ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

SemesterApril 2021Module CodeACC4304
Module TitleAuditing
Coursework StructureEssay (1,800 words)Assignment Weighting40%
Assignment TitleCritically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.
Coursework Submission DeadlineDate: Week 13 of April 2021 Session Time: 5pm
Method: SafeAssign via Blackboard
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
Evaluate the purpose of auditing and the auditor
Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
Examine current techniques and issues in auditing
General Coursework Rules
Written Assignment must be submitted online through SafeAssign (or other plagiarism checker) via Blackboard for originality check. Oral Presentation must be recorded and securely uploaded to YouTube (or other online video platform) for moderation purpose. The private link to video must be given to the lecturer during submission. Assignment submitted after the deadline will be subject to a penalty. Please refer to the guidelines on Coursework Submission that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook. Suspected academic misconduct will be handled according to the Policies and Procedures for Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook.
Assignment Brief

External auditors play a crucial role in bridging the principal and the agent’s interest by executing their role in providing an audit opinion on the financial statement. However, recent accounting scandals in Malaysia raise concerns about external audit quality and their role in detecting financial statement frauds (Aghghaleh, Mohamed, and Rahmat, 2016)

Reference:

 Aghghaleh, S., Mohamed, Z., & Rahmat. M. (2016) ‘Detecting financial statement frauds in Malaysia : Comparing the abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models’. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance. 7 pp.57–65. [Online] Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/11847 [Assessed: 16 February 2021]



Required:

Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

Other Specific Instructions for this Assignment

None

Student Support and Guidance
For further help, contact your module leader/lecturer during consultation hours or by email. Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work. Make full use of Library search to identify relevant academic material and find links to other Information Databases and the Information Management contact details. For HBS students, you may go to CASE website www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/ for more student support and guidance.
Marking Criteria and Feedback
Performance will be assessed using UH Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme. These two documents are attached to this assignment brief. Feedback will typically be given within 4 weeks from the submission deadline in a written/typed/verbal form.

UGGrading Criteria for HBS Coursework(Essay)

ESSAYPresentation & structureIntellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard ReferencingContent/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ CalculationsBreadth / Depth / Integration of LiteratureDiscussion/Analysis/Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
90-100
Outstanding
Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style No grammatical / spelling errors.Outstanding selection of quality sources, well beyond core & recommended resources. Outstandingstandard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Outstanding exploration of topic showing outstanding knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate content.Outstanding business insight & application. Outstanding integration of literature/data into work. Very impressive breadth and depth.Outstanding level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Highly developed/ focused work.
80-89
Excellent
Excellent presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only minor errors.Excellent selection ofquality sources. Evidence of independent searching beyond core & recommended resources. Excellent standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Excellent level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Evidence of appropriate reading. Covers all relevant points & issues.Excellent business insight & application. Excellent integration of literature/data into work. Impressive breadth and depth.Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Clearly developed points all of which are relevant to the topic.
70-79
Very Good
Very good presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.Very good selection of mostly quality sources beyond the recommended resources. Few irrelevant/poor quality sources used. Very good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Very good level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Covers most relevant points & issues. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations.Very good business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates very good breadth and depth of understanding.Very good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. A few less relevant ideas/points or would benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.
60-69
Good
Good presentation & essay structure with effective paragraphing. Writing is mainly good with some flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom impede understandingGood selection of quality sources but some irrelevant/poor quality sources used beyond the recommended reading. Good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Good grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented. Good knowledge & understanding is demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions in content/ calculations.Good business insight & application. Literature /data is integrated in a way that demonstrates good breadth and depth of understanding.Good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
50-59
Clear Pass
Clear presentation and sound essay structure with paragraphing that is effective for the most part. Writing is mainly clear, but errors may slightly impede understandingSome quality sources used to clear effect, but some may be inappropriate. Limited attempt to go beyond recommended reading. Harvard referencing system is mostly consistently, though there may be minor inaccuracies.Sound grasp of the main topic with clear knowledge and understanding of main issues demonstrated. There may be some errors/omissions in content/calculationsSound business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates clear understanding.Sound level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some irrelevant points and more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
40-49
Marginal Pass
Satisfactory: Basic essay structure. Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors which impede understanding. See CASE/T&L with feedbackSatisfactory: Some quality sources used. Research did not go beyond the recommended sources. Satisfactory referencing within text & some inconsistent use of Harvard referencing system. See CASE/ T&L with feedbackSatisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses most of the task. Some errors / omissions in content/ calculations. May benefit from further research.Satisfactory business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
Satisfactory: Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some points superficially made so need further development. See CASE/T&L with feedback
30-39
Marginal Fail
Weak essay format. Limited or poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors.
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
Weak: Limited evidence of appropriate research. Some use made of recommended reading, but the majority of sources are irrelevant/of poor quality. Weak use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackWeak: Limited content / knowledge/ calculations. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Weak: Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight Work needs to show better links between practical application & theory.
Weak: Limited evidence of discussion/ analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
20 – 29
Clear Fail
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing / signposting. Inappropriate writing style Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackInadequate: Little evidence of appropriate research. Few quality sources used from recommended reading. Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackInadequate: Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.
Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation & /or reflection. Descriptive. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
0 – 19
Little or Nothing of merit
Nothing of merit: Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: No evidence of research. No use made of recommended reading. Sources are irrelevant & of poor quality. No or little attempt to use the recommended Harvard referencing system. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.
Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback

Individual Essay Marking and Feedback Sheet

Assignment Title :
Date :
Module Title :
Module Code :
Name :
ID Number :

Please refer to Grading Criteria for Essay when awarding marks (upon 100). Key in the weightage (X%) for each criteria and the detailed tasks and expectations (link to MLO).

