MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMIS500 Foundations of Information Systems
AssessmentGroup Case Study
Individual/GroupGroup
LengthPart A – Group report 3000 words +/- 10% Part B – Group presentation 10-15 minutes
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Apply business and IS knowledge and concepts to develop verifiable solutions and recommendations to address and support strategic goals of a business or an organisation.   Develop and communicate a collaborative strategy which embodies the principles of agile methodology to stakeholders of an organisation.
SubmissionPart A: by 11:55pm AEST Friday end Module 4.1 (Week 7) Part B: Module 4.2 (Week 8) to be presented during class time (in person classes) or submitted as a video recording by 11:55pm AEST Friday (online classes)
WeightingPart A: 25% Part B: 15%
Total Marks100 marks

Context The development of your professional skills includes researching information systems to assist with organisational issues that are encountered in contemporary business.

You will be learning important ‘agile’ skills to assist in the workplace, such as scrum meetings

Purpose: To conduct research in response to current business issues that your organisation will present.

This project will require you to respond to a specific business issue that is presented to you and then design, collect, analyse, interpret, report and present data back to the business via your report. The case study is a real business. A detailed case study will be distributed in class during Module 3.1.

Task Instructions • Form groups of 3-5 members. PART A Group Report:

Introduction to Chanel

Chanel is a French luxury fashion house that was founded by Coco Chanel in 1910. It focuses on women’s high fashion and ready to wear clothes, luxury goods, perfumes and accessories.

The company is currently privately owned by the Wertheimer family This is one of the last family businesses in the world of fashion and luxury with revenues of €12.8 billion (2019) and net income €2,14 billion (2019).

Chanel – Case Study To complete this assessment task you are required to design an information system for Chanel to assist with their business. You have discussed Porter’s Value Chain in class and you should understand the primary and support activities within businesses. For this assessment you need to concentrate on Marketing and Sales and how Chanel cannot survive without a Digital Strategy.

Figure 1: Porter’s Value Chain Model

Source: Porter’s Value Chain Model (Rainer & Prince, 2019),

Read the Chanel case study which will be distributed in Class during Module 3.1. Visit these websites

https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company- profiles.chanel.c17e7e5c74a842d90acdeb6cf13e86b6.html

https://www.voguebusiness.com/companies/chanel-invested-1-billion-in-a-pandemic-full-year- 2020-earnings?utm_source=Vogue+Business&utm_campaign=e1a3a4a1eb- 6WE+WED+16+JUNE+%E2%80%94+Future+of+food+%26+fashion+re&utm_medium=email&utm_te rm=0_5d1e7914df-e1a3a4a1eb-58977880

https://www.thefashionlaw.com/in-third-ever-financial-report-chanel-says-it-generated-12-8- billion-in-sales-in-2019/

  • to understand the business and where you, as consultants, can add value by improving their information systems in marketing and sales.

Based on the information provided as well as your own research (reading!) into information systems write a report for Chanel to assist them in developing a ‘Digital Strategy’ to develop insights for their marketing and sales especially in online sales.

Please structure the group report as follows:

  • Title page
    • Introduction
    • Background to the issue you plan to solve
    • Identify and articulate the case for a Digital Strategy at Chanel (based upon the data do you as a group of consultants agree or disagree)
    • Research the issues at Chanel and present a literature review – discuss the marketing and sales data analysis needs and the range of BI systems available to meet these needs.
    • Recommended Solution – explain the proposed Digital Strategy and information systems and how it will assist the business. You may use visuals to represent your ideas.
    • Conclusion
    • References (quality and correct method of presentation. You must have a minimum of 15 references)

Appendices should include: ‘scrum’ meeting minutes and ‘scrum’ meeting notes: During the Trimester you will hold scrum meetings in your groups (in class or online in a discussion thread). Each group has five minutes to state what they have done and what they plan to do in the next week (each person in the group is required to speak every week). Any issues can be addressed in this time and groups are required to take minutes and update their status every scrum meeting. These meeting minutes then need to be attached to the report as an appendix.

PART B Presentation: Your group is required to present your proposed ‘Digital Strategy’ for the business in a ten (10) minute presentation pitched as though your lecturer is the client and you are selling the idea of your ‘Digital Strategy’.

Every group member must present a minimum of 2.5 minutes with an overall maximum of six slides (plus a reference list).

The presentation is ten (10) minutes with an additional five (5) minutes for questions in in-person classes.

Online students are advised to attempt to anticipate what questions might be asked by an audience, and answer them during their recording.

