Assignment 1 – Design Documentation

Overview

This is an individual assignment that requires you to implement your design using block-based coding using MIT Scratch (https://scratch.mit.edu/).  Scratch is a free programming language and online community where you can create your own interactive stories, games, and animations. For this assignment you will use Scratch to create the program you designed in Assignment 1 – Design Documentation

Learning Outcomes Assessed

The following course learning outcomes are assessed by completing this assessment:

  • K2. Relate goal-setting and plan formulation to problem solving
  • K3. Compare and contrast commonly used problem solving strategies
  • K4. Describe tools and techniques that can be used to model and describe problems
  • K5. Describe the value of reflection, attitude and self-efficacy towards success in problem solving
  • S1. Decompose a problem and create goals and plans to solve that problem
  • S2. Devise and implement problem solving strategies which can be applied to a range of IT problems
  • S3. Develop and verify algorithms based on conceptual models used in programming
  • S4. Construct documentation describing how to solve a problem
  • A1. Apply problem solving strategies, tools and techniques to solve problems in a variety of domains
Assessment Details
Assignment Scenario Reminder

In Assignment 1 – Design Documentation, you designed an original program that in some way incorporated searching, the colour red, and your student id.  

Important Note Before You Begin

This assignment takes the form of a hackathon, meaning that you have a short period of time in which to work on your idea and you may not have a finished product when it ends. This is absolutely fine – you do not need to fully implement your program, but you do need to make some progress towards your goal.

You are not being assessed on how good your program is, or how complicated its design, or anything else that assumes you already have a level of coding ability.  Instead, the focus is on your problem solving skills.  When you encounter a challenge, how do you respond?  What strategies do you employ?  How do you proceed when your first (or first several) attempts are unsuccessful?  For your assignment, this means two key things:

CRICOS Provider No.   00103D | RTO Code 4909

  1. Even though you are able to freely see and access existing Scratch programs, copying someone else’s work does not provide you with any benefit.  Copying existing work does not allow you to practise your problem solving skills, and so you would not receive high marks for the submitted work.  It is what you, personally, achieve that counts, not what you’re able to source from someone else.
  2. The complexity of your program idea allows you to control the level of problem solving you need to perform.  Only you know your current capabilities, and so it is up to you to choose an idea that interests you and that pushes you just beyond your current capabilities so that you have the opportunity to demonstrate your problem-solving skills.  If, when you are coding, you find that your choice was too simple, you can add further complexity.  You will not be penalized for submitting an incomplete implementation of your program, but you will be penalized if you have chosen a task that does not provide you the opportunity to problem-solve appropriately.
Using Scratch v3

Scratch (https://scratch.mit.edu/) is available for both online and offline use. Download Scratch from here: https://scratch.mit.edu/download.  Save your work to your computer as you go. 

Some interactive tutorials are available within Scratch; and others are available here:

https://projects.raspberrypi.org/en/codeclub/scratch-module-1 to help you learn how to use the Scratch interface and create programs.

Assignment Requirements

Your task is to develop your design documentation further and to create your program in Scratch. THIS IS AN INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT.

PART A

For this part of your assignment you need to submit one document with the following:

  • Program title and description (an overview of your program). This should include an update on the idea you have chosen for your program, and an explanation of why you have chosen this idea (based on your current capabilities with programming and problem-solving) and any modifications you have made since you submitted your Assignment 1.
  • One or more UML diagrams showing the behaviour of your program.  You may need to break your requirements down into smaller sub-tasks to achieve this, and should make it clear how diagrams fit together.
  • Test cases and test results.
  • Work journal discussing, analysing and reflecting upon the problem solving techniques you use during the hackathon. You will update and maintain your work journal on a frequent basis throughout the hackathon, documenting:
    • an overview of the work you have been attempting
    • challenges or problems you encounter
    • the output of your work.

Throughout these journal entries, you will make and analyse connections between the work you are performing and the course concepts reviewed throughout the semester.  For example, if you attempt to solve a problem using a graphical model, your entry would identify the problem you were trying to solve, discuss the use of the graphical model and the reason for its use and analyse how effective the graphical model was in helping you resolve the problem.

You will also reflect on your learning and responses to challenges encountered throughout the hackathon.  This learning can include both course concepts that you understand better due to applying them during the hackathon, and learning about yourself as a problem solver. 

An example of the format for a single journal entry is included below:

Journal Entry: Day 8

Tasks Attempted Today: Getting Dragon to React when Touched

Finally made a breakthrough on the issue I had trying to get the Dragon to react appropriately when it is touched. I realized it had to be an error with the logic of the code somewhere, so I revisited my activity diagram and worked through it step by step. It seemed okay, so I then compared it carefully with the code I’d created in Scratch. It turns out I hadn’t set up the “if” statement correctly, so the code to react was never being reached. I found it much easier using the activity diagram to compare with my code because I could then just concentrate on making sure the code exactly followed the activity diagram’s structure. When I had tried reviewing the code directly without the activity diagram, I got lost (without realizing) trying to keep track of what the code was doing and the logic of what I wanted the code to actually do. It was such a relief to fix this issue and it gave me confidence that I can actually do this if I put the effort into thinking about it.

