Disruption & Engagement
Due: Week 5
Weighting: 30%
Type: Case Study Review / Visual & Written Presentation)
Learning Outcomes:
- research, analyse and critically evaluate effective disruption practices;
- critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement;
- write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
- deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.
Description:
Research and analyse a case study of disruption that has successfully engaged at a global level. Critically evaluate the effectiveness of the disruption and the global cultural influences & impact of the project, including level of engagement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental & sustainability considerations with reference to theory (include citations using Harvard referencing). In addition, prepare a self-reflective statement of the personal position on the project process and outcomes. Present as a visual presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 words).
Details:
Students must cite at least 3 external sources and refer to these using Harvard referencing (in text citations and reference list). Also include a full bibliography.
Upload final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) of the visual presentation to Moodle for marking.
Marking Criteria & Rubrics:
| Criterion 1: | Depth of research and analysis – 40% |
| Fail: | Incomplete research and analysis |
| Pass: | Adequate but basic research and analysis |
| Credit: | Competent research and analysis |
| Distinction: | Compressive and detailed research and analysis |
| High Distinction | Outstanding research and analysis |
| Criterion 2: | Critical evaluation of influences and impact – 20% |
| Fail: | Incomplete critical evaluation |
| Pass: | Adequate but basic critical evaluation |
| Credit: | Competent critical evaluation |
| Distinction: | Compressive and detailed critical evaluation |
| High Distinction | Outstanding critical evaluation |
| Criterion 3: | Personal refection – 20% |
| Fail: | Incomplete personal reflection |
| Pass: | Adequate but basic personal reflection |
| Credit: | Competent personal reflection |
| Distinction: | Compressive and detailed personal reflection |
| High Distinction | Outstanding and insightful personal reflection |
| Criterion 4: | Quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20% |
| Fail: | Incomplete presentation, no references |
| Pass: | Adequate but basic presentation, some references |
| Credit: | Competent presentation with references |
| Distinction: | Compressive and detailed presentation, accurate references |
| High Distinction | Outstanding presentation, includes additional references |
Get expert help for RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