Grading CriteriaMLO100mX%Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & structure: Follows logical structure with good flow; meet the format requirements outlined in the instruction, articulate and fluent academic writing.
/100/5
C2. Intellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing Use a minimum of 8 sources; in-text citations done properly and use Harvard referencing style.
/100/10
C3. Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ Calculations Perform full and rich content including problem, include one theory, background evidence of research and findings with specific examples; demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues
/100/20
C4. Breadth / Depth / Integration of Literature Articulate appropriate and relevant data; clear tables and charts with accurate data to support findings
/100/30

C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection Express a strong, focused argument, well supported by impressive analysis and evidence, provide relevant and achievable recommendations; represents well critical thinking skills
/100/25
C6. Reflections (Self) Reflects the skills gained from the course and suggestion on how to use the knowledge learned in future
/100/10
Total (Assessor)/100
Total (Peer Reviewer/Moderator)/100


UH Internal Moderator Comments
External Examiner Comments (if applicable)

Order Now

Get expert help for Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds Assignment and many more. Best service in Australia. Online Order Now!

No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (February 1, 2023) ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/.
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - February 1, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
Universal Assignment June 18, 2022 ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.., viewed February 1, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/>
Universal Assignment - ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. [Internet]. [Accessed February 1, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 1, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/. [Accessed: February 1, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Question 10 – REPORTS

Complete the table below, by listing three types of financial reports that are produced in your workplace. Type of Report Content of Report Frequently of Report                  

Read More »

Question 9 – BUSINESS RECORDS

Work through the following table and indicate whether each record should be kept or destroyed. Detail the reason for your answer and how long the record should be kept (for example, legislation requirement – retain for five years). Record Keep – Yes or No Reasons Suppliers Invoices     Employee

Read More »

Question 6 – BUSINESS ACTIVITY STATEMENT

Using the following information, complete the Business Activity Statement, you may need to refer to the ATO website to help you complete. Download and complete the Business Activity Statement (BAS). It can be found separately on the course page.

Read More »

Question No 5 – BREAKEVEN ANALYSIS & MOVING

AVERAGE Activity 5.1 – Break-even Answers A. B.   Manage 8 Buildings Manage 10 Buildings Manage 15 Buildings Manage 20 Buildings Manage 25 Buildings Income           Less Variable Costs           Less Fixed Costs           Total Cost    

Read More »

Question 3 – Depreciation

You are the Licensee-In-Charge of Hope & Murphy Real Estate and wish to purchase computers for your new office in the CBD. Using the information below: Office fit out                      $120,000 Assets effective Life          4 years Purchase Date                  1st July STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD CALCULATION Years 1 to 4 – JOURNAL ENTRIES DEPRECIATION                                               

Read More »

Question 1 – PROFIT & LOSS AND BALANCE SHEET

Please note: Editing has been restricted in this document. From the information provided below, complete the following table: Account Name Classification Profit & Loss or Balance Sheet Amount Pay Superannuation Expense Profit & Loss $117,325 Pay Mobile Phone     $7,500 Pay Office Rent     $65,000 Land & Buildings

Read More »

Case Study – WORLDUCATION

Worlducation is a social startup that manufactures tablet computers for primary school students. They not only focus on the hardware, but they also have a competitive team creating software, content and activities to better engage and educate the students. Worlducation aims to change the way children learn at school by

Read More »

BSBOPS505 Manage Organisational Customer Service

BSBOPS505 MANAGE ORGANISATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE STUDENTASSESSMENT TASKS QIBA Pty Ltd | CRICOS Provider Code: 01515J | RTO Code: 5304 | ABN: 35 071 667 108  Student Assessment TasksBSBOPS505 Manage Organisational Customer Service     BSBOPS505 Contents Introduction  4 Assessment Task 1: Knowledge questions  5 Assessment Task 1: Checklist 9 Assessment Task 2:

Read More »

BSBOPS505 MANAGE ORGANISATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE

BSBOPS505 MANAGE ORGANISATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE STUDENT VERSION PROJECT PORTFOLIO Contents Student declaration. 3 Section 1: Establish customer service requirements. 4 Section 2: Deliver quality customer service. 9 Section 3: Monitor and assess customer service. 13 STUDENT PROJECT PORTFOLIO COVER SHEET Student declaration This declaration must be completed in full by

Read More »

