MAA703 – Accounting for Management

Trimester 2 2022 Assessment Task 2 Part B – Teamwork Reflection (Individual)

DUE DATE AND TIME:                        Wednesday, 7 September 2022 by 8:00pm (AEST) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:    10%

WORD COUNT:                                   750 – 800 words

Description

Teamwork is one of the vital components of many workplaces and the ability to demonstrate teamwork in the learning environment is an important component of your university education. Knowing what elements contribute to an effective team and how you personally contribute to the team’s success are important skills you’ll develop in this unit and through this task. This understanding of your own capacity to work as a member of a team will stand you in good stead in current and future workplaces.

This task provides you with an opportunity to reflect on your contribution to the success (or otherwise) of the

team and its final product (Part 2A). You are also to reflect on your teammates’ contributions to the team.

Specific Requirements

Using the MAA703 Reflection Submission Template, evaluate each of your team members and write a brief response to the question of why you would (or would not) work with them again. You will then respond reflectively to the following three questions:

  1. In your self-assessment you noted that others either would or would not want to work with you in the future. Justify your response providing concrete examples from working in this team that help explain your response. Aim to write 250 words.
  2. What elements of teamwork ensured your team worked effectively to produce the final product? If your team did not work effectively, what elements of teamwork were missing? What did you learn about what makes teamwork successful from engaging in this assessment task? What will you do differently next time you engage in teamwork? Aim to write 250 words.
  3. What have you learnt about yourself with respect to your capacity to work as a team member that will help in future team projects (either in the university context or in the workplace)? In your response, write about both your skills and your attributes in relation to teamwork. How and when have you also demonstrated leadership within the team? Aim to write 250 words.

It is expected that each student contributes and participates evenly in the completion of the team tasks. To this end, it is important that you submit, as evidence, your specific contribution to the written report. See the Evidence section below for more details.

Your reflection should be between 750-800 words in total. It is important that you do not exceed the word count (indicate the word count on the title page of your submission).

The sooner you form a team and register the team, the sooner you can get started.

Learning Outcomes

This task allows you to demonstrate achievement of the unit learning outcomes. The ULOs are aligned with specific graduate learning outcomes – that is, the skills and knowledge graduates are expected to have upon completion of their studies – and this assessment task is an important tool in determining achievement of those outcomes.

If you do not demonstrate achievement of the unit learning outcomes, you will not be successful in this unit. It is a good practice to familiarise yourself with the ULOs and GLOs as they provide guidance on the knowledge,

understanding and skills you’re expected to demonstrate upon completion of the unit. In this way they can be

used to guide your study.

Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO)Graduate Learning Outcomes (GLO)
ULO 3: Demonstrate individual responsibility for planning and achieving team goals in completing the case study analysis.GLO7: Teamwork

Submission

There is a reflection template (MAA703_T1_2022-Assignment 2 Part B – Reflection Submission Template.docx) in CloudDeakin and you are strongly encouraged to use that for your submission. It contains a title page. Ensure you fill in the required details (name, student ID, word count) on the title page and in the header of the document (page 2). The document you upload must be a Word document. If you choose not to use the template provided, ensure you include all the requisite details on the title page.

You need to submit your reflection and evidence in the individual Assignment Dropbox in the MAA703 CloudDeakin unit site on or before the due date.

When uploading your assignment, name your document using the following syntax: Surname_FirstName_DeakinID_MAA703.doc (or ‘.docx’). The following is an example for your reference: ‘Jones_Barry_123456789_MAA703.doc’.

Submitting a hard copy of this assignment is not required.

You must keep a backup copy of every assignment you submit, until the marked assignment has been returned to you. In the unlikely event that one of your assignments is misplaced, you will need to submit your backup copy.

Any work you submit may be checked by electronic or other means for the purposes of detecting collusion and/or plagiarism.

When you submit an assignment through your CloudDeakin unit site, you will receive an email to your Deakin email address confirming that it has been submitted. You should check that you can see your assignment in the Submissions view of the Assignment Dropbox folder after upload, and check for, and keep, the email receipt for the submission.

Use of appendices are required as part of the evidence for this task.

Evidence

It is important that you provide evidence to support what you are claiming in your reflection as well as direct evidence of your contribution to the written report.

This evidence is to be included as an appendix to your reflection. If the evidence is missing from your reflection you will be severely limiting your capacity to succeed in this task.

The first piece of evidence you MUST include is your contribution to the written report. Which part of the report did you write and what other support did you contribute? For example, note if you proofread the final report, or if it was your responsibility to format the report, or to ensure the reference list was correct.

As well as direct evidence of your contribution to the final report, it is also important you provide evidence of your contributions to the functioning of the team, including your interactions with others. This could be in the form of journal entries, emails, copies of feedback provided, images and/or audio content.

