FIN7055 International Financial Strategy

BIRMINGHAM CITY BUSINESS SCHOOL ASSESSMENT BRIEF

MODULE TITLE:            International Financial Strategy

MODULE CODE:            FIN7055

LECTURER:                   XXXXXXXXXXXX

ISSUE DATE:                 30th May 2022

HAND IN DATE:             5th September 2022 12:00 NOON

Learning outcomes and assessment criteria specific to this coursework:

On completion of the coursework, students should be able to demonstrate their ability to:

  1. Critically examine Fisher-Hirshleifer model in relationship with the firm’s investment decisions with and without capital markets.
  • Critically apprise theory and practice of determining cost of capital, using the Capital Asset Pricing Model for investment appraisal and its limitations for investment appraisal at advance level.
  • Evaluate the role of stock market within the context of stock market efficiency, dividend policy and its implications for firm’s capital structure.
  • Analyse and evaluate challenges and opportunities for national and international merger and acquisition activity, environment, and current research for the topic area. Consider international environment, risk, and evaluate strategies to manage such risks

Number of attempts

Please note that, under the Academic Regulations, you are entitled to only two attempts to pass each assignment. You are strongly advised to take every opportunity to submit work as failure to submit counts as a fail. Should you fail an assignment, it is very important that you arrange a tutorial with the marker so that you can improve your work.

Please read the full academic regulations available on the Course page.

Plagiarism

Please read the plagiarism guidelines on your module page.

Late Submissions

1.    Assessment Overview

1.1           Rationale

The assignment for International Financial Strategy tests at an advanced level knowledge and comprehension of a range of concepts, models and theories related to the theory of finance and strategy. It also provides the opportunity for students to demonstrate their ability to evaluate firm theories and analyse the firm performance thorough evaluating share price, consider relationships between dividend, investment, and divestment policies to promote core objectives of owners and the key stakeholders.

This is an individually assessed assignment. There is no objection to students discussing the content and approaches to be adopted, but the final submission must be 100% your OWN work.

Please ensure that all your calculations are supported by relevant workings and attribute any references you make to published work of others using Harvard Referencing.

To pass this module, you must achieve a final overall mark of at least 50%.

2.    Assessment Brief

The module is assessed through a 3000 words coursework.

2.1           Required task(s)

There are two questions in part 1 and two questions in part 2 in the coursework. You should attempt all questions. The word limit is 3,000 words. When determining the amount of effort for each question you should take notice of the mark allocations.

Coursework

Part 1

Select a company of your choice from FTSE 250 for which you are able to access all relevant information for the purposes of answering this question. Using the financial and market information, you are required to:

Critically evaluate the followings:

  1. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), including considering its assumptions and consider its practical application for firms and investors.                                                                                                                     (20 marks)
  • Using the dividend valuation model (DVM), estimate the company’s share price; compare the estimated share price with current price, and comment briefly on any differences in the estimated and current share price of the company.

(30 marks)

(Total 50 marks)

To use DVM, you will need to estimate cost of equity and estimate the beta value for CAPM. Compare the estimated beta value with the beta value provided on the company’s web page and comment on any variations. Use 3% as proxy for risk free rate and assume market return is 9%.

Part 2.

There has been a debate amongst academics and practitioners whether merger and acquisition activity is in the best interest of the economies. In view of this, you have been invited to:

  • Define and discuss why merger and acquisition are popular amongst developed economies and critically evaluate whether merger and acquisition activity are in the economic interest of a country.

`           (30 marks)

  • Using the Fisher-Hirshleifer model, explain consumption and investment decisions with and without capital markets

(20 marks)

(Total 50 marks)

Your coursework should not exceed 3000 words. There is no fixed penalty for exceeding the word count, but students should be made aware that the marker will not consider any work after the +10% word count tolerance has been reached, within the allocation of marks. Students may therefore be penalised for a failure to be concise and for failing to conclude their work within the word count specified.

