Faculty of Business and Law Assignment Brief Mode E and R Regulations
| Module Title: | Innovation and Entrepreneurship | Assignment Number | 2 of 2 | |
| Module Code: | 7001SSL | Assignment Title | Individual video | |
| Module Leader: | Assignment Credits | 5 credits | ||
| Release Date: | ||||
| Submission Date/Time: | ||||
| Submission Time and Place: | Submission through Turnitin ONLY |
Assessment Information
This assignment is an individual assignment.
This assignment requires you to prepare a 10-minute video reflection on your enterprising potential and how you can make a change in your organisation. You can use any video recording software or alternatively, a PPT (voice over slides) is acceptable as well.
Criteria for Assessment
| 1. Succinct self-reflection based on the results of Get2test, entrepreneurial competencies (Entrecomp framework), Mind-set tools | 40% |
| 2. The innovation/ entrepreneurial role you can play in your organisation | 20% |
| 3. Persuasive presentation, confidence, audience engagement, time management | 20% |
| 4. Quality of the slides or materials presented to support the presentation | 10% |
| 5. Evidence of preparation and planning | 10% |
This assignment is designed to assess learning outcomes:
- Critically discuss a range of theories, frameworks, models and methods of innovation management at the individual and organisational level.
- Critically discuss a range of theories, frameworks, models and methods of enterprise and entrepreneurship development at an individual and organisational level.
- Apply theories, frameworks, models and methods of innovation management, enterprise and entrepreneurship to a new venture or in another entrepreneurial / intrapreneurial context.
- Demonstrate an understanding of value creation through the interconnection of innovation and entrepreneurship in the development, survival and sustained growth of a business or social enterprise.
Presentation length
Your presentation length is 10 minutes
There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark (after internal moderation) for work exceeding the time limit by 10% or more.
Presentation length excludes time for questions and answers
How to submit your assessment
The assessment must be submitted by 18:00 on 01/12/2022. No paper copies are required. You can access the submission link through the module web.
- Your coursework will be given a zero mark if you do not submit a copy through Turnitin. Please take care to ensure that you have fully submitted your work.
- Please ensure that you have submitted your work using the correct file format, unreadable files will receive a mark of zero. The Faculty accepts Microsoft Office and PDF documents, unless otherwise advised by the module leader.
- All work submitted after the submission deadline without a valid and approved reason (see below) will be given a mark of zero.
- The University wants you to do your best. However we know that sometimes events happen which mean that you can’t submit your coursework by the deadline – these events should be beyond your control and not easy to predict. If this happens, you can apply for an extension to your deadline for up to two weeks, or if you need longer, you can apply for a deferral, which takes you to the next assessment period (for example, to the resit period following the main Assessment Boards). You must apply before the deadline. You will find information about the process and what is or is not considered to be an event beyond your control at https://share.coventry.ac.uk/students/Registry/Pages/Deferrals-and-Extension.aspx
- Students MUST keep a copy and/or an electronic file of their assignment.
- Checks will be made on your work using anti-plagiarism software and approved plagiarism checking websites.
GUIDELINES AND BACKGROUND TO THIS ASSIGNMENT
Plagiarism
As part of your study you will be involved in carrying out research and using this when writing up your coursework. It is important that you correctly acknowledge someone else’s writing, thoughts or ideas and that you do not attempt to pass this off as your own work. Doing so is known as plagiarism. It is not acceptable to copy from another source without acknowledging that it is someone else’s writing or thinking. This includes using paraphrasing as well as direct quotations. You are expected to correctly cite and reference the works of others. The Centre for Academic Writing provides documents to help you get this right. If you are unsure, please visit www.coventry.ac.uk/caw. You can also check your understanding of academic conduct by completing the Good Academic Practice quiz available.
Self-plagiarism or reuse of work previously submitted
current course or for another qualification of this and any other university, unless this is specifically provided for
in your assignment brief or specific course or module information. Where earlier work by you is citable, ie. it has already been published/submitted; you must reference it clearly. Identical pieces of work submitted concurrently will also be considered to be self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism is unacceptable because you cannot gain credit for the same work twice.
The University VLE includes a plagiarism detection system and assessors are experienced enough to recognise plagiarism when it occurs. Copying another student’s work, using previous work of your own or copying large sections from a book or the internet are examples of plagiarism and carry serious consequences. If you are a business student and joined Coventry University in September 2020 or later, please use APA 7th edition referencing, if you joined prior to this date you may use APA or the existing Harvard Reference Style (Coventry
version) that you are familiar with. Law students should use OSCOLA. Please be consistent in the referencing style that you use and use it correctly to avoid a case of plagiarism or cheating being brought. If you are unsure, please contact the Centre for Academic Writing, your Progress Coach or a member of the course team.
Return of Marked Work
You can expect to have marked work returned to you within 10 working days. If for any reason, there is a delay you will be kept informed. Marks and feedback will be provided online. As always, marks will have been internally moderated only, and will therefore be provisional; your mark will be formally agreed later in the year once the external examiner has completed his / her review.
Marking Rubric
| 80%-100% | Outstanding work with presentation of a very high standard. There is comprehensive understanding of key concepts and knowledge and evidence of critical analysis and insight. Points are made clearly and concisely, always substantiated by appropriate use of source material. There is evidence of a sound ability to critically interrelate theories with examples from practice where appropriate. Accurate interpretation of data with arguments, ideas and solutions presented effectively and based on strong research and reading. |
| 70%-79% | Extremely good work with presentation of a high standard. Evidence of strong knowledge and understanding together with some critical analysis and insight. Source material is used effectively to support arguments, ideas and solutions. |
| 60%-69% | Very good presentation. Sound knowledge and understanding with an emerging ability to critically engage with and apply the concepts involved linking them to practice where appropriate. Good use of source material which supports most points clearly. Content is wholly relevant and is coherently structured. |
| 50%-59% | Presentation is of a good standard but some shortcomings. Evidence of a sound knowledge base but limited critical and practical application of concepts and ideas. Content is largely relevant although points may not always be clear and structure may lack coherence. Contains some critical reflection and some use of source material to illustrate points. |
| 40%-49% | Adequate presentation. The work is descriptive and/or lacks critical analysis where required but is relevant with limited though sufficient evidence of knowledge and understanding. There is some evidence of reading although arguments/ proposals/solutions often lack coherence and may be unsubstantiated by relevant source material or partially flawed. Links to practice are made where appropriate |
| 20%-39% | Poorly structured, incoherent and wholly descriptive work. Evidence of a weak knowledge base with some key aspects not addressed and use of irrelevant material. Flawed use of techniques. Limited evidence of appropriate reading and no evidence of critical thought. Little reference to practice where appropriate. |
| 0% – 19% | Very poorly structured, incoherent and wholly descriptive work. Evidence of a very weak knowledge base with many key omissions and much material irrelevant. Use of inappropriate or incorrect techniques. Very little evidence of appropriate reading and no evidence of critical thought. No links to practice where appropriate. To obtain a mark of 20% the work must show evidence of a genuine attempt to engage with the assessment requirements and with the subject matter. |
Get expert help for Innovation and Entrepreneurship and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