If, at your first meeting, you develop an Action Plan you could submit this as evidence to support your reflection. The Action Plan will help you remember what was decided and what each team members agreed to contribute to the task. At every subsequent meeting someone should be delegated with the task of recording discussions and decisions made. These notes (the minutes of your meetings) should be distributed to all team members as soon after the meeting as possible using a collaborative communication method such as OneDrive or One Note.

To this end, a Teamwork template (MAA703_T1_2022 Assignment 2 Part B – Teamwork Template.docx) has been developed which you can use as part of your evidence. You can use this template to help get the first team meeting organized.

Other sources of evidence that support your reflection should also be included. If, for example, you provided feedback to a team member, include a copy of the feedback, plus the date it was given, and the form in which it was given. If you have conflict in the team, record why there was conflict, and how it was resolved. If a team member takes a long time to reply to emails or conversations, keep evidence of this.

Evidence is not counted as part of the word count for this task.

Evidence must be attached as an appendix to your reflection.

Marking and Feedback

The marking rubric for this task is below and also available in the MAA703 CloudDeakin unit site – in the Assessment folder (under Assessment Resources).

It is always a useful exercise to familiarise yourself with the criteria before completing any assessment task. Criteria act as a boundary around the task and help identify what assessors are looking for specifically in your submission. The criteria are drawn from the unit’s learning outcomes ensuring they align with appropriate graduate attribute/s.

Identifying the standard you aim to achieve is also a useful strategy for success and to that end, familiarising yourself with the descriptor for that standard is highly recommended.

Students who submit their work by the due date will receive their marks and feedback on CloudDeakin 15 working days after the submission date.

Extensions

Extensions will only be granted for exceptional and/or unavoidable circumstances outside the student’s

control.

Students seeking an extension for an assignment prior to the due date should apply directly to the Unit Chair by completing the Assignment and Online Test Extension Application Form. Requests for extensions will not be considered after 12 noon Wednesday 31 August 2022. Applications for special consideration after the due date must be submitted via StudentConnect.

Late submission

The following marking penalties will apply if you submit an assessment task after the due date without an approved extension: 5% will be deducted from available marks for each day up to five days, and work that is submitted more than five days after the due date will not be marked and will receive 0% for the task.

‘Day’ means working day for paper submissions and calendar day for electronic submissions. The Unit Chair may refuse to accept a late submission where it is unreasonable or impracticable to assess the task after the due date.

Calculation of the late penalty is illustrated in the example below: assuming that the assignment is due on a Thursday at 8:00pm

  • 1 day late: submitted after Thursday 11:59pm and before Friday 11:59pm– 5% penalty.
  • 2 days late: submitted after Friday 11:59pm and before Saturday 11:59pm – 10% penalty.
  • 3 days late: submitted after Saturday 11:59pm and before Sunday 11:59pm – 15% penalty.
  • 4 days late: submitted after Sunday 11:59pm and before Monday 11:59pm – 20% penalty.
  • 5 days late: submitted after Monday 11:59pm and before Tuesday 11:59pm – 25% penalty.

Dropbox closes the Tuesday after 11:59pm AEST time.

Support

The Division of Student Life provides a range of Study Support resources and services, available throughout the academic year, including Writing Mentor and Maths Mentor online drop ins and the SmartThinking 24 hour writing feedback service at this link. If you would prefer some more in depth and tailored support, make an appointment online with a Language and Learning Adviser.

Referencing

Any material used in this assignment that is not your original work must be acknowledged as such and appropriately referenced. You can find information about plagiarism and other study support resources at the following website: http://www.deakin.edu.au/students/study-support

Academic misconduct

For information about academic misconduct, special consideration, extensions, and assessment feedback, please refer to the document Your rights and responsibilities as a student in this Unit in the first folder next to the Unit Guide in the Resources area of the CloudDeakin unit site.

[Rubric to be added on the following page]

