IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK

This document provides you with general information about the requirements for this assessment task. A generic Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) rubric that markers will use to help grade the assessment task is included.

Task Overview

Assessment name:Assignment 2: Interactive Application
Task description:You are required to develop an interactive computer program which allows its user to selectively view data extracted from multiple sources and export chosen data values for later in- spection. The data sources update regularly so your solution must be resilient to any possible changes to the incoming data set. To complete the task you will need to design and implement an application with an appropriate “front-end” Graphical User Interface and corresponding “back-end” data processing functions.
Learning outcomes measured:ULO 2: Effectively use some of the many computer lan- guages needed to build IT systems. ULO 3: Apply appropriate processes and creative thinking to develop solutions to small IT challenges.
Due Date:Part A, user interface: Friday, end of Week 9, at 23:59 Part B, complete solution: Friday, end of Week 12, at 23:59
Estimated time to com- plete task:Approximately 50 hours
Weighting:Part A: 7% of final grade Part B: 23% of final grade
Individual or Group:Individual
Authentic Assessment:  Yes
Formative/Summative:  Summative
How will I be assessed:  Grading scale using a supplied rubric

Task details

What you need to do:  Part A: Read the Criterion Reference Assessment Rubric.Study the “client’s requirements” for the assignment (on Blackboard).Download the program template and other support tools (from Blackboard) and familiarise yourself with them.Identify suitable data sources for your application and fa- miliarise yourself with their various data formats.Design and implement the front-end Graphical User In- terface for your application.Submit Part A (to Blackboard) by the due date above.   Part B: Read the Criterion Reference Assessment Rubric.Develop and test the back-end functions needed to pro- cess any possible inputs from each of the data sources.Upload drafts of your solution (to Blackboard) as you make progress.Be prepared to respond to last-minute changes in the re- quirements made by the “client”.Submit Part B (to Blackboard) by the due date above.
Presentation requirements:See the IFB104 Code Presentation Guide (on Black- board) for tips on code layout.See the assignment’s requirements (on Blackboard) for examples of the standard expected of the program’s in- terface and behaviour.Your program must run in a standard Python 3 environ- ment with no extensions. You may not use any Python modules that need to be downloaded and installed sep- arately, such as “Beautiful Soup” or “Pillow”. Only mod- ules that are part of a standard Python 3 installation may be used.
Resources needed to complete task:  The following items will be made available on Blackboard: Program template codeThe “client’s” requirements for the programOther resources to assist with the assignment

Submission Information

What you need to submit:Upload your completed application as a single, self-contained zip archive (do not use other compression formats such as RAR or 7z), after checking the following points: You have added your name and student number to the state- ment of authorship at the top of the program template.Your program code runs without “crashing” (generating un- handled exceptions), even if your solution is incomplete. You will receive partial marks for incomplete solutions.Your program code runs in a standard Python 3 environment and does not rely on any separately-installed extension mod- ules. You may not use any Python modules that need to be downloaded and installed separately, such as “Beautiful Soup” or “Pillow”. Only modules that are part of a standard Python 3 installation may be used.You have included any additional files needed to support your Python program, but no other unnecessary files.
How to submit:A link will be made available on the IFB104 Blackboard site under Assessment Task 2 for uploading your solution file. Click on the Submit Assessment Task 2A or Task 2B link.Drag your Assessment file into the Attach Files box or click on the Browse My Computer button to locate your file. Add any comments you wish to make to the teaching staff in the Comments textbox.Click the Submit button.   Notes: You can submit as many drafts of your solution as you like. You are strongly encouraged to submit several draft solutions before the final submission date as insurance against com- puter or network problems near the deadline.If you are unsure whether or not you have successfully up- loaded your file, upload it again!If you encounter problems uploading your files to Blackboard contact HiQ’s Technology Services for advice (http://qut.to/ithelp; askqut@qut.edu.au; 3138 2000).Do not email assignments to the teaching staff. Teaching staff cannot submit assignments to Blackboard on a student’s be- half, and Python files are blocked by Microsoft Outlook and will not be received.
      What feedback will I receive?Under normal circumstances, you will receive marks for each cri- terion via a Blackboard rubric within 16 days of submission. Click on your mark in MyGrades to see the rubric. Usually the reason for each choice of mark is self-evident, but sometimes the marker will add a few words of explanation. You should use this feedback to strengthen your performance in the next program- ming unit.
Moderation:All staff who assess your work are instructed on the expected quality of solutions and the technical marking criteria before grading begins.
Academic Integrity
As a student of the QUT academic community, you are asked to work to uphold the principles of academic integrity during your course of study. QUT sets expectations and responsibilities of students, more specifically it states that students “adopt an ethical approach to academic work and assessment in accordance with this policy and the Student Code of Conduct. E/2.1 (MOPP C/5.3 Academic Integrity). At university, students are expected to demonstrate their own understanding and thinking using the ideas provided by ‘others’ to support and inform their work, always making due acknowledgement to the source. While we encourage peer learning, it is not appropriate to share assignments with other students unless your assessment piece has been stated as being a group assignment. If you do share your assignment with another student, and they copy part of or all of your assignment for their submission, this is considered collusion and you may also be reported for academic misconduct. If you are unsure and need further information you can find this at: http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jsp#C_05_03.03.mdoc.

