MGT603: Systems Thinking

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMGT603: Systems Thinking
AssessmentRich Picture, CATWOE and Root Definition Report
Individual/GroupIndividual
LengthUp to 1200 words
Learning Outcomesb) Create a visual depiction of a multi-dimensional complex situation that represents differing views
    SubmissionFor regular class (12 Weeks Duration): By 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 4.2 (week 8) For intensive class (6 Weeks Duration): By 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 4.2 (week 4)
Weighting20%
Total Marks20 marks

Assessment Task and Context

We live in a dynamic world, which consists of various complex adaptive systems and requires today’s managers to take a holistic view of the business. In order to gain a holistic understanding, managers need to understand all the key internal and external stakeholders and the intended and unintended consequences of their decisions. To achieve this objective, managers need to learn and apply systems thinking tools and techniques. One such tool is “Rich Picture”. Rich Picture helps us express our own understanding of the world, the stakeholders to be considered and the impact that they may have our actions. Tools such as Rich Picture, CATWOE and Root Definition Reports, help us to understand others’ perspectives without getting involved in conflicting arguments of convincing one another about their own worldview.

Instructions

*** This assessment is linked to MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).

To successfully complete MGT603 Assessment 2, students will require to write a comprehensive report that helps resolve the problem that they have introduced in MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A) for their selected case organisation.

Using the resulting discussion from MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A), students are required to analyse and synthesise consequences of the selected case organisation’s issue/problem/challenge on various internal and external stakeholders involved while achieving the goals and objectives through policy implementation.

There are two (2) important discussions to MGT603 Assessment 2.

  1. Rich Picture: Students are required to create/draw a Rich Picture of the identified problem/challenge/issue in MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A). The Rich Picture can be hand

drawn and should provide a concise overview of the complex system under review.

  • Root Definition Report Using CATWOE: A “Root Definition Report” is a “structured analysis and description of the system being investigated”. A Root Definition Report explains, “what”, “how” and “why”. A CATOWE analysis can help in the development of a thorough Root Definition Report. CATWOE is a mnemonic that identifies all stakeholders in the system being analysed.

To successfully complete MGT603 Assessment 2 report, it must include:

  • Rich Picture
  • Root Definition Report Using CATWOE
  • And based on these tools (Rich Picture and Root Definition Report Using CATWOE), students will recommend two (2) optimal solutions to overcome the problem/issue/challenge identified in MGT603 Assessment 1 (Part A).

MGT603 Assessment 2 Submission Instructions:

The Rich Picture and Root Definition Report using CATWOE needs to be produced according to academic writing guidelines and must be submitted in compliance with the following:

  • The submission must be in WORD document format and must contain a “signed” assessment cover sheet.
  • You should make significant references to the subject material and substantial wider reading. A minimum of six (6) academic-related (e.g. peer-reviewed journal articles, books chapters, university resources, conference papers) and a minimum of two (2) other references (e.g. newspaper articles, industry reports, and etc.) are required in this assessment. References to ‘Wikipedia’ or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted. It is highly advised to use recent references (from the past five years) where possible and necessary.
  • It is essential that students use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here in the Academic Writing Guide found via the Academic Skills website.
  • In academic writing, it is highly advised to write in the third person (e.g. the author, the writer, the researcher).
  • Within your assessment document all sections and sub-sections of the report require being numbered (e.g. 1, 1.1, 2, 2.2, etc.). Furthermore, all submissions require having page numbers.
  • All inserted Figures and Tables within the assessment require being labelled and numbered appropriately (e.g. Figure 1: Rich Picture …., Table 1: CATWOE Analysis ….). Furthermore, they all require being initially stated/introduced and then discussed in-detail and in-depth.
  • The “Rich Picture” for the chosen case organisation requires being drawn by the student. Only “scanned” hand-drawn Rich Pictures are accepted.
  • Please make sure to review the provided marking rubric at the end of this document for your information.

Referencing

It is essential that students use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here in the Academic Writing Guide found via the Academic Skills website.

Academic Integrity

All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online. Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.

MGT603 Assessment 2 Submission Instruction:
  • Submit MGT603 Assessment 2 via the MGT603 Assessment 2 link in the Assessment section found in the main navigation menu of the subject Blackboard site by end of Module 4.2 (Sunday of Week 8).

