ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL

ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL

Due Date: End of Week 6, Sunday 11.59pm Weighting: 40% each

Introduction

This assessment maps on to the following learning objectives:

  • Explain a variety of theories and methods used in social psychology research.
  • Critically evaluate knowledge claims in contemporary social psychology topics.
  • Apply social psychology theory and methods to address real-world problems.
  • Communicate applications of social psychology to varied audiences.

Questions can be posted to the Assessment 3 Discussion Board and you should consult the assessment rubric when preparing your submission.

Purpose

The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate content knowledge; to develop critical engagement with social psychological theories; to apply theory to real-world examples; and to encourage you to reflect upon your own beliefs, assumptions, and prior knowledge when evaluating social psychological theories.

Your tasks

Prepare a 1400-word reflective journal for the topics from Modules 3, 4, 5 and 6 (350-words each, + or – 10%). Your responses must include a description of relevant theory, critical reflection on the theory as it pertains to real life examples, and personal reflections on the topic.

Your reflective journal submission must include:

  • a description of the issue and your stance:
  • For Module 3: are social psychologists responsible for sharing their research to the wider public to inform and educate people about social behaviour?
    • For Module 4: what role do you think the researchers might have played in encouraging the children to make the link between themselves and the negative qualities they attributed to the brown dolls?
    • For Module 5: does SRT have the capacity to help solve global problems that arise out of the rejection of expert knowledge, or can it only explain this phenomenon?
    • For Module 6: how does the DP approach to the topic differ from traditional Social Psychology, and what practical applications do you think the DP approach can offer for making society more just and equal?
  • critical engagement with the relevant psychological literature
  • your own personal experiences, observations, values or beliefs
  • a clear link between your experiences and the topic, and
  • first-person informal language.

The reflective journal weekly topics are detailed below.

Week 3: Social influence in the real world

Watch the video presentation on conformity, obedience, and the real world.

Are social psychologists responsible for sharing their research to the wider public to inform and educate people about social behaviour?

To help you reflect on this question, consider some of the following issues:

  • How might Milgram’s obedience studies, the Asch conformity studies, and the Stanford Prison experiment, be applied to the above question?
  • Are there clear links between psychological research and real-world events (such as the Stanford Prison experiment and the events at Abu Ghraib), or were there too many other factors (variables) that contributed to the real-world events? And what are the implications of this?
  • Have your views changed since learning more about this topic? If so, how?

Note: you do not need to answer these questions in your response. They are simply included to help you contemplate and reflect upon the question.

Week 4: The Clarke and Clarke doll studies

One of the key topics that serves as a thread throughout this course is an understanding of the key ethical issues that arise in social psychological research. There are ethical considerations of the Clarke and Clarke studies that are rarely discussed, despite the fact that the experiment appears to have been designed to elicit a negative (and perhaps distressing) response from the children.

For example, the list of commands was constructed expecting the children to attribute negative qualities to the dolls, but then asking them to identify themselves in the dolls.

As it was clear that the children would most likely identify with the doll that they identified as ‘bad’, it could not have been surprising that some children were visibly upset. Indeed, the study reported consistently negative reactions from the young participants when they were asked to identify which doll looked like them, with several children even running from the room in tears.

This reflective task requires that you have listened to the audio presentation on the Clarke and Clarke doll studies.

You may also wish to watch examples of this study with these YouTube videos and read the original paper:

  • Clark Doll experiments
  • Landmark Cases: Brown v Board Doll Test (C-SPAN)

Once you have listened to the presentation and done any other background research related to the topic, respond to the following question:

What role do you think the researchers might have played in encouraging the children to make the link between themselves and the negative qualities they attributed to the brown dolls?

To help you reflect on this question, consider some of the following issues:

  • To what extent did the study elicit the children’s perceptions of racial stereotypes?
  • Are there any other ways that researchers could have explored the children’s racial perceptions?
  • Do you think this method impacted on the findings, or would the findings have been the same using other methods?
  • Should the findings be dismissed based on ethical criticisms of the methods?
  • Do the methods justify the results and new knowledge gained through these studies?
  • Have your views changed since learning more about this topic? If so, how?

Note: you do not need to answer these questions in your response. They are simply included to help you contemplate and reflect upon the question.

Week 5: Can SRT change society or just describe it?

In this assessment, you are required to write a 350-word reflective piece on how psychology can change society.

Consider the practical applications of SRT and reflect on how the theory could be used to create positive social change. Consider your reflection in relation to any of the scientific topics you have learnt about in the course so far, or a topic of your choice (Note: the topic must be

based on science/technology that has been challenged by a significant portion of the population).

Does SRT have the capacity to help solve global problems that arise out of the rejection of expert knowledge, or can it only explain this phenomenon?

To help you reflect on this question, consider some of the following issues:

  • What can theories of communication and social thinking tell us about how to instigate social change?
  • How can social psychologists facilitate science communication to avoid the rejection of scientific knowledge?
  • Does understanding how societies communicate provide us with strategies harness and deliver communicative practices that promote positive social change? And what are the implications of this?
  • Have your views changed since learning more about this topic? If so, how?

Note: you do not need to answer these questions in your response. They are simply included to help you contemplate and reflect upon the question.

