| Unit title & code | Applied Microbiology, BHS014-6 |
| Assignment number and title | Assignment No-1, Course work- data analysis and data interpretation Report |
| Assignment type | Electronic |
| Weighting of assignment | 30% |
| Size or length of assessment | Approx. 2000 (certainly < 3000) |
| Unit learning outcomes | Evaluate the conceptual and methodological advances in applied microbiology, and develop a critical appreciation of the potential and limitations of exploiting microorganisms for industrial and biotechnology applications including genomic, and multi/interdisciplinary approaches. Critically assess the literature relevant to the application of microbiology in industry, and identify key principles and methodologies applicable to specific contexts, also recognizing the applicable risks, and ethical issues as well as the areas requiring further research and development. |
| What am I required to do in this assignment? |
| 1. You will be provided with the data set for analysis for the experiments: transformation, streak plate procedures, cellulose degrading bacteria and recombinant protein expression (full details provided in the Associated materials/ data set). 2. You will conduct data analysis and present the results in a report form. Skills taught/practiced/assessed Core technical skills Not applicable. Subject specific skills Streak plating. Transformation of bacteria. Serial dilutions. Spread plating. Use of selective and differential agar. SDS PAGE. Transferable skills Time management. Team work. Communication. Scientific writing. Literature searching. Word processing. Data presentation. Referencing Maths/Statistics Data handling. Scientific notation. Colony forming unit calculations. |
| What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF) |
| In order to pass Assignment 1, you will need to: Demonstrate the ability to carry out an analysis of experimental data in the area of applied microbiology.Produce a written report in the form of a scientific report that discusses the content of the given data.Demonstrate advanced written communication skills suitable for a technical audience. |
| How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade? |
| There will be two distinct parts to this report: “Manipulation of Bacteria” & “Protein expression in bacteria”. These will contribute 45% each to the total mark with the remaining 10% is allocated for written expression and structure and use of literature and references. Clarity of English language and presentation is essential throughout. A typical report will include 2 parts. Each part should include: Introduction (including aims) These sections should summarise the published background literature relevant to this study. They must explain what your experimental studies were about, and place them in context of the previously published literature. They should clearly state the scientific aim(s) of the studies. Methods These sections should briefly summarise the methods. You simply say how would you perform the expected tests for the data collection. They should contain sufficient detail to allow someone else to reproduce your experiments, but avoid unnecessary detail. Results You should include written text to explain what your findings are and what is shown in any figures and tables. Data may be presented in text, tables, graphs, diagrams, or photographs as appropriate for your particular studies. Figures and tables should be separately numbered and be clearly labelled. Results should describe your findings/observations and may state brief conclusions Discussion You should interpret your results, explaining what they indicate. You should evaluate the quality of your data and the reliability of the experimental technique used. You should identify any problems with the technique or data (if any exist) and suggest possible solutions. You should also compare your findings to previously published findings or your expected findings, and should place your results in the context of published scientific literature. There should be a single reference list section listing all references cited in both parts of the report. You should include peer-reviewed scientific journal articles or textbooks as sources. These should be listed in the correct University of Bedfordshire Harvard Referencing format in a single reference list (see here for details: https://lrweb.beds.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/557568/UoBHarvard17_18.pdf). The reference list should only contain sources that have been cited appropriately – e.g. (Smith, 2010) – in the main text of your report. |
| How does this assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions? |
| You should demonstrate in your report knowledge and understanding of basic concepts applied microbiology and its application in industry and biotechnology approaches.Your report should be structured formally and professionally, following the instructions given in this assignment brief. You should present your data in tables, graphs or statistical analyses as appropriate and provide clear referencing in UoB Harvard format. |
| How will my assignment be marked? |
| Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page. You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit. |
| Assessment Criteria | Pass – 40-49% | Pass – 50-59% | Commendation – 60-69% | Distinction– 70%+ |
| Quality of understanding and analysis of scientific principles and knowledge base. (20%) | Satisfactory level of understanding and analysis of scientific principles and knowledge base are in some areas limited and/or erroneous. Inadequate review of relevant literature. Explain the experimental aim and approach, with little connection of study to the broader context. | A good level of understanding of relevant scientific principles and knowledge base. Adequate review of relevant literature, though some omissions or tangents. A reasonable attempt to relate study to broader context and explain aim and approach. | A very good level of understanding of relevant scientific principles and knowledge base. Detailed review of relevant literature and the context of the report. | A comprehensive understanding of the scientific principles and knowledge base. Detailed and focused review of previously published literature. Broader context of study clearly described. Experimental aim and approach well defined. |
| Data handling and presentation. (40%) | A satisfactory data analysis and is complete. Presentation of data is appropriate. Some attempt is given to explain what is being presented. | Data analysis is correct. Presentation is generally clear and appropriate. A good attempt is given to explain what is being presented. | Data analysis is accurate, thorough and very good. Data interpretation is generally meaningful and shows an ability to evaluate data and the techniques used. | Data analysis is accurate, thorough and complete. Presentation is clear and appropriate. Clear explanation of what is presented is given. Sound understanding of data analysis shown. |
| Critical evaluation and discussion. (30%) | Satisfactory evidence of reflection or evaluation of scientific approach. Lack of critical evaluation of cited literature. Connections made between subject matter and current scientific thought show evidence of significant shortcomings in terms of understanding and analysis. | Good evidence of reflection and evaluation of scientific problem and approach. Some critical evaluation of cited literature, though at times a little shallow. Demonstrates some ability to make evaluative links between the current scientific thought and the work in hand, but the evaluation is sometimes rather superficial. | Demonstrates a very good evidence to evaluate scientific problems. Good critical evaluation of cited literature. Demonstrates a very good ability to make evaluative links between the current scientific thought and the work in hand, which are capable of contributing to the advance of scientific knowledge. | Demonstrates a well-developed ability to evaluate scientific problems and to make clear evaluative links between the current scientific thought and the work in hand, which are capable of contributing to the advance of scientific knowledge. Shows deep critical evaluation of cited literature. |
| Written expression and structure. (5%) | Written expression makes some of the arguments difficult to access. The structure of the work is satisfactory, but planning could have been more thorough in parts. | Written expression is clear, and arguments can be followed without undue difficulty. The structure of the work is good and well panned. | Written expression is clear and concise. Arguments are put forward succinctly and the structure of the piece is well-planned, well- thought out and logical, enhancing its readability | Written expression is exceptionally clear and concise. Arguments are well constructed, and the overall structure is logical and easy to read. Sentence construction is clear and not convoluted. |
| Use of literature and referencing. (5%) | A reasonable range of literature is accessed, with considerable reliance on secondary sources. Correct use of UoB Harvard referencing format. Appropriate level of citations within text of report. | A good range of literature is accessed, including important primary sources. In-text citations are used appropriately and UoB Harvard format is generally correctly used | Avery good range of primary sources are accessed. Correct UoB Harvard formatting of citations and reference list used throughout, to a very good standard. | A broad range of primary sources are accessed. Correct UoB Harvard formatting of citations throughout the report. In-text citations are used entirely appropriately throughout. |
Get expert help for Applied Microbiology BHS014-6 Data analysis and Data interpretation Report and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
