| Unit title & code | Critical Issues in Tourism and Hospitality (TAL030-3) |
| Assignment number and title | Assignment 2: Poster |
| Assignment type | Poster (WR-PO) |
| Weighting of assignment | 60% |
| Size or length of assessment | 2,500 words (including an annotated LR element) |
| Unit learning outcomes | Synthesise critical issues from various perspectives to evaluate the role of international tourism and hospitality on people, populations and places.Critically analyse contemporary research and newsworthy stories to explain the complex critical alignments between the ‘non-business’ and ‘business’ sides of the tourism and hospitality industries. |
| What am I required to do in this assignment? |
| Task There are TWO parts to this assessment. Part 1: You are to produce an individual creative and well-researched Poster which will explore a selected critical issue in-depth. The critical issue you select must be different to that of your first assessment. The Poster should focus on how your selected critical issue is having an impact on society and how the Tourism or Hospitality sector is helping to mitigate against the impacts of your selected issue. Guidance Select one critical issue which is different from assessment 1Explain the issue clearlyWhy is it a critical issue? What impact is it having on society? On who/what?Can you give any evidence to support the fact that you are focusing on a critical issue?Who are the stakeholders involved?Using a key example / case (e.g. destination, business),explain the interrelationship between the issue and the tourism or hospitality industry and explain what steps are being taken to address the issue and who is taking these stepsevaluate the effectiveness of these steps – how well are the issues you have identified being mitigated? |
| Assess how well the industry (Tourism or Hospitality) is responding as a wholeProvide recommendations to address the issue more effectivelyYou will be given separate advice on how to design your Poster in PowerPoint (this is the recommended format). Part 2: Annotated Literature Review: You are then to select SIX of your most important sources and state why they were important and what contribution they allowed you to make in your Poster. We will discuss in class what this annotated Literature Review might look like (especially during week 8); typically, it can be presented in a tabular format. |
| What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF) |
| In order to pass Assessment 2, you will need to: Propose and critically assess various contemporary issues in tourism and hospitality.Highlight the role of tourism and hospitality sector in mitigating the issue chosen. |
| How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade? |
| In week 1, a general overview of the assignment and requirements will be presented. This will be followed by a more detailed discussion on how you can produce high quality work in this assignment in assessment week 4. Make sure you have downloaded/printed out the Assignment Brief and bring it to the session with you. The outcome of our session will be available on BREO for all students to view. |
| How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions? |
| The unit aims to introduce you to the critical issues confronting tourism and hospitality on a global context i.e. in each session we will discuss an issue critically in order to advance your critical management knowledge and skills. This assignment provides you with the opportunity to apply your critical skills and evaluate one topic in more depth. |
| How will my assignment be marked? | ||||
| Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit. | ||||
| 3rd Class – 40-49% | Lower 2nd – 50-59% | Upper 2nd – 60-69% | 1st Class – 70%+ | |
| 1 Knowledge & Understanding (30%) | Some basic knowledge and understanding of the chosen critical issue in the context of T.H.E., but with major inaccuracies and inconsistencies | Good knowledge and understanding of the chosen critical issue in the context of T.H.E., but with minor inaccuracies and inconsistencies | Very good knowledge and understanding of the chosen critical issue in the context of T.H.E., but limited in depth | Excellent and comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the chosen critical issue in the context of T.H.E. |
| 2 Interpretation & Evaluation (30%) | Some basic ability to synthesize different perspectives, but lacks evaluation of the role of T.H.E. and analysis of contemporary research to explain the complex interrelationships between the chosen issue and T.H.E. industries Argument lacks consistency, critical thought and appropriate conclusions and recommendations | Good ability to synthesize different perspectives, but limited evaluation of the role of T.H.E. and limited analysis of contemporary research to explain the complex interrelationships between the chosen issue and T.H.E. industries Attempt to develop a consistent argument, but lacks critical depth Conclusions and recommendations are made, but not supported | Very good ability to synthesize different perspectives and evaluate the role of T.H.E., and to analyse contemporary research to explain complex interrelationships between the chosen issue and T.H.E. industries Evidence to construct a consistent argument (which is not critical throughout) and derive relevant conclusions and recommendations | Excellent ability to synthesize different perspectives and evaluate the role of T.H.E., and to critically analyse contemporary research to explain complex interrelationships between the chosen issue and T.H.E. industries Strong evidence to construct a consistent and critical argument and derive relevant conclusions and recommendations |
| 3 Presentation & Structure (20%) | Basic presentation skills but major inconsistencies in terms of structure and flow that hinder understanding Basic style of writing without using adequate terminology and vocabulary, major spelling and grammatical errors | Good presentation skills, but inconsistencies in terms of structure and flow Good style of writing; however, limited in using appropriate terminology and vocabulary and some minor spelling and grammatical errors | Very good presentation skills, but minor inconsistencies in terms of structure and flow Very good style of writing in terms of terminology and vocabulary, grammar and spelling; however, some minor issues in terms of clarity of writing | Excellent presentation skills evidenced by a clear structure and coherent flow Excellent style of writing in terms of clarity of expressions, terminology and vocabulary, grammar and spelling |
| 4 Relevance and Quality of Sources & Referencing (20%) | (Basic) identification of some sources; however, sources lack relevance and quality and are not used effectively to support ideas Basic referencing following the university’s standard (both in-text and reference list), but with major inconsistencies | Good identification of relevant sources, however, weaknesses in using sources to support arguments effectively Good referencing following the university’s standard (both in-text and reference list), but with some inconsistencies | Very good identification of and use of a range of relevant and quality sources in an effective manner Very good referencing following the university’s standard (both in-text and reference list) to a large extent | Excellent identification and use of a wide range of relevant and high- quality sources that support arguments effectively Excellent referencing following the university’s standard (both in-text and reference list) without any flaws |
Get expert help for Critical Issues in Tourism and Hospitality and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