Week 6: Discursive Psychology and traditional social psychology

This reflective task requires that you have read one of the journal articles outlined on the topic ‘Discursive Psychology and traditional social psychology’. Recall that you were provided with a list of articles that cover a range of different social psychological topics on:

  • Attitudes and attributions
  • Categorisation and identity
  • Racism.

After reading your chosen article, respond to the following questions:

·        How does the DP approach to the topic differ from traditional Social Psychology?

  • What practical applications do you think the DP approach can offer for making society more just and equal?

To help you reflect on this question, consider some of the following issues:

  • Is the social constructionist approach of DP too removed from traditional social psychology to provide any useful insights into traditional social psychological topics?
  • Can understanding how societies communicate provide us with strategies to harness and deliver communicative practices that promote positive social change? And what are the implications of this?
  • Have your views changed since learning more about this topic? If so, how?

Note: you do not need to answer these questions in your response. They are simply included to help you contemplate and reflect upon the question.

Directions

Check each weekly Reflective Journal topic and use the social psychological theories to respond to each question(s). Each response must include:

  • demonstrated knowledge of relevant social psychological theory/theories
  • critical engagement with social psychological theory/theories
  • application of theory/theories to real-world examples
  • self-reflection of your own experiences, beliefs, and prior knowledge that clarifies your stance on the question.

Requirements:

Format your assignment using either Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman, size 11 or 12 font, double spaced.

Responses to each module topic should be 350 words (1400 words in total, + or – 10%).

Citations are not necessary but when used, must adhere to APA style. In text citations will be included in the word count, but the reference list will not.

The journal entries are to be submitted at the end of Week 6 online via the Canvas assignment portal. Include your student ID number but do not include your name on your submission.

Assessment 3: Module Reflective Journal Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPoints
Part 1: Clarifying issuePoints: 1.0 Name: Full points   You have described the issue and clarified your stance.Points: 0.0 Name: No points   You have not taken a stance on the issue.1.0 pts
Part 2: Critical engagement with theoryPoints: 3.0 Name: Full points   You have provided an insightful analysis, synthesis and evaluation of theory and concepts with clear connections made to course content and the question addressed.Points: 2.0 Name: Partial points   You have provided an analysis, synthesis and evaluation of theory and concepts and have made general connections to the course content and the question addressed.Points: 1.0 Name: Partial points   You have described theories or concepts in general terms but your analysis, synthesis and evaluation are limited or contain errors or generalisations.Points: 0.0 Name: No points   You provide no analysis, synthesis and evaluation or the commentary is off- topic.3.0 pts
Part 3: Application to real world examplesPoints: 3.0 Name: Full points   You have integrated key features of real-world examples to support claims and have made insightful comments on the application of the theory.Points: 2.0 Name: Partial points   You have integrated features of real-world examples to support claims and have demonstrated the application of theory.Points: 1.0 Name: Partial points   You have included descriptions of real-world examples but have not connected these to the application of the theory in a cohesive way.Points: 0.0 Name: No points   You have not included real world examples that are relevant to application of the theory.3.0 pts
Part 4: Personal reflectionPoints: 3.0 Name: Full points   You have integrated personal comments on your experiences, beliefs, assumptions or prior knowledge with well-developed, in-depth insights into their impact on your interpretation of theory. Your comments clarify your  stance on the question and your learning on this topic.Points: 2.0 Name: Partial points   You have integrated personal comments on your experiences, beliefs, assumptions or prior knowledge with some insights that clarify your stance on the question and your learning on these topics.Points: 1.0 Name: Partial points   You have included personal comments on some aspects of your experiences, beliefs, assumptions or prior knowledge on the topic. Your inferences or insights lack cohesion or do not adequately address your stance on the question or your learning.Points: 0.0 Name: No points   You have not included personal comments that are relevant to clarify your stance and learning on this topic.3.0 pts
Total:10 pts
Order Now

Get expert help for ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (September 8, 2024) ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/.
"ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL." Universal Assignment - September 8, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/
Universal Assignment March 3, 2023 ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL., viewed September 8, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/>
Universal Assignment - ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL. [Internet]. [Accessed September 8, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/
"ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL." Universal Assignment - Accessed September 8, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/
"ASSESSMENT 3 – REFLECTIVE JOURNAL." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/reflective-journal/. [Accessed: September 8, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Categories

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

NTW 600 Computer Network and Security

Assessment 2 Information and Rubric Subject Code  NTW 600 Subject Name Computer Network and Security Assessment Number and Title Assessment 2: Cyber Security Threats to IT Infrastructure of a real-world Organisation Assessment Type Group Assessment Length / Duration  1500 words Weighting %  30% Project Report: 20% Presentation :10% (Recorded) Total

Read More »

LAW500 Business Law Assessment 2 – Group Project

Assessment Information and Rubric Subject Code LAW500 Subject Name Business Law Assessment Number and Title Assessment 2 – Group Project Assessment Type Group Length / Duration 3000 words maximum, no ±10%, and excluding references Weighting % 30% Total Marks 100 Submission Online Submission via TurnitIn for the written report Due

Read More »

Population Nutrition Case Study Analysis

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition Assessment Task: 1 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Case Study Analysis Assignment task type: Short Written Report and Literature Search Strategy Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. In

Read More »

Applied Quantitative Economics Assignment

Goldsmiths College, University of London Applied Quantitative Economics Project ** You must attempt only one project, and you must complete it either in R or in Excel ** General Background Key Stage 4 (KS4) is a legal term for the last two years of secondary school education in England leading

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?