The Learning Facilitator will provide constructive feedback via Grade Centre in the Student Portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Assessment Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 2
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge) Understands theoretical models and concepts Percentage for this criterion = 25%Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed.Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline.   Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning
Context, Audience and Purpose Percentage for this criterion = 25%Demonstrates no awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Rich picture does not show relevant stakeholders, goals, intendedDemonstrates limited awareness         of context     and/or purpose of the assignment Rich picture show some but not all relevant stakeholders. Goals,Demonstrates consistent awareness of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Rich picture show all relevant stakeholders. Goals,Demonstrates an advanced and integrated understanding of context and/or purpose of the assignment. Rich picture show all relevant stakeholders. Goals, intended andConsistently demonstrates a systematic and critical understanding of context and purpose of the assignment. Rich picture show all relevant stakeholders. Goals, intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are written clearly in
 and unintended consequences of the policy change. CATWOE and root definition are not written properly.intended and unintended consequences of the policy change are written but lack clarity CATWOE and root definition are written but are somewhat vagueintended and unintended consequences of the policy change are written clearly. CATWOE and root definition are written clearlyunintended consequences of the policy change are written clearly in an integrated manner. CATWOE and root definition are written clearly integrating all the dimensions of CATWOEan integrated manner, demonstrating systematic and critical understanding of the context and purpose of the assessment.   CATWOE and root definition are written properly, demonstrating systematic and critical understanding of the context and purpose of the assessment.
Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Percentage for this criterion = 25%Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/ Recommendations based upon analysis.Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature.Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis.Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.
Effective Communication Percentage for this criterion = 15%Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence.Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning isInformation, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning isInformation, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Demonstrates culturalExpertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audience’s interest in the
 Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning.often difficult to follow.easy to follow.sensitivity.topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multi-media.
Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion = 10%Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidenceDemonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a)Critically evaluate the paradigms of Systems Thinking conceptualisation and its application to contemporary business issues
SLO b)Create a visual depiction of a multi-dimensional complex situation that represents differing views
SLO c)Analyse, select and apply systems modelling tools in integrating, optimising and enhancing business processes within contemporary organisations
SLO d)Synthesise technological and non-technological solutions to business problems that promote integration and that optimise whole-of-enterprise operations
Order Now

Get expert help for MGT603: Systems Thinking and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 13, 2025) MGT603: Systems Thinking. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/.
"MGT603: Systems Thinking." Universal Assignment - June 13, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/
Universal Assignment August 1, 2022 MGT603: Systems Thinking., viewed June 13, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/>
Universal Assignment - MGT603: Systems Thinking. [Internet]. [Accessed June 13, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/
"MGT603: Systems Thinking." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 13, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/
"MGT603: Systems Thinking." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mgt603-systems-thinking/. [Accessed: June 13, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

NUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity

Assessment Item Task SheetCourse code andnameNUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity Assessment itemand nameAssessment Three | ReportDue date and time Week 11 | 22/04/2025 at 2359 hours AESTLength 1400 words (+/- 10% in each section) – includes in-text references, but not reference list.Marks out of:Weighting:80 Marks50%Assessed CourseLearning Outcomes(CLO)CLO1,

Read More »

PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-Awareness

Course Code and NamePSY1040: An Introduction to Cultural Safety in PracticeAssessment Item Number and NameAssessment 2: PortfolioAssessment Item TypePortfolio PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-AwarenessDue Date & TimeTuesday, 29 April 2025 (Week 12), 11:59pmLength2000 words – an average of 400 words per task.Marks and WeightingMarked out of: 100Weighting: 50%Assessed Course

Read More »

Innovative Digital App Development Report

OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT Assessment 1- Type of Assignment Individual Written Report Details Individual Written Report 3,000 words (500 words of the Report is Contextualisation) Weighting of Assessment : 70% INDIVIDUAL MARK Learning outcomes assessed by Assessment: 1, 2, 3 and 4 – See Module Listings of Learning

Read More »

Tourism Trends and Investment Decisions: A Comparative Study

Assignment TaskYou are a strategist working for a major hospitality group based in Australia. The company is planninginternational expansion, and the board has asked you to compile a report to identify the most suitablelocation for the project. The board has shortlisted two international locations (which will be allocatedto you by

Read More »

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Unit Code/Description EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Course/Subject Bachelor of Early Childhood Education Semester March 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective Assessment 1: Poster Including an Invigilated stage in Week 3. Due

