Fit to sit policy: The University operates a fit to sit policy whereby you, in submitting or presenting yourself for an assessment, are declaring that you are fit to sit the assessment. You cannot subsequently claim that your performance in this assessment was affected by extenuating factors. | |
Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Declaration: By submitting this assessment, you declare that it is your own work and that the sources of information and material you have used (including the internet) have been fully identified and properly acknowledged as required1. Additionally, the work presented has not been submitted for any other assessment. You also understand that the Faculty reserves the right to investigate allegations of plagiarism or unfair practice which, if proven, could result in a fail in this assessment and may affect your progress. | |
Intellectual Property and Retention of Student Work: You understand that the University will retain a copy of any assessments submitted electronically for evidence and quality assurance purposes; requests for the removal of assessments will only be considered if the work contains information that is either politically and/or commercially sensitive (as determined by the University) and where requests are made by the relevant module leader or dissertation supervisor. | |
Details of Submission: Please note the 5 working day rule does not apply to resit assessments. If the assessment is submitted after the deadline then it will be classed as a failure unless extenuating circumstances are applied for and accepted (Advice Shop to be consulted). | |
You are required to acknowledge that you have read the above statements by writing your student number (s) in the box: | Student Number(s): |
IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY TO KEEP A RECORD OF ALL WORK SUBMITTED
| Part B: Marking and Assessment (to be completed by Module Lecturer) |
| Assessment Task: This assignment will be marked out of 100% This assignment contributes to 50% of the total module marks. This assignment is bonded. The word limit for the assignment is 3000. Footnotes and Bibliography will not be included in the word count but should not be abused. Assessment task “The fusing of law and equity has been going on for centuries …. it reflects the law’s striving for coherence and consistency” “Fusionists come in all shapes and sizes, generally united by concerns for coherence, rationality, efficiency and respect for general principles that serve as guides in legal education and appellate decision-making. Anti-fusionists may also share these goals but they are generally united in their greater respect for a static legal framework and their love of history” (Mason, Fusion: Fallacy, Future or Finished? December 16th 2004, Supreme Court at 14). In light of the above statement, critically consider the view that the law and equity are fused and that the dualism argument is obsolete. |
| Learning Outcomes to be assessed(as specified in the validated module descriptor https://icis.southwales.ac.uk/): One To demonstrate a study in depth and in context of the law of Equity and Trusts in England and Wales Two To act independently in planning and undertaking tasks in the context of Equity and Trusts Three To make a critical judgement of the merits of particular arguments. |
| Grading Criteria: Please see School’s marking criteria for undergraduate/post graduate assessments on the module Unilearnsite. Any additional grading/marking guidance will be posted below: None |
| Feedback/feed-forward(linked to assessment criteria): Areas where you have done well: Feedback from this assessment to help you to improve future assessments: Other comments | ||
| Mark: | Marker’s Signature: | Date: |
| Work on this module has been marked, double marked/moderated in line with USW procedures. | ||
| Provisional mark only: subject to change and/or confirmation by the Assessment Board |
| Part C: Reflections on Assessment (to be completed by student – optional) | |
| Use of previous feedback: In this assessment, I have taken/took note of the following points in feedback on previous work: | |
Please indicate which of the following you feel/felt applies/applied to your submitted work A reasonable attempt. I could have developed some of the sections further. A good attempt, displaying my understanding and learning, with analysis in some parts. A very good attempt. The work demonstrates my clear understanding of the learning supported by relevant literature and scholarly work with good analysis and evaluation. A n excellent attempt, with clear application of literature and scholarly work, demonstrating significant analysis and evaluation. | |
| What I found most difficult about this assessment: | |
| The areas where I would value/would have valued feedback: |
1University Academic Misconduct Regulations
No Fields Found.