TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1
Assessment Details
| Item | Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy |
| Type | Digital Presentation (Recorded) |
| Due | Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) |
| Group type | Individual |
| Length | 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) |
| Weight | 50% |
| Gen AI use | Permitted, restrictions apply |
| Aligned ULOS | ULO1, ULO2, ULO3, ULO4 |
| Resources | 1x Assessment 1 Pitch Template |
| Deliverables & Submissions | 1x Presentation Recording (MP4) submitted to VoiceThread.1x Pitch template (Word) submitted to Turnitin. |
| Resubmissions | Assignment resubmissions are not permitted in this unit. |
| Marking | Instructor Marked |
| Grades & Feedback | SCU Letter Grade, Assessment Rubric, Written Feedback |
Early childhood teachers (ECT) need to have a thorough understanding of diverse theoretical and philosophical foundations of play-based pedagogies to critically consider the possibilities and challenges associated with incorporating play into our early childhood education practices. As an ECT, part of our responsibility is to advocate for the recognition and significance of play as a fundamental right of every child. Moreover, we must strive to create inclusive and collaborative learning environments that welcome diverse perspectives and allow for the development of a shared understanding of what ‘play’ entails, as well as the implications of implementing play-based pedagogies in early childhood policies and practices.
Assessment 1 requires students to critically engage with theoretical perspectives of play and reflect upon key issues presented in Modules 1-3 and create a digital presentation.
This assignment aligns with the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs)
- ULO1: identify and analyse the role of play in learning and examine the challenges pertaining to play and pedagogies.
- ULO2: discuss the diversity of approaches to pedagogies utilised in early childhood education and care, and how they position children, teachers, and parents/carers.
- ULO3: analyse the relationships between philosophy, theory, and pedagogy to the learning environment for all young children (birth – 5 years).
- ULO4: critically reflect on personal philosophy to play and pedagogies for learning and teaching as an early childhood professional.
Task Description
Imagine you are working in an early childhood education and care (ECEC) setting and have been asked to present at the family information night. Some families of children aged 4-5 years voice their concerns about the play-based approaches used in your setting. They believe their children should be engaged in more formal, academic approaches to prepare them for school. Other families are interested in the play-based approach but would like to know more about the potential value and benefits of play.
For assessment 1, your task is to prepare a ‘pitch’ to explain and justify the importance of a play-based pedagogical approach for children now and in their future.
Instructions
Step 1: Develop your Pitch
To ensure your pitch is well-organised and addresses all necessary elements you have been provided with a pitch template. You are required to fill in the ‘Assessment 1 Pitch Template’ and submit the completed document for grading.
To access the template:
- Go to the ‘Assessment Tasks and Submissions’ section of the unit learning site (Blackboard).
- Open the Assessment 1 folder.
- Locate the Word document titled ‘Assessment 1 Pitch Template’.
- Download the document and save it to your files.
Complete the pitch template with a detailed plan for your presentation. Include a URL link to the presentation recording, a brief description of each presentation slide (200 words maximum), and a reference list.
Your pitch must identify and justify the following elements:
- Introduction: Introduce yourself to the service and briefly address the concerns raised by families (30 seconds to 1 minute).
- Role of play: Explain the role of play in children’s learning, development and wellbeing, including an example of a play-based experience and activity. Remember to address different developmental domains (2 minutes).
- Personal philosophy: Share your personal philosophy regarding play and how it influences your approach to teaching and learning (2 minutes).
- Successful play-based learning environment: Discuss what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment, including physical, social, and temporal elements (2 minutes).
- Challenges and solutions: Identify potential challenges when incorporating play into early childhood teaching and how to overcome them (2 minutes).
- Summary and farewell: provide a summary and farewell note (30 seconds to 1 minute).
Your pitch must be supported and informed by:
- At least 1 theoretical perspective presented in Module 2.
- Academic sources (readings, journal articles, book chapters, etc.)
- Professional sources and ECEC policies (Early Years Learning Framework, National Ǫuality Standard, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, Code of Ethics, Developmental Milestones)
Step 2: Create your Presentation slides
You are to create (insert max of 15 slides, preferably less) to visually support and enhance your presentation. You are to submit your slides for grading.
You may use PowerPoint, Prezi, or Canva to create your presentation slides. Resources on how to prepare the digital presentation are provided in the Assessment 1 Folder on Blackboard.
Your presentation slides must:
- use an easy-to-read font for the text on the slides (e.g., Arial, Times New Roman) and a 1.5 or double-line space.
- include clear headings
Step 3: Record your Presentation
Record yourself delivering your 10-minute presentation. You may use Zoom, PowerPoint, or any other recording software to capture your presentation delivery and slides.