ALL STUDENTS MUST ATTEND THE PRESENTATION. Special consideration (SC) must be sought if you are unable to attend. If you do not attend you will not receive any marks for this part of the assignment (unless SC is approved).

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

Submission Instructions

Submit your group report via the Assessment 2 link in the main navigation menu in MIS500: Foundations of Information Systems. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity Declaration

Group assessment:

We declare that except where we have referenced, the work we are submitting for this assessment task is our own work. We have read and are aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms

We are aware that we need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and we will do so accordingly.

Assessment Rubric – PART A

  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Title and Introduction   Percentage for this criterion = 10%No title or “Assignment 2”.   No introduction is attempted.Title is not clear and/or relevant.   A weak or non-existent introduction of topic. The paper’s purpose is unclear/thesis is weak or missing.Title is not clear but attempt is made.   A basic introduction that states topic but lacks interest. The thesis is somewhat clear and arguable.Title has been attempted but needs editing to be clearer.   A proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. The thesis is clear and arguable statement of position.Title clearly states the intent of the report.   Exceptional introduction that grabs interest of reader and states topic. The thesis is exceptionally clear, well-developed, and a definitive statement.
Issue and research question   Percentage for this criterion = 5%No clear identification of an issue or research question.The report does not clearly address the objective(s) and no research question is identified.The purpose and objective of the report is made clear, and addresses the objective(s). No research question is identified.The purpose and objective of the report is made clear, and addresses the objective. Research question is identified.The purpose and objective of the report is made clear, and it addresses the objecti ve(s) in a focused and logic al manner. A well- articulated research question.
Evidence based discussion and critical analysis   25%Effort considered inferior to the required minimum standard. No attempt at a discussion or critical review.   No attempt at analysis.Information is gathered from a single source. Lacks a basic knowledge of the field; selected sources irrelevant to project; misinterprets sources.   Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. Lack of analysis.Information is gathered from a limited number of sources. Demonstrates a basic knowledge of the field; selected sources relevant to project.   Some connections made between evidence and thesis. Some analysis but improvements can be made.Information is gathered from multiple sources. Demonstrates proficient knowledge of the field; thorough selection of sources pertinent to project.   Consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Overall, good analysis.Information is gathered from multiple, research- based sources.   Demonstrates exceptional depth of knowledge of the field; Comprehensive use of most recent and seminal sources)   Exceptionally critical, relevant and consistent
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
     connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis.
Description of Solution and justification of recommendation 30%Solution was not clear.Ideas were unclear. Little evidence of creativity or originality.   Evidence used does not clearly support the main argument.Ideas were relevant and stated. Appropriate concepts were included. Demonstrated knowledge of the key issues. Ideas were not as creative as they could be. Mid-level originality.   Connection between argument and evidence is not clearly articulated in all cases.Ideas were relevant and clearly stated. Appropriate concepts were included. Demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues. Ideas were somewhat creative. Good level of originality.   Evidence used to support the central point is well chosen, though not particularly rich or detailed.Ideas were all relevant and clearly stated. Appropriate concepts were included and integrated effectively. Demonstrated competence and knowledge of the key issues. Ideas were creative. High level of originality.   Evidence used to support the central point is rich, detailed and well chosen.
Conclusion 10%Not attempted.Recommendations do not clearly flow from the document, and/or miss key findings. They are not well organised.Conclusions are mostly relevant and are linked to the results of the document. Recommendations do not clearly flow from the document, and/or miss key findings. They are not well organised.Conclusions are relevant and portray the results of the document. Recommendations, if applicable, are specific, action-oriented suggestions, oriented to topic. Recommendations logically flow from the document but the logic may not always be clear.Conclusions are relevant and accurately portray the results of the document. Recommendations if applicable are specific, action-oriented suggestions, oriented to the topic, and relevant. Recommendations logically flow from the document in a manner which is evident to the reader.
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Appendix   Percentage for this criterion = 5%Not attempted.Not all minutes are attached.Not all minutes (only 1 missing) are attached but standard is good to averageAll minutes from scrum meeting attached and are of a good standard. Some minor issuesAll minutes from scrum meeting attached and are of a high standard.
Use of academic and discipline conventions   Percentage for this criterion = 15%  Reader has difficulty following the document.   Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas.     Referencing is omitted or does not resemble APA.  Poor grammar, spelling and punctuation. Low readability of document.   Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.   Referencing resembles APA, with frequent or repeated errors.  Communicates in a coherent and readable manner that adheres to the given format.     Accurately employs specialised language and terminology.     Meaning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is clear and logical.     Occasional minor errors present in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation.  Communicates coherently and concisely in a manner that adheres to the given format.     Accurately employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology.     Engages audience interest. Information, arguments and evidence are structured and sequenced in a way that is, clear and persuasive.     Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.   Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and  Communicates eloquently. Expresses meaning coherently, concisely and creatively within the given format.   Discerningly selects and precisely employs a wide range of specialised language and terminology.   Engages and sustains audience’s interest. Information, arguments and evidence are insightful, persuasive and expertly presented.     Spelling, grammar and punctuation are free from errors.   Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
   Demonstrates use of credible resources to support and develop ideas.     Referencing resembles APA, with occasional errors.develop arguments and statements.   Show evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence.     APA referencing is free from errors.relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements.   Show evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence.   APA referencing is free from errors.

