ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

SemesterApril 2021Module CodeACC4304
Module TitleAuditing
Coursework StructureEssay (1,800 words)Assignment Weighting40%
Assignment TitleCritically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.
Coursework Submission DeadlineDate: Week 13 of April 2021 Session Time: 5pm
Method: SafeAssign via Blackboard
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
Evaluate the purpose of auditing and the auditor
Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
Examine current techniques and issues in auditing
General Coursework Rules
Written Assignment must be submitted online through SafeAssign (or other plagiarism checker) via Blackboard for originality check. Oral Presentation must be recorded and securely uploaded to YouTube (or other online video platform) for moderation purpose. The private link to video must be given to the lecturer during submission. Assignment submitted after the deadline will be subject to a penalty. Please refer to the guidelines on Coursework Submission that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook. Suspected academic misconduct will be handled according to the Policies and Procedures for Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook.
Assignment Brief

External auditors play a crucial role in bridging the principal and the agent’s interest by executing their role in providing an audit opinion on the financial statement. However, recent accounting scandals in Malaysia raise concerns about external audit quality and their role in detecting financial statement frauds (Aghghaleh, Mohamed, and Rahmat, 2016)

Reference:

 Aghghaleh, S., Mohamed, Z., & Rahmat. M. (2016) ‘Detecting financial statement frauds in Malaysia : Comparing the abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models’. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance. 7 pp.57–65. [Online] Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/11847 [Assessed: 16 February 2021]



Required:

Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

Other Specific Instructions for this Assignment

None

Student Support and Guidance
For further help, contact your module leader/lecturer during consultation hours or by email. Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work. Make full use of Library search to identify relevant academic material and find links to other Information Databases and the Information Management contact details. For HBS students, you may go to CASE website www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/ for more student support and guidance.
Marking Criteria and Feedback
Performance will be assessed using UH Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme. These two documents are attached to this assignment brief. Feedback will typically be given within 4 weeks from the submission deadline in a written/typed/verbal form.

UGGrading Criteria for HBS Coursework(Essay)

ESSAYPresentation & structureIntellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard ReferencingContent/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ CalculationsBreadth / Depth / Integration of LiteratureDiscussion/Analysis/Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
90-100
Outstanding
Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style No grammatical / spelling errors.Outstanding selection of quality sources, well beyond core & recommended resources. Outstandingstandard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Outstanding exploration of topic showing outstanding knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate content.Outstanding business insight & application. Outstanding integration of literature/data into work. Very impressive breadth and depth.Outstanding level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Highly developed/ focused work.
80-89
Excellent
Excellent presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only minor errors.Excellent selection ofquality sources. Evidence of independent searching beyond core & recommended resources. Excellent standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Excellent level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Evidence of appropriate reading. Covers all relevant points & issues.Excellent business insight & application. Excellent integration of literature/data into work. Impressive breadth and depth.Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Clearly developed points all of which are relevant to the topic.
70-79
Very Good
Very good presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.Very good selection of mostly quality sources beyond the recommended resources. Few irrelevant/poor quality sources used. Very good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Very good level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Covers most relevant points & issues. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations.Very good business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates very good breadth and depth of understanding.Very good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. A few less relevant ideas/points or would benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.
60-69
Good
Good presentation & essay structure with effective paragraphing. Writing is mainly good with some flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom impede understandingGood selection of quality sources but some irrelevant/poor quality sources used beyond the recommended reading. Good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Good grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented. Good knowledge & understanding is demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions in content/ calculations.Good business insight & application. Literature /data is integrated in a way that demonstrates good breadth and depth of understanding.Good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
50-59
Clear Pass
Clear presentation and sound essay structure with paragraphing that is effective for the most part. Writing is mainly clear, but errors may slightly impede understandingSome quality sources used to clear effect, but some may be inappropriate. Limited attempt to go beyond recommended reading. Harvard referencing system is mostly consistently, though there may be minor inaccuracies.Sound grasp of the main topic with clear knowledge and understanding of main issues demonstrated. There may be some errors/omissions in content/calculationsSound business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates clear understanding.Sound level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some irrelevant points and more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
40-49
Marginal Pass
Satisfactory: Basic essay structure. Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors which impede understanding. See CASE/T&L with feedbackSatisfactory: Some quality sources used. Research did not go beyond the recommended sources. Satisfactory referencing within text & some inconsistent use of Harvard referencing system. See CASE/ T&L with feedbackSatisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses most of the task. Some errors / omissions in content/ calculations. May benefit from further research.Satisfactory business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
Satisfactory: Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some points superficially made so need further development. See CASE/T&L with feedback
30-39
Marginal Fail
Weak essay format. Limited or poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors.
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
Weak: Limited evidence of appropriate research. Some use made of recommended reading, but the majority of sources are irrelevant/of poor quality. Weak use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackWeak: Limited content / knowledge/ calculations. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Weak: Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight Work needs to show better links between practical application & theory.
Weak: Limited evidence of discussion/ analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
20 – 29
Clear Fail
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing / signposting. Inappropriate writing style Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackInadequate: Little evidence of appropriate research. Few quality sources used from recommended reading. Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackInadequate: Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.
Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation & /or reflection. Descriptive. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
0 – 19
Little or Nothing of merit
Nothing of merit: Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: No evidence of research. No use made of recommended reading. Sources are irrelevant & of poor quality. No or little attempt to use the recommended Harvard referencing system. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.
Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback

Individual Essay Marking and Feedback Sheet

Assignment Title :
Date :
Module Title :
Module Code :
Name :
ID Number :

Please refer to Grading Criteria for Essay when awarding marks (upon 100). Key in the weightage (X%) for each criteria and the detailed tasks and expectations (link to MLO).

Grading CriteriaMLO100mX%Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & structure: Follows logical structure with good flow; meet the format requirements outlined in the instruction, articulate and fluent academic writing.
/100/5
C2. Intellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing Use a minimum of 8 sources; in-text citations done properly and use Harvard referencing style.
/100/10
C3. Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ Calculations Perform full and rich content including problem, include one theory, background evidence of research and findings with specific examples; demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues
/100/20
C4. Breadth / Depth / Integration of Literature Articulate appropriate and relevant data; clear tables and charts with accurate data to support findings
/100/30

C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection Express a strong, focused argument, well supported by impressive analysis and evidence, provide relevant and achievable recommendations; represents well critical thinking skills
/100/25
C6. Reflections (Self) Reflects the skills gained from the course and suggestion on how to use the knowledge learned in future
/100/10
Total (Assessor)/100
Total (Peer Reviewer/Moderator)/100


UH Internal Moderator Comments
External Examiner Comments (if applicable)

Order Now

Get expert help for Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds Assignment and many more. Best service in Australia. Online Order Now!

No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (March 6, 2026) ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/.
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - March 6, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
Universal Assignment June 18, 2022 ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.., viewed March 6, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/>
Universal Assignment - ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. [Internet]. [Accessed March 6, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - Accessed March 6, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/. [Accessed: March 6, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Quantitative CASP RCT Checklist

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising arandomised controlled trial:Is the basic study design valid for a randomisedcontrolled trial? (Section A)Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)What are

Read More »

Assignment Qualitative CASP Qualitative Checklist

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative researchHow to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study:Are the results of the study valid? (Section A)What are the results? (Section B)Will the results help locally? (Section C) The

Read More »

Assignment Topics

PS3002 Assignment TopicsDear studentsPlease choose one of the topics below. Please note that if you are repeating this subject, you cannot choose the same topic that you did previously in this subject.patellar tendinopathyinstability of the lumbar spinehamstring strainperoneal tendinopathyhip – labral tear.hip osteoarthritispatellofemoral instabilityankylosing spondylitisanterior cruciate ligament rupture (conservative management)quadriceps

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Report

Assessment 2 – Report (1200 words, 30%)PurposeTo demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and application of evidence-based dietary advice and guidelinesLearning objectives1.Review and analyse the role and function of macronutrients, micronutrients and functional components of food in maintaining health2.Understand digestion, absorption and metabolism of food in the human body and

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

Southern Cross Institute,Level 2, 1-3 Fitzwilliam Street, PARRAMATTA NSW 2150 & Level 1, 37 George Street PARRAMATTA NSW 2150Tel: +61 2 9066 6902 Website: www.sci.edu.auTEQSA Provider No: PRV14353 CRICOS Provider No: 04078ªPage 1 of 16HRM201 Human Resources ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis ReportSubmission Deadline: This Week,

Read More »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF HPSYSD101 The Evolution of Psychology

HPSYSD101_Assessment 2_20240603 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleHPSYSD101 The Evolution of PsychologyAssessment TaskAnnotated BibliographyIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2,000 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:b) Examine the significant figures, events and ideas present in the history of psychology.c) Identify and relate the

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

HOS203 Contemporary Accommodation ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report (10%)Submission Deadline: This Week, at 11:59 pm (Week 4)Overview of this AssignmentFor this assessment, students are required to analyse an assigned case study about hospitality industry relevant regulations and/or operational and accreditation failures of a hospitality organisation.

Read More »

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?