the complete cases using the na.omit(.) function, and name the dataset MLData2023_cleaned.

Briefly outline the preparation and cleaning process in your report and why you believe the above steps were necessary.

  • Use the code below to generated two training datasets (one unbalanced mydata.ub.train and one balanced mydata.b.train) along with the testing set (mydata.test). Make sure you enter your student ID into the command set.seed(.).
Text Box: # Separate samples of non-malicious and malicious events
dat.class0 <- MLData2023_cleaned %>% filter(Class == 0) # non-malicious
dat.class1 <- MLData2023_cleaned %>% filter(Class == 1) # malicious

# Randomly select 19800 non-malicious and 200 malicious samples, then combine them to form the training samples
set.seed(Enter your student ID)
rows.train0 <- sample(1:nrow(dat.class0), size = 19800, replace = FALSE) rows.train1 <- sample(1:nrow(dat.class1), size = 200, replace = FALSE)
# Your 20000 unbalanced training samples
train.class0 <- dat.class0[rows.train0,] # Non-malicious samples train.class1 <- dat.class1[rows.train1,] # Malicious samples mydata.ub.train <- rbind(train.class0, train.class1) mydata.ub.train <- mydata.ub.train %>%
mutate(Class = factor(Class, labels = c("NonMal","Mal")))
“></td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>Note that in the master data set, the percentage of malicious events is less than 1%. This distribution is roughly represented by the unbalanced data. The balanced data is generated based on up-sampling of the minority class using bootstrapping. The idea here is to ensure the trained model is not biased towards the majority class, i.e. non-malicious event.</p>



<h2 class=Part 2 – Compare the performances of different ML algorithms
  • Randomly select two supervised learning modelling algorithms to test against one another by running the following code. Make sure you enter your student ID into the command set.seed(.). Your 2 ML approaches are given by myModels.
set.seed(Enter your student ID) models.list1 <- c(“Logistic Ridge Regression”, “Logistic LASSO Regression”, “Logistic Elastic-Net Regression”) models.list2 <- c(“Classification Tree”, “Bagging Tree”, “Random Forest”) myModels <- c(sample(models.list1, size = 1), sample(models.list2, size = 1)) myModels %>% data.frame

For each of your two ML modelling approaches, you will need to:

  • Run the ML algorithm in R on the two training sets with Class as the outcome variable.
  • Perform hyperparameter tuning to optimise the model:
    • Outline your hyperparameter tuning/searching strategy for each of the ML modelling approaches. Report on the search range(s) for hyperparameter tuning, which 𝑘-fold CV was used, and the number of repeated CVs (if applicable), and the final optimal tuning parameter values and relevant CV

statistics (i.e. CV results, tables and plots), where appropriate. If you are using repeated CVs, a minimum of 2 repeats are required.

  • If your selected tree model is Bagging, you must tune the nbagg, cp and minsplit hyperparameters, with at least 3 values for each.
    • If your selected tree model is Random Forest, you must tune the num.trees and mtry hyperparameters, with at least 3 values for each.
    • Be sure to set the randomisation seed using your student ID.
  • Evaluate the predictive performance of your two ML models, derived from the balanced and unbalanced training sets, on the testing set. Provide the confusion matrices and report and describe the following measures in the context of the project:
    • False positive rate
    • False negative rate
    • Overall Accuracy
    • Precision
    • Recall
    • F-score

For the precision, recall and F-score metrics, you will need to do a bit of research as to how they can be calculated. Make sure you define each of the above metrics in the context of the study.

  • Provide a brief statement on your final recommended model and why you chose it. Parsimony, and to a lesser extent, interpretability maybe taken into account if the decision is close. You may outline your penalised model if it helps with your argument.

What to submit

Gather your findings into a report (maximum of 5 pages) and citing relevant sources, if necessary.

Present how and why the data was ‘cleaned and prepared’, how the ML models were tuned and provide the relevant CV results. Lastly, present how they performed to each other in both the unbalanced and balanced scenarios. You may use graphs, tables and images where appropriate to help your reader understand your findings. All tables and figures should be appropriately captioned, and referenced in-text.

