Disruption & Engagement
Due: Week 5
Type: Case Study Review / Visual & Written Presentation)
- research, analyse and critically evaluate effective disruption practices;
- critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement;
- write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
- deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.
Research and analyse a case study of disruption that has successfully engaged at a global level. Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the disruption and the global cultural influences & impact of the project, including level of engagement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental & sustainability considerations with reference to theory (include citations using Harvard referencing). In addition, prepare a self-reflective statement of the personal position on the project process and outcomes. Present as a visual presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 words).
Students must cite at least 3 external sources and refer to these using Harvard referencing (in text citations and reference list). Also include a full bibliography.
Upload final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) of the visual presentation to Moodle for marking.
Marking Criteria & Rubrics:
|Criterion 1:||Depth of research and analysis – 40%|
|Fail:||Incomplete research and analysis|
|Pass:||Adequate but basic research and analysis|
|Credit:||Competent research and analysis|
|Distinction:||Compressive and detailed research and analysis|
|High Distinction||Outstanding research and analysis|
|Criterion 2:||Critical evaluation of influences and impact – 20%|
|Fail:||Incomplete critical evaluation|
|Pass:||Adequate but basic critical evaluation|
|Credit:||Competent critical evaluation|
|Distinction:||Compressive and detailed critical evaluation|
|High Distinction||Outstanding critical evaluation|
|Criterion 3:||Personal refection – 20%|
|Fail:||Incomplete personal reflection|
|Pass:||Adequate but basic personal reflection|
|Credit:||Competent personal reflection|
|Distinction:||Compressive and detailed personal reflection|
|High Distinction||Outstanding and insightful personal reflection|
|Criterion 4:||Quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20%|
|Fail:||Incomplete presentation, no references|
|Pass:||Adequate but basic presentation, some references|
|Credit:||Competent presentation with references|
|Distinction:||Compressive and detailed presentation, accurate references|
|High Distinction||Outstanding presentation, includes additional references|
Get expert help for RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!