T1 2022 MAA703 Assessment 2 Part B Rubric

Performance Levels/CriteriaN (0-29)N (30-49)P (50-59)C (60-69)D (70-79)HD (80-100)
Demonstrate individual responsibility for completing allocated work, [Questions 1 and 3 of the reflective report], ULO3, GLO7, (3 marks)0.4 points   Always fails to complete assigned tasks by deadline. Work accomplished is not at an appropriate standard or impedes the team’s progress. Does not demonstrate any level of responsibility and accountability to the team.                             (0-0.8 marks)1.2 points   Often fails to complete assigned tasks by deadline. Work accomplished is not at an appropriate standard or impedes the team’s progress. Does not demonstrate a high level of responsibility and accountability to the team.                             (0.9-1.4 marks)1.6 points   Completes all assigned tasks by deadlines. Work accomplished is acceptably thorough, comprehensive, and advances the team’s task. Demonstrates a satisfactory sense of high level of responsibility and accountability to the team and a high level of professionalism.                         (1.5-1.7 marks)1.9 points   Completes all assigned tasks by deadlines. Work accomplished is thorough, comprehensive, and advances the team’s task. Demonstrates a good sense of high level of responsibility and accountability to the team and a high level of professionalism.                           (1.8-2 marks)2.2 points   Completes all assigned tasks by or ahead of deadlines. Work accomplished is very thorough, comprehensive, and advances the team’s task, indicative of a high functioning team. Generally proactively and expertly helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Demonstrates a consistently high sense of responsibility and accountability to the team, and an exceptional level of professionalism.       (2.1-2.3 marks)3 points   Consistently completes all assigned tasks by or ahead of deadlines. Work accomplished is exemplary thorough, comprehensive, and advances the team’s task, indicative of a high functioning team. Always proactively and expertly helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. Demonstrates a consistently exemplary sense of responsibility and accountability to the team, and an exceptional level of professionalism.       (2.4-3 marks)
Reflectively evaluate their capacity to work as a team member, [Peer team work evaluation, Questions 2 and 3 of the reflective report], ULO3, GLO7, (2 marks)0.3 points   Never/seldom reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) at a surface level, often without revealing clarified meaning or indicating a broader perspective about educational or life events.           (0-0.5 marks)0.8 points   Often reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) at a limited level, often revealing limited clarified meaning or indicating a broader perspective about educational or life events.           (0.6-0.9 marks)1.1 points   Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) in depth, revealing clarified meanings and/or changed perspectives about educational or life events.             (1-1.1 marks)1.3 points   Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) in depth, revealing fully clarified meanings and/or changed perspectives about educational or life events.             (1.2-1.3 marks)1.5 points   Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) in depth to reveal clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about educational and life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge, growth, and maturity over time.   (1.4-1.5 marks)2 points   Independently critically reviews prior learning (past experiences inside and outside of the team) in depth to reveal fully clarified meanings and significantly advanced perspectives about educational and life experiences, which provide foundation for expanded knowledge, growth, and maturity over time.   (1.6-2 marks)
Demonstrating leadership capabilities, [Question 3 and appendix of evidence of the reflective report], ULO3, GLO7, (2 marks)0.3 points   No evidence or indication of how and in which capacity leadership was demonstrated.       (0-0.5 marks)0.8 points   Some indication of how leadership was demonstrated, but no evidence to support claim.       (0.6-0.9 marks)1.1 points   At least a single instance where some affective leadership capacity was demonstrated, with reasonable evidence to support claim.   (1-1.1 marks)1.3 points   Explains several instances where some affective leadership capacity was demonstrated, with reasonable evidence to support claim.   (1.2-1.3 marks)1.5 points   Regularly and consistently supports the team by taking on a leadership role and provides evidence to support claim.     (1.4-1.5 marks)2 points   Regularly and consistently supports the team in a significant leadership role and provides evidence to support claim.   (1.6-2 marks)
Demonstrates evidence of constructive teamwork, [Question 1 and appendix of evidence of the0.4 points   Always fails to engage positively with the team and support a constructive team1.2 points   Often fails to engage positively with the team and support a constructive team1.6 points   Satisfactorily supports a constructive team climate by treating team members1.9 points   Supports a constructive team climate by treating team members2.2 points   Regularly supports a constructive team climate by treating team members3 points   Completely and regularly supports a constructive team climate by treating
reflective report], ULO3, GLO7, (3 marks)climate and/or fails to treat team members respectfully and show a positive attitude about the team and its work. Always does not communicate politely or constructively or provide expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members. Does not demonstrate any awareness and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.     (0-0.8 marks)climate and/or fails to treat team members respectfully and show a positive attitude about the team and its work. Often does not communicate politely or constructively or provide expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members. Does not demonstrate a high level of awareness and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.   (0.9-1.4 marks)respectfully, showing a positive attitude about the team and its work, communicating politely and constructively, and providing expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.           (1.5-1.7 marks)respectfully, showing a positive attitude about the team and its work, communicating politely and constructively, and providing expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.           (1.8-2 marks)respectfully, showing a positive attitude about the team and its work, communicating politely and constructively, and providing expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members, including strong and expert leadership. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.       (2.1-2.3 marks)team members respectfully, showing a positive attitude about the team and its work, communicating politely and constructively, and providing expert assistance, encouragement and/or support to team members, including strong and expert leadership. Consistently demonstrates a high level of awareness of and sensitivity to diversity amongst team members.     (2.4-3 marks)
Overall, 10N 0 or aboveN 3 or aboveP 5 or aboveC 6 or aboveD 7 or aboveHD 8 or above
Order Now

Get expert help for MAA703 – Accounting for Management and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 14, 2025) MAA703 – Accounting for Management. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/.
"MAA703 – Accounting for Management." Universal Assignment - February 14, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/
Universal Assignment September 27, 2022 MAA703 – Accounting for Management., viewed February 14, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/>
Universal Assignment - MAA703 – Accounting for Management. [Internet]. [Accessed February 14, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/
"MAA703 – Accounting for Management." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 14, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/
"MAA703 – Accounting for Management." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/maa703-accounting-for-management/. [Accessed: February 14, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?