PART B

  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Introduction An accurate statement of the purpose of the presentation is provided and the team are introduced. A brief introduction to the topic is provided and the structure of the remainder of the presentation is outlined.   Percentage for this criterion = 15%  Further work is required to meet the minimum standard.  Acceptable but has room for improvement to meet criteria standards to fullest potential. Requires consistent development of criteria elements to reach next level.  Still has room for growth to be completely satisfactory. Has potential to reach the next level but development still requires more application to fully satisfy criteria requirements.  Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements.  Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved.
Background A discussion and critical analysis of related literature/background material is presented. Multiple high quality references are used to underpin key points   Percentage for this criterion = 15%  Further work is required to meet the required minimum standard.  Acceptable but has room for improvement to meet criteria standards to fullest potential. Requires consistent development of criteria elements to reach next level.  Still has room for growth to be completely satisfactory. Has potential to reach the next level but development still requires more application to fully satisfy criteria requirements.  Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements  Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved.
Solution A discussion of results is presented with evidence based recommendations responding to stakeholder needs are presented. Recommendations are feasible and will deliver business value for the organisation.  Further work is required to meet the required minimum standard.  Acceptable but has room for improvement to meet criteria standards to fullest potential. Requires consistent development  Still has room for growth to be completely satisfactory. Has potential to reach the next level but development still requires more  Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements.  Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved.
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Percentage for this criterion = 40% of criteria elements to reach next level.application to fully satisfy criteria requirements.  
Presentation A confident and clear presentation by each team member contributing to a cohesive project pitch accurately reflecting project outcomes and responding to stakeholder requirements. Team members respond to panel questions and feedback and can clearly articulate their contribution to the project   Percentage for this criterion = 20%  Further work is required to meet the required minimum standard  Acceptable but has room for improvement to meet criteria standards to fullest potential. Requires consistent development of criteria elements to reach next level.  Still has room for growth to be completely satisfactory. Has potential to reach the next level but development still requires more application to fully satisfy criteria requirements  Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements  Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved.
Slides Slides created to a clear, creative and professional standard.   Percentage for this criterion = 10%  Further work is required to meet the required minimum standard.  Acceptable but has room for improvement to meet criteria standards to fullest potential. Requires consistent development of criteria elements to reach next level.  Still has room for growth to be completely satisfactory. Has potential to reach the next level but development still requires more application to fully satisfy criteria requirements.  Completely satisfactory. Has elements of excellence but needs to be consistent across all criteria requirements.  Outstanding application of effort. Criteria requirements fully achieved.
Order Now
No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (July 6, 2025) MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/.
"MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems." Universal Assignment - July 6, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems., viewed July 6, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/>
Universal Assignment - MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems. [Internet]. [Accessed July 6, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/
"MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems." Universal Assignment - Accessed July 6, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/
"MIS500 Foundations of Information Systems." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis500-foundations-of-information-systems-2/. [Accessed: July 6, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Nursing Ethics and Law – Henry Pearson Case Study

Nursing Ethics and Law – Henry Pearson Case Study Course Code & NameNUR1103 |Context of Professional PracticeAssessment Item and NameAssessment THREE | Case StudyAssessment Item TypeEssay/ Case studyDue Date & TimeWeek 10 | 15th March 23:59 hrsLengthEssay is 1200 words + or – 10%Marks and WeightingOverall mark is out of

Read More »

NUR3397 – Complex Care Case Study Presentation

Course Code & NameNUR3397 |Complex Care AAssessment Item and NameAssessment TWO | PresentationAssessment Item TypeIndividual oral presentationDue Date & TimeWeek 10 | 22nd April 23:59 hrsResults data will be returned to you three weeks after your submission dateLength12-15 minute oral presentation recorded to ZOOM cloud + or – 10%Marks and

