NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets

Banking and Financial Markets
Section 1 General Information
Module Title:   Banking and Financial Markets
Module code:  NBS-7079BCredit value: 20Level (3, 4, 5, 6 or 7): 7  
Total student effort hours: 200
Academic Year: 2022/23Semester: 2
Related modules (Co-requisites, pre-requisites etc.): Investment and Risk Management and Empirical Finance

INDIVIDUAL Assignment BRIEF

Assessment Type% WeightingAssignment DeadlineMethod of submissionReturn Date of marked workFormat of feed-backWord limitMethod of return
CW – Coursework40%     60%    24th April 2023   14th June 2023Electronic     ElectronicWithin 20 working days Within 20 working daysTyped attached detailed feedback Typed attached detailed feedback2000     2000Electronic     Electronic
                                                                                                                                     Assignment title and further details (e.g. presentation length): Do Foreign Direct Investment inflows affect bank competition? Evaluate using an example of Eastern European Country from the list below. *Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia STEP 1: 40% ASSIGNMENT DEADLINE 24th April 2023 Background of the study Banking environment of your chosen country Recent history of banking industry of your chosen countryMotivations for studying the problem and research questionsLiterature reviewConcentration and competition measures and their differences Concentration approach and empirical literature.  Competition approach and empirical literature. Effect of Foreign Direct Investment STEP 2: 60% ASSIGNMENT DEADLINE 14th June 2023 Data sources and sample description Created dataset and its descriptive statisticsResearch methodologyRegression modelVariable definitions (dependent and independent variable(s))Regression analysis and resultsSummary conclusions Potential policy implications of research and suggestionsLimitations of research Please be aware that the bank data should be accessed via Fitch Connect Dataset available through the UEA library catalogue. Foreign Direct Investment variable can be obtained using World Development Indicators (World Bank database). The choice of banks should include specialisations such as: Commercial Banks Real Estate & Mortgage Bank Finance Companies (Credit Card, Factoring & Leasing) Cooperative Bank Investment Banks Specialized Governmental Credit Institution   The time period in which the data should be collected should not exceed years prior to 1999.  

Coursework General Guidelines:

  • Coursework Presentation: Font must be Times New Roman with a size of 12 points; character scale must be 100% and spacing and position should be normal (the default options); use normal margins (2.5cm on top, bottom, left and right); line spacing must be 1.5 lines with an extra line between paragraphs and headings; alignment must be justified; do not use colour in your graphs and text since the printout will be in grayscale. Coursework must be word processed. All sections, tables and figures must be clearly titled and sequentially numbered. All tables and figures should self-explanatory and should include necessary axis definitions and legends. Do not copy-paste tables and figures directly from excel into word and apply appropriate formatting. Numbers in the text, tables and figures should have a reasonable number of decimal points in order to allow an accurate representation and comparisons (usually between 2 and 4 decimal points).
  • Do not include articles that you do not cite within your report or that you have not at least partly read. Do not use material that exists exclusively on the internet (eg.., websites, blogs, etc) or module lecture notes/slides as sources in your references. Academic coursework in the Norwich Business School requires the use of the Harvard System of referencing. Your coursework should clearly distinguish between your original words and ideas, and those of others. When referring to the work of others, from books, journals or any other source (including the internet), it is essential that you make this clear by acknowledging your source and referencing correctly. Failure to reference correctly will lose you marks and may constitute plagiarism or collusion.
  • As a general principle, you should always cite your source whenever you are reporting someone else’s work, using their terminology or quoting directly from their work. You lose no marks for borrowing their concepts or terminology. On the contrary, you probably will gain marks, as you are demonstrating to the reader that you have read the literature and assimilated the ideas of others. In fact, you may well lose marks for not citing, as the reader/assessor is usually familiar with most of the relevant literature in a given area, and may be concerned that you have not cited the relevant literature.
  • It is important that you avoid plagiarism and collusion. You must be fully aware of the relevant UEA rules and regulations can be found
  • Individual study skills support and advice on referencing is also provided by the Learning Enhancement Service at the Dean of Students Office. You may be requested to provide a digital copy of your coursework (after an initial examination of the hard copy by the coursework assessors) for use with plagiarism detection software. Instances where plagiarism is suspected will be investigated by the NBS Plagiarism Officer. Students who are found to have plagiarised will be penalised. In proven cases offenders will be punished and the punishment may extend to degree failure, temporary suspension or expulsion from further study if the case comes before a Discipline Committee of the University.
  • Please preserve anonymity by using your university number, not your name.
  • In line with UEA policy, the word count for coursework, written assignments, projects, reports and dissertations shall include: Footnotes and endnotes, references (in the main text), tables and illustrations and if applicable the abstract, title page and contents page. Any appendicised material and the bibliography or reference list shall be excluded from the word count. Where it is agreed that bibliographic referencing will take the form of footnotes and/or endnotes this will not be included in the word count – any additional notes within the body of the text will be counted. You should declare the word count of the text of their assignment on the coversheet (electronic or hard copy) submitted with their piece of work. Markers who suspect an assignment is over the word limit should assign it an unpenalised mark, and return it to the Learning and Teaching Hub, flagged appropriately, for investigation and application of any resulting penalty. Penalties will be applied if work exceeds the word limit, with a 10% tolerance allowance. Cases of intentional misrepresentation of the word count will result in the mark being capped at the pass mark. When an assignment is excessively over the word limit, the marker is obliged to read up to the limit but is not obliged to read beyond it. It is recommended that a 10% allowance is made in determining the cut-off point, which should be clearly identified on the script by the marker. The awarded mark will reflect the assignment content up to that cut-off point. In addition, this awarded mark will have a 10 mark deduction penalty applied by Learning and Teaching Service staff. For Pass/Fail assignments where the word count is found to exceed the word limit plus 10%, the judgement on whether the grade is a pass or a fail should made only on the text up to the word limit plus 10%. The penalties for exceeding the word limit are: Up to 10% over word limit (No Penalty), 10% or more over the word limit (Deduction of 10 marks off original mark), Failure to provide an electronic copy when requested (Mark capped to the pass mark), Intentional misrepresentation of the word count on the coversheet (Mark capped to the pass mark). When the original mark is within 10 marks of the pass mark, the penalty will be capped at the pass mark. Original marks below the pass mark will not be penalised.
  • The reassessment of this module will be in the form of coursework assignment.

