ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

SemesterApril 2021Module CodeACC4304
Module TitleAuditing
Coursework StructureEssay (1,800 words)Assignment Weighting40%
Assignment TitleCritically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.
Coursework Submission DeadlineDate: Week 13 of April 2021 Session Time: 5pm
Method: SafeAssign via Blackboard
Assessment Criteria
Learning Outcomes: Knowledge and Understanding tested in this assignment:
Evaluate the purpose of auditing and the auditor
Learning Outcomes: Skills and Attributes tested in this assignment:
Examine current techniques and issues in auditing
General Coursework Rules
Written Assignment must be submitted online through SafeAssign (or other plagiarism checker) via Blackboard for originality check. Oral Presentation must be recorded and securely uploaded to YouTube (or other online video platform) for moderation purpose. The private link to video must be given to the lecturer during submission. Assignment submitted after the deadline will be subject to a penalty. Please refer to the guidelines on Coursework Submission that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook. Suspected academic misconduct will be handled according to the Policies and Procedures for Academic Dishonesty and Misconduct that can be found in the INTI-UH Student Guidebook.
Assignment Brief

External auditors play a crucial role in bridging the principal and the agent’s interest by executing their role in providing an audit opinion on the financial statement. However, recent accounting scandals in Malaysia raise concerns about external audit quality and their role in detecting financial statement frauds (Aghghaleh, Mohamed, and Rahmat, 2016)

Reference:

 Aghghaleh, S., Mohamed, Z., & Rahmat. M. (2016) ‘Detecting financial statement frauds in Malaysia : Comparing the abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models’. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance. 7 pp.57–65. [Online] Available at: https://ejournal.ukm.my/ajac/article/view/11847 [Assessed: 16 February 2021]



Required:

Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.

Other Specific Instructions for this Assignment

None

Student Support and Guidance
For further help, contact your module leader/lecturer during consultation hours or by email. Use the Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme to help improve your work. Make full use of Library search to identify relevant academic material and find links to other Information Databases and the Information Management contact details. For HBS students, you may go to CASE website www.studynet.herts.ac.uk/go/CASE/ for more student support and guidance.
Marking Criteria and Feedback
Performance will be assessed using UH Grading Criteria and Mark Scheme. These two documents are attached to this assignment brief. Feedback will typically be given within 4 weeks from the submission deadline in a written/typed/verbal form.

UGGrading Criteria for HBS Coursework(Essay)

