MBA621 Healthcare Systems

MBA621 Healthcare Systems

Assessment 2 Information

Subject Code:MBA621
Subject Name:
Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length:Case Study Slide Deck Individual PowerPoint presentation slides with notes 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) 20 slides with 100 words per slide
Weighting:35%
Total Marks: Submission:100 Online
Due Date:Weeks 7

Your task

Develop a PowerPoint Presentation (x 20 slides) with notes (100 words per slide).

Assessment Description

The purpose of this individual assessment is to foster students’ ability to utilise data and a systems- thinking approach to predict the role and influence of preventative strategies and technology on demand for healthcare in the future. Students will debate the ethical issues that can arise in the management of health care systems. They will utilise these skills to develop plans and recommendations to create ways for systems and management challenges to be resolved. In addition, they will make an inventory of resource requirements applicable to a variety of healthcare settings, focusing on vulnerable populations.

Assessment Instructions

This assessment requires students to undertake an analysis of a health service and consider how well it is prepared to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population.

Students may select any specialist health service from within their own state and should be from the health sectors c) OR e) as described below:

  1. Primary Care (e.g. General Practice, Dental Service).
  2. Primary Health Care (e.g. Drug and Alcohol Service, Aboriginal Health Services).
  3. Secondary Care (e.g. Pathology Services, Breast Screening Services).
  4. Tertiary Care (e.g. Public or Private Hospitals).
  5. Quaternary Care (e.g. specialised tertiary care such as neurosurgery, cardiac surgery, plastic surgery, and transplantation).

This analysis should be undertaken using systems thinking approach and should use the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework. The building blocks are:

  • Service Delivery: good service delivery comprises quality, access, safety and coverage.
    • Health Workforce: a well-performing workforce consists of human resources management, skills and policies.
    • Information: a well-performing system ensures the production, analysis, dissemination and use of timely and reliable information.
    • Medical Products, Vaccines and Technologies; procurement and supply programs need to ensure equitable access, assured quality and cost-effective use.
    • Financing: a good health financing system raises adequate funds for health, protects people from financial catastrophe, allocates resources, and purchases good and services in ways that improve quality, equity, and efficiency.
    • Leadership and Governance (Stewardship): effective leadership and governance ensure the existence of strategic policy frameworks, effective oversight and coalition- building, provision of appropriate incentives, and attention to system design and accountability.

It is important that you view the PowerPoint entitled ‘Tools for Systems Thinking’ available in the assessments portal BEFORE you begin your assessment.

The PowerPoint provides an overview of several tools used for undertaking systems thinking approach to analysis. Make sure you read the slides and review all the additional resources supplied.

Your assessment is essentially in two parts:

In part one, you should position your chosen service within the broader Australian heath system by examining its interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships using a systems perspective. You should use at least one (1) systems thinking tool.

In part two, you should analyse your chosen service and its preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework. You should use at least two (2) systems thinking tools.

Assessment Submission

Your assessment submission will be a PowerPoint slide deck made up of:

  • Twenty (20) slides focussing on the assessment requirements providing graphic and /or knowledge content as required.
  • Corresponding notes for each of the 20 slides addressing assessment requirements, to a maximum of 100 words per slide, i.e. 2,000 words maximum.
  • An additional two (2) slides that do not form a part of the word count, one a title slide and the other a slide to accommodate the listing of references.

There is no expectation that students will deliver the presentation.

Late assignment submission penalties

Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School “late assignment submission penalties” policy.

Number of daysPenalty
1* – 9 days5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available
10 – 14 days50% deducted from the total marks available.
After 14 daysAssignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s).
NoteNotwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students

*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty

For more information, please read the full policy

Important Study Information

Academic Integrity Policy

KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.

What is academic integrity and misconduct? What are the penalties for academic misconduct? What are the late penalties?

How can I appeal my grade?

Word Limits for Written Assessments

Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at which that limit is exceeded.

Study Assistance

Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.

MBA621 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric – Case Study Slide Deck 35%

