MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment

MIS771Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS DEAKIN BUSINESS SCHOOL FACULTY OF BUSINESS AND LAW, DEAKIN UNIVERSITY
Assignment One
Tasks

Assignment one is an individual assignment with three tasks. The first task is to report on how to plan and deliver the assessment task on time. The second task is to analyse the given dataset and draw conclusions from the analysis. Finally, the third task is to convey the findings and conclusions in a written report to a person with very little or no knowledge of Business Analytics.

The assignment uses the dataset file T22022A1.xlsx and expects the use of techniques studied in Module-1.

Percentage of the final grade30%
The Due Date and Time8.00pmThursday18thAugust2022
Submission instructions

The assignment must be submitted by the due date electronically in CloudDeakin. Please note that we will NOT accept any paper, email copies, or part of the assignment submitted after the deadline.

Extensions

No extensions will be granted unless there are exceptional and most unusual circumstances outside the student’s control.

A student who requires a time extension must use the Extension Request tool in CloudDeakin’s Assessment menu. In addition, please provide relevant supporting documents, the plan for assignment one and a draft of the analysis.

Extension requests will not be considered after 5 pm on 18th August 2022.

Late submission

The following marking penalties will apply for late submissions without an approved extension:

  • 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day, or part thereof, up to five days.
  • Work submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked and will receive 0% for the task.

Note: ‘Day’ means calendar day.

The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.

Academic misconduct

For information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unit in the first folder next to the Unit Guide in the Resources area of the CloudDeakin unit site.

Assurance of Learning

This assignment assesses the following Graduate Learning Outcomes and related Unit Learning Outcomes:

GraduateLearningOutcome(GLO)UnitLearningOutcome(ULO)
GLO1: Discipline-specific knowledge andcapabilities – appropriate to the level of study related to a discipline or profession. GLO2: Communication – using oral, written and interpersonal communication to inform, motivate and effect change GLO5:ProblemSolving– creating solutions to authentic (real world and ill-defined) problems. GLO6: Self-Management – working and learning independently, and taking responsibility for personal actionsULO1: Apply quantitative reasoning skills to solve complex problems. ULO2: Plan, monitor, and evaluate own learning as a data analyst. ULO 3: Deduce clear and unambiguous solutions in a form that they useful for decision making and research purposes and for communication to the wider public.
Feedback before submission

Students can seek assistance from the teaching staff to ascertain whether the assignment conforms to submission guidelines.

Feedback after submission

An overall mark, together with feedback, will be released via CloudDeakin, usually within 15 working days. Students should refer and compare their answers to the feedback to understand any areas of improvement.

Support

The Division of Student Life (see link below) provides all students with editing assistance. Students who wish to take advantage of this service must organise, plan and contact the Division of Student Life to schedule a booking well in advance of the due date of this assignment. http://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/administrative-divisions/student-life

Referencing

Any material used in this assignment that is not the student’s original work must be acknowledged as such and appropriately referenced. Students can find information about plagiarism and other study support resources at the following website: http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support

UnitedHealthGroupCaseStudy

‘Medical malpractice insurance is a type of professional liability insurance which protects the physicians and other licensed health care professionals (e.g. dentists, nurses) from liability associated with wrongful practice resulting in a bodily injury, medical expenses and property damage, as well as the cost of defending lawsuits related to such claims’ (National Association of Insurance Commissioners*.)

According to a study published by the Harvard School of Public Health in 2010, the cost of medical malpractice in the United States is $55.6 billion a year, which is 2.4 per cent of annual healthcare spending. Another study published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed that from 1991 to 2005, 7.4 per cent of all physicians licensed in the US had a malpractice claim against them annually.

Uncapped economic and noneconomic damages awarded by courts have increased premiums for medical malpractice insurance. Worst of all is the trend of specialists moving into defensive medicine. That is to reduce the number of high-risk patients they accept. See LeverageRX’s 2019 Medical Malpractice Payout report for the current state of medical malpractice insurance at https://www.leveragerx.com/malpractice-insurance/2019-medical-malpractice-report.

To fix this broken medical system, some state and federal governments introduced new legislation – Medical Liability Reform (MLR). These reforms included a cap on noneconomic damages and specifying expert witness qualifications. See the American Medical Association report on MLR at https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/mlr-now.pdf

The United Health Group (UHG): America’s most prominent health insurance provider has collated a range of data and wants a better understanding of payouts for medical malpractice lawsuits. Its records show payout amounts and information about the presiding physician and the claimant for many mediated or settled lawsuits last year.