My next task was to make the reaction occur over a larger distance. I wasn’t sure how big to create the reaction zone, so I created a table of different values for the reaction zone and recorded the results for each. In doing this, I determined that the zone size I wanted was halfway between two values I’d tested and was able to confirm this through testing. This combination of trial and error with recording the results in a table worked effectively as it gave me some structure around choosing a suitable value rather than just guessing.

Embedded Images: Activity Diagram, Screenshot of current code, Table of Reaction Zone results

PART B

The final thing you will do is create a video recording OR present in Week 11 labs[1]

This presentation will:

  • introduce and demonstrate your program
  • identify a personally-significant moment experienced during the hackathon and discuss what made this significant.  A significant moment may include events that were challenging, particularly emotive (satisfying, frustrating, etc) or that had a large impact on the work performed during the hackathon.
  • discuss one problem solving technique or strategy used personally to address a problem faced during coding and how (and why) it was used.  

Each presentation should not exceed 5 minutes.  Any presentation aids readily available to students may be used, but students are responsible for ensuring these will work in the labs and having a backup available in the event of an issue.

For ODL students and those students who choose to do a video, you will have to include a link to your presentation within your word document created in PART A. Failure to do this, will result in zero marks for the presentation component of the assignment. 

Part A and Part B (if you are submitting a video) are due Friday of Week 11 @ 5pm.

Submission

Your assignment must be submitted as a Microsoft Word file or a .pdf file only, in the assignment submission box provided in Moodle.  Your work will be evaluated for originality using TurnItIn. There will be a separate assignment 

Marking Criteria

Refer to the marking rubric at the end of this document.

Feedback

Marks will be uploaded in fdlMarks and a completed marking feedback sheet uploaded in Moodle within 2 weeks of the assessment due date.

Plagiarism: 

Plagiarism is the presentation of the expressed thought or work of another person as though it is one’s own without properly acknowledging that person. .

Marking Rubric for Part 1: Hackathon Documentation

CriteriaHigh (3 marks)Medium (2 marks)Low (1 marks)Not demonstrated (0 marks)
Program title and description A single idea for a program has been selected. An explanation has been provided that shows a high level of insight into why this program is appropriate based on the student’s current capabilities with programming and problem-solving. Any modification to original design has been justifiedA single idea for a program has been selected. An explanation has been provided that shows limited insight into why this program is appropriate based on the student’s current capabilities with programming and problem-solving. Any modification to original design has been mentioned but not justifiedA single idea for a program has been selected but no explanation of why this choice was made has been provided OR no / an inappropriate program idea has been selected. Modifications to original design have not been justified
Provide an appropriate UML model to represent the proposed programUML diagram is provided and is an appropriate type of diagram for the purpose it has been used. The diagram appropriately reflects the program. Correct notation is used, and following the diagram would lead to implementation of appropriate solutions.UML diagram is provided and is an appropriate type of diagram for the purpose it has been used. The diagram reflects the program as appropriate. There are some issues with clarity, or logic that would cause issuesProvide an appropriate UML model to represent the proposed programA UML diagram is not provided and/or is not suitable  for the purpose it has been used. 
Problem Solving TechniquesA variety of problem solving techniques are identified and discussed with explicit connection to the related modelling documentation, code and / or test cases. Meaningful connections are analysed between course concepts and the application of these concepts to solve problems experienced during the hackathon. Use of problem solving techniques has led to significant progress towards implementing a solution.Problem solving techniques are identified and discussed with explicit connection to the related modelling documentation, code and / or test cases. Attempts to relate course concepts with experiences solving problems in the hackathon are made but these lack depth and / or understanding. Use of problem solving techniques has led to reasonable progress towards implementing a solution.A limited selection of problem-solving techniques are identified and discussed.Application of problem solving techniques is not evident through the journal OR Problem solving techniques are identified and discussed but links are not made between these techniques and how they have been applied to specific modelling documentation, code and / or test cases.
Perseverance through challengesJournal entries demonstrate that the problem selected for the hackathon presented many challenges. This may have  been achieved by adapting the initial problem to a more difficult standard.   Experiences resolving challenges are discussed and demonstrate a thoughtful approach to identifying and trialling possible  solutions. A strong willingness to persist through difficulties and adapt approaches when required is evident.Journal entries demonstrate that the problem selected for the hackathon presented several challenges. This may have been achieved by adapting the initial  problem to a more difficult standard.   Experiences resolving challenges are discussed. A willingness to persist through difficulties and adapt approaches when required is evident.Journal entries demonstrate that the  problem selected for the hackathon presented few challenges.   Experiences resolving challenges are discussed. A limited willingness to persist through difficulties and adapt approaches when required is evident.Journal entries do not identify challenges  encountered during the hackathon OR Journal entries identify challenges encountered during the hackathon but do not provide details of how these were approached and / or demonstrate willingness to persist through difficulties.

                                                                                                                                                             Page 5 of 6

CriteriaHigh (3 marks)Medium (2 marks)Low (1 marks)Not demonstrated (0 marks)
Test Cases A comprehensive selection of test cases (including results) is provided to validate design (whether or not  code is fully implemented).Test cases (including results) are provided to validate most of  the design (whether or not code is fully implemented). Additional test cases would be required for confidence that the code  behaves as required.Limited or no test cases and/or results are provided.
Reflection On-going, frequent reflection is evident throughout the journal and includes analysis of how the experiences