Marking Criteria ( /100)F (Fail) 0 – 49%P (Pass) 50 – 64%C (Credit) 65 – 74%D (Distinction) 75 – 84%HD (High Distinction) 85 -100%
PART 1: The position of the chosen service within the broader Australian heath system is identified.   /10 marksThe chosen service is inadequately described, and its position within the broader Australian heath system is not identified fully.The chosen service is described, and its position within the broader Australian heath system is identified.The chosen service is described, and its position within the broader Australian heath system is identified and analysed using a systems perspective.The chosen service is described, and its position within the broader Australian heath system is identified and critically analysed using a systems perspective with evidence of theory identification.The chosen service is described, and its position within the broader Australian heath system is identified and critically analysed using a systems perspective with evidence of theory application.
The interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships of the chosen service are identified and analysed.   /10 marksThe chosen service’s interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships are poorly identified.The chosen service’s interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships are identified.The chosen service’s interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships are identified, and basic analysis is performed.The chosen service’s interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships are identified, and higher-order analysis is performed.The chosen service’s interconnectedness, boundaries and relationships are identified, higher-order analysis and critical thinking are performed.
A systems thinking perspective and tools are employed in the analysis of the chosen service.       /10 marksReporting is undertaken with little / no evidence of using a systems perspective and/or system thinking tools.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and one (1) systems thinking tool.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and more than one (1) systems thinking tool.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and more than one (1) systems thinking tool. There is evidence of theory identification to underpin findings.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and two or more systems thinking tools. There is evidence of theory identification and application to underpin findings.
PART 2: The chosen service is analysed regarding its preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population.   /10 marksThe chosen service’ preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population is inadequately described and poorly analysed using a systems perspective.The chosen service’ preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population is described.The chosen service’ preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population is described and analysed using a systems perspective.The chosen service’ preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population is described and critically analysed using a systems perspective with evidence of theory identification.The chosen service’ preparedness to meet the needs of Australia’s ageing population is described and critically analysed using a systems perspective with evidence of theory application.
The chosen service is analysed using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework.       /30 marks – 5 marks eachThe chosen service is not/poorly analysed using the required framework.The chosen service is analysed, to a basic level, using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework.The chosen service is analysed, to a more complex level, using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework.The chosen service is analysed, to a complex level, using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework. Systems thinking and engagement with the theory is evident.The chosen service is analysed, to a highly complex level, using the WHO six building blocks of a health system framework. Systems thinking and engagement with theory and critical thinking is evident.
At least two (2) systems thinking tools are utilised in the building blocks analysis.       /10 marksReporting is undertaken with little/no evidence of utilising system thinking tools.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and two (2) systems thinking tools.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and more than two (2) systems thinking tools.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and more than two (2) systems thinking tools. There is evidence of theory identification to underpin findings.The analysis is undertaken using a systems perspective and three or more systems thinking tools. There is evidence of theory identification and application to underpin findings.
PowerPoint deck adopts a clear and logical structure consistent with KBS guidelines.       /5 marksPoorly organised and difficult to follow and/or does not contain the required components.Addresses criteria, adopts a clear and logical structure consistent with KBS guidelines.Adopts a clear and logical structure, consistent with KBS guidelines and is of a professional standard.Adopts a clear and logical structure, is consistent with KBS guidelines, is of a professional standard, with a logical progression from subsection to subsection, with clear relevance to the intended audience.Adopts a clear and logical structure, is consistent with KBS guidelines, is of a professional standard, with a logical progression from subsection to subsection, with clear relevance to the intended audience. It is error-free and of a standard, that would easily be adopted as a best practice exemplar.
Appropriate theory and research presented.       /5 marksPresents insufficient evidence of research and does not refer to relevant theory.Presents limited evidence of research and refers minimally to theory with some links to the topic.Presents evidence of research and the inclusion of appropriate theory to justify statements and assertions.Presents evidence of sound research and includes a range of appropriate theories to justify statements and assertions.As with distinction, seamlessly integrating research and theoretical frameworks to justify statements and assertions
Professional language, presentation and engagement.       /5 marksThe language used in slides and notes is not of a professional standard, inappropriate for both topic and audience.The presentation is mostly appropriate for the topic and audience, with some issues such as clarity or too much jargon language.The presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience, with little to no issues, offering some engaging content.The presentation is of a high professional standard, using appropriate business language and offering a range of examples using multimedia or interactive content.As with distinction, the presentation is responsive to the audience, with a highly engaging delivery, sequence and clarity.
In-text citations and referencing.       /5 marksNeither in-text referencing nor reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style.In-text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors.Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors.Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with only occasional minor errors.Both in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere strictly to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with no errors.
Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS
Order Now

Get expert help for MBA621 Healthcare Systems and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 5, 2025) MBA621 Healthcare Systems. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/.
"MBA621 Healthcare Systems." Universal Assignment - June 5, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/
Universal Assignment June 2, 2023 MBA621 Healthcare Systems., viewed June 5, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/>
Universal Assignment - MBA621 Healthcare Systems. [Internet]. [Accessed June 5, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/
"MBA621 Healthcare Systems." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 5, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/
"MBA621 Healthcare Systems." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mba621-healthcare-systems-2/. [Accessed: June 5, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

NUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity

Assessment Item Task SheetCourse code andnameNUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity Assessment itemand nameAssessment Three | ReportDue date and time Week 11 | 22/04/2025 at 2359 hours AESTLength 1400 words (+/- 10% in each section) – includes in-text references, but not reference list.Marks out of:Weighting:80 Marks50%Assessed CourseLearning Outcomes(CLO)CLO1,

Read More »

PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-Awareness

Course Code and NamePSY1040: An Introduction to Cultural Safety in PracticeAssessment Item Number and NameAssessment 2: PortfolioAssessment Item TypePortfolio PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-AwarenessDue Date & TimeTuesday, 29 April 2025 (Week 12), 11:59pmLength2000 words – an average of 400 words per task.Marks and WeightingMarked out of: 100Weighting: 50%Assessed Course

Read More »

