Structure and Guidance- CTS
Assignment 2 – (Case Study) 2000 words +/- 10%
Total Weighting: 50%
Intended Learning Outcomes: 2 and 3
1. Introduction (Write one paragraph covering the following, Approx. 100 – 150 words)
(a) Begin with introducing logical reasoning and critical thinking skills when evaluating sources of information and data.
(b) Briefly introduce the article, emphasizing its purpose of highlighting defining moments for gender equality in 2021.
(c) Outline the main objectives of the assignment, specifically addressing the three tasks:
- Logical reasoning analysis of the arguments presented.
- Evaluation of the sources of information.
- Assessing evidence of a systematic and rigorous process in producing the article.
Give a transition line to connect the introduction to the rest of the write up: indicate that in the rest of the review, the outcomes of the above tasks will be discussed.
2. Main body:
Apply an understanding of logical reasoning to analyse the arguments presented in the above article. [40 Marks] (Write approx. 600-650 words)
Task 1: Logical Reasoning Analysis of Arguments
- Define Logical Reasoning Types
Briefly explain inductive, deductive, and abductive reasoning.
- Inductive Reasoning Analysis
- Identify instances where generalizations are made based on specific events (e.g., women’s leadership advancements or legislative changes in specific countries).
- Assess the sufficiency of examples: Are the cited instances (e.g., women assuming high political offices) representative of global trends?
- Explore potential overgeneralization or selection bias in inductive claims.
Deductive Reasoning
- Identify premises and logical conclusions drawn in the article (e.g., progress in gender equality due to specific reforms).
Abductive Reasoning
- Examine plausible inferences made based on evidence presented (e.g., linking legislative changes to societal progress).
Give a transition line to connect this section to the next section on the evaluation of the sources of information
Apply your acquired critical evaluation skills to evaluate the sources of information (hyperlinked and marked in blue text) in the above article. [40 Marks] (Write approx. 600-650 words)
Task 2: Critical Evaluation of Sources of Information
- Summarize the overall reliability of the sources based on the CRAAP analysis.
- Highlight strengths, such as authoritative and accurate sources, and note areas where sources fall short (e.g., lack of currency or bias).
- Conclude on whether the sources collectively support a systematic and rigorous argument in the article.
Give a transition line to connect this section to the next section on evidence of a systematic and rigorous process adopted by the author in producing the above article.
In your conclusion, comment on evidence of a systematic and rigorous process adopted by the author in producing the above article. [20 Marks]. (Write approx. 350-400 words)
Task 3: Evidence of a Systematic and Rigorous Process (20 Marks)
- Discuss whether the article uses a diverse and balanced range of examples to support its claims.
- Evaluate the coherence and organization of the article.
- Assess whether the facts presented align with known data or verifiable reports.
- Examine whether the article demonstrates impartiality or displays selective reporting.
- Highlight specific sections of the article that reflect a systematic approach and identify any areas where rigor may be lacking.
3. Conclusion (Write one paragraph, Approx. 100 – 150 words)
NOTE:
- Follow the correct use of in-text citation and end-referencing using Harvard Referencing Style.
- Proof read before the final submission to check the correct use of English language.
