PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy

PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and TitlePUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy
AssessmentAssessment 2: Policy Analysis Essay
Individual/GroupIndividual
Length2000 words (+/‐) 10%)
      Learning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the following learning outcomes:     Analyse different theories and approaches to policy agenda setting Apply knowledge of policy development to a public health policy issue Analyse issues in contemporary Australian health care policy Develop processes for the evaluation of and accountability for policy Critique the role of networks and coalitions in the policy agenda setting process
SubmissionSunday of week 8 at 11.55pm*
Weighting40%
Total Marks100 marks

*Please Note: This time is Sydney time (AEST or AEDT). Please convert to your own time zone (eg. Adelaide = 11:25pm).

Instructions:

In this Assessment, you will engage in policy analysis. Choose a health policy (either current or past),

either at the state or federal level, to analyse in this Assignment (eg, mental health policy, women’s health policy, preventative health policy, men’s health policy, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health policy).

The Assignment should be approximately 2,000 words (+/‐ 10%) and presented in essay form. Address the following questions in your Assessment but please do not answer the questions as a series of short answers:

Firstly, provide a short introduction to your essay. Then proceed to analyse your chosen policy, and in doing so, consider the following issues:

The Problem and Context

•Describe the current and historical policy context of the problem.

•What is the problem which the policy seeks to address? What problems are highlighted?

•What problems have been overlooked?

Frame of Reference/Dominant Discourse

•What is the common frame of reference or dominant discourse evidence within this policy?

•Are certain words and phrases commonly used?

•Are there any underlying assumptions behind these?

Targets, Stakeholders and their Representation

•Who is the target of the policy (the subject of the discourse)?

•Who are the other stakeholders identified in the policy? Describe key institutional structures, agencies and workforce capacity building.

•How are the subjects of the policy being represented?

•How are different social groups portrayed in this policy and what implications does this have?

•Are there any moral judgements expressed in this representation?

Policy process

•Who were the stakeholders involved in the development of the policy? Who was overlooked?

•Whose interests were represented in the development of the policy? Which voices were not heard?

•What were the potential competing interests and power differentials of those involved in the development of the policy?

•What was the motivation for stakeholders in creating this policy?

•Were there any particular windows of opportunity that enabled the development of this policy?

Policy Solutions

•What solutions are put forward to address the problems? What alternative solutions might have been overlooked?

•Are there any social/power/ethical implications of this policy?

Effectiveness

•Consider the implementation of the policy. How effectively do you think the current policy has been implemented?

•What are the accountability processes for the policy?

•Consider evaluation measures (indicators) and any evaluation which has been undertaken.

•How effective has the policy proven to be?

Finally, finish your essay with a conclusion.

Assessment Criteria:

  • Knowledge and understanding of the policy issue (30%)
  • Critical analysis of the problem, frames of reference used, the policy process
  • and policy solutions (30%)
  • Application and synthesis of knowledge about policy theories (25%)
  • General Assessment Criteria (15%) Assessment fulfills general academic standards, including:
    • Provide an introduction and conclusion
    • Complies with academic standards of writing, including legibility, clarity, accurate spelling, presentation and grammar.
    • Uses appropriate APA 6 style for citing and referencing research
    • Upholds standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by acceptable report from text‐matching software (e.g Safe Assign).

Marking Rubric:

Assessment attributesF2 0‐34F1 35‐49Pass 50‐64Credit 65‐74Distinction 75‐84High Distinction (HD) 85‐100
Grade description     
  Evidence ofEvidence of a good Evidence of an
  satisfactorylevel of understanding, exceptional level of
  achievement of subjectknowledge and skill achievement of the
  learning outcomes anddevelopment in learning objectives
 Evidence ofadequate knowledgerelation to the content across the entire
 unsatisfactoryand critical analysisof the subject.Evidence of a high levelcontent of the course
 achievement of one orskills.Demonstration of aof achievement of thedemonstrated in such
 more of the learning good level of criticallearning objectivesareas as interpretation
 objectives of the analysis.demonstrated in suchand critical analysis,
 subject, insufficient  areas as interpretationlogical argument,
 understanding of the  and critical analysis,creativity, originality,
 subject content and/or  logical argument, useuse of methodology
 unsatisfactory level of  of methodology andand communication
 skill development.  communication skills.skills.
Knowledge and The assessmentThe assessment The assessment
understanding of the demonstrates somedemonstrates a good demonstrates an
policy issue (30%) knowledge andlevel of knowledge and exceptional level of
  understanding of theunderstanding of the knowledge and
  policy issue, but this ispolicy issue. This isThe assessmentunderstanding about
  limited. Claimsreasonably well linkeddemonstrates a highthe policy issue. This
 The assessment doesregarding the policyto relevant literature.level of knowledge andunderstanding is very
 not demonstrateare anecdotal and not understanding aboutwell supported by
 knowledge orwell linked to relevant the policy issue. Thisrelevant literature,
 understanding of theliterature (either grey understanding is wellwhich shows extensive
 policy issue.or peer review). supported by relevantresearch has been
    literature.conducted.
Critical analysis of the The assessmentThe assessment The assessment
problem, frames of demonstrates somedemonstrates aThe assessmentdemonstrates a well
reference used, the attempts at criticalreasonable criticaldemonstrates a verydeveloped and
policy process analysis, but theanalysis of the policy,good critical analysis ofcomprehensive critical
and policy solutions discussion of the policyincluding the policythe policy, with ananalysis of the policy,
(30%) problem, frames,problem, frames ofanalysis of the policywith an analysis of the
  policy process andreference, policyproblem, frames ofpolicy problem, frames
  policy solutions isprocess and policyreference, policyof reference, policy
  mostly descriptive.solutions. Alternativeprocess and policyprocess and policy
   ways to approach thesolutions thatsolutions that
 The assessment does policy issue areconsiders alternativeconsiders alternative
 not demonstrate any discussions.ways to approach thisways to approach this
 critical analysis.  policy issue.policy issue.
Application and    The assessment
synthesis of The assessmentThe assessmentThe assessmentdisplays an excellent
knowledge about displays attempts todisplays a reasonabledisplays a very goodapplication of policy
policy theories (25%) apply policy theories inapplication of policyapplication andtheories in the
  the discussion of thetheories in the analysissynthesis of policydiscussion of the policy
  policy issue. Theof the policy issue.theories in discussionissue. The discussion
  understanding of policyThere are some minorthe policy issue. Thisdemonstrates an
 The assessment doestheories is limited.limitations indemonstrates a veryexcellent and
 not demonstrate any knowledge of policygood level ofcomprehensive
 application of policy theories.understanding of policyknowledge of policy
 theories.  theories.theories.
General AssessmentPoorly written with errors in spelling, grammar.   The assessment has no introduction or conclusion.   DemonstratesIs written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence andIs well‐written andIs very well‐writtenExpertly written and
Criteria (15%)adheres to theand adheres to theadheres to the
Assessment fulfillsacademic genreacademic genre.academic
general academic(e.g. with genre.
standards, including:introduction,Consistently 
Provide an introduction and conclusionconclusion or summary).   Demonstratesdemonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant researchDemonstrates expert use of high‐ quality, credible and relevant research
Complies with academic standards of writing, including legibility, clarity, accurate spelling, presentation and grammar. Uses appropriate APA 6 style for citing and referencing research Upholds standards of academic integrity, as demonstrated by acceptable report from text‐matching software (e.g Safe Assign).inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.     There are mistakes in using the APA style.   There may be questions regarding the academic integrity of the assessment.paragraph construction.   Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.   The assessment upholds standards of academic integrity.consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.   The assessment upholds standards of academic integrity.sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.   The assessment upholds standards of academic integrity.sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading   There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.     The assessment upholds standards of academic integrity.
Order Now

Get expert help for PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 25, 2026) PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/.
"PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy." Universal Assignment - February 25, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/
Universal Assignment January 2, 2023 PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy., viewed February 25, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/>
Universal Assignment - PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy. [Internet]. [Accessed February 25, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/
"PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 25, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/
"PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6001-health-policy-and-advocacy/. [Accessed: February 25, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT Assessment task-1

Assessment Task 1 (30% of the final mark)This Year30 Points PossibleIn ProgressNEXT UP: Submit assignmentUnlimited Attempts AllowedAttempt 1 Add commentDetailsAssessment task Assessment 1 – ASSIGNMENTPurposeTo give students the opportunity to produce a well-written piece of formal analysis on a topic inland law. Graduate capabilities GC1,3,7-11 are covered by this assessment.Length

Read More »

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming Challenge

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming ChallengeUnit Code/DescriptionICT313 Big Data for Software DevelopmentCourse/SubjectBachelor of Information TechnologySemesterThis Semester:Unit Learning Outcomes AddressedULO3: Critically assess and implement advanced data pre-processing and analytics strategies in a software development context, focusing on tasks like data cleansing, transformation, and feature selection.ULO4: Design, develop, and evaluate big

Read More »

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3 (Group) Unit Code/Description ICT306 – Advanced Cybersecurity Course/Subject Bachelors Semester This Semester Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed a) Evaluate different techniques used by attackers and defenders in cybersecurity, employing both technical knowledge and ethical reasoning.b) Design, implement, and critically evaluate cybersecurity solutions for addressing real-world challenges. Assessment

Read More »

Assignment MECH3780: Computational Mechanics

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

Assessment Task 1

Assessment Task 1 (30% of the final mark)This Week30 Points PossibleIn ProgressNEXT UP: Submit assignmentUnlimited Attempts AllowedThis WeekAttempt 1 Add commentDetailsAssessment task Assessment 1 – ASSIGNMENTPurposeTo give students the opportunity to produce a well-written piece of formal analysis on a topic inland law. Graduate capabilities GC1,3,7-11 are covered by this

Read More »

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming Challenge

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming ChallengeUnit Code/DescriptionICT313 Big Data for Software DevelopmentCourse/SubjectBachelor of Information TechnologySemesterS1 – 2025Unit Learning Outcomes AddressedULO3: Critically assess and implement advanced data pre-processing and analytics strategies in a software development context, focusing on tasks like data cleansing, transformation, and feature selection.ULO4: Design, develop, and evaluate

Read More »

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection Part 1 Infographic and Part 2 Reflection using the Gibbs Cycle This assessment is worth 35% of your final grade (Infographic 18% + Reflection 17%). Assessment Instructions Part 1: Infographic TOPIC: Create your infographic as a poster (A3 paper size) for your clients to introduce

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?