Innovative Digital App Development Report

OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT Assessment 1- Type of Assignment Individual Written Report Details Individual Written Report 3,000 words (500 words of the Report is Contextualisation) Weighting of Assessment : 70% INDIVIDUAL MARK Learning outcomes assessed by Assessment: 1, 2, 3 and 4 – See Module Listings of Learning

Read More »

Tourism Trends and Investment Decisions: A Comparative Study

Assignment TaskYou are a strategist working for a major hospitality group based in Australia. The company is planninginternational expansion, and the board has asked you to compile a report to identify the most suitablelocation for the project. The board has shortlisted two international locations (which will be allocatedto you by

Read More »

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Unit Code/Description EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Course/Subject Bachelor of Early Childhood Education Semester March 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective Assessment 1: Poster Including an Invigilated stage in Week 3. Due

Read More »

EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development

Unit Code/Description EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development Course/Subject Graduate Diploma in Education (early childhood) Semester S 1, 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective In this assessment, student are required to select one of the case studies provided and critically analyze the child’s

Read More »

JSB172: Professional Academic Skills

JSB172: Professional Academic SkillsAssessment: Workplace Report and Presentation Weight: 50%Due date: Friday 30th May 11:59pm Length: 1,750 words (+/- 10 %) / 5minutesPurpose/Learning Objectives:This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4: Task:Your task is to write a Workplace Report identifying how to address the topic/issue chosen or

Read More »

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment 2025 2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment Assignment MaterialsAssignment Information Sheet & Marking Criteria.pdf (this document)Assignment Template.docx (template)Example Assignment.pdf (HD exemplar)Due Date: Friday 16 May, 11:59PM (Week 10)Weighting: Marked out of 100 (worth 30% of course grade)Word Count: 1,500 words maximum(inclusive of main text, headings, in-text citations; excluding

Read More »

Principles of Economics Federal Budget

Principles of Economics Short-answer Assignment V1 (20% of final mark) The assignment consists of four questions.  You should allocate at least half a page (or 250 words) to each answer or 1000 words for all four answers depending on the nature of and/or marks allocated for the question/s. You may

Read More »

LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS)

Graduate Diploma in Migration Law LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHER VISAS) Assessment Task 2 – Semester 1, 2025 LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS) Instructions: 1. Students must answer all questions as indicated. Make certain all answers are clearly labelled. 2. Make certain

Read More »

Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry

REPORT TOPICPrepare an Academic Report on the following:‘Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry’.The report should encompass the following: Your personal evaluation and critique of the key findings in your report including your evaluation of construction cadetships, yourfindings in relation to potential issues/problems with cadetships and your recommendations to improve

Read More »

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Master of Professional Accounting and Accounting Advanced

Assessment 2 – Business Case (CVP) AnalysisUnit Code/Description ACC901 Accounting for Managerial DecisionsCourse/Subject Master of Professional Accounting and Master of Professional Accounting AdvancedSemester S1 2025 Assessment Overview Unit Learning OutcomesAddressed1,2,3,4 and 5Assessment Objective The primary objective of this assessment is to assess the students’ ability to apply CVPanalysis and relevant

Read More »

Urban Design Theory Essay writing

Essays are a major form of assessment at university. Through essays, you develop your understanding of discipline-specific content, strengthen your critical thinking, and develop your ability to translate that thinking into a persuasive written form. This assignment assesses your understanding of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 1) understand the historic

Read More »

Statutory Interpretation of Disability Discrimination in NSW Law

Foundations of Law 70102 – Assessment Task 3 – Autumn 2025Statutory Interpretation and Research ExerciseDue: Thursday 22 May 2025 by 23.59Length: 2000 words (excluding the headings Part A, Part B and Part C, footnotes andbibliography. Any additional headings that you decide to use will be included in the wordcount)Weighting: 40%Task

Read More »

Engineering Career Readiness: Sustainability & Reflection

Objectives: The purpose of this assignment is to: Apply your learning in this unit to your development as an engineering graduate and your future career.Develop the ability to communicate yourself professionally.Develop an ability to reflect on your professional development, and identify any gaps in your capabilities.Unit Learning Outcomes: This task

Read More »

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains Introduction This Child Study Report focuses on Saif, a 4-year and 6-month-old boy attending our childcare centre. Saif is an active, curious, and sociable child who engages enthusiastically in various activities. Over three weeks, multiple observations were conducted in different settings—such as

Read More »

2500 Words Insurance Case Study Analysis

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Critical Reflections: Arts, Play & Mental Health

Peer Learning and DiscussionTask type Discussion Contribution Task description Contribute constructively to the formal weekly online discussions under the guidance of your moderator, in peer-to-peer learning. The purpose of the discussions is for students to explore and share ideas linked to the material being studied that week, and develop skills

Read More »

Indo-Pacific Health Challenge: Community Practice in Kiribati

Task type Indo-Pacific health challenge scenario Task description You will be presented with a real-world case scenario of a health challenge confronting an Indo-Pacific community that directly relates to the current climate emergency. You will analyse the scenario, exploring how community practice principles are being applied. You will then provide

Read More »

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?