Assessment 3 Guidelines
2,000 words equivalent 40% of the subject grade
Due date: Part A October 26th Submitted online Part B Week of October 31st Presented in class or Zoom
(Based on your clinical School)
Background
In many graduate nurse programs new graduates are required to complete a clinical project related to change or innovation in clinical practice. That may mean reviewing and researching an area of clinical practice in the ward that requires improvement, or an area where practice in the ward has been delivered at an excellent level. The new graduate may present their completed project as an in-service education session for ward colleagues or perhaps as a poster during the hospital Research Week.
Assessment Task
This assessment task is broken up into three (3) integral and interrelated components: PART A
- Reflect and write about a situation that occurred within the ward setting while on clinical practicum.
- Identify one (1) National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standard to which this clinical situation relates.
PART B
- Produce a print media submission (poster) related to your chosen NSQHS standard and clinical situation; and present your poster over four minutes in a zoom class to your fellow students
Reflect on a clinical situation
Reflective writing is your response to experiences, situations, events or new information and usually these are linked to some relevant literature on the subject. There is no right or wrong answer.
Reflection is unique and you are expected to use personal pronouns (I, me, us) to express your ideas. We do reflective writing:
- to demonstrate knowledge and understanding of what occurred
- to react to written text or situation by agreeing or disagreeing and explaining why
- to make connections between what you know and what you are learning
- to examine how you learn and whether it is effective
- to reflect on successes and / or mistakes for your future career.
NSG3NRC Assessment 3 Guidelines Page 1 of 4
NSG3NRC Assessment 3 Guidelines Page 2 of 4 Identify one (1) National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standard.
The primary aims of the NSQHS Standards are to protect the public from harm and to improve the quality of health service provision. The eight NSQHS Standards provide a nationally consistent statement about the level of care consumers can expect from health services (Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare [ACSQHC], 2019).
Produce a print media submission.
Print media is the printed version of telling the news, relying information and communicating primarily through newspapers and magazines. Print media continues to evolve and includes but not restricted to newspapers, magazines, newsletters, banners, posters, billboards, books, flyers and brochures. For the purpose of this print media submission however, you are required to produce a poster.
| 3. Produce a print media submission: Poster. Copy emailed to facilitator for class presentation (500 words) For the purpose of this print media submission, you are required to produce a poster and should include the following headings and content. • Title The name of the chosen National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standard you will be addressing. • Author with the LTU logo • Introduction Provide a statement which summarises the clinical practice improvement has been maintained OR could have been maintained in context to this ward situation problem or the practice situation while ensuring person-centred care. • Use the heading below to develop your poster o Clinical issue • Outline the clinical issue or best practice being discussed and relevant standard. o Literature Review • Discussion of what the literature states is best practice for the clinical issue. o Recommendations based on evidence-based practice • Supported by peer-reviewed evidence-based literature. • Conclusion • Reference List This can be printed on a separate sheet **There are poster templates within the Assessment tile (Assessment 3: Print Media Submission) for you to use. 3. Produce a print media submission and 4-minute presentation of poster in zoom/ face to face class to fellow students and facilitator (500 words) |
| NSG3NRC: Assessment 3 Print Media Presentation | ||||||
| Criteria | Excellent (>80%) | Very Good (70 – 79%) | Good (60 – 69%) | Fair (50 – 59%) | Poor (< 50%) | Mark |
| STRUCTURE & ORGANISATION (20%) | Introduction succinctly identifiestherelevance,scope and focusofthecontent.Logical sequencingBody ofposter wellstructured, with coherent and logical developmentofkeyideasin appropriate sectionsEffective use of headingsConclusion appropriate to type and format ofresponse.Print media presentation within word count (+/- 10%). | Introduction identifies relevance, scopeand focusof content but maynotbe succinct.Logical sequencingBody well structured, with predominantlycoherentand logicaldevelopmentofkey ideas inappropriatesections.Effective use of headings.Conclusion predominantly appropriateto type andformat of response.Print media presentation within word count (+/- 10%). | Introduction largely appropriate to the task, but doesn’t clearly identify the relevance, scope and focus of the content.Fair sequencingBody well structured, with mostly coherentandlogicaldevelopment of key ideas in appropriate sections effectiveuseofheadings.Conclusionlargelyappropriateto