You are a Data Analyst working for United Health Group. Your Manager – Edmond Kendrick, has asked you to analyse the collected data. In particular, you are expected to perform descriptive and inferential analyses and produce a report based on your findings.

The data set contains numerous variables and details about the claims. The eight variables in the data table are described below:

ClaimantIDUniqueIDoftheclaimant
PayoutAmountPayoutamountoftheclaimindollars
SeverityTheseverityratingofdamagetothepatient(MILD,MEDIUM,SEVERE)
AgeAgeoftheclaimant inyears
PrivateAttorneyWhetheraprivateattorneyrepresentingtheclaimant
MaritalStatusMaritalstatusoftheclaimant
SpecialityThespecialtyofthephysicianinvolvedinthelawsuit
InsuranceTypeofmedicalinsurancecarriedbythepatient
GenderPatientGender

Edmond’s email to you is reproduced on the next page.

* https://content.naic.org/cipr_topics/topic_medical_malpractice_insurance.htm

https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/medical-liability-costs-us/

Email from Edmond Kendrick

To:<<Your Name>>

From:Edmond Kendrick

Subject:Analysis of Claims (updated 03/08/2023)

Hi <Your Name>,

I have the following questions/issues relating to the claims dataset.

Theme-1:Analysingtheimpactofprivateattorneys.

  • Do claimants with private attorneys receive higher payouts than those without private attorneys?
  • Is private attorney representation less common in malpractice claims against dermatologists than orthopaedic surgeons?
  • Is there a difference in private attorney representation between surgeonphysicianspecialities?
  • Design an experiment to see the effect of private attorney representation and insurance type on the amount claimed?

Theme-2:Analysingmedicalmalpracticeclaimsandmedicalliabilityreform.

  • Does the average payout significantly differ across the surgeonphysicianspecialities?
  • Is the average payout for “SEVERE” claims higher for Orthopaedic surgeons compared to all others?
  • Obstetricians/Gynaecologists have been reducing the number of high-risk obstetric patients they accept due to fear of liability claims. Design an experiment to test the effectiveness of Medical Liability Reform (MLR) legislation on the acceptance rate of high-risk obstetric patients?

I look forward to your response on or before 18th August 2022. Regards

Eddie

SUBMISSIONS

The assignment consists of three parts: Assignment Planning and Execution Tables, Analysis andReport.You must submit all three (your plan, data analysis and written report).

  1. Guidelines for Assignment Planning and Execution Tables

This practical task aims to help you keep track of your progress with the assignment and submit it on time. To report how you plan your project and turn the plan into action, you must complete the tables provided in dot points as clearly as possible. Remember, effective planning, execution, and completing given tasks on time are essential self-management skills.

Note: Dot point writing requires you to use ‘point form’, not complete sentences.

The assignment planning and execution details should be submitted in the appropriate tables provided. The tables should be in dot points. However, before filling in the tables, you are strongly encouraged to watch the pre-recorded workshop ‘How to plan an assignment and turn the plan into action?’

Note:Give the assignment planning and execution file the following name

A1_Planning_YourStudentID.docx
  1. Guidelines for Data Analysis

Read the case study and questions asked by Edmond carefully. Then spend some time reviewing the data to get a sense of the context. The analysis required for this assignment involves material covered in Module 1, with the corresponding tutorials being a helpful guide. Start the analysis by translating the worded business problems into testable propositions.

You can complete all data analysis using the Excel templates provided in practicals. In choosing the technique to apply for a given question, keep the following in mind:

  1. Are we dealing with a numerical variable or a categorical variable?
  2. Are we dealing with one population, two populations or more than two populations?
  3. Are we dealing with an independent population or a dependent population?
  4. Each question must be answered using the most appropriate technique(s) and justify your decision where applicable.
  5. Please formulate the hypotheses, and state them clearly in both notation and words in the Excel file.
  6. Even though a question(s) lead you to inferential techniques, consider conducting a descriptive analysis of the data first.

For all questions in the email, assume that:

  1. 95%confidencelevelis appropriate for confidence intervals and;
  2. 5.0%levelofsignificance(i.e. α = 0.05) is appropriate for any hypothesis tests.

ATTENTION!