Coursework Assessment

The table below shows how numerical grades relate to class of performance and gives some of the criteria used in the determination of grades. A close study of the descriptors will enable you to understand the standards that you should be aiming at in coursework and to interpret the marks that you are awarded.

  • 80-100% = outstanding work at distinction level: A mark in this range will be given for work which shows the qualities described below (70-79% range). In addition it will show evidence of intellectual rigour, independence of judgement and inventiveness, and will convey a firm impression of originality of mind. It should demonstrate insight which forces reconsideration of existing knowledge and understanding in the reader.
  • 70-79% = excellent work at distinction level: Work in this range will display a full understanding of its subject, a firm grasp of factual details and of the relevant theory and literature and techniques. It will be clearly argued and presented, with evidence of insight and some originality of thought and expression. It will demonstrate wider reading, and draw upon relevant source material which goes beyond the core material required for the module. Application of appropriate theory and techniques to management situations is anticipated, with evidence of the ability to critically evaluate their relevance.
  • 65-69% = work of a very high standard: Work in this range will show a thorough grasp of the topic (though a lesser ability to apply theory and techniques) and will be clearly argued and presented. It should demonstrate wider reading, and draw upon relevant source material which goes beyond the core material required for the module. It will show an appropriate awareness of the relevant theory, literature, and techniques without quite achieving that intellectual independence and originality that distinguishes distinction level work. It should demonstrate the ability to use theory to transfer learning from one context or situation to another.
  • 60-64% = very good work: Work in this range will be intelligently argued, although there may be flaws in the structure or in the use of information. There may also be some unevenness in the quality of the work, and theory and techniques may be less well applied than in work of a very high standard.
  • 55-59% = good work: Work in this range will show a broad knowledge and understanding of its subject. It may lack sophistication in its argument or be somewhat too descriptive in its treatment, and consequently ignores relevant theoretical foundations and technical applications. It should demonstrate accurate and a more complete recycling of the material covered.
  • 50-54% = acceptable work to an adequate level: Work in this range will show a satisfactory knowledge but may be vague or very descriptive in its interpretation of the subject. It may also be structurally weak, and lack a sense of argumentative purpose, and be less extensively argued. There will be little evidence of managerial applicability. It should demonstrate accurate recycling of the material covered. Pass Mark is 50%.
  • 40-49% = Marginal fail; work which does not reach an acceptable level: Work in this range will only partly address the question there will be a lack in synthesis of ideas and a tendency to description rather than analysis. The work shows a restricted range of sources consulted, only a basic understanding of evidence, a limited range of examples, sometimes inappropriate ones and a limited understanding of key concepts. There will also be poor typography and layout, a considerable number of grammatical errors, a limited vocabulary, inaccurate citation and a bibliography with significant omissions. Given a mark in this category, the Exam Board may require the student to re-sit / resubmit the assessment.
  • 30-39% = Clear Fail: Work in the range will have a weak structure, be largely irrelevant to the set question and contain considerable misunderstanding of key concepts. A minimal range of sources will have been consulted, very limited understanding of evidence, minimal range use of examples; little use of sources beyond direct paraphrase of lectures, easily available texts or web pages. The work will show poor presentation; numerous and significant grammatical errors; highly restricted vocabulary; inadequate citation and bibliography.
  • 20-29% = Well below passable standard: Work in this range only marginally addresses the question; contains a fundamental misunderstanding of key concepts; is mostly irrelevant; and contains no line of argument. There will be little attempt to support any assertions; no use of sources beyond direct paraphrase of lectures or easily available texts or web pages. Poor grammar and vocabulary makes it difficult to decipher any intended meaning; no citation; no relevant bibliography.
  • 10-19% = Very few learning outcomes met: Work in this range will contain few relevant elements; only fragmentary arguments; only slight evidence of understanding of key concepts. There will be no attempt to support assertions. Poor grammar and vocabulary makes it very difficult to understand the intended meaning.
  • 1-9% = Far from meeting any learning outcome: Work in this range will have no evidence of learning anything from the module, although there may be elements derived from general knowledge. Short answer; note form; mostly incomprehensible.
  • 0% = No work submitted: The correct citation practices should be adopted for all coursework and references should be correctly and consistently structured. The Harvard System of Referencing is the preferred model in the school and should always be used unless you have been explicitly told otherwise in writing by the module organiser. Further information about these requirements, and general help on how to write reports and essays, can be found on the Dean of Students website