IFB104 | Building IT Systems | Assessment Task 2 (30% of Final Grade)

CriteriaPerfectHigh Distinc- tionDistinctionCreditPassMarginal FailFailLow FailNo Evidence
PART A
Intuitive, ca- pable Graph- ical User In- terface   Weight (of final grade): 7%Intuitive, at- tractive GUI with all widgets re- quired for: identifying the app; controlling data access and display; and control- ling data ex- port. (7%)Excellent but some slight flaw in the user inter- face, e.g., a spelling er- ror or colour choices that make text hard to read. (6.5%)All necessary widgets are provided but a noticeable problem with the GUI’s layout or basic op- eration, e.g., some widg- ets overlap. (5.6%)Generally good but some signifi- cant prob- lem with one of the widg- ets, e.g., its intended purpose or operation is unclear. (4.9%)Good, with all necessary widgets, but layout and clarity of the user inter- face could be improved significantly. (4%)Significant problems such as one or more nec- essary widg- ets missing or inappro- priate choices of widgets. (3.2%)Serious problems such as most necessary widgets missing or choices of widgets that cannot meet the user in- teraction re- quirements. (2.3%)Only a trivial GUI is cre- ated with few widgets and no pos- sibility of supporting the neces- sary user in- teraction. (0.9%)No evidence of address- ing this crite- rion. (0%)
PART B
Data can be imported from external sources com- pletely and accurately   Weight: 7%Under user control, it is evident that all necessary data can be imported ac- curately and completely from all sources. (7%)All data can be imported correctly ex- cept in an extreme case, e.g., an abnormally long text value is trun- cated. (6.5%)All necessary data can be imported but there is some minor formatting error in a small part, e.g., spuri- ous charac- ters or mark- ups. (5.6%)All necessary data can be imported but there are several formatting errors, inac- curacies or data values missing. (4.9%)Most data can be im- ported cor- rectly but a significant is- sue with one data source, e.g., many incomplete or mis- matching values. (4%)Data can be imported from only some of the required data sources or there are serious inad- equacies in large parts of the data imported. (3.2%)Serious limi- tations, e.g., only one data source can be im- ported cor- rectly or all data sources are hard- wired to re- trieve fixed values only. (2.3%)Program is hardwired to work with fixed data values only; no ability to import new data. (0.9%)No evidence of address- ing this crite- rion. (0%)
CriteriaPerfectHigh Distinc- tionDistinctionCreditPassMarginal FailFailLow FailNo Evidence
Data can be displayed cor- rectly using the GUI   Weight: 5%Under user control, all required ex- ternal and imported data can be displayed completely and accu- rately using the GUI. (5%)Excellent but a slight flaw in the data displayed, e.g., punctu- ation or ty- pographical errors. (4.6%)All data can be displayed but noticea- ble format- ting errors in a small part, e.g., some slightly ob- scured text. (4%)Generally good but there are small for- matting problems that affect readability, e.g., bad line breaks or some text truncated. (3.5%)Good but a small part of the data is presented incorrectly or not at all, e.g., some values miss- ing, or signif- icant prob- lems with readability. (2.9%)Large parts of the data cannot be displayed, contain sig- nificant inac- curacies, and/or are displayed in a hard-to- read form. (2.3%)Serious limi- tations in the ability to display data such as only one data source dis- playable or all data dis- played con- tains signifi- cant inaccu- racies. (1.6%)Program code for dis- playing data cannot run to comple- tion or can display only fixed data values. (0.6%)No evidence of address- ing this crite- rion. (0%)
Data can be exported cor- rectly   Weight: 6%Under user control, any chosen data set can be exported completely and cor- rectly, and is well-format- ted. (6%)All chosen data can be exported but a small part has a slight formatting error, e.g., one or two spurious characters or symbols. (5.6%)Chosen data can be ex- ported but there are a few minor formatting errors, or an incorrect or missing value. (4.8%)Chosen data can be ex- ported but there are a few format- ting errors and inaccu- racies, e.g., mis-matched values. (4.2%)The majority of the data can be ex- ported but some parts have format- ting errors or inaccuracies, e.g., several missing or mis-matched values. (3.5%)Many for- matting er- rors or some significant part of the data cannot be exported at all or is in- correct. (2.7%)Major prob- lems with the ability to choose and export data, e.g., large parts of the data missing or inaccu- rate. (2%)Only some fixed data values can be exported and/or the user has no control over data export. (0.8%)No evidence of address- ing this crite- rion. (0%)
Code concise- ness, clarity and presenta- tion   Weight: 5%All code is concise, neatly laid out, uses meaningful identifiers,Excellent but with a minor flaw such as a misleading comment, an obscureOne or two substandard elements such as unin- formative identifiersGenerally good but a few unin- formative identifiers, inadequatelyGood but some signifi- cant parts are hard to understand due to poorInsufficient commenting in many parts, many unhelpful identifiers,Little code to assess and/or barely any commenting and/or largeVery little code to as- sess or code is inade-No evidence of address- ing this crite- rion. (0%)
CriteriaPerfectHigh Distinc- tionDistinctionCreditPassMarginal FailFailLow FailNo Evidence
 and is com- mented helpfully. (5%)choice of identifier, etc. (4.6%)(“i”, “j”, “n”, etc) or inad- equately commented code blocks. (4%)commented blocks, or unneces- sarily dupli- cated code segments. (3.5%)commenting or identifier choices, or significant amounts of unnecessary duplication. (2.9%)and/or large amounts of unneces- sarily dupli- cated code. (2.3%)amounts of confusing, unneces- sarily dupli- cated code. (1.6%)quately pre- sented throughout. (0.6%) 
Order Now

Get expert help for IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (December 5, 2024) IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/.
"IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK." Universal Assignment - December 5, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/
Universal Assignment October 21, 2022 IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK., viewed December 5, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/>
Universal Assignment - IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK. [Internet]. [Accessed December 5, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/
"IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 5, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/
"IFB104 BUILDING IT SYSTEMS: ASSESSMENT TASK." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/ifb104-building-it-systems-assessment-task/. [Accessed: December 5, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?