Read More »

AI in Recruitment: Legal and Ethical Implications for Harmony Haven

PurposeThis assessment helps you demonstrate report-writing skills essential for HR and other professional roles. It develops your research abilities, including sourcing, reviewing, and synthesizing academic and non-academic literature. Strong report-writing skills support informed business decisions, enhancing your ability to assist managers and advance your career. AI in Recruitment: Legal and

Read More »

Youth Justice Crisis: Indigenous Incarceration in Australia

issues During Impact Root  cause Youth justice crisis ongoing Disproportionate indigenous youth incarcerations reports of abuse eg Don Dale Low age of criminal responsibility (10) – Systemic racism and overpolicing – Lack of diversion and rehabilitation pathways Word: 1000 Topic selected: Youth Justic Crisis, Assessment 1: Conflict Analysis Exercise –

Read More »

PV System Design and Energy Analysis for Residential Use

Executive Summary Provide a brief summary of the key methods and key results, max 500 words. 1.         Introduction (aims and objectives and brief description of the system studied and methods of the next sections) approximately half a page 2.         Solar irradiation analysis Provide location and data used. Provide hourly GHI,

Read More »

Assignment 3: Statistical Analysis and Recommendations for Enhancing HDI

Student Name:               Your full name Student ID:                     Your Student ID Make sure to delete the instructions!! Introduction: Include a succinct introduction at the start of your report. You may write a few sentences about purpose of this report, the type of analysis, or any other relevant information (about 50 words).

Read More »

Brian Old Age Case study Assignment

Assessment 1 – Written AssessmentAssessment TypePurposeDescriptionWritten AssignmentThe purpose of this assessment is to broaden each student’s understanding of the modulecontent using a case study and assessment toolsCase Study: Brian is an 84-year-old retired farmer in a rural area in Northern Territory. Hewas recently assessed following a minor motor vehicle accident

Read More »

Assessment name: Portfolio of planning cycle

Assessment name: Portfolio of planning cycleDue Date: Friday 13 June 11:59pmWeighting: 50%Length: 2000 wordsTask Description: This Portfolio is comprised of two tasks. You must submit your assessment as onedocument. Task 1: Anecdotal record and learning experienceAnecdotal recordView the video of pre-schoolers provided under the link “Video for Assessment 2” andcomplete

Read More »

NUR5327 Assessment 3 Assignment Help

Name NUR5327 Assessment 3 (Essay)Purpose The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your understanding of therolesof leadership and management in healthcare by identifying and analysinga change you have actively participated in, and how it relates to key topicssuch as interprofessional communication, evidence-based practice, and staffdevelopment.LearningOutcomes NUR5327 Assessment 3 Assignment

Read More »

Mathematics Investigation and Reflection Assignment Help

Submission: Mathematics Investigation and Reflection Assignment Help TurnitinFormat:Individual written document.Uses the current APA referencing style correctly.Length:2,000 wordsThreshold Detail:For this assessment task you must obtain at least 50% of the overall result (i.e. 25 points). If the total result for this unit is at least 50 points but you scored less

Read More »

FASS Research Proposal Template Assignment

FASS Research Proposal Template Word length2000 to 3000 wordsTitleUse a concise and descriptive title that accurately reflects the content of the proposal.Background context and significanceThis section should explain the background and context of the proposed research work,indicating the main contribution to knowledge you wish to make.Aims and objectivesInclude a clear

Read More »

Evidence to Inform Nursing Practice Assignment Help

Unit Code:   NURS12165 Unit Title:    Evidence to Inform Nursing Practice Assessment Three Type:                               Written Assessment Due date:                         Week 11: Wednesday, 28 May 2025 at 1600 (AEST) Extensions:                     Available as per policy Return date:                    Results for this assessment will be made available on Wednesday, 18 June 2025 Weighting:                       50% Length:                           

Read More »

NUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity

Assessment Item Task SheetCourse code andnameNUR1120 | Burden of Disease and Health Equity Assessment itemand nameAssessment Three | ReportDue date and time Week 11 | 22/04/2025 at 2359 hours AESTLength 1400 words (+/- 10% in each section) – includes in-text references, but not reference list.Marks out of:Weighting:80 Marks50%Assessed CourseLearning Outcomes(CLO)CLO1,

Read More »

PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-Awareness

Course Code and NamePSY1040: An Introduction to Cultural Safety in PracticeAssessment Item Number and NameAssessment 2: PortfolioAssessment Item TypePortfolio PSY1040 Portfolio: Cultural Responsiveness & Self-AwarenessDue Date & TimeTuesday, 29 April 2025 (Week 12), 11:59pmLength2000 words – an average of 400 words per task.Marks and WeightingMarked out of: 100Weighting: 50%Assessed Course

Read More »

Innovative Digital App Development Report

OVERALL DESCRIPTION OF TYPE OF ASSIGNMENT Assessment 1- Type of Assignment Individual Written Report Details Individual Written Report 3,000 words (500 words of the Report is Contextualisation) Weighting of Assessment : 70% INDIVIDUAL MARK Learning outcomes assessed by Assessment: 1, 2, 3 and 4 – See Module Listings of Learning

Read More »

Tourism Trends and Investment Decisions: A Comparative Study

Assignment TaskYou are a strategist working for a major hospitality group based in Australia. The company is planninginternational expansion, and the board has asked you to compile a report to identify the most suitablelocation for the project. The board has shortlisted two international locations (which will be allocatedto you by

Read More »

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years

EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Unit Code/Description EC502 Language and Literacy in the Early Years Course/Subject Bachelor of Early Childhood Education Semester March 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective Assessment 1: Poster Including an Invigilated stage in Week 3. Due

Read More »

EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development

Unit Code/Description EC501 Early Childhood Learning and Development Course/Subject Graduate Diploma in Education (early childhood) Semester S 1, 2025 Assessment Overview   Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed 1, 2, 3 Assessment Objective In this assessment, student are required to select one of the case studies provided and critically analyze the child’s

Read More »

JSB172: Professional Academic Skills

JSB172: Professional Academic SkillsAssessment: Workplace Report and Presentation Weight: 50%Due date: Friday 30th May 11:59pm Length: 1,750 words (+/- 10 %) / 5minutesPurpose/Learning Objectives:This assessment relates to Learning Outcomes 1, 2, 3, and 4: Task:Your task is to write a Workplace Report identifying how to address the topic/issue chosen or

Read More »

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment

2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment 2025 2015PSY Developmental Psychology Assignment Assignment MaterialsAssignment Information Sheet & Marking Criteria.pdf (this document)Assignment Template.docx (template)Example Assignment.pdf (HD exemplar)Due Date: Friday 16 May, 11:59PM (Week 10)Weighting: Marked out of 100 (worth 30% of course grade)Word Count: 1,500 words maximum(inclusive of main text, headings, in-text citations; excluding

Read More »

Principles of Economics Federal Budget

Principles of Economics Short-answer Assignment V1 (20% of final mark) The assignment consists of four questions.  You should allocate at least half a page (or 250 words) to each answer or 1000 words for all four answers depending on the nature of and/or marks allocated for the question/s. You may

Read More »

LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS)

Graduate Diploma in Migration Law LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHER VISAS) Assessment Task 2 – Semester 1, 2025 LML6003 – AUSTRALIA’S VISA SYSTEM 1 (FAMILY AND OTHERVISAS) Instructions: 1. Students must answer all questions as indicated. Make certain all answers are clearly labelled. 2. Make certain

Read More »

Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry

REPORT TOPICPrepare an Academic Report on the following:‘Construction Cadetships in the Australian Construction Industry’.The report should encompass the following: Your personal evaluation and critique of the key findings in your report including your evaluation of construction cadetships, yourfindings in relation to potential issues/problems with cadetships and your recommendations to improve

Read More »

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance

Assessing Corporate Governance and its Significance: A Case Study Analysis Overview: Accounting irregularities have cost investors millions of dollars and, most importantly, adversely impacted their confidence in the financial system. While there have been remarkable improvements in regulatory supervision, auditing framework and reporting transparency, young graduates must assess major corporate

Read More »

Master of Professional Accounting and Accounting Advanced

Assessment 2 – Business Case (CVP) AnalysisUnit Code/Description ACC901 Accounting for Managerial DecisionsCourse/Subject Master of Professional Accounting and Master of Professional Accounting AdvancedSemester S1 2025 Assessment Overview Unit Learning OutcomesAddressed1,2,3,4 and 5Assessment Objective The primary objective of this assessment is to assess the students’ ability to apply CVPanalysis and relevant

Read More »

Urban Design Theory Essay writing

Essays are a major form of assessment at university. Through essays, you develop your understanding of discipline-specific content, strengthen your critical thinking, and develop your ability to translate that thinking into a persuasive written form. This assignment assesses your understanding of the following Unit Learning Outcomes: 1) understand the historic

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?