| Unit title & code | BHS013-6 |
| Assignment number and title | Assignment 2: Practical Portfolio |
| Assignment type | Written practical report |
| Weighting of assignment | 30% |
| Size or length of assessment | 2500 words |
| Unit learning outcomes | This practical report assessment principally assesses core learning outcomes 1 and 2: Relation to the Unit Learning Outcomes The first core learning outcome requires that on completion of the unit you should be able to demonstrate a systematic understanding of measurement techniques in the biotechnology context. The second core learning outcome requires you to recognise and use professional standards for reporting laboratory data. |
| What am I required to do in this assignment? |
| Brief Description of Assessment Task Assignment 2 requires you to analyse and present laboratory analytical data and write a formal structured report according to peer-reviewed research standard. In this case you will prepare a formal report of the Yeast Fermentation Practical of both the spectrophotometry manual practical and the yeast fermentation manual practical based on provided laboratory data. |
| What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF) |
| Appropriately analyse and present laboratory data and understand the meaning of analysed data.Present a formal written report of the work according to expectations described in the assignment brief. |
| How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade? |
| Outline of Laboratory Report The report must contain at the top of the first page: your student number, the unit code and assignment number, and the word count (excluding references). The main body of the report should contain the following: Short descriptive titleIntroduction Background theory that links the laboratory work with the science that underpins the measurements; and an explicit statement of the aim(s) and objective(s) of the work done. Methods Brief summary of the various aspects of the work done. This must be written in the past tense. Do NOT reproduce the protocol; rather you should outline in a few lines what was done at each stage of the work. Results Section must start with extensive text that describes the results that follow: calibration data and glucose concentration changes (test and control). Discussion Discussion of the meaning of your results and explicit consideration of whether or not the aims and objectives were achieved. References List that contains the full information for each of the citations within your text. The reference list must only contain sources that have been cited appropriately in the main text using correct format, e.g. (Lanigan, 2011). Instructions for formatting the references can be found here: https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/ data/assets/pdf_file/0009/557568/UoBHarvard17_18.pdf Appendix Electronic scanned copies (NOT photographs NOR images scanned using a mobile phone) of the original signed result sheets for both the spectrophotometry and yeast fermentation practicals. NOTE The word limit is NOT a target for the required number of words. A shorter, well written report is likely to attract a higher grade than a longer report containing an unnecessarily large number of words. Submission: The completed report should include your student number, unit code and assessment number, and should be submitted via BREO. Failure to submit your report by the deadline, without approval from the mitigation team will result in a FAIL grade. |
| How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions? |
| The assessment report will document the findings of the yeast fermentation practical experiment manual and communicate their significance. The assessment will provide you with the opportunity to demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the development of modern biosensor approaches covered in the relevant lectures of the unit. |
| How will my assignment be marked? | |||||
| Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit. | |||||
| Pass – 40-49% | Pass – 50-59% | Commendation – 60-69% | Distinction– 70%+ | ||
| Quality of understanding and analysis of scientific principles and knowledge base (20%) | Satisfactory levels of understanding of the scientific principles and knowledge base with some inaccuracies. Adequate review of relevant literature, though some omissions or tangents. Superficial attempt to relate work to broader context and explain aim and approach. | Good understanding of the scientific principles and knowledge base. Sufficient review of relevant literature. A reasonable attempt to relate work to broader context and explain aim and approach. | Commendable level of understanding of the scientific principles and knowledge base. Appropriate review of relevant literature. Highly competent attempt to relate work to the most relevant features of the broader context and define the experimental aim. | A comprehensive understanding of the scientific principles and knowledge base. Detailed and focused review of previously published literature. Broader context of work clearly described. Experimental aim and approach accurately defined. | |
| Data handling and presentation (40%) | Data analysis is mostly correct with few errors or omissions. Clarity and quality of presentation are barely sufficient. Some attempt is given to explain what is being presented. | Data analysis is correct. Presentation is generally clear and appropriate. A reasonable attempt to explain what is being presented. | Data analysis is correct and complete. Presentation is clear, appropriate and suitable for arguments. Well-structured explanations of what is presented. | Data analysis is accurate, thorough and complete. Presentation is exemplary reflecting professional norms. Clear explanation of what is presented is given. | |
| Critical evaluation and discussion (30%) | Acceptable evidence of reflection or evaluation of scientific approach though at times a little shallow. The work is largely descriptive with some but limited interpretation and critical evaluation of data. Demonstrates some ability to discuss links between the current scientific thought and the work in hand, but it is rather superficial. | Evidence of reflection and evaluation of scientific problem and approach. Sound interpretation and critical evaluation of the data. Reasonable connections discussed between subject matter and current scientific thought. | Evidence of high quality reflection and evaluation of scientific problem and approach. Appropriate interpretation and critical evaluation of the data. Plentiful connections discussed between subject matter and current scientific thought. | Demonstrates a well- developed ability to evaluate scientific problems and to discuss clear evaluative links between the current scientific thought and the work in hand. Shows deep interpretation and critical evaluation of the data. |
| Written expression and structure. (5%) | Written expression uses simple syntax and contains some grammatical and spelling errors. Some parts of the work are disorganized. | Written expression is generally clear and arguments can be followed without undue difficulty. The work is suitably structured. | Written expression is clear and precise and supports well the development of the argument. The work is logically structured. | Written expression is clear, precise and concise. Arguments are put forward succinctly and the structure of the report is well- planned, well-thought out and logical. |
| Use of literature and referencing. (5%) | Limited range of relevant reference sources, or limited range of literature cited. Use of UoB Harvard referencing format with a few errors. Omissions in citations within text of report. | A reasonable range of literature accessed. In- text citations are used appropriately and UoB Harvard format is generally used correctly. | A significant range of primary sources is accessed including important primary sources. Correct UoB Harvard formatting of citations. | A wide range of primary sources is accessed. Correct UoB Harvard formatting of citations and reference list used throughout. |
Get expert help for BHS013-6 Assignment 2: Practical Portfolio and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
