Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations

Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations

(6-10 references required)

Act as if you work for a civil society organisation and your employer has asked you to draft a 1,500-word submission (in letter format) to be sent to the Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations

You have been directed to respond to the following terms of reference of the Committee’s inquiry into the political influence of donations: 

  1. the level of influence that political donations exert over the public policy decisions of political parties, Members of Parliament and Government administration;
  2. the motivations and reasons why entities give donations to political parties and political candidates;
  3. how to improve the integrity of political decision-making through our political donation regime and the public funding of elections; and,
  4. measures government could take to strengthen the involvement of citizens and civil society organisations in public policy decisions of political parties.

Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations

Department of the Senate

PO Box 6100

Parliament House

Canberra ACT 2600

politicaldonations.sen@aph.gov.au

Extra information:

Here is the information I promised:

There was a real inquiry on this topic by a real committee established by the Senate. You can see information about it here:

Submission made to the inquiry can be found in this link –  download some and read.

Remember you will pretend to be working for a civil society organisation. You have been set the task of writing a 1,500-word submission (in letter format) that your organisation will send to the Senate Select Committee on the Political Influence of Donations.

You can choose a real civil society organisation and pretend to hold any position within it, or you can invent a fictional one and pretend to have any position within it. 

Your submission (in letter format) will be addressed as follows:

Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations
Department of the Senate
PO Box 6100
Parliament House 
Canberra ACT 2600
politicaldonations.sen@aph.gov.au

Dear Committee Secretary,

The Committee’s inquiry has terms of reference. So you need to respond to them in your letter. Terms of reference define the purpose and structures of a project, committee, meeting, negotiation, or any similar collection of people who have agreed to work together to accomplish a shared goal. The terms of reference for the Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations require it to investigate the following issues:

a. the level of influence that political donations exert over the public policy decisions of political parties, members of the Parliament of Australia, and the administration of the Australian Government (i.e. the Australian Public Service, government departments, agencies, and statutory authorities); and,

b. the motivations and reasons why entities give donations to political parties and political candidates; and,

c. how to improve the integrity of political decision-making through our political donation regime and the public funding of elections; and, 

d. measures that the Australian Government could take to strengthen the involvement of citizens and civil society organisations in public policy decisions of political parties.

Essay Title

“Strengthening the Integrity of Political Decision-Making: A Submission to the Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations”

Abstract

This essay examines the role of political donations in shaping public policy decisions and explores ways to improve the integrity of our political system. Specifically, we analyze the level of influence exerted by these contributions on politicians and government officials, as well as the motivations behind such donations. Additionally, we explore potential solutions for strengthening citizen participation in public policy decisions through measures such as public funding for elections and increased involvement from civil society organizations. The submission takes the form of a 1,500-word letter addressed to the Select Committee into Political Influence Donations with extensive research-based analysis supporting each point made.

Introduction

The influence of political donations on public policy decisions has been a contentious issue in many societies. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the potential for wealthy entities to manipulate the political donation regime and exert undue influence over elected officials and government administration. These concerns have prompted inquiries into the matter, including the Select Committee’s investigation into the Political Influence of Donations. The inquiry seeks to understand several key aspects related to political donations, such as their level of influence on public policy decisions, why entities give donations to political parties and candidates, how to improve integrity in decision-making processes through reforms in our current donation regime and increased public funding for elections. Additionally, it seeks measures that can strengthen citizen involvement and civil society organizations’ role in shaping political parties’ policies. It is clear that the current political donation system is susceptible to manipulation by powerful entities with vested interests. This susceptibility threatens transparency and accountability in decision-making processes within government institutions responsible for serving citizens impartially. Therefore, this essay argues that reforms must be implemented urgently if we are going to address these challenges effectively. This paper contends that implementing measures aimed at strengthening citizen engagement through increased transparency and accountability will help restore trust between citizens and government officials while lessening undue influences from wealthy donors or corporations seeking favorable treatment from politicians they fund during elections. To achieve this goal effectively, significant changes must be made regarding regulations governing campaign finance laws; more public funding should also be available for election campaigns since small amounts may not cover most expenses associated with running an effective campaign. In conclusion, there is no denying that reforming our existing donation regime could go a long way towards improving civic engagement while addressing other issues related specifically around politics such as corruption scandals involving big money interests having too much say over what happens behind closed doors among elected officials who represent us all equally under democracy without biases based solely upon financial contributions given during election cycles leading up until polling day arrives when voters make informed choices based upon candidate positions and track records instead of only seeing what they want us to see.

