ASSESSMENT 2B BRIEF | |
Subject Code and Title | POA304 Positive Ageing |
Assessment | Video Presentation – ethics, challenges, opportunities |
Individual/Group | Individual |
Length | 5 minutes (+/-10%) |
Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: g) Apply evidence-based innovative approaches and technologies to ageing. |
Submission | Due by 11:55pm AEST Sunday end of Module 6.1 (Week 11). |
Weighting | 25% |
Total Marks | 100 marks |
Task Summary
In this assessment you are required to research a new technology or innovation that has being used in the aged are sector (acute care hospital, community aged care or residential aged care) in Australia in the last five years, to improve the quality of life for older people and consider if there are any ethical implications for its use in this population. Research the topic and develop and deliver a 5 min (+/- 10%) oral presentation via zoom. This is an individual presentation.
Please refer to the Task Instructions for details on how to complete this task.
Context
Continuing to develop services or products that improve the quality of life of older people or improve work efficiency of the health professionals that care for older people, is a key focus of every service organisation’s continuous quality improvement program. An innovation does not necessarily need to be an advancement in technology, but can by implementing new ideas, such as a new work process, a new product or service. The purpose of the innovation being that it changes, creates, or adds value to the service being provided or the recipients of that service (Doyle, 2018).
Reference
Doyle, N. (2018, autumn). Top tips for creating a safe and ‘ideas – sharing environment on your organisation. Fusion: The voice of aged care. Leading Aged Services Australia.
This assessment will help you to identify and apply evidence-based innovative approaches and technologies to the ageing population and consider the ethical implications of their use in the aged
care industry. This will assist you to develop an appreciation of the expanded role that nursing has in the development of new innovations to promote better health outcomes both for current and future populations. The assessment allows you to demonstrate your communication skills with your peers; these are necessary skills for you to practice in preparation for clinical practice.
Task Instructions
To complete this assessment task, you must…
- Research the literature of the last five years (2014 – 2019) and identify one innovation or technology, that has been developed and implemented to
improve the delivery of care to older Australians or improve the life of older Australian in the aged care sector (community or residential aged care).
- How does this innovation propose it will improve service delivery, care, or the quality of life of the older person population? In other words, why was this innovation developed?
- Are there any ethical issues related to the use of this new innovation with older people, older people with dementia, and older people from LGBTQIA+, ATSI or CALD groups?
- Identify whether this innovation has been supported by a clinical trial, research and/or a follow up evaluation of its effectiveness or ability to change outcomes and briefly present the aims and results of this research.
- Provide an example of how you could implement this innovation? For example, how could a electronic tablet be used to monitor your patient, that has been admitted back to their own home in the first 48 hours post discharge
The following article may help you to get started,
Cheu, S. (2018, November). Innovative technology in aged care recognised. Australian Ageing Agenda. Retrieved from https://www.australianageingagenda.com.au/2018/11/23/innovative- technology-in-aged-care-recognised/
Suggested format.
- Presentation is 5 minutes long (+/- 30 seconds).
- Maximum of five slides + reference slide.
- Target audience is a group of your peers e.g. a group of registered nurses, or nursing staff in an aged care facility or community setting (please identify on your front slide which type of audience).
- Do not overcrowd the slide with text. Keep to dot points and narrate. You can use pictures if that will assist your story.
- Slide content
- Slide one – Introductory slide where you introduce your topic, state who you are and who you are presenting the information to.
- Slide two – discuss the background to the innovation or new technology, what was the reason for the development of the new innovation and what was it proposed to be able to do.
- Slide three – discuss any supporting evidence for its use and ability to change care outcomes or quality of life of older people? Are there any ethical issues that arise in relation to the innovation?
- Slide four – explain how you propose implementing this innovation
- Slide five – provide a summary slide to the presentation.
- Slide six – reference list in APA format.
- The presentation can be prepared on power point presentation but needs to be orally presented and narrated in a Zoom forum. The presentation should be recorded in zoom and then uploaded with a pdf version of the transcript included. Make sure your references are included in this file.
Grading
This assessment will be marked using the attached rubric. Please refer to this for marking criteria.