Make a final recommendation on which ML modelling approach is the best for this task.

Your final report should look professional, include appropriate headings and subheadings, should cite facts and reference source materials in APA-7th format.

Your submission must include the following:

  • Your report (5 pages or less, excluding cover/contents/reference/appendix page). The report must be submitted through TURNITIN and checked for originality.
  • A copy of your R code, and three csv files corresponding to your two training sets and a testing set. The R code and data sets are to be submitted separately via another submission link.

Note that no marks will be given if the results you have provided cannot be confirmed by your code. No more than 20% of your code can be from online resources, including ChatGPT. Furthermore, all pages exceeding the 5-page limit will not be read or examined.

Marking Criteria

CriterionContribution to assignment mark
Accurate implementation data cleaning and of each supervised machine learning algorithm in R. Strictly about codeDoes the code work from start to finish?Are the results reproducible?Are all the steps performed correctly?Is it your own work?      20%
Explanation of data cleaning and preparation. Corresponds to Part 1 b)Briefly outline the reasons for sub-parts (i) and (ii).Provide justifications for merging of categories, i.e. sub- part(iii) and (iv).    10%
An outline of the selected modelling approaches, the hyperparameter tuning and search strategy, the corresponding performance evaluation in the training sets (i.e. CV results, tables and plots), and the optimal tuning hyperparameter values. Penalised logistic regression model – Outline the range of value for your lambda and alpha (if elastic-net). Plot/tabulate the CV results. Outline the optimal value(s) of your hyperparameter(s). Outline the coefficients if required for your arguments of model choice.        20%
Tree models – Outline the range of the hyperparameters (bagging and RF). Tabulate, e.g. the top combinations and the optimal OOB misclassification error, or plot the CV results (e.g. classification tree). 
Presentation, interpretation and comparison of the performance measures (i.e. confusion matrices, false positives, false negatives, and etc) among the selected ML algorithms. Justification of the recommended modelling approach. Provide the confusion matrices (frequencies, proportions) in the test set.   Predicted/Actual          Yes                                          No Yes                                     Freq1 (Sensitivity %)       Freq2 (False positives %) No                                      Freq3 (False                        Freq4 (Specificity %) negatives %)   Interpretation of the above metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall and F-score) in the context of the study.                30%
Report structure and presentation (including tables and figures, and where appropriate, proper citations and referencing in APA- 7th style). Report should be clear and logical, well structured, mostly free from communication, spelling and grammatical errors. Overall structure, presentation and narrative.ReferencingTable and figures are clear, and properly labelled and referenced.No screenshots of R output, except of plots.Spelling and grammar.            20%
                     

Academic Misconduct

Edith Cowan University regards academic misconduct of any form as unacceptable. Academic misconduct, which includes but is not limited to, plagiarism; unauthorised collaboration; cheating in examinations; theft of other student’s work; collusion; inadequate and incorrect referencing; will be dealt with in accordance with the ECU Rule 40 Academic Misconduct (including Plagiarism) Policy. Ensure that you are familiar with the Academic Misconduct Rules.

Assignment Extensions

Instructions to apply for extensions are available on the ECU Online Extension Request and Tracking System to formally lodge your assignment extension request. The link is also available on Canvas in the Assignment section.

Normal work commitments, family commitments and extra-curricular activities are not accepted as grounds for granting you an extension of time because you are expected to plan ahead for your assessment due dates.

Where the assignment is submitted not more than 7 days late, the penalty shall, for each day that it is late, be 5% of the maximum assessment available for the assignment.

Where the assignment is more than 7 days late, a mark of zero shall be awarded.

Order Now

Get expert help for Machine Learning Modelling and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (November 6, 2024) Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/.
"Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling." Universal Assignment - November 6, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/
Universal Assignment May 22, 2023 Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling., viewed November 6, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/>
Universal Assignment - Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling. [Internet]. [Accessed November 6, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/
"Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling." Universal Assignment - Accessed November 6, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/
"Assignment 2 Machine Learning Modelling." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-2-machine-learning-modelling/. [Accessed: November 6, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?