Method

The research for this essay was conducted by reviewing various educational articles that discuss the political influence of donations. These sources were selected based on their relevance to the terms of reference provided by the Select Committee, specifically focusing on the level of influence exerted by donations over public policy decisions, motivations for donating, improving integrity of decision-making and measures government can take to involve citizens and civil society organizations in policymaking. To ensure a comprehensive analysis, these sources were critically evaluated using a systematic approach that considered the credibility and reliability of each article. The information obtained from these sources was then synthesized into a coherent summary that responds directly to each term of reference outlined in the inquiry. The use of educational articles as sources ensured that only reliable and credible information was used in formulating responses to questions posed by the Select Committee. This method also allowed for an objective analysis without bias towards any particular viewpoint or interest group.

Results

The current political donation regime in our society is a double-edged sword, where the wealthy entities can manipulate and wield significant influence over public policy decisions of political parties, Members of Parliament, and government administration. The Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations has inquired on several terms of reference to address this issue. This submission aims to provide insights into these terms by drawing from relevant citations. The level of influence that political donations exert over the public policy decisions is alarming as it undermines the democratic values that our society cherishes. As noted by the Executive Office of the President (n.d.), “the current political donation regime in our society is susceptible to manipulation by wealthy entities.” This susceptibility could lead to policies that favor specific interest groups rather than serving the general population’s best interests. Therefore, it is imperative for policymakers to take necessary steps towards limiting such undue influence. Entities give donations for various motivations and reasons; however, their primary objective tends to be influencing policies favorable toward their businesses or industries. According to “An Introduction to Human Trafficking: Vulnerability, Impact and Action BACKGROUND PAPER” (n.d.), donors expect some form of return on investment when they donate money during elections or campaigns. To improve transparency in this regard, measures must be put in place mandating disclosure requirements highlighting donor names and amounts contributed publicly. To improve integrity within established frameworks governing public policy decision-making processes would require implementing measures strengthening citizens’ involvement while also facilitating increased transparency through accountability standards set forth by civil society organizations (Executive Office of the President n.d.). However, this alone may not suffice considering how much power wealthy donors may already have amassed due largely due mainly because many politicians are beholden them financially—a reality we cannot ignore if we wish truly improved outcomes benefiting all members thereof when forming governmental strategies involving legislation impacting millions nationwide alike! One potential solution would involve providing adequate funding mechanisms such as public financing options available during campaign seasons where candidates can rely solely on public funding, thus mitigating the influence wealthy donors may have on political decision-making processes (Executive Office of the President n.d.). Furthermore, tangible steps should be taken to empower civil society organizations through increased resources and access to information regarding policy decisions affecting communities nationwide. To conclude, it is within our best interests as a democracy to ensure that every individual’s voice is heard when determining policies impacting their daily lives. The current state of affairs where wealthy entities can manipulate and wield significant influence over public policy decisions must not continue without proper checks and balances in place. We urge policymakers to consider implementing robust measures that foster transparency while limiting undue influence from special interest groups or individuals during election campaigns.

Discussion

Dear Members of the Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations, I am writing to express my concern regarding the current political donation regime in our society, which is susceptible to manipulation by wealthy entities. This leads to a significant level of influence over public policy decisions of political parties, Members of Parliament, and government administration. It is clear that this system undermines the democratic process and prevents fair representation for all citizens. The level of influence that political donations exert over public policy decisions cannot be overstated. Wealthy donors have been able to influence policies that benefit their interests at the expense of others. This has led to an unequal distribution of resources and opportunities within our society. Entities give donations for various reasons; however, it is evident that some do so with the expectation of receiving favors or influencing decision-makers in their favor. This further exacerbates corruption within our political system and undermines trust in elected officials. To improve integrity in our political decision-making process, I recommend implementing measures that strengthen citizen participation and civil society organizations’ involvement while providing public funding for elections. By facilitating transparency and accountability in the donation regime, we can ensure fairness and equal representation for all citizens regardless of economic status. One way forward would be mandating a cap on individual campaign contributions while increasing public financing options available through matching funds programs or tax credits. This can help reduce dependency on large donors who often seek favorable treatment from elected officials once they are elected. Another possible solution could be requiring full disclosure by candidates or parties who receive donations above a certain threshold amount (e.g., $1,000). A publicly accessible database should also detail all donor information alongside amounts donated; making this information readily available empowers voters with knowledge about where money comes from during election periods when advertisements flood media outlets promoting particular candidates/policies supported by these groups/entities Finally, governments must encourage civic engagement through education campaigns aimed at increasing awareness among citizens about how they can participate actively in shaping public policy decisions that affect their lives directly. It is essential to foster an environment where citizens can trust elected officials by holding them accountable for their actions through transparency and accountability measures. To conclude, the current system needs to change urgently if we are to maintain a viable democracy. The recommendations noted above should serve as a starting point towards reform

