ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

SemesterApril 2021Module CodeACC4304
Module TitleAuditing
Coursework StructureEssay (1,800 words)Assignment Weighting40%
Assignment TitleCritically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.
Coursework Submission DeadlineDate: Week 13 of April 2021 Session Time: 5pm
Method: SafeAssign via Blackboard
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
Evaluate the purpose of auditing and the auditor
Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
Examine current techniques and issues in auditing
General Coursework Rules
Written Assignment must be submitted online through SafeAssign (or other plagiarism checker) via Blackboard for originality check. Oral Presentation must be recorded and securely uploaded to YouTube (or other online video platform) for moderation purpose. The private link to video must be given to the lecturer during submission. Assignment submitted after the deadline will be subject to a penalty. Please refer to the guidelines on Coursework Submission that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook. Suspected academic misconduct will be handled according to the Policies and Procedures for Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook.
Assignment Brief

External auditors play a crucial role in bridging the principal and the agent’s interest by executing their role in providing an audit opinion on the financial statement. However, recent accounting scandals in Malaysia raise concerns about external audit quality and their role in detecting financial statement frauds (Aghghaleh, Mohamed, and Rahmat, 2016)

Reference:

 Aghghaleh, S., Mohamed, Z., & Rahmat. M. (2016) ‘Detecting financial statement frauds in Malaysia : Comparing the abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models’. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance. 7 pp.57–65. [Online] Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/11847 [Assessed: 16 February 2021]



Required:

Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

Other Specific Instructions for this Assignment

None

Student Support and Guidance
For further help, contact your module leader/lecturer during consultation hours or by email. Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work. Make full use of Library search to identify relevant academic material and find links to other Information Databases and the Information Management contact details. For HBS students, you may go to CASE website www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/ for more student support and guidance.
Marking Criteria and Feedback
Performance will be assessed using UH Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme. These two documents are attached to this assignment brief. Feedback will typically be given within 4 weeks from the submission deadline in a written/typed/verbal form.

UGGrading Criteria for HBS Coursework(Essay)

ESSAYPresentation & structureIntellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard ReferencingContent/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ CalculationsBreadth / Depth / Integration of LiteratureDiscussion/Analysis/Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
90-100
Outstanding
Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style No grammatical / spelling errors.Outstanding selection of quality sources, well beyond core & recommended resources. Outstandingstandard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Outstanding exploration of topic showing outstanding knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate content.Outstanding business insight & application. Outstanding integration of literature/data into work. Very impressive breadth and depth.Outstanding level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Highly developed/ focused work.
80-89
Excellent
Excellent presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only minor errors.Excellent selection ofquality sources. Evidence of independent searching beyond core & recommended resources. Excellent standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Excellent level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Evidence of appropriate reading. Covers all relevant points & issues.Excellent business insight & application. Excellent integration of literature/data into work. Impressive breadth and depth.Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Clearly developed points all of which are relevant to the topic.
70-79
Very Good
Very good presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.Very good selection of mostly quality sources beyond the recommended resources. Few irrelevant/poor quality sources used. Very good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Very good level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Covers most relevant points & issues. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations.Very good business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates very good breadth and depth of understanding.Very good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. A few less relevant ideas/points or would benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.
60-69
Good
Good presentation & essay structure with effective paragraphing. Writing is mainly good with some flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom impede understandingGood selection of quality sources but some irrelevant/poor quality sources used beyond the recommended reading. Good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Good grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented. Good knowledge & understanding is demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions in content/ calculations.Good business insight & application. Literature /data is integrated in a way that demonstrates good breadth and depth of understanding.Good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
50-59
Clear Pass
Clear presentation and sound essay structure with paragraphing that is effective for the most part. Writing is mainly clear, but errors may slightly impede understandingSome quality sources used to clear effect, but some may be inappropriate. Limited attempt to go beyond recommended reading. Harvard referencing system is mostly consistently, though there may be minor inaccuracies.Sound grasp of the main topic with clear knowledge and understanding of main issues demonstrated. There may be some errors/omissions in content/calculationsSound business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates clear understanding.Sound level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some irrelevant points and more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
40-49
Marginal Pass
Satisfactory: Basic essay structure. Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors which impede understanding. See CASE/T&L with feedbackSatisfactory: Some quality sources used. Research did not go beyond the recommended sources. Satisfactory referencing within text & some inconsistent use of Harvard referencing system. See CASE/ T&L with feedbackSatisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses most of the task. Some errors / omissions in content/ calculations. May benefit from further research.Satisfactory business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
Satisfactory: Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some points superficially made so need further development. See CASE/T&L with feedback
30-39
Marginal Fail
Weak essay format. Limited or poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors.
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
Weak: Limited evidence of appropriate research. Some use made of recommended reading, but the majority of sources are irrelevant/of poor quality. Weak use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackWeak: Limited content / knowledge/ calculations. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Weak: Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight Work needs to show better links between practical application & theory.
Weak: Limited evidence of discussion/ analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
20 – 29
Clear Fail
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing / signposting. Inappropriate writing style Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackInadequate: Little evidence of appropriate research. Few quality sources used from recommended reading. Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackInadequate: Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.
Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation & /or reflection. Descriptive. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
0 – 19
Little or Nothing of merit
Nothing of merit: Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: No evidence of research. No use made of recommended reading. Sources are irrelevant & of poor quality. No or little attempt to use the recommended Harvard referencing system. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.
Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback

Individual Essay Marking and Feedback Sheet

Assignment Title :
Date :
Module Title :
Module Code :
Name :
ID Number :

Please refer to Grading Criteria for Essay when awarding marks (upon 100). Key in the weightage (X%) for each criteria and the detailed tasks and expectations (link to MLO).

Grading CriteriaMLO100mX%Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & structure: Follows logical structure with good flow; meet the format requirements outlined in the instruction, articulate and fluent academic writing.
/100/5
C2. Intellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing Use a minimum of 8 sources; in-text citations done properly and use Harvard referencing style.
/100/10
C3. Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ Calculations Perform full and rich content including problem, include one theory, background evidence of research and findings with specific examples; demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues
/100/20
C4. Breadth / Depth / Integration of Literature Articulate appropriate and relevant data; clear tables and charts with accurate data to support findings
/100/30

C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection Express a strong, focused argument, well supported by impressive analysis and evidence, provide relevant and achievable recommendations; represents well critical thinking skills
/100/25
C6. Reflections (Self) Reflects the skills gained from the course and suggestion on how to use the knowledge learned in future
/100/10
Total (Assessor)/100
Total (Peer Reviewer/Moderator)/100


UH Internal Moderator Comments
External Examiner Comments (if applicable)

Order Now

Get expert help for Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds Assignment and many more. Best service in Australia. Online Order Now!

No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (June 7, 2023) ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/.
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - June 7, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
Universal Assignment June 18, 2022 ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.., viewed June 7, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/>
Universal Assignment - ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. [Internet]. [Accessed June 7, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 7, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/. [Accessed: June 7, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management

School of Economics, Finance and Marketing Master of Finance BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management ASSESSMENT TASK 3 – INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Semester 1 – 2021 Marks Due Date Submission Instructions Objective In this assignment, you are required to apply techniques and concepts acquired in this course to analyse and provide

Read More »

MMP742 – Investment Valuation

MMP742 – Investment Valuation Trimester 1, 2021 Assessment Task 2 DUE DATE AND TIME:                        Week 10, 17/05/2021, 8PM (AEST) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:        25% WORD COUNT:                                   2,500 words Learning Outcome Details Unit Learning Outcome (ULO) Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO) ULO 1: Collect, evaluate and interpret market data relevant to property

Read More »

Initial Instructions: Research Report

General Information For this assignment, the class will participate in a simple research project which you will write up as a research report with the following sections: Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion and References. In order to successfully complete this assignment, you will need to I encourage you to work

Read More »

LST3LPC Policy Proposal

Due: Tuesday October 26 (11:59pm) Size: 1500 words Worth: 40% Submission: Turnitin Description Students are required to produce a policy proposal, including the discussion of a social issue, policy options and recommendations. To support students to complete this task comprehensively and in accordance with expectations for policy proposals produced outside

Read More »

HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing

Assessment 2: Literature Review- Evidence-Based Practice HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing CHCPOL003 Research and apply evidence to practice Instructions for Student Instructions Select one of the topics below and undertake a literature review using evidence-based Practice (EBP).   Topics The impacts of effective hand hygiene practices in nursing.Improvements in nursing interventions

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation Assessment Type Narrated Presentation of an Educational Resource Description: Teaching and Learning Outline.  In this assessment item you are required to: 1. Topic is: Blood Glucose level management and subcutaneous insulin application for patients with type 2 diabetes. 2. Conceptualise an educational resource that will

Read More »

FOOD PANDA Case Study

FOOD PANDA Question 2 – Delivery performance measure Delivery Performance is the level at which an organization’s provision of products and services meets the criteria anticipated by its consumers. To achieve maximum client happiness, service providers must focus on quality. The top 2 approaches performance measure to evaluate their food

Read More »

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021 Instructions: Please save this document onto your computer. Type your answers into the document, saving the document as you go – you don’t want to lose any answers! Once complete, upload the final document via the Turnitin Exam Submission Link on the Blackboard site

Read More »

Hospitality Services Management

Hospitality Services Management Group members: each doing 7 marks worth Chloe Kate Tori Gideon Assessment 2 Group Task – (using a Wiki) A Group Task, using a Wiki, to create a new service organisation Related Topics: 3, 4, 5 & 6. You have been assigned to a group drawn from

Read More »

Development and Construction – Assignment 3

Development and Construction – Assignment 3 Marking Guide This is a guide to help you with the structuring of your report and highlighting what specific information should be included in your report. You should use information from your previous assignments, including designs and the feasibility study, as the basis for

Read More »

Case Analysis Sarita

Sarita due Sunday 12 September 2021 2500 words ± 10% You will be marked against the criteria in the marking rubric for Case analysis. Theme  5 Stress response in health and illness and theme 6 Immunology concepts Weighting: 50% referenced using APA style. • ll written assessments are to be

Read More »

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay Topic Healthcare professionals have an ethical responsibility to always advocate for the introduction of new treatments and technologies into healthcare. Instructions In relation to your selected topic: • Consider the application of the bioethical principles. • Consider the application of ethical theories and other ethical concepts.