Save your recording as an MP4 file.
Referencing
APA referencing is required for this assignment. Please refer to the APA 7th edition. See the SCU Library Guides for detailed instructions on APA formatting. References are not counted in the overall word count.
You must:
- Create a reference list on the last page of the Assessment 1 Pitch Template. You must include a minimum of 8 references (you may use more).
- Literature needs to include the unit textbook, accompanied by peer reviewed articles, book chapters, and other authoritative sources. At a minimum, your sources for this task will include the unit required text, unit readings, EYLF (AGDE, 2022) and broader literature.
- If you have used an AI tool or technology in completing your assessment (for example, brainstorming, understanding concepts, generating examples, summarising readings), you must acknowledge how you have used AI tools. You can create this acknowledgement by adding a declaration at the end of your reference list. For example: “I acknowledge the use of ChatGPT to brainstorm concepts for this
assessment as a starting point for initial research before writing my assessment.”
Submissions
You are required to submit the following items for grading:
1. SCU cover page completed pitch template (Word or PDF) submitted to Turnitin.
It is not required to submit slides
anymore, as explained above.
3. Presentation Recording (MP4) submitted to VoiceThread.
Submission portals can be accessed from the ‘Assessment Tasks and Submission’ section of the unit learning site (Blackboard). Please note, there are two submission portals for this assignment.
- VoiceThread Submission Portal: For submission of video files. For more information see How to submit a VoiceThread assignment.
- Turnitin Submission Portal: For submission of Template
and presentation slides. It is not requiredto submit slides anymore, as explained above.
3.
Please label the Template document clearly. Include the unit code, the assessment item, your first name and family name. For example: ‘CIVL3009_A1 Presentation_BarakOBAMA_ID123456.pdf’
Referencing
APA 7 referencing is required for this assignment. Please refer to the APA 7th edition. Refer to the SCU (Southern Cross University) Library Guides for detailed instructions on APA formatting, and to ensure your referencing is accurate, refer to the SCU Library Guides.
Academic Integrity
Adherence to SCU’s academic integrity policies is mandatory. Breaches may result in severe penalties, including failing the assessment or the unit. Examples of academic misconduct include plagiarism, collusion, and the use of unauthorised tools or materials. Refer to SCU’s academic integrity policies and guides for detailed information on what constitutes a breach, and the consequences involved.
Generative AI (Artificial Intelligence) use Policy
You are permitted to use generative AI (Gen AI) tools responsibly and ethically to complete components of this assignment.
Please do not post confidential, private, personal, or otherwise sensitive information into Gen AI tools. If you use these tools, you must be aware of their limitations, biases, and propensity for fabrication.
Below are the details of permitted and prohibited uses of Gen AI for this assignment:
Permitted use
Students are permitted to use Generative AI to:
- clarify concepts, theories, ideas, etc., discussed in class
- generate preliminary ideas for writing
- edit a working draft of the assessment
- read and summarise research and supporting evidence for the assessment
Prohibited use
Students are not permitted to use Generative AI to:
- generate definitions or writing used in their final submission.
- produce arguments or refine thinking on their final submission
Any of these actions will constitute and be treated as a breach of academic integrity.
Gen AI Acknowledgement
Your use of AI tools must adhere to the SCU Academic Integrity Framework, which includes upholding honesty, ethics, professionalism, and academic integrity. All use of Gen AI must
be explicitly documented and acknowledged in your submission. If you use generative AI tools without acknowledgment, it may result in an academic integrity breach against you, as described in the Student Academic and Non-Academic Misconduct Rules, Section 3. To find out how to reference generative AI in your work, consult the referencing style for your unit via the library referencing guides.
Special Considerations
Students wishing to request special consideration must submit a Request for Special Consideration form via their ‘MyEnrolment’ page as early as possible and prior to the original due date for that assessment task, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.
Late Submissions & Penalties
Except when special consideration is awarded, late submission of assessment tasks will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be incurred as soon as the deadline is reached. A penalty of 5% of the available marks will be deducted from the actual mark at one minute after the time listed on the due date. A further penalty of 5% of the available mark will be deducted from the actual mark achieved on each subsequent calendar day until the mark reaches zero.
Grades & Feedback
Assignments submitted by the due date will receive an SCU Letter Grade, a Turnitin originality report, an assessment rubric evaluating performance against specified criteria and standards, and written feedback from the assignment marker. Grades and feedback will be posted to the ‘Grades & Feedback’ section on the learning site. Please allow up to seven business days for marks to be posted.
Works submitted by the due date will be evaluated against the grading criteria and standards outlined below and summarised in the ‘Assessment Rubric’. For more information regarding SCU grades and standards, visit Final Grades.
Continued next page . . .