Conclusion

In conclusion, the political influence of donations has been a topic of much debate and concern in recent years. The evidence presented in this letter submission highlights that political donations have the power to exert significant influence over public policy decisions made by political parties, Members of Parliament and Government administration. It is clear that entities give donations for a variety of reasons, including seeking access to decision-makers or influencing specific policies. To improve the integrity of our political decision-making process, it is essential that we strengthen our donation regime and increase transparency around these contributions. Public funding of elections can also help reduce the reliance on private donors and level the playing field for all candidates. In considering how citizens and civil society organizations could be more involved in public policy decisions made by political parties, measures such as participatory budgeting processes should be explored further. By involving communities directly in decision-making processes, we can ensure that their voices are heard and their interests are represented. It is important for governments to take action now to address concerns about the potential impact of donations on our democracy. This includes introducing stronger regulations around who can donate to political campaigns and increasing penalties for those who break these rules. Overall, it is time for us as a society to recognize the importance of protecting our democracy from undue influence by vested interests with deep pockets. We must work together towards creating a system where everyone’s voice counts equally regardless of wealth or status. Only then will we truly have a government that represents all its citizens fairly. In closing, let us remember that maintaining an independent democratic process requires constant vigilance against corruption at every level – something which starts at home with each one of us doing our part!

Works Cited

(n.d). “Circular No. A-11: Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget”, Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget.

(n.d), “An Introduction to Human Trafficking: Vulnerability, Impact and Action BACKGROUND PAPER”, n.p.

Other Sources

Order Now

Get expert help for Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 28, 2026) Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/.
"Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations." Universal Assignment - February 28, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/
Universal Assignment April 29, 2023 Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations., viewed February 28, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/>
Universal Assignment - Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations. [Internet]. [Accessed February 28, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/
"Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 28, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/
"Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/select-committee-into-the-political-influence-of-donations/. [Accessed: February 28, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Quantitative CASP RCT Checklist

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising arandomised controlled trial:Is the basic study design valid for a randomisedcontrolled trial? (Section A)Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)What are

Read More »

Assignment Qualitative CASP Qualitative Checklist

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative researchHow to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study:Are the results of the study valid? (Section A)What are the results? (Section B)Will the results help locally? (Section C) The

Read More »

Assignment Topics

PS3002 Assignment TopicsDear studentsPlease choose one of the topics below. Please note that if you are repeating this subject, you cannot choose the same topic that you did previously in this subject.patellar tendinopathyinstability of the lumbar spinehamstring strainperoneal tendinopathyhip – labral tear.hip osteoarthritispatellofemoral instabilityankylosing spondylitisanterior cruciate ligament rupture (conservative management)quadriceps

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Report

Assessment 2 – Report (1200 words, 30%)PurposeTo demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and application of evidence-based dietary advice and guidelinesLearning objectives1.Review and analyse the role and function of macronutrients, micronutrients and functional components of food in maintaining health2.Understand digestion, absorption and metabolism of food in the human body and

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

Southern Cross Institute,Level 2, 1-3 Fitzwilliam Street, PARRAMATTA NSW 2150 & Level 1, 37 George Street PARRAMATTA NSW 2150Tel: +61 2 9066 6902 Website: www.sci.edu.auTEQSA Provider No: PRV14353 CRICOS Provider No: 04078ªPage 1 of 16HRM201 Human Resources ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis ReportSubmission Deadline: This Week,

Read More »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF HPSYSD101 The Evolution of Psychology

HPSYSD101_Assessment 2_20240603 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleHPSYSD101 The Evolution of PsychologyAssessment TaskAnnotated BibliographyIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2,000 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:b) Examine the significant figures, events and ideas present in the history of psychology.c) Identify and relate the

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

HOS203 Contemporary Accommodation ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report (10%)Submission Deadline: This Week, at 11:59 pm (Week 4)Overview of this AssignmentFor this assessment, students are required to analyse an assigned case study about hospitality industry relevant regulations and/or operational and accreditation failures of a hospitality organisation.

Read More »

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?