Applied Sports Physiology
Assessment Guidance–CW2
Module Title: Applied Sports Physiology
Module Code: M20119
Module Coordinator: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: MSc Sports Performance
MSc Human Applied Physiology
Professional Doctorate Sport Exercise & Health Science Submission Date: Friday 20th January 2023 (12:00 noon)
Assessment Type: Report (CW2) Assessment Weighting: 50%
Page Count: 2000 words
Submission Type: TurnItIn
- Analyse, interpret, and feed back data from an assessment of an athlete in a user- friendly format.
- Critically discuss the concepts that relate to physiological testing and sports performance.
Utilising the knowledge you have gained through the lectures, seminars and workshops in this module as well as your own research into the literature, please write a 2000 word report which includes a 1 page coach-friendly summary based upon the scenario outlined below.
Formatting and Submission Guidelines:
There are two sections to this assignment, a report, and a one page coach summary. The report must be 1.5 line spaced, times new roman, font size 12, with 2.54 cm margins on all sides. You must include appropriately sized and presented results (figure(s) or table(s)). Please adhere to APA 7th Edition formatting. The coach summary must fit on 1 A4 page. The coach summary must adhere to APA 7th edition referencing, but otherwise the formatting on this 1 A4 page summary can be more informal and modified as required to be ‘coach-appropriate.’
Feedback will be received in a timely manner within 20 working days. Assessment Topic
You have recently started working with a national team athlete as their sport scientist.
The coach has given you data on some tests that were completed with this team. The head sport scientist has requested that you provide a scientific report to your sports science colleagues and a one-page summary of the findings to forward onto the coach. The report should include the following headings, please note relative mark weightings are provided by each subheading. Please use these mark weightings to direct your word count:
- Introduction (30%): An introduction to the topic of physiological assessment relevant to the data you have been given. Include relevant literature and concepts that relate to physiological testing.
- Results(20%):Presentation of results and assessment of the athletes strengths and weaknesses for the various tests in relation to the literature.
- Discussion (40%): Summary of your findings and any recommendations for focus of future training based upon results discussed. Ensure you critically discuss the results and contextualise them in relation to the literature.
- Coach friendly summary (10%): A 1-page summary of the key points from your report that is designed to be appropriately pitched for a coach to understand. It should include any information that may influence their coaching practice e.g. training programmes
Double Blind / Verification Marking Process:
These assessments will be subject to mark verification, whereby a second member of staff scans 10% (min 6, max 20) of the assessments to ascertain that the marks for the module are broadly appropriate and have been fairly arrived at.
Assessment Guidance and Marking Criteria (CW2)
| Grade | Report |
| DISTINCTION 70%+ as previous plus | Outstanding work – contains accurate, relevant material, demonstrates understanding of complex subject matter and is able to view it in a wider context. Shows originality and confidence in criticising assumptions, is aware of the limits of knowledge. Relevant research is very well presented with a critical analysis and interpretation of relevant physiological literature with reference to the results. Clear and coherent analysis of athlete strengths and weaknesses and insightful and appropriate future training recommendations. Coach summary is insightful, appropriately pitched and highlights key information that may influence coaching practice. Accurate and clear adherence to guidance information. Formatting and presentation of the work meet the requirements for the assignment and are at a publishable standard. The work contains no spelling and grammatical errors. Accurate referencing adhering to APA 7th style. |
| MERIT 60-69% as previous plus | Very good work – contains most of the information required, is accurate and relevant and demonstrates understanding of the subject matter and attempts to view it in a wider context. Shows some originality of thought with good critique, is aware of the limits of knowledge. Appropriate use of scientific language in well-structured sentences. Well-presented and clear adherence to guidance information. Good review of physiological literature. Good analysis of results and athlete strengths and weaknesses with appropriate and relevant training recommendations. Coach summary is relevant, pitched mostly well and includes most of the key information that may influence coaching practice with some minor omissions. Only a few minor referencing mistakes and/or spelling and language errors, adheres to APA 7th style. |
| PASS 50-59% as previous plus | Work that attempts to address the topic with some understanding and analysis, key aspects of the subject matter covered. Competent introductory narrative provided. Most key information presented. A reasonable analysis of results and athlete strengths and weaknesses, training recommendations are mostly appropriate but may lack scientific underpinning in places. Coach summary is pitched reasonably, while most key information is included there are omissions, in places the language used is not appropriate for the coach. Relevant discussion of the study findings. Competent and appropriate use of scientific language. Appropriate adherence to guidance information. No major formatting mistakes, some language and spelling errors, mostly adheres to APA 7th style |
| PASS 40-49% | Adequate work which attempts to address the topic with limited understanding and critique. Adequate narrative provided. Some key information presented. Main narrative considered some underpinning physiological theory. Lacking in use of literature support. An attempt is made to analyse results and athlete strengths and weaknesses but some areas are omitted. Training recommendations are limited or not well thought through. Coach summary is adequate but language is often inappropriate for the coach, some key information is included that would influence coaching practice but with significant omissions. Limited prose style, but attempts to write clearly. Followed basic guidance information. Some major formatting, language and spelling mistakes and does not adhere to APA 7th style. |
| FAIL 0-39% | Work in this range attempts to address the question but is substantially incomplete and deficient. Little or no relevant narrative provided. Limited information provided. No consideration for underpinning physiological theory. Lack of understanding. Serious problems with a number of aspects of language such as grammar, comprehension and spelling. Inability to write for different audiences (the coach) or identify key information to relay to them. Lack of appropriate referencing. Limited or no analysis of athlete strengths and weaknesses with training recommendations either absent or mostly inappropriate. |
Threshold statement for use of English:
Written skills are sufficient to produce complex documents that exhibit sophisticated argument and structure and show post-graduate levels of research, citation and referencing. Presentation of documents is to a standard that could be expected from a new post-graduate.”
Get expert help for M20119 Applied Sports Physiology and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