Assessment Rubric
| Grading Criteria | High Distinction (85-100%) | Distinction (75-84%) | Credit (65-74%) | Pass (50-64%) | Fail (1-49%) |
| Criterion 1. (25%) ULO1&2&3 Knowledge and understanding of contemporary theoretical perspectives about the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing. | Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and deep understanding of a broad range of contemporary theoretical perspectives of play. Comprehensive explanation of the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing, with well- chosen and appropriate example/s of play-based experiences. Thoroughly addresses all developmental domains. | Provides a thorough understanding of at least two contemporary theoretical perspectives. Detailed explanation of the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing with relevant example/s of play-based experiences. Thoroughly addresses all or most developmental domains. | Shows a reasonable understanding of at least one contemporary theoretical perspective. Clear explanation of the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing with an example of a play-based experience. Addresses some developmental domains. | Demonstrates a basic understanding of one contemporary theoretical perspective. Basic explanation of the role of play in children’s learning, development, and wellbeing. Basic examples of a play-based experience are provided. | Lacks understanding of contemporary theoretical perspectives. Limited explanation of the role of play in children’s learning. Example of play-based experience is not relevant. |
| Criterion 2. (25%) ULO2&4 Personal philosophy of play and how it | Play philosophy is insightful and well- articulated. It provides comprehensive and reflective explanations of its influence on teaching | Play philosophy is detailed and provides explanations of its influence on teaching and learning, including specific examples of | Play philosophy is clear and provides explanations of its influence on teaching and learning. | States the personal philosophy of play but lacks depth and detail. Includes a basic explanation of its | Personal philosophy of play is unclear or poorly articulated. Little to no explanation of its influence on teaching and learning. |
| influences teaching and learning. | and learning, including detailed examples of translating philosophy to practice. | translating philosophy to practice. | influence on teaching and learning. | ||
| Criterion 3. (20%) ULO3 Knowledge and understanding of environments that facilitate play-based learning. | Comprehensive discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment includes thorough examples of physical, social, and temporal elements. | Detailed discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment includes detailed examples of most physical, social, and temporal elements. | Clear discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment, including at least one of the following: physical, social, and temporal elements. | Basic discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment including at least one of the following: physical, social, and temporal elements. | Unclear discussion of what contributes to a successful play-based learning environment. |
| Criterion 4. (20%) ULO3 Challenges and solutions relating to play-based pedagogy. | Provides a comprehensive and insightful examination of potential challenges relating to play-based pedagogy with strong examples and solutions. | Provides detailed discussions of potential challenges relating to play-based pedagogy with detailed solutions. | Provides a clear discussion of potential challenges relating to play-based pedagogy. Provides some basic solutions. | Provides a basic awareness of potential challenges related to play- based pedagogy. | Lack of understanding of potential challenges related to play-based pedagogy. |
| Criterion 5. (5%) ULO 1-4 Supporting evidence including academic and | Outstanding use of academic and professional sources and literature throughout presentation. Outstanding integration of these materials with deep and insightful connections. | Very good use of academic and professional sources and literature throughout presentation. There is a strong integration of these materials with clear and relevant connections. | Good use academic and professional sources and literature. Clear but at times superficial connections. | Basic use of academic and/or professional sources and literature. Some connections are unclear or lack depth. | Limited or incorrect use of academic and/or professional sources and literature. |
| professional resources/literature. | The submission demonstrates an advanced understanding and critical engagement with the materials. | ||||
| Criterion 6. (5%) ULO1-4 Presentation skills | Outstanding presentation skills are demonstrated, including appropriate pace, tone, articulation, and volume. The student has included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing excellent physical presentation skills and body language. | Very good presentation skills evident including pace, tone, articulation, volume. The student may or may not have included a video of themselves presenting, showcasing very good physical presentation skills and body language. | Good presentation skills evident including pace, tone, articulation, volume. | Basic presentation skills evident including pace, tone, articulation, volume. | Poor presentation skills evident including pace, tone, articulation, volume. |
High Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows exceptional ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as outstanding in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Distinction:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements, demonstrates distinctive insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts, and shows a well-developed ability to synthesise, integrate and evaluate knowledge. The student’s performance could be described as distinguished in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Credit:
The student’s performance, in addition to satisfying all of the basic learning requirements specified, demonstrates insight and ability in researching, analysing and applying relevant skills and concepts. The student’s performance could be described as competent in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Pass:
The student’s performance satisfies all of the basic learning requirements specified and provides a sound basis for proceeding to higher-level studies in the subject area. The student’s performance could be described as satisfactory in relation to the learning requirements specified.
Fail: The student’s performance fails to satisfy the learning requirements specified.
