HLSC 220 HEALTH CARE ETHICS
ASSIGNMENT 1: Argumentative Essay
Topics
- Healthcare administrators have an ethical obligation to provide all the resources necessary to deliver evidence-based care, regardless of constraining budgetary factors.
- In Australia, all patient data should be digitised and made freely accessible to all healthcare staff to facilitate safe and high-quality care.
- During a health pandemic the ethical obligation for health care providers to provide autonomous patient-centred care is negated.
- Australian individuals that intentionally engage in lifestyle behaviours that compromise their health, should not be eligible for subsidised healthcare under the Medicare scheme.
202130 HLSC220 Assessment 1 Argumentative Essay Topics
| ASSESSMENT INFORMATION | |
| Assessment Title | Argumentative essay |
| Purpose | The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based around the four bio-ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Students will use their chosen topic to develop a sound ethical argument. |
| Due Date | Semester week 6, Monday 12th April, 2021 |
| Time Due | 0900hrs (09:00am) |
| Weighting | 50% |
| Length | 1500 words +/- 10% (includes intext citations, excludes reference list) |
| Assessment Rubric | Refer to Extended Unit Outline Appendix A |
| LOs Assessed | LO1, LO2 |
| Task | Four topics will be available for you on LEO. You will select one of these topics and construct an argumentative essay. You are encouraged to choose a topic that you feel is important to you and that you feel passionate about. |
| Target Audience | Healthcare professionals |
| Submission | Via the Turnitin link in the HLSC220 LEO site |
| FORMATTING | |
| File format | Please submit as a .doc or .docx (not .pdf files) |
| Margins | 2.54cm, all sides |
| Font and size | Use 11-point Calibri or Arial |
| Spacing | Double spacing |
| Paragraph | Aligned to left margin, indent first line of each paragraph 1.27cm |
| Title Page | Not to be used |
| Level 1 Heading | Centered, bold, capitalize each word (14-point Calibri or Arial) |
| Level 2 Headings | Not to be used |
| Structure | Introduction, Body, Conclusion, Reference List |
| Direct quotes | Always require page number. No more than 10% of the word count should be direct quotes. |
| Header | Page number top right corner (9-point Calibri or Arial) |
| Footer | Name _ Student Number_ Assessment _ Unit _ Year (9-point Calibri or Arial) |
HLSC220 _ Assessment 1: Argumentative Essay _ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 1 of 2
| REFERENCING | |
| Referencing Style | APA 7th Edition. It is recommended that you download ENDNOTE referencing software free from ACU https://libguides.acu.edu.au/endnote |
| Minimum References | There is no set number of texts that must be used as a minimum for this task. All arguments must be supported using a variety of high-quality primary evidence. Avoid using any one source repetitively. |
| Age of References | Most references for this task should be published within the last 5 years, however the appropriate use of older evidence sources (e.g. seminal theoretical ethical work) is acceptable. |
| List Heading | “References” is centered, bold, on a new page. (14 point Calibri or Arial) |
| Alphabetical Order | References are arranged alphabetically by author family name |
| Hanging Indent | Second and subsequent lines of a reference have a hanging indent |
| DOI or URL | Presented as functional hyperlink |
| Spacing | Double spacing the entire reference list, both within and between entries |
| ADMINISTRATION | |
| Late Penalties | Late penalties will be applied from 09:01am on the 12th of April, 2021, incurring 5% penalty of the maximum marks available up to a maximum of 15% in total. Assessment tasks that are submitted more than three calendar days after the due or extended date will not be allocated a mark. Example: An assignment is submitted 12 hours late and is initially marked at 60 out of 100. A 5% penalty is applied (5% of 100 is 5 marks). Therefore, the student receives 55 out of 100 as a final mark. Penalty Timeframe Penalty Marks Deducted 9:01 am Monday to 9 am Tuesday 5% penalty 5 marks 9:01am Tuesday to 9am Wednesday 10% penalty 10 marks 9:01am Wednesday to 9am Thursday 15% penalty 15 marks Received after 9:01 Thursday No mark allocated n/a |
| Return of Marks | Marks will generally be returned in three weeks of the submission due date; if this is not obtainable, you will be notified via your campus LEO forum. |
| Final Assignment | Marks for the final assessment (assessment two) of this unit will be withheld until after grade ratification and grade release on 2nd of July, 2021. |
| Assessment template project informed by ACU student forums, ACU Librarians and the Academic Skills Unit. | |
HLSC220 _ Assessment 1: Argumentative Essay _ © Australian Catholic University 2021 _ Page 2 of 2
HLSC220 Argumentative essay – Points to consider
Ethical arguments are comprehensively informed by credible, well-chosen academic literature, &/or professional codes & standards. Evidence of sophisticated level of critical thinking,
reasoning, defence & evaluation. Ethical arguments (use of argument and/or counter arguments) are cogent & always well defended.
The argument is organised in an exemplary manner: repetitiveness is avoided, the argument flows succinctly, ending with a strong, comprehensive, & rational conclusion.
In addition to the rubric the content below are some guidelines for student consideration in writing their argumentative essay. This is not an exhaustive list, but simply points for consideration.
The bare minimum is that you should let the reader know the topic and introduce your stance on the issue for example – “ this essay will address the options health care workers ( HCW) have in confronting issues of violence against them and will show and reason why HCW ought to be able to
refuse care”.
Remember to clarify your understanding of the topic and key terms or concepts used – do not assume the reader knows – the examiner wants to know that you know.
A good argumentative essay considers the counter arguments against the position taken and seeks to defend them with reasoning and logic and always with reference to the literature. Failure to do so cannot be considered an argument – it is a one-sided account and unchallenged opinion even if well sourced and referenced.
The essay must be ethically sound and constructed –it ought to provide a rich account of ethical thought and justification based on sound ethical theories and priniciplism. Much of this is available to you in the modules and Leganto reading list in the same tile. Where necessary you might choose to reinforce arguments with professional codes, and legal considerations.
Communicating based on an “emotional account” can detract from the essay as the write is communicating on a personal stake on the topic and thus is invested in that emotion. It is better to give example and support the example with the literature in mind. However, you can obviously draw the reader to your argument by providing strong ethical, conventional, and contemporary arguments that support your stance.
As always in any essay the following points ought to be respected:
- paragraph construction
- Flow of argument
- Avoiding repetitive statements
- Considering the literature and carefully providing sources used
- Consider using the literature to point of redundancy – i.e. you read the same view in other sources
- A good argument is well supported with the literature and this ought to be provided from multiple sources
- There is no required number of reference sources. The lower the volume of evidence will rarely make for a salient essay
- You should summarise your stance and argument in the conclusion
- Do not introduce new material in this section (Conclusion)
- Remember the requirements for presentation in terms of spacing, font size and structure available to you from ACU academic skills unit
- If you do use clinical examples, they ought to be reflective of your ethical argument
- Finally it is required that you write in the 3rd person
RT 202060
Get expert help for HLSC220 Argumentative essay Help and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