  • We expect you to estimate and report the difference if you have established a difference between two means or proportions.
  • Suppose you have established a difference between two or more means or proportions. In that case, we expect you to follow up with an appropriate multiple comparison procedure.

You may need to make assumptions about the dataset to answer some questions. There will be technical/statistical assumptions that you need to make, for example, whether to use an equal or an unequal variance test. You need to consider and incorporate any violations of assumptions such asunequalsamplesizesaslimitationsofyouranalysisinbothExcelandthereport.

Each question from the email should be analysed in a separate worksheet (e.g. Q1.1, Q2.1 …). Therefore, you need to add these extra tabs.

Before submitting your analysis, ensure it is logically organised and removed any incorrect or unnecessary output. Marks will be penalised for poor presentation, disorganised/incorrect results, or unnecessary output.

Note: Name your Excel file in the following format A1_YourStudentID.xlsx (use a short file name while analysing).

  1. Guidelines for the Report

Your report consists of three sections: Introduction, Main Body, and Conclusion. The report should be around 1,200 words.

The introduction begins by highlighting the primary purpose(s) of the analysis and concludes by explaining the report’s structure (i.e., subsequent sections).

The report’s main body summarises the key findings for each question, specifically addressing Edmond’s questions. Use simple English to convey your conclusion and avoid statistical jargon. Use proper headings and do not include any Excel output in the report.

The conclusion should highlight the key findings of the analyses and explain the main limitations (if any).

When you have completed the report, it is a useful exercise to leave it for a day, return to it and then re- read. Does it flow easily? Does it make sense? Often, on re-reading, you become aware that you have made some points clumsily, and you find that you can re-phrase them much more clearly.

Note: Give the report the following name A1_YourStudentID.docxor pdf.

Rubric
PERFORMANCEYET TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM STANDARDMEETS STANDARDEXCEEDS STANDARD
CriteriaNot AttemptedNeeds ImprovementSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExemplary



Analysis (Marks: 35%)
GLO1GLO5
Explores topic at a surface level and rarely uses appropriate data analysis tools.





0 – 10.4
Explores topic at a limited level and often uses irrelevant or inappropriate techniques to analyse data and/or there are many errors in the analysis.


10.5 – 17.4
Independently pursues substantial knowledge, explores topics in some depth and uses appropriate descriptive analysis and visualisation tools to analyse the data but there are some errors in the analysis. 17.5 – 20.9Independently pursues substantial, additional knowledge, and explores a topic in depth, yielding mostly rich analysis using appropriate techniques but there are minor errors in the analysis.
Some assumptions/limitations are considered.
Learning interests exist outside classroom requirements. Explores a topic in-depth and produces a very comprehensive analysis of the data using most appropriate techniques. Consistent use of correct Inferential analysis methods to answer questions.Learning interests exist and flourish outside classroom requirements. Explores a topic in depth and produces a skilful and comprehensive analysis of the data using many different techniques.
All assumptions/limitations are addressed.






28-35




21 – 24.4All assumptions/limitations are considered and communicated.





24.5-27.9













Interpretation (Marks: 45%)
GLO1GLO2
Does not communicate any of the main findings of the analysis in an accurate or useful way. Provide no insight and/or information beyond basic facts.



0 – 10.4
Interpretation and communication of findings is at a basic level or do not adequately explain the main findings of the analysis. Provide little insight and/or information beyond basic facts.





10.5 – 17.4
Explains most of the main findings of the analysis accurately. Shows evidence of independently applying learning to demonstrate comprehension in familiar and novel situations.





17.5 – 20.9
Provides a reasonable and accurate description of the most important features of the analysis along with appropriately qualified conclusions. Shows evidence of independently and creatively applying learning to demonstrate comprehension in familiar and novel situations.
21 – 24.4
Provides a very detailed and accurate description of the most important features of the analysis in appropriate language. Report clearly addresses main research questions asked in the assignment. Shows evidence of independently and creatively applying learning to demonstrate high level of comprehension in familiar and novel situations.Provides an outstanding descriptions and inference of results. Conclusions are explained in clear language and insightful. The entire report is aimed to address main research questions. Shows evidence of independently and expertly applying learning to demonstrate outstanding level of comprehension in familiar and novel situations. 28-35





24.5-27.9

The report is poorly structured and/or few sections missing with a poor use of language.

