Module code and title: | FY007 Computing Essentials | Module leader: | XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX |
Assignment No. and type: | Design and Develop a W3C Compliant Web Page | Assessment weighting: | 100% |
Submission time and date: | Wednesday 24th August 2pm | Target feedback time and date: | Before 2pm 14 September 2022 |
Assignment task | |
Think of a topic that has visual appeal, is acceptable for general public consumption and that interests you Examine the template page “fy007_template_v1a.html” available on Blackboard at “Module Materials 2021/22 … New template for Web option coursework … Web template for 2021-2022” Create a home page that reflects your topic Add content in the main content column and an image(s) in the image column [20 marks] Modify the fonts, font and background colours/images and overall look to reflect your topic [20 marks] Create a rollover opacity effect for your image(s) … visit https://www.w3schools.com/css/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_image_transparency to see how to do this [10 marks] Add menu navigation to create another topic page and a ‘contact me’ page [10 marks] In the second topic page demonstrate text controls, hyperlinks, a table and embed images in your table with the aforementioned rollover opacity effects [20 marks] CHALLENGE QUESTION … use Bootstrap to make your page compatible across browsers and devices (see https://www.w3schools.com/bootstrap/tryit.asp?filename=trybs_temp_webpage&stacked=h) [20 marks] REPORT YOUR WORK, THE MECHANISMS USED AND USE APPROPRIATE SCREEN CAPTURE. PLEASE REFERENCE YOUR SOURCES. REPORT LENGTH c.1000 WORDS | |
This assignment has been designed to provide you with an opportunity to demonstrate your achievement of the following module learning outcomes: | |
LO 2 | Design and develop prototypes of Websites and mobile applications |
Task requirements | |
In addition to submitting a report, please ensure that your lecturer has access to the website you have developed. As a guide, submissions should not normally exceed 1000 words, excluding code, tables and diagrams. | |
Referencing and research requirements | |
Please reference your work according to the APA (American Psychological Association) style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2019) Cite them right: the essential reference guide. 11th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are available via the University library. | |
How your work will be assessed | |
Your work will be assessed against the assessment criteria which have been provided at the end of this brief. These criteria have been designed specifically for this assignment and are intended to measure the extent to which you have demonstrated your achievement of its associated learning outcomes (see above). They have been aligned with the institutional grade descriptor appropriate for your level. The assessment criteria provide a basis for fair and consistent marking and indicate what is expected of you in this assignment. It is strongly recommended that you engage with them while you are working on the assignment and use them in combination with any feedback you receive once your work has been marked to help you plan for future learning and development. | |
Submission details | |
This assignment should be submitted electronically. Please use the relevant Turnitin submission point in the Submit your work area in your Blackboard module shell. Please ensure that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format. Turnitin will only accept the following file types: Microsoft Word, Excel or PowerPoint, PostScript, PDF, HTML, RTF, OpenOffice (ODT), Hangul (HWP),Google Docs, or plain text. Your file must also contain at least 20 words of text, consist of fewer than 400 pages and be less than 40MB in size. You can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If you do submit your work more than once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version. Once you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with the original electronic copy of your assignment. You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic integrity, which can be viewed on the University website: https://www.bucks.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-07/academic-integrity-policy.pdf. In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging that you have read and understood these regulations Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late submissions will be marked and the actual mark recorded, but will be capped at the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard. Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission. |
Before you submit |
Please use the provided checklist below to make sure you are ‘fit to submit’ your work We recommend you use this checklist as soon as you get this assignment brief to help you plan your work |
Fit to Submit: Assignment Checklist |
This brief assignment checklist is designed to help you avoid some of the most common mistakes students make in their coursework. Have you read the assignment brief? If not, do so now! In it you will find details of the assessment task, word count, the assessment criteria your work is marked against, and the learning outcomes – the basis for the assessment strategy in each module. Students often lose marks by forgetting some of the more straightforward elements of their assignments. We recommend that you “tick off” each of the points below as you prepare your work for submission. If you need any help, ask your tutor and/or visit https://bucks.ac.uk/students/academicadvice/assessment-and-examination Have you read and understood the assessment criteria? Have you metthe learning outcomes? You will lose marks and your work may even be failed if you have not. Have you demonstrated you can think and write critically in the completed work? This means you have supported your arguments/explanations appropriately e.g. using relevant academic sources and you have offered discussion points which extends your own or others’ viewpoints to make reasoned conclusions/judgements. Have you maintained an appropriatetonethroughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, developed and clear? Have you checked that the referencing in your assignment is in line with your programme requirements? Have you proof-read your work and used spellcheck software to check your spelling and grammar? Have you checked the presentation of your work is as specified by your tutor, for example, are font size, colour, style, line spacing and margins as the tutor specified? Have you kept to the word count (or equivalent)? If you are not sure, check with your tutor. Can you confirm that the work submitted is your own and maintains academic integrity? |