Read More »

EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development

Unit Code/Description EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development Course/Subject Graduate Diploma in Education (early childhood) Semester S 1, 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective In this assessment, student are required to select one of the case studies provided and critically analyze the child’s

Read More »

JSB172: Professional Academic Skills

JSB172: Professional Academic SkillsAssessment: Workplace Report and Presentation Weight: 50%Due date: Friday 30th May 11:59pm Length: 1,750 words (+/- 10 %) / 5minutesPurpose/Learning Objectives:This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4: Task:Your task is to write a Workplace Report identifying how to address the topic/issue chosen or

Read More »

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment 2025 2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment Assignment MaterialsAssignment Information Sheet & Marking Criteria.pdf (this document)Assignment Template.docx (template)Example Assignment.pdf (HD exemplar)Due Date: Friday 16 May, 11:59PM (Week 10)Weighting: Marked out of 100 (worth 30% of course grade)Word Count: 1,500 words maximum(inclusive of main text, headings, in-text citations; excluding

Read More »

Principles of Economics Federal Budget

Principles of Economics Short-answer Assignment V1 (20% of final mark) The assignment consists of four questions.  You should allocate at least half a page (or 250 words) to each answer or 1000 words for all four answers depending on the nature of and/or marks allocated for the question/s. You may

Read More »

LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS)

Graduate Diploma in Migration Law LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHER VISAS) Assessment Task 2 – Semester 1, 2025 LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS) Instructions: 1. Students must answer all questions as indicated. Make certain all answers are clearly labelled. 2. Make certain

Read More »

Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry

REPORT TOPICPrepare an Academic Report on the following:‘Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry’.The report should encompass the following: Your personal evaluation and critique of the key findings in your report including your evaluation of construction cadetships, yourfindings in relation to potential issues/problems with cadetships and your recommendations to improve

Read More »

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Master of Professional Accounting and Accounting Advanced

Assessment 2 – Business Case (CVP) AnalysisUnit Code/Description ACC901 Accounting for Managerial DecisionsCourse/Subject Master of Professional Accounting and Master of Professional Accounting AdvancedSemester S1 2025 Assessment Overview Unit Learning OutcomesAddressed1,2,3,4 and 5Assessment Objective The primary objective of this assessment is to assess the students’ ability to apply CVPanalysis and relevant

Read More »

Urban Design Theory Essay writing

Essays are a major form of assessment at university. Through essays, you develop your understanding of discipline-specific content, strengthen your critical thinking, and develop your ability to translate that thinking into a persuasive written form. This assignment assesses your understanding of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 1) understand the historic

Read More »

Statutory Interpretation of Disability Discrimination in NSW Law

Foundations of Law 70102 – Assessment Task 3 – Autumn 2025Statutory Interpretation and Research ExerciseDue: Thursday 22 May 2025 by 23.59Length: 2000 words (excluding the headings Part A, Part B and Part C, footnotes andbibliography. Any additional headings that you decide to use will be included in the wordcount)Weighting: 40%Task

Read More »

Engineering Career Readiness: Sustainability & Reflection

Objectives: The purpose of this assignment is to: Apply your learning in this unit to your development as an engineering graduate and your future career.Develop the ability to communicate yourself professionally.Develop an ability to reflect on your professional development, and identify any gaps in your capabilities.Unit Learning Outcomes: This task

Read More »

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains Introduction This Child Study Report focuses on Saif, a 4-year and 6-month-old boy attending our childcare centre. Saif is an active, curious, and sociable child who engages enthusiastically in various activities. Over three weeks, multiple observations were conducted in different settings—such as

Read More »

2500 Words Insurance Case Study Analysis

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Critical Reflections: Arts, Play & Mental Health

Peer Learning and DiscussionTask type Discussion Contribution Task description Contribute constructively to the formal weekly online discussions under the guidance of your moderator, in peer-to-peer learning. The purpose of the discussions is for students to explore and share ideas linked to the material being studied that week, and develop skills

Read More »

Indo-Pacific Health Challenge: Community Practice in Kiribati

Task type Indo-Pacific health challenge scenario Task description You will be presented with a real-world case scenario of a health challenge confronting an Indo-Pacific community that directly relates to the current climate emergency. You will analyse the scenario, exploring how community practice principles are being applied. You will then provide

Read More »

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?