Indicative marking points Part 1.

a)

Evaluation of the CAPM – define and explain the model, assumptions and its limitation Evaluation of the dividend policy – limitation of the model and assumptions

(20 marks)

b)

Estimate beta and comment

Identify beta for your chosen company and explain why the values may differ Estimate price using CAPM

Estimate price using DVM

Reasons for differences and comments

(30 marks)

(Total 50 marks)

Part 2 c)

Define M & A

Why M& A are popular

Discuss whether M& A activity is in the economic interest of a country

Define key stakeholders and comment how the interests of key stakeholders are affected by mergers and acquisition

d)

Explain HL model and the separation theorem.

Demonstrate how investment decision are made without capital markets Demonstrate how investment decision are made without capital markets Relate the HL model with agency relationship

(30 marks)

(20 marks)

(Total 50 marks)

2.2           Word count

The maximum word count is: 3000 words (+/- 10%).

The word limit is for your coursework and does not cover material submitted as an appendix. Material submitted as an appendix provides background for your coursework, but it will not be marked unless it is part of the main body of the coursework. Also, it is important that you cross-refer between the main text of your assignment and any appendices to demonstrate the linkage, and that the appendices do not constitute additional material unrelated to that included in the body of your assignment.

Your references page will not be included in the word count, but inline citations used in the main body of the assignment (e.g., Smith and Jones (2010) identified that…) will be included in the word count.

You are required to declare the number of words used in your assignment. There is no fixed penalty for exceeding the word count, but students should be made aware that the marker will not consider any work after the +10% word count tolerance has been reached, within the allocation of marks.

Students may therefore be penalised for a failure to be concise and for failing to conclude their work within the word count specified.

2.3           Drafts

You may ask any questions within class and out of class, but a draft copy of the assignment will not be read, as this will constitute double marking. You may also arrange to meet me via MS Teams to ask any specific question regarding the assignment.

2.4           Submission point

Your assignment should be submitted online through TurnitIn via the link provided in the Assessment area of the module’s Moodle site. Hard copy submissions will not be accepted. Please follow the University policy regarding online submission and submitting assignments on time.

You should attach the assessment cover sheet for feedback. The assessment cover sheet is on the Moodle.

2.5           Formatting and presentation

The assignment should be word-processed and double line spaced. Use of bullet points should be avoided or used sparingly

  1. Use Arial size 11 point for your assignments, full justified
  2. Each page should be numbered except for the content page (if any)
  3. Presentation must be formal in language and style and must adhere to the structure given above.

2.6           Referencing

All work should be referenced using the Harvard format – there are handouts available online at the library website and are available as hard copy in the library if you are unsure of this.

Do not use popular websites like Wikipedia, Google, or Yahoo – the former is not peer assessed and the work is not always reliable.

Use textbooks and journal articles (newspaper articles may at times be acceptable). You should, however, make more use of current journal articles as these are peer reviewed and are often more recent than textbooks. If you are to use textbooks, these should be the latest, so it is important to check whether you have the latest edition.

3. Marking criteria

 0 – 39% Fail40 – 49% Fail50 – 59% Pass60 – 69% Strong Pass (merit)70 – 79% Very Strong Pass (distinction)80 – 100% Exceptionally Strong Pass (distinction)
Criterion 1Evaluate the role of stock market within the context of stock market efficiency, dividend policy and its implications for firm’s capital structure.
Mark: 
Limited understanding                of models,                theories, and concepts Lack of ability to analyse and                                interpret information in the appropriate context.Vague and unsatisfactory understanding of theory and ability to interpret or to apply or contextualise information to answer the question.Demonstrates ability to understand the role of dividend policy and efficient capital markets to correctly value share prices. Evidence of independent inquiry and judgement in selecting, analysing, and evaluating firm specific data.Evidence of good degree of subject specific literature and knowledge. Able to demonstrate critical awareness and an ability to apply analytical skills to answer the questions.There is excellent evidence of independent inquiry and judgement in analysing and ordering data. Evidence of a high degree of critical awareness and ability to infer key conclusion from the analysis and ability to justify                     conclusions derived.Excellent ability to synthesise theory and apply it to practice within the given scenario. Analysis is well referenced; critically evaluated and key conclusions are inferred.
       