typeand format ofresponse.Print media presentation within word count (+/- 10%). | Introduction may not be appropriatetothetask, and does not clearly identify the relevance, scopeand focusof the paper.Poor sequencing.Body may not be well structured, with limited coherence and logicaldevelopmentofkey ideas in appropriate sections some inappropriateuseofheadings.Conclusion may not be appropriate to type and format of response.Print media presentation within word count (+/- 10%). | Introduction inappropriate to type andformat of response, or not evident.Illogical sequencing.Body poorly structured and lacks coherent and logical development of key ideas in appropriate sections.Inappropriateuseofslides/ headings.Conclusioninappropriatetotype andformat of response or not evident.Print media presentation not within word count (+/- 10%). | /20 |
| QUALITY and CREATVITY (25%) | Demonstrated an excellent understandingoflinksbetween the necessaryconcepts.Demonstrated creativity for interesting information delivery.Evidence of synthesis of information and logical developmentofargumentsto support keyconcepts. | Demonstrated a very good understanding of linksbetween the necessaryconcepts.Demonstrated some creativity for interesting information delivery.Someevidence ofsynthesis of information and logical development of arguments to support keyconcepts. | Demonstrated a good understandingoflinksbetween the necessaryconcepts.Demonstrated inconsistent creativity for interesting information delivery.Inconsistent evidence of synthesisofinformationand logical development of arguments to support key concepts. | Demonstrated limited understandingoflinksbetween the necessaryconcepts.Demonstrated limited creativity for interesting information delivery.Limitedevidenceofsynthesis of information and logical developmentof argumentsto support keyconcepts. | Demonstrated lack of understandingoflinksbetween the necessaryconcepts.No evidence of creativity for interesting information delivery.Noevidenceofsynthesisof information and logical developmentofargumentsto support keyconcepts. | /25 |
| CONTENT (30%) | Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic.All requirements of the task have been fully & explicitly addressedInformation is accurate & relevant.Key terms & concepts are defined appropriately and concisely.Key aspects of the task (i.e., | Demonstrates a sound understanding of the topic.All requirements of the task have been addressedInformation is accurate & generally relevant.Definitions are generally accurate & appropriate.Key aspects of the task are discussed.Arguments and ideas are | Demonstrates a reasonable understanding of the topicMost requirements of the task have been addressedSome minor details are missing or inaccurate and/or some information may be irrelevant.Some definitions are incomplete or inaccurate.Limited discussion of key aspects of the task. | Demonstrates a very basic understanding of the topicSome requirements of the task have not been addressedSome key information may be missing, inaccurate, or irrelevant.Definitions are incomplete or inaccurateArguments & ideas are not | Demonstrates little or no- understanding of the topic.Few, if any, of the task requirements have been addressed.Information is incomplete, inaccurate or irrelevant.No definitions are providedArguments & ideas are missing or unclear | /30 |
| impact) are discussed intelligently & in depth. Arguments & ideas are very well developed & the point of view is clearThe appropriate balance is maintained between different aspects of the task. | clear and reasonably well developed. The relative emphasis given to different aspects of the task is generally appropriate. | Arguments & ideas are put forward & point of view is generally clear.The emphasis given to some aspects of the task does not reflect their relative importance | developed & point of view is not always clear. Insufficient space is devoted to the main focus of the task. | |||
| USE OF LITERATURE (20%) | Wellsupportedwithsufficient and appropriate references.References sourced from relevantandcrediblesources.Ideas and discussion is consistently supported by evidence from the literature. | Supportedwithsufficientand appropriate references.References sourced from relevantandcrediblesources.Correct in-text referencing.Ideas and discussion is usually supported by evidence from the literature. | Supportedwithmostlysufficient andappropriatereferences.References predominantly sourcedfromrelevantand credible sources.Inconsistent correct in-text referencing.Ideas and discussion are sometimes supported by evidence from the literature. | Limitedsupportfromsufficient andappropriatereferences.References inconsistently sourcedfromrelevantand credible sources.Inconsistent correct in-text referencing.Some attempt to use the literature · | Nilsupport fromsufficient and appropriate references.Referencesnotsourcedfrom relevantandcrediblesources.Nilcorrect in-text referencing. | /20 |
| All three (3) integral and interrelated components have been submitted: Yes: all three have been submitted= 5/5 No: two or less have been submitted= 0/5 Reflection on clinical situationNSQHS StandardPrint media presentation: poster AND 4 minute presentation in zoom class | /5 |
Get expert help for Print Media Presentation and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!