Read More »

Healthcare Ethics Argumentative essay

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION   Assessment Title   Argumentative essay     Purpose The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based around the four bio-ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Students will use their chosen topic to develop a sound ethical

Read More »

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection Reflection (Total of 30 marks) – Due 31st October 2021 Reflect on the desirable qualities of counselling and how these qualities shape your approach and values to counselling and/or developing a therapeutic professional relationship. Reflect on your PART A reflection and consider

Read More »

Critical Reflection scenario-based essay

Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to deepen student’s understanding of the characteristics of leadership styles and the dynamic relationship of leadership with workplace communication and culture. Aim: This assessment provides the student the opportunity to apply and evaluate leadership styles in a scenario involving making changes to improve workplace

Read More »

MBA621 Healthcare Systems

Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MBA621 Subject Name: Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: Case Study Slide Deck Individual PowerPoint presentation slides with notes 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) 20 slides with 100 words per slide Weighting: 35% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Weeks 7 Your task Develop

Read More »

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference, Project 2023                    (total: 40 points) Conditional Generation with Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks Overview In this project, you will work with Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). You will build and train conditional versions of these models to generate MNIST digits given

Read More »

Surveying Plan Assignment Help

Submission Component and Marks Awarded Marks   PLAN:     Find Scale of plan and explain 4   9 Bearing and Distances of three lines 3 Plan Presentation 2 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT     Deflection Angles 4   18 Curve Elements 4 Chainages along the Road 10 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT:    

Read More »

NURBN3034 Assessment Task

NURBN3034 Assessment Task 1a Global Health Issues Group ePoster Presentation Weighting: 30% Due date: Thursday August 18th 13.59pm each group Purpose: The purpose of this learning task is to choose one of the following global health issues that under the right conditions has or is likely to have a significant

Read More »

ISYS3375 Business Analytics

School of Business, IT and Logistics — ISYS3375 Business Analytics Assessment 2: Case Study Assessment Type: Individual report                                               Word limit: 2000-3000 (+/– 10%) Each Table or Figure is counted as Due date: Sunday of Week 5 23:59 (Melbourne time) Weighting: 35% 50 words + the number of words in its

Read More »

NURBN3032 Task 2: Managing a Transition to Practice Issue

NURBN3032 Task 2: Managing a Transition to Practice Issue Weight: 60% Due: Thursday 18th May (Week 11) In this task, students are required to demonstrate knowledge relating to understanding and addressing a transitional issue that can affect new graduate nurses. Using evidence from current scholarly literature (i.e., less than seven

Read More »

ATS2561 Sex and the Media

Assessment Guide – Research Essay Due: Friday Week 12, submit on Moodle Weighting: 40% Length: 2000 words Write an essay responding to one of the following questions/topics: ‘objectifying’ images might be different, or that they should be understood as the same, for men and women. Your argument should address why

Read More »

ITC597 Digital Forensics

ITC597 Digital Forensics – SAMPLE EXAM ONLY This paper is for Distance Education (Distance), Port Macquarie, Study Centre Sydney and Study Centre Melbourne students. EXAM CONDITIONS: NO REFERENCE MATERIALS PERMITTED No calculator is permitted No dictionary permitted WRITING TIME:                     2 hours plus 10 minutes reading time Writing is permitted during

Read More »

Simulation Project- Computer Lab Project

Model and analyse the communication tower at the Casuarina campus. Apply dead, live and wind load as per in AS 1170 or other relevant standards in SAP2000. You should measure size of the elements as far as you can from or make reasonable assumptions about the dimensions. Reasonable assumptions should

Read More »

COM621 UX Strategy

Solent University Coursework Assessment Submission Module Name:    UX Strategy Module Code:    COM621 Module Leader: Assessment Submission Date: Student Number: UX Strategy Contents Part 1 – Introduction to System (1K words) 2 1.0 Introduction. 2 1.1       Current SUAA UX Design and Business Model 2 1.2       Academic and Market Research. 3 1.3      

Read More »

MIT302 Internet of Things

Group Presentation and Video (part 2) Unit:             MIT302 Internet of Things Due Date:       09/06/2023 Total Marks:    This assessment is worth 10% of the full marks in the unit. Instructions: 1.        Students are required to cover all stated requirements. 3.        Please save the document as: MIT302_Firstname_Surname_StudentNumber[assessment1].ppt Requirements: Write a PowerPoint of

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?