Referencing
Please use a minimum number of two academic references for this presentation. It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing
Submission Instructions
Save your video into mp4 file format and follow the correct naming convention by putting your name and student number in the file name.
Submit your presentation video and pdf file simultaneously via the Assessment 3 link in the main navigation menu in POA304: Positive Ageing.
WARNING
You must not press Submit until you have uploaded both your video and your pdf file.
- Use the Browse my Computer Button to attach the file containing the transcript.
- BEFORE CLICKING SUBMIT, upload your video, following the instructions on this page
Only after you have added your video and your pdf file should you click Submit.
The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
.
Assessment Rubric
Assessment Attributes | Fail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75-84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
Knowledge and understanding of innovations and technologies utilised in the aged care sector. | Demonstrates a partially- developed understanding of an innovation or technology developed and implemented in the aged care sector. | Demonstrates a functional knowledge of an innovation or technology developed and utilised in the aged care sector. | Demonstrates proficient knowledge of an innovation or technology developed and utilised in the aged care sector. | Demonstrates advanced knowledge of an innovation or technology developed and utilised in the aged care sector. | Demonstrates exceptional knowledge of an innovations or technology developed and utilised in the aged care sector. |
Percentage for this criterion = 30% | |||||
Application of evidence- based innovative approach Proposal for implementation supported by relevant research or reports and identifies the ethical implications of use of the innovation of technology in the older population. Percentage for this criterion = 30 % | Limited synthesis and analysis of information from the literature to support the benefit of this innovation to care delivery or the quality of life for the older person. Limited identification of the ethical implications of use of the new innovation in the older population. | Partial ability demonstrated to apply findings from the literature that support the benefit of this innovation to care delivery or the quality of life for the older person. Some interpretation of relevant information and literature. Identification of some of the ethical implications of use of the new innovation. | Well-developed proposal to implement an innovation, supported by findings from the literature that support the benefit of this innovation to care delivery or the quality of life for the older person. Identification and clear description of the major ethical implications of use of the new innovation. | Thoroughly developed and creative proposal to implement an innovation, supported by findings from the literature that support the benefit of this innovation to care delivery or the quality of life for the older person. Thorough description of the major ethical implications of use of the new innovation. | Highly sophisticated and creative proposal to implement an innovation, supported by findings from the literature that support the benefit of this innovation to care delivery or the quality of life for the older person. High sophisticated exposition of the ethical implications of use of the new innovation. |
Effective Communication (Presentation/Oral) Percentage for this criterion = 25% | Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Specialised language and terminology are rarely or inaccurately employed. Stilted, awkward and/or oversimplified delivery. | Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Employs some specialised language and terminology with accuracy. Correct, but often stilted or awkward delivery. | Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Accurately employs specialised language and terminology. Correct, but occasionally stilted or awkward delivery. | Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well-supported by evidence. Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology. Clear and confident delivery. | Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well- supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology. |
Limited use of engaging presentation techniques. (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice) Presentation aids are not employed or developed as directed. | Sometimes uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice) Employs basic, but generally accurate presentation aids as directed. A number of aspects require further refinement (e.g. amount of information, styling, editing, etc.). | Uses engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice) Employs clear and somewhat engaging presentation aids as directed. A few aspects require further refinement (e.g. amount of information, styling, editing, etc.). | Confidently and consistently uses a range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice; stance; movement) Employs succinct, styled and engaging presentation aids that incorporate a range of elements (graphics, multi-media, text, charts, etc.). | Clear, confident and persuasive delivery. Dynamic, integrated and professional use of a wide range of engaging presentation techniques (e.g. posture; eye contact, expression; gestures; volume, pitch and pace of voice; stance; movement) Employs succinct, creative and engaging presentation aids that effectively integrate a wide range of elements (graphics, multi-media, text, charts, etc.). |
Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 15% | Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA 6. | Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Referencing resembles APA 6, with frequent or repeated errors. | Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas. Referencing resembles APA 6, with occasional errors. | Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. | Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. |
APA 6 referencing is free from errors. | APA 6 referencing is free from errors. |
Get expert help for POA304 Positive Ageing and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!