GBL Final Take Home Exam

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was meant to be a ground-breaking new agreement by placing 12 economies under a common set of economic norms and regulations. After the US withdrew from the TPP, the remaining 11 signatories continued talks and which led to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans Pacific

Read More »

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT 3

You will be creating a Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments and pharmacological interventions. This is designed to assist in the development of theoretical and clinical skills in mental health, with a direct connection to your clinical practice as a registered student nurse. The evidence record provides you with the opportunity to showcase your learning

Read More »

NRSG375 Clinical Leadership

Assessment Task 3: Written assignment (45%) Discuss and analyse in more detail 2 of the discussion posts that you submitted for assessment task (AT) 2 and use contemporary literature for support. For the 2 posts that you choose, you are to discuss and analyse professional leadership in nursing in further

Read More »

Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT 3 You will be creating a Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments and pharmacological interventions. This is designed to assist in the development of theoretical and clinical skills in mental health, with a direct connection to your clinical practice as a registered student nurse. The evidence record provides you with the opportunity to

Read More »

The aetiology of mrs simpsons pain Assignment Help

Length: 1800 words Group Assessment: No Submission method options: EASTS (online) TASK back to top This assessment task requires you to analyse the case study provided below.  In the case study,  a patient is experiencing a range of health challenges. You are required to read the case study carefully and complete the following

Read More »

The Dangers of a Single Story Assignment Help

Narrative Essay Instructions Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s TED Talk titled “The Dangers of a Single Story” recounts instances where one perspective can lead to assumptions, conclusions, and/or decisions that may incomplete or lead to misunderstandings (e.g., think about the story of Fide or how Adichie’s roommate was shocked to learn how

Read More »

LAW1101 21F – Fundamentals of Law

LAW1101 21F – Fundamentals of Law Assignment 1:  Legislative interpretation Due date: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 at 3:00pm Instructions: You are to read two excerpts from legislation and then answer questions about each of them.  The questions are weighted differently and the marks for each question are included.  There are

Read More »

A Work Based Quality Improvement Project

Project Title: Impact of educational intervention on nurses knowledge of hand hygiene in aged care setting: A Work Based Quality Improvement Project Executive Summary: (100- 150 words) Background: Hand hygiene is one of the most important strategies for preventing infections in healthcare settings and healthcare-associated infections, which affect hundreds of

Read More »

Community Health and Development

Part A :  Assessment event 3(a) details Assessment Task 3(a): Apply a problem-solving approach to a social issue in your local community by using the Community Health and Development (2017b) 10-point process. Word count: 2000 Weighting: 35% It is recommended that you: Criteria Fail <17.5 Pass 18- Credit 20 – 22 Distinction 23– 25 High Distinction 

Read More »

RE-AWAKENING HEALTH SYSTEMS

In this assignment, you are asked to pick ONE of the following case studies and answer a series of questions about the particular health situation that is described. In each case study, you are asked to examine the significance of the issue for Australia, explore the condition from a very broad policy

Read More »

FINAL EXAM – SPRING SESSION Building Law

FINAL EXAM – SPRING SESSION 2021 School of Law EXAM INSTRUCTIONS Read all the information below and follow any instructions carefully before proceeding. Clearly indicate which question you are answering.   UNIT NAME: Building Law UNIT NUMBER: 200292 NUMBER OF QUESTIONS: 4 VALUE OF QUESTIONS: Question 1 (10 marks) Question

Read More »

MGMT8055 Brief Case Writeup Bauing Construction Holding Group

Why do you think Bauing Indonesia was so successful? Suggestions government, cost, and competitive Main proof-points The first factor behind this decision was increasing competition in the building and decoration industry in China. In 2016, most public companies in this industry in China experienced decreasing gross margins due to increased

Read More »

MGMT8055 Case Writeup Xiaomi

After recognising numerous global opportunities, Xiaomi in Beijing charted its overseas market strategy in 2013. However, opportunities came with challenges, and during the internationalization process, Xiaomi encountered many problems. After three years of hard work, Xiaomi had gained more experience than profits. Compared with Xiaomi’s domestic success, Xiaomi’s internationalization strategy

Read More »

LNG11120 Developing Intercultural Competence in the Workplace

Edinburgh Napier University Academic Year 2021-22 Trimester 1 Assessment Brief 1.  Module number   LNG11120 2.  Module title   Developing Intercultural Competence in the Workplace 3.  Module leader   4.  Assessment Coursework 1: Group report – an ‘intercultural training’ plan (see Section 10 below for more details) 5.  Weighting  

Read More »

Knowledge, Individual, and Society

Essay 1 Assignment To be submitted via Turnitin on LMS. Assignment: Write a 1,200 word (not including references or footnotes) essay answering ONE of the following questions: 1) What is the Gettier problem and can we solve it? Address this question by carefully explaining and evaluating 1-2 responses to the

Read More »

9014 NPD New Product Design

Summary In the 2000-word written report, students are required to develop some specific aspects of the initial three phases of a new product (service or idea) development process. Students are expected to apply the relevant design thinking tools and ideas in this assessment. Referencing is Australian Harvard (AGPS) and outlined

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?