Fail | Fail | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | |
0-34 (F) – Fail | 35-39 E – Marginal fail | 40-49 (D) | 50-59 (C) | 60-69 (B) | 70-79 (A) | 80-100 (A+) | |
Not successful | Below required standard | Satisfactory | Good | Very Good | Excellent | Outstanding | |
Criterion 1 Knowledge and Understanding Indicators: • Depth of knowledge and understanding • Engagement with subject-specific theories, paradigms, concepts and principles | Work demonstrates a limited and/or substantially inaccurate or no understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is little or no demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates insufficient understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is insufficient demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates a basic understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is sufficient demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates a sound breadth and depth of understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is a sound demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates a refined understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is a sophisticated demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates a highly accomplished understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is a highly accomplished demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. | Work demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the underlying concepts and principles associated with the subject area. There is an exceptional demonstration of the ability to identify principles and concepts underlying theoretical frameworks and approaches. |
Criterion 2 Application and practice Indicators: • Development and/or application discipline-specific specialist skills • Accuracy, coordination and proficiency in completion of practical tasks/ processes • Technical, creative skills | The work demonstrates a limited or no ability to evaluate and accurately apply given problem-solving approaches/methods/tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts, and so: • processes attempted but inaccurate and error strewn • use of given technical, creative skills is not demonstrated in most or all key areas | The work demonstrates an insufficient ability to evaluate and accurately apply given problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts and so: • practical tasks and/or processes completed with partial accuracy and independence • use of given technical, creative skills is only demonstrated in some of the key areas | The work demonstrates a sufficient ability to evaluate and apply given problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts and so: • complete practical tasks and/or processes accurately in well-defined contexts • use of a given range of technical, creative skills is demonstrated | The work demonstrates an ability to evaluate and apply, in a consistent and informed manner, given problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts and so: • complete practical tasks and/or processes accurately with a degree of autonomy in well-defined contexts • consistently use a given range of technical, creative skills | The work demonstrates an ability to evaluate and apply in a capable and effective manner, given problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working context and so: • complete practical tasks and/or process autonomously and with accuracy and coordination in well-defined contexts • consistently use in a highly developed way a given range of technical, creative skills | The work demonstrates an ability to select, evaluate and apply in a highly accomplished manner, appropriate problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts and so: • complete practical tasks and/or process autonomously and with a high degree of accuracy, coordination and proficiency in well-defined contexts • consistently use in a highly developed way the full range of given technical, creative skills | The work demonstrates an ability to select, evaluate, and apply in a exceptionally accomplished manner appropriate problem-solving approaches/methods/ tools/techniques relevant to well-defined aspects of the subject and/or working contexts and so: • complete practical tasks and/or process autonomously and with an exceptional degree of accuracy, coordination and proficiency in well-defined contexts • consistently use in a highly developed and sophisticated way the full range of given technical, creative skills |
Examples of grading applying the above criteria to your Web assignment are below. Note, the following are indicative (not exhaustive), thus a technically outstanding assignment may achieve a high grade even if some presentation elements (e.g. in code comments) are incomplete.
Grade D (40%+, pass) presentation and technical evidence of sufficient understanding to produce a basic Web site implementing the technologies covered in this assignment.
Grade C (50%+) evidence demonstrating a proper understanding of fundamental HTML and CSS structures.
Grade B (60%+) evidence of advanced CSS separation of concerns for content and presentation (including consistent use of CSS/<div> layouts).
Grade A (70%+) this will be awarded when all aspects of the assignment are addressed and supported by evidence (explanations and in-code comments) of a robust understanding of mechanisms.
Get expert help for FY007 Computing Essentials W3C Compliant Web Page and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!