In preparing your coursework, you should be aware that you will be assessed by the extent to which your report meets the following criteria (indicative weights for each criterion are also given):

CriterionWeighting
Learning outcomes and scholarship20
Presentation5
Argument and understanding20
Criticality and analysis20
Use of sources and evidence20
Academic referencing5
Written communication10
Total100

Further details on these criteria for different levels of performance can be found on the UEA Senate scale

Order Now

Get expert help for Banking and Financial Markets and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 16, 2025) NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/.
"NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets." Universal Assignment - June 16, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/
Universal Assignment May 17, 2023 NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets., viewed June 16, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/>
Universal Assignment - NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets. [Internet]. [Accessed June 16, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/
"NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 16, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/
"NBS-7079B Banking and Financial Markets." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/nbs-7079b-banking-and-financial-markets/. [Accessed: June 16, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

NUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity

Assessment Item Task SheetCourse code andnameNUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity Assessment itemand nameAssessment Three | ReportDue date and time Week 11 | 22/04/2025 at 2359 hours AESTLength 1400 words (+/- 10% in each section) – includes in-text references, but not reference list.Marks out of:Weighting:80 Marks50%Assessed CourseLearning Outcomes(CLO)CLO1,

Read More »

PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-Awareness

Course Code and NamePSY1040: An Introduction to Cultural Safety in PracticeAssessment Item Number and NameAssessment 2: PortfolioAssessment Item TypePortfolio PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-AwarenessDue Date & TimeTuesday, 29 April 2025 (Week 12), 11:59pmLength2000 words – an average of 400 words per task.Marks and WeightingMarked out of: 100Weighting: 50%Assessed Course

Read More »

Innovative Digital App Development Report

OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT Assessment 1- Type of Assignment Individual Written Report Details Individual Written Report 3,000 words (500 words of the Report is Contextualisation) Weighting of Assessment : 70% INDIVIDUAL MARK Learning outcomes assessed by Assessment: 1, 2, 3 and 4 – See Module Listings of Learning

Read More »

Tourism Trends and Investment Decisions: A Comparative Study

Assignment TaskYou are a strategist working for a major hospitality group based in Australia. The company is planninginternational expansion, and the board has asked you to compile a report to identify the most suitablelocation for the project. The board has shortlisted two international locations (which will be allocatedto you by

Read More »

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Unit Code/Description EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Course/Subject Bachelor of Early Childhood Education Semester March 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective Assessment 1: Poster Including an Invigilated stage in Week 3. Due