Criterion 2Analyse and evaluate challenges and opportunities for national and international merger and acquisition activity, environment , and current research for the topic area. Consider international environment, risk, and evaluate strategies to manage such risks
Mark: 
Limited understanding            of the          topic          and demonstrates limited    ability           to analyse            and interpret information in the appropriate context.Some       knowledge of    merger       and acquisition             but demonstrated limited   ability   to reason or evaluate the theory,Some evidence of subject                       specific knowledge, ability to analyse and apply the acquired knowledge and reasons what are benefit of merger and acquisition for various stakeholders.Good evidence of wider reading and reflection in terms of why firms merge and their implications for the               stakeholders. Ability to show a good degree of critical awareness               and analytical skills.Excellent evidence of independent inquiry and judgement in analysing and reasoning theory and practice. Ability to show a high degree of critical awareness and analytical skills to produce conclusions consistent with the analysis.An outstanding well researched and referenced work that shows evidence of extensive research, understanding and ability to infer key conclusions.

BIRMINGHAM CITY BUSINESS SCHOOL

ASSESSMENT BRIEF: FIN7055 International Financial Strategy

Criterion 3 Mark:Critically apprise theory and practice of determining cost of capital, using the Capital Asset Pricing Model for investment appraisal and its limitations for investment appraisal at advance level.
 Limited understanding         of theory and models. Not able to use models. Lack ability to    analyse    and interpret information in the appropriate context.Vague understanding              of theory   and    little ability     to      use CAPM model. Limited ability to interpret and apply or contextualise information         to answer                     the question.Demonstrates ability to understand the role of CAPM and cost of capital to evaluate firm’s performance. Some evidence of independent inquiry and judgement in selecting and analysing and evaluating firm specific data.Evidence of good degree of subject specific literature and knowledge relating cost of capital and CAPM to evaluate                       firm performance. Able to demonstrate critical awareness and an ability to apply analytical skills to answer the questions.There is excellent evidence of independent inquiry and judgement in use of models and analysing and ordering data. Evidence of a high degree of critical awareness and ability to infer key conclusion from the analysis and ability to justify                   conclusions derived.Excellent ability to synthesise theory and practice of models CAPM and its use for calculating cost of capital its application to share price evaluation. Analysis is well referenced; critically evaluated and key conclusions are inferred.
Criterion 4 Mark:Critically examine Fisher-Hirshleifer model in relationship with the firm’s investment decisions with and without capital markets.
Basic level understanding of agency relationship within the context of HL model and role of managers and stakeholders. Lack of evaluation and application.Some ability to explain agency relationship and HL model but this may be a little confused or incomplete at times.An ability to demonstrate separation theorem and the role of HL model and the agency relationship. Able to provide good analysis of the conflict and resolution.A good ability to explain and apply HL and its link with the agency relationship. Explanations are well reasoned, and some justification provided.Good ability to explain, HL model and demonstrate its usability within the context of the agency theory and practice. Explanations are justified and applied to the given context.Excellent ability to evaluate the agency relationship, conflict and show role of capital markets using the HL model. Explanations are fully justified and applied to the relevant context.
Order Now

Get expert help for FIN7055 International Financial Strategy and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (January 11, 2025) FIN7055 International Financial Strategy. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/.
"FIN7055 International Financial Strategy." Universal Assignment - January 11, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/
Universal Assignment September 3, 2022 FIN7055 International Financial Strategy., viewed January 11, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/>
Universal Assignment - FIN7055 International Financial Strategy. [Internet]. [Accessed January 11, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/
"FIN7055 International Financial Strategy." Universal Assignment - Accessed January 11, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/
"FIN7055 International Financial Strategy." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/fin7055-international-financial-strategy/. [Accessed: January 11, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

NTW 600 Computer Network and Security

Assessment 2 Information and Rubric Subject Code  NTW 600 Subject Name Computer Network and Security Assessment Number and Title Assessment 2: Cyber Security Threats to IT Infrastructure of a real-world Organisation Assessment Type Group Assessment Length / Duration  1500 words Weighting %  30% Project Report: 20% Presentation :10% (Recorded) Total

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?