0 – 2.9
The report is poorly structured. Only few analysis insights are considered. Language is difficult to follow with many grammatical errors noted.
3 – 4.9
The report is clear and easy to follow. The 3 main elements of a well- structured statement (i.e., claim + evidence + conclusion) is considered across the entire report. 5 – 5.9The report is well- structured with all sections included. All relevant insights are in the report. Communication is clear with NO grammatical errors noted.
6– 6.9
The report is on par with a professional report. All relevant analysis insights are included in the report Written communication is clear, easy to follow and has a structure.

7 – 7.9
The report is masterfully structured. All relevant analysis insights included. Report follows a consistent formatting style. Language is truly professional and easy to follow.
8 – 10


AssignmentPlanning andExecution(Marks: 20%)
GLO6
Takes no responsibility for maintaining accurate evidence of learning achievements from within formal course experiences.
0 – 5.9
Takes little responsibility for maintaining accurate evidence of learning achievements from within formal course experiences.



6 – 9.9
Takes responsibility for seeking improved learning and maintaining evidence of learning achievements from within formal course experiences, although there is some inconsistency in application. 10 – 11.9Consistently takes responsibility for seeking improved learning and maintaining evidence of learning achievements from within formal course experiences.
12 – 13.9
Consistently takes responsibility for maintaining accurate and detailed evidence of learning achievements from within and beyond formal course experiences.
14 – 15.9
Consistently takes responsibility for maintaining accurate and compelling evidence of learning achievements from within and beyond formal course experiences.

16 – 20
OverallDescriptionOr Equivalent Fail (N)Or Equivalent Pass (P)Or Equivalent Credit (C) 60% – 69%Or Equivalent Distinction (D)Or Equivalent High Distinction (HD)

0 – 49%50% – 59%
70% –79%80% –100%

MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisations Page 7 of 7

Order Now

Get expert help for MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (March 12, 2026) MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/.
"MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment." Universal Assignment - March 12, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/
Universal Assignment August 10, 2022 MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment., viewed March 12, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/>
Universal Assignment - MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment. [Internet]. [Accessed March 12, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/
"MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment." Universal Assignment - Accessed March 12, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/
"MIS771 Descriptive Analytics and Visualisation Assignment." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis771-descriptive-analytics-and-visualisation-assignment/. [Accessed: March 12, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Quantitative CASP RCT Checklist

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising arandomised controlled trial:Is the basic study design valid for a randomisedcontrolled trial? (Section A)Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)What are

Read More »

Assignment Qualitative CASP Qualitative Checklist

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative researchHow to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study:Are the results of the study valid? (Section A)What are the results? (Section B)Will the results help locally? (Section C) The

Read More »

Assignment Topics

PS3002 Assignment TopicsDear studentsPlease choose one of the topics below. Please note that if you are repeating this subject, you cannot choose the same topic that you did previously in this subject.patellar tendinopathyinstability of the lumbar spinehamstring strainperoneal tendinopathyhip – labral tear.hip osteoarthritispatellofemoral instabilityankylosing spondylitisanterior cruciate ligament rupture (conservative management)quadriceps

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Report

Assessment 2 – Report (1200 words, 30%)PurposeTo demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and application of evidence-based dietary advice and guidelinesLearning objectives1.Review and analyse the role and function of macronutrients, micronutrients and functional components of food in maintaining health2.Understand digestion, absorption and metabolism of food in the human body and

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

Southern Cross Institute,Level 2, 1-3 Fitzwilliam Street, PARRAMATTA NSW 2150 & Level 1, 37 George Street PARRAMATTA NSW 2150Tel: +61 2 9066 6902 Website: www.sci.edu.auTEQSA Provider No: PRV14353 CRICOS Provider No: 04078ªPage 1 of 16HRM201 Human Resources ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis ReportSubmission Deadline: This Week,

Read More »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF HPSYSD101 The Evolution of Psychology

HPSYSD101_Assessment 2_20240603 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleHPSYSD101 The Evolution of PsychologyAssessment TaskAnnotated BibliographyIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2,000 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:b) Examine the significant figures, events and ideas present in the history of psychology.c) Identify and relate the

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

HOS203 Contemporary Accommodation ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report (10%)Submission Deadline: This Week, at 11:59 pm (Week 4)Overview of this AssignmentFor this assessment, students are required to analyse an assigned case study about hospitality industry relevant regulations and/or operational and accreditation failures of a hospitality organisation.

Read More »

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?