Read More »

EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development

Unit Code/Description EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development Course/Subject Graduate Diploma in Education (early childhood) Semester S 1, 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective In this assessment, student are required to select one of the case studies provided and critically analyze the child’s

Read More »

JSB172: Professional Academic Skills

JSB172: Professional Academic SkillsAssessment: Workplace Report and Presentation Weight: 50%Due date: Friday 30th May 11:59pm Length: 1,750 words (+/- 10 %) / 5minutesPurpose/Learning Objectives:This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4: Task:Your task is to write a Workplace Report identifying how to address the topic/issue chosen or

Read More »

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment 2025 2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment Assignment MaterialsAssignment Information Sheet & Marking Criteria.pdf (this document)Assignment Template.docx (template)Example Assignment.pdf (HD exemplar)Due Date: Friday 16 May, 11:59PM (Week 10)Weighting: Marked out of 100 (worth 30% of course grade)Word Count: 1,500 words maximum(inclusive of main text, headings, in-text citations; excluding

Read More »

Principles of Economics Federal Budget

Principles of Economics Short-answer Assignment V1 (20% of final mark) The assignment consists of four questions.  You should allocate at least half a page (or 250 words) to each answer or 1000 words for all four answers depending on the nature of and/or marks allocated for the question/s. You may

Read More »

LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS)

Graduate Diploma in Migration Law LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHER VISAS) Assessment Task 2 – Semester 1, 2025 LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS) Instructions: 1. Students must answer all questions as indicated. Make certain all answers are clearly labelled. 2. Make certain

Read More »

Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry

REPORT TOPICPrepare an Academic Report on the following:‘Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry’.The report should encompass the following: Your personal evaluation and critique of the key findings in your report including your evaluation of construction cadetships, yourfindings in relation to potential issues/problems with cadetships and your recommendations to improve

Read More »

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Master of Professional Accounting and Accounting Advanced

Assessment 2 – Business Case (CVP) AnalysisUnit Code/Description ACC901 Accounting for Managerial DecisionsCourse/Subject Master of Professional Accounting and Master of Professional Accounting AdvancedSemester S1 2025 Assessment Overview Unit Learning OutcomesAddressed1,2,3,4 and 5Assessment Objective The primary objective of this assessment is to assess the students’ ability to apply CVPanalysis and relevant

Read More »

Urban Design Theory Essay writing

Essays are a major form of assessment at university. Through essays, you develop your understanding of discipline-specific content, strengthen your critical thinking, and develop your ability to translate that thinking into a persuasive written form. This assignment assesses your understanding of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 1) understand the historic

Read More »

Statutory Interpretation of Disability Discrimination in NSW Law

Foundations of Law 70102 – Assessment Task 3 – Autumn 2025Statutory Interpretation and Research ExerciseDue: Thursday 22 May 2025 by 23.59Length: 2000 words (excluding the headings Part A, Part B and Part C, footnotes andbibliography. Any additional headings that you decide to use will be included in the wordcount)Weighting: 40%Task

Read More »

Engineering Career Readiness: Sustainability & Reflection

Objectives: The purpose of this assignment is to: Apply your learning in this unit to your development as an engineering graduate and your future career.Develop the ability to communicate yourself professionally.Develop an ability to reflect on your professional development, and identify any gaps in your capabilities.Unit Learning Outcomes: This task

Read More »

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains

Child Study Report: Saif’s Development Across Key Domains Introduction This Child Study Report focuses on Saif, a 4-year and 6-month-old boy attending our childcare centre. Saif is an active, curious, and sociable child who engages enthusiastically in various activities. Over three weeks, multiple observations were conducted in different settings—such as

Read More »

2500 Words Insurance Case Study Analysis

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Critical Reflections: Arts, Play & Mental Health

Peer Learning and DiscussionTask type Discussion Contribution Task description Contribute constructively to the formal weekly online discussions under the guidance of your moderator, in peer-to-peer learning. The purpose of the discussions is for students to explore and share ideas linked to the material being studied that week, and develop skills

Read More »

Indo-Pacific Health Challenge: Community Practice in Kiribati

Task type Indo-Pacific health challenge scenario Task description You will be presented with a real-world case scenario of a health challenge confronting an Indo-Pacific community that directly relates to the current climate emergency. You will analyse the scenario, exploring how community practice principles are being applied. You will then provide

Read More »

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?