ESSAYPresentation & structureIntellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard ReferencingContent/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ CalculationsBreadth / Depth / Integration of LiteratureDiscussion/Analysis/Critical evaluation &/or Reflection
90-100
Outstanding
Outstanding presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style No grammatical / spelling errors.Outstanding selection of quality sources, well beyond core & recommended resources. Outstandingstandard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Outstanding exploration of topic showing outstanding knowledge & understanding through thorough & appropriate research. Impressive choice and range of appropriate content.Outstanding business insight & application. Outstanding integration of literature/data into work. Very impressive breadth and depth.Outstanding level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Highly developed/ focused work.
80-89
Excellent
Excellent presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Articulate & fluent academic writing style. Only minor errors.Excellent selection ofquality sources. Evidence of independent searching beyond core & recommended resources. Excellent standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Excellent level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Evidence of appropriate reading. Covers all relevant points & issues.Excellent business insight & application. Excellent integration of literature/data into work. Impressive breadth and depth.Excellent level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. Clearly developed points all of which are relevant to the topic.
70-79
Very Good
Very good presentation & essay structure, with flowing paragraphs. Fluent academic writing style. Very few grammatical errors & spelling mistakes.Very good selection of mostly quality sources beyond the recommended resources. Few irrelevant/poor quality sources used. Very good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Very good level of knowledge & understanding demonstrated. Covers most relevant points & issues. Few errors / omissions in content/calculations.Very good business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates very good breadth and depth of understanding.Very good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. A few less relevant ideas/points or would benefit from further development &/or evaluation/comparison.
60-69
Good
Good presentation & essay structure with effective paragraphing. Writing is mainly good with some flow and spelling/grammar errors seldom impede understandingGood selection of quality sources but some irrelevant/poor quality sources used beyond the recommended reading. Good standard of referencing within text & consistent use of Harvard referencing system. Accuracy of in-text references & full details shown in Reference list.Good grasp of the topic & some of its implications presented. Good knowledge & understanding is demonstrated. Minor errors / omissions in content/ calculations.Good business insight & application. Literature /data is integrated in a way that demonstrates good breadth and depth of understanding.Good level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
50-59
Clear Pass
Clear presentation and sound essay structure with paragraphing that is effective for the most part. Writing is mainly clear, but errors may slightly impede understandingSome quality sources used to clear effect, but some may be inappropriate. Limited attempt to go beyond recommended reading. Harvard referencing system is mostly consistently, though there may be minor inaccuracies.Sound grasp of the main topic with clear knowledge and understanding of main issues demonstrated. There may be some errors/omissions in content/calculationsSound business insight & application. Literature/data is integrated in a way that demonstrates clear understanding.Sound level of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some irrelevant points and more ideas/points could be addressed /developed further.
40-49
Marginal Pass
Satisfactory: Basic essay structure. Not always written clearly & has grammatical & / or spelling errors which impede understanding. See CASE/T&L with feedbackSatisfactory: Some quality sources used. Research did not go beyond the recommended sources. Satisfactory referencing within text & some inconsistent use of Harvard referencing system. See CASE/ T&L with feedbackSatisfactory content / level of knowledge of the topic. Addresses most of the task. Some errors / omissions in content/ calculations. May benefit from further research.Satisfactory business insight & application. Limited integration with literature/ data. Use of literature/data but limited in breadth OR depth.
Satisfactory: Basic evidence of discussion/analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection but some points superficially made so need further development. See CASE/T&L with feedback
30-39
Marginal Fail
Weak essay format. Limited or poor structure. Muddled work with many spelling & / or grammatical errors.
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
Weak: Limited evidence of appropriate research. Some use made of recommended reading, but the majority of sources are irrelevant/of poor quality. Weak use of Harvard referencing system with errors & inconsistently applied. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackWeak: Limited content / knowledge/ calculations. Limited or muddled understanding of the topic/question. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Weak: Unsatisfactory evidence of business application & insight Work needs to show better links between practical application & theory.
Weak: Limited evidence of discussion/ analysis/ critical evaluation &/or reflection. More development & comment needed. May need to do more than describe. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
20 – 29
Clear Fail
Inadequate essay format & poor paragraphing / signposting. Inappropriate writing style Poorly written &/or poor spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackInadequate: Little evidence of appropriate research. Few quality sources used from recommended reading. Inadequate use of Harvard referencing with many errors &/or inconsistencies. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackInadequate: Lacking in relevant content/ knowledge/calculations. Content irrelevant / inaccurate. Does not meet all the learning outcomes.Inadequate: Lacks evidence of business application & insight. Some literature irrelevant to topic.
Inadequate: Lacking / inadequate level of discussion/ analysis/critical evaluation & /or reflection. Descriptive. Must see CASE/T&L with feedback
0 – 19
Little or Nothing of merit
Nothing of merit: Poorly written work, lacking structure, paragraphing / signposting. Many inaccuracies in spelling & grammar. Must see CASE/T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: No evidence of research. No use made of recommended reading. Sources are irrelevant & of poor quality. No or little attempt to use the recommended Harvard referencing system. Must see CASE/ T&L with feedbackNothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of knowledge demonstrated. Content used irrelevant / not appropriate/ to the topic. Does not meet the learning outcomes.Nothing of merit: No evidence of appropriate business application & insight.
Nothing of merit: Unsatisfactory level of discussion/analysis/critical evaluation &/or reflection
Must see CASE/T&L with feedback

Individual Essay Marking and Feedback Sheet

Assignment Title :
Date :
Module Title :
Module Code :
Name :
ID Number :

Please refer to Grading Criteria for Essay when awarding marks (upon 100). Key in the weightage (X%) for each criteria and the detailed tasks and expectations (link to MLO).

Grading CriteriaMLO100mX%Comments / Feedback / Feed Forward
C1. Presentation & structure: Follows logical structure with good flow; meet the format requirements outlined in the instruction, articulate and fluent academic writing.
/100/5
C2. Intellectual curiosity (Quality of academic sources). Use & presentation of Harvard Referencing Use a minimum of 8 sources; in-text citations done properly and use Harvard referencing style.
/100/10
C3. Content/ Terms/ Findings/ Definitions/ Calculations Perform full and rich content including problem, include one theory, background evidence of research and findings with specific examples; demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues
/100/20
C4. Breadth / Depth / Integration of Literature Articulate appropriate and relevant data; clear tables and charts with accurate data to support findings
/100/30

C5. Discussion /Analysis /Critical evaluation &/or Reflection Express a strong, focused argument, well supported by impressive analysis and evidence, provide relevant and achievable recommendations; represents well critical thinking skills
/100/25
C6. Reflections (Self) Reflects the skills gained from the course and suggestion on how to use the knowledge learned in future
/100/10
Total (Assessor)/100
Total (Peer Reviewer/Moderator)/100


UH Internal Moderator Comments
External Examiner Comments (if applicable)

Order Now

Get expert help for Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds Assignment and many more. Best service in Australia. Online Order Now!

No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (December 1, 2023) ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/.
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - December 1, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
Universal Assignment June 18, 2022 ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.., viewed December 1, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/>
Universal Assignment - ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.. [Internet]. [Accessed December 1, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 1, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/
"ACC4304 Critically evaluate the auditors’ role in detecting financial statement frauds.." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/acc4304/. [Accessed: December 1, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Categories

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea

Write 2 articles 1st Topic: 5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea 2nd topic: Korean language: various tips and resources to learn Deadline: 10th October 2023 12:00 AM Instructions: Article Structure is given below Meta Description: First, you will start with a meta description of your article in

Read More »

2002HSV Human Services Research

Assessment 2: Written research proposal Worth 45% of final grade Complete your answers in this assignment template Name: xxxxxxx Student ID: xxxxxxx Title: xxxxxxx Exact word count (exc. cover sheets and reference list; max. 2,000 words): x,xxx Please specify the research methodology are you proposing to use: ☐ Quantitative                                    ☐

Read More »

COIT29226 Introduction to IoT

Assessment item 3 – Project Due date: Week 12 (8 October 2023) 11:55 pm AEST Weighting: Length: Submission: 50% There is no word limit for this report Group work (submit via Moodle) Objectives This assessment item relates to the following unit learning outcomes: Learning Outcomes Assessed: Enabling objectives What do

Read More »

BUSM1008 Assessment 2 Brief Spring 2023

Assessment 2: Individual Report (20%) and Presentation (20%) Background You are appointed as a business consultant, recruited by the company allocated to you in week 6 by your tutor.  Your role is to undertake research on the company, the allocated topic and an issue identified in the media in relation to your company and

Read More »

ECON1020 PRINCIPLES OF ECONOMICS

INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Total Marks 100 | Weighting 25% DUE: 29/09/2023, 11:55pm IMPORTANT INFORMATION: READ BEFORE YOU START SUBMISSION 11.55 pm. A 1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical concern. DOCUMENT PREPARATION REFERENCING UNACCEPTABLE ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES MARKING Question 1 | [12 marks] Download the spreadsheet data that

Read More »

ENTERPRISE LAW LAWS1001

Assessment task 3 Individual Case Study This task is the result of your individual effort, so students must not discuss their work with anyone else, otherwise it may lead to an allegation of collusion. Weight: 15% Due: Before 5 pm on Wednesday 27th September. Late submissions will incur a penalty

Read More »

International Business INBU01-7

Module International Business INBU01-7 (NQF LEVEL 7) FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT – ASSIGNMENT C Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023) Exam Date 20 October 2023 Marks 50 Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023)   Total: 20 marks SECTION A (10 MARKS) – PARAGRAPH QUESTION Question 1 (10 marks) Coca-Cola is marking its 70th year in Nigeria

Read More »

Summative Assessment Help

Summative Assessment Brief: Learning Outcomes: LO1: Construct a problem/issue/need identified from practice that impacts on individual outcomes LO2: Formulate a focus-based enquiry on the identified problem/issue/need utilising an area of individual learner interest LO3: Critically evaluate the evidence base to support the proposal of the solution focused initiative LO4: Develop

Read More »

EDU30067 Teaching English

Assignment 2: Folio Template INTRODUCTION:         LESSON 1 Lesson title:   Year level: Topic:   Duration of lesson: Curriculum links: Strands & sub-strands Content descriptions       Students background knowledge: What is your starting point – what do the students already know, what have they done

Read More »

Edge Computing Security and Privacy

Proposal Background Title: Edge Computing Security and Privacy Proposal The new computing paradigm in the Internet of Things domain is known as IoT edge computing which functions by processing calculations at the edge of the network (Alli & Alam, 2020). The current technology aided by cloud and fog computing has created

Read More »

Foundations of Communication Assessment 2 Instructions

Discussion task (Total grade – 10%)   Process Work (Steps to complete the task) Answer on the Assessment 2 Submission Document – Do not upload this instruction document. Requirements (important elements to include) lastname_firstname_studentID_COMS_Assess 2_semester_year. Process for Assessment discussion tasks NOTE: If you do not participate in the class discussions then

Read More »

Assessment Two Dos and Don’ts (Internal)

Do: Read the assessment instructions carefully Read the marking rubric carefully Understand the question – break it down Conduct research – record the reference details Read the topic materials about communication theories, forms and factors and refer to them Contribute to the discussions in class or no marks for the

Read More »

Unpacking the Question: Assessment Two

Studying at university requires you to become familiar with strategies to un-pack or breakdown a variety of assessment questions/tasks throughout your studies.  Task Example of integrating the discussion, research and theories. In the group discussion my group members (name them) stated that an advertisement for a beauty product would most

Read More »

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment 2 (worth 30%) Due date:                  2:00pm (AWST) Friday 15th September 2023 Submission:              Via Turnitin assessment submission link (see ‘Assessment 2’ folder in ‘Assessments’ section of Blackboard). Additional Instructions: Part A (42 marks) Nathan is a well-known chef with years of experience cooking various cuisines. After

Read More »

ACCT5011: Accounting Systems in the Digital Age

Practical Assignment Guide, Semester 2, 2023 Due Date for Submission: Monday 11th September 2023 at 5.00 PM Please note that the Folio Assignment for ACCT5011 Accounting Systems in the Digital Age is an individual assessment task worth 30% of your total marks in the unit. Please refer to the online

Read More »

EC229- Review session

Assume two cities, A and B, that can’t trade between them. Each city produces its own coconuts for its local market. If suddenly trade is possible then: D) As we saw in class, the new price will be somewhere between the original price 𝑃_𝐴,𝑃_𝐵. Hence it is impossible for consumers

Read More »

Computing Theory COSC

Computing Theory COSC 1107/1105 Assignment 1: Fundamentals Assessment Type Individual assignment. Submit online via Canvas → As- signments → Assignment 1. Marks awarded for meeting re- quirements as closely as possible. Clarifications/updates may be made via announcements/relevant discussion forums. Due Date Week 6, Sunday 27th August 2023, 11:59pm Marks 125

Read More »

BE279 Applied Statistics and Forecasting

Strategy, Operations, & Entrepreneurship Group Essex Business School Module Code BE279 Module Title Applied Statistics and Forecasting Assessment Type Individual Report (2,000 word) Academic Year 2022/23, Spring Term Submission Deadline Refer to FASER Task Specific Guidance Please note that: Module Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module, students will

Read More »

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds. Prepared by Sara Hart Date 30th August, 2023 (feel free to leave this date as it is the AT2 due date) Brief description of Learning Design   Chooseit Maker: Create, edit and play personalised learning activities that can be used in your

Read More »

HUMN1041 PEOPLE, PLACE AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE ASSIGNMENT

HUMN1041 PEOPLE, PLACE AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE ASSIGNMENT 1 TEMPLATE This assignment is made up of three (3) parts, plus a reference list and appendix. Marks are allocated for each section, as follows: – 1 mark Please ensure that you provide your answers in this template, and provide a Reference list

Read More »

Model 3 Launch in Australia

Client Information Company Name Tesla Contact Name   Email   Phone Number   Address Level 14, 15 Blue St. North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia Ad link & image Project Information Project Title Model 3 Launch in Australia Project Description (100 words) Highlight the uniqueness of the car. Show the superior

Read More »

MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience

School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship Assessment Task – Assignment 2  MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience Semester 2, 2023. Assessment Type Analytical Report Associated Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO’s) 2, 3, 4 Group or Individual task Individual Value (%) 25% Due Date Monday 20th September at 10:00 AET – Enterthis

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation Date of Submission- 4TH SEP 2023 25 MARKS COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW Q. You are the new Central Minister for Urban Development who is keen to make major Indian cities as smart cities. You visit different countries like USA, UK, European Countries, Japan and other developed countries

Read More »

Corporate & Financial Due Diligence Report

[Name of the company] Note: Students should keep in mind that application of legal provisions (including Securities Regulations) and analysis of the same is important. Merely putting the facts and figures won’t fetch even a decent mark. Note: Students should only mention the broad area of business. This part should

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – Marking Guidance and FAQs on GTP

Students will be marked on the extent to which they specifically answer the question and provide clear, logical, well-reasoned and sufficient explanations. Here is a summary breakdown of how marks are allocated in this GTP: Part 1 [15 marks] §  Providing relevant observations from the information provided in the articles

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief A.  Context and Overview The Game Theory Presentation (GTP) is worth 30% of the final mark. GTP is a ‘take-home’ exercise with a set of tasks to do. The GTP is based on Lecture Topics: L1 and L2. You will have twenty (21) days

Read More »

Order #35042 Human Rights Research Essay

Draft due 26th Aug 2,500 words (excluding references and bibliography) Instructions: Structure: Title – The Tigray War: A Critical Analysis of What the Future Holds for Human Rights in the Region What can be done to ensure human rights violations will cease and be prosecuted? Expand on different actors and

Read More »

PMC1000: Applied Pathology

Assessment Task Sheet: Poster Presentation Date: Thursday 31st August 2023 | Weighting: 30% Assessment Task 2 You are required to develop a handout style resource (pamphlet or brochure) on a selected pathological condition which is aimed at first year student paramedics. You will need to use high quality peer reviewed

Read More »

Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment Due Date:                   Tuesday 5th September 2023 at 4:00 pm (AWST). Marks:                       30% of the total marks for this unit. Assignment:              The assignment will comprise two questions. Students must answer all parts of both questions. Examinable topics: The cultural immersion exercise and/or

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?