Assignment 2 Consultant’s report on your self-developed case study (fictitious) using Waterfall Project Management Processes.
Weight: 45% of total marks for the course.
Course objectives related to this assessment item:
- Use evidence to justify a chosen project management approach;
- Apply project management tools in accordance with industry practice for the management of projects;
- Create communications of a professional standard to engage stakeholders and justify proposals.
Aim: to justify the use of four Waterfall Project Management tools for application to an appropriate self-developed case study.
Format: a formal, consultant’s report.
Tasks:
- Prepare a formal, written report of 2250 words
- Justify the selection and application of Waterfall project management processes to a case study you develop e.g., Schedule, risk register, communications plan, RACI.
- Provide illustrations of the application of Waterfall PMP tools by providing examples derived from your case study.
- Select and apply a range of references to support your justification of Waterfall PMPO tools.
Remember, your role is to advise the Project owner (for instance) on Project Management Processes, NOT to prepare a project plan.
You outline and explain (including references) the various project management tools that would suit the case study project and perhaps even include an example of how they apply. It will then be up to the Project Board to develop the Project Plan etc. This is not your task as a consultant.
The word count includes the intro, body and conclusion of the report only.
You still need to prepare:
- a Letter of Transmittal,
- Report Title Page,
- Executive Summary,
- List of References and
- Appendices
MGT3203: Assignment 2 Waterfall PMP report
| Criteria | ≥ 85% | 75-84% | 65-74% | 50-64% | < 50% |
| Use evidence to justify the chosen Waterfall Project Management Processes 10 marks | Deeply, integrated understanding of Waterfall PMP elements. Application to case study provides reliable advice to the project team and key stakeholders. | Critical appraisal of evidence explained and value-add in the majority of cases. Well selected and applied references | PMP challenges presented and articulated at a surface level. Selection of relevant references evident. | Identification and resolution relies on restating major themes from PMP and other sources; some evidence of analysis to resolve case study problem. Limited use of references to support findings. | Understanding of Waterfall PMP is limited. Application to the case study does not meet the assignment requirements. Poor selection of, or absence of references |
| Sub total / marks | |||||
| Apply project management tools in accordance with industry practice for the management of projects 40 marks | Demonstrated high-level understanding of Waterfall PMP tools and sound justification of their selection. No errors in application of Waterfall PMP tools. | Good understanding and interpretation of the task and application of Waterfall PMP tools, accurately presented report. | Sufficient understanding and interpretation of tasks. Waterfall PMP tools well selected & explained but missed minor details or inaccuracy may have occurred at points during application. | Rudimentary understanding of the task. Waterfall tools selected and presented accurately in the main but missed vital detail in application to the case study. Minor misidentification of Waterfall features may occur | PowerPoint advice does not align with the stakeholders’ expectations. Waterfall PMP tools are not used as basis of advice. |
| Sub total / mark | |||||
| Create communications of a professional standard to engage stakeholders and justify proposals 50 marks | A well-directed report which will justify to stakeholders an accurate explanation of Waterfall PMP tools to the case study. | Clear and appropriate explanation of Waterfall tools and their application relevant to the case study. | Application of Waterfall tools to case study are sound but suggests conceptual gaps or misunderstanding in some areas of their application. | Occasions of an appropriate report presentation style. Some Identification of the application of Waterfall PMP tools relevant to the case study | Insufficient identification of Waterfall PMP. Application of tools relevant to the case study not evident. |
| Mark / | |||||
| Total / 100 |
Get expert help for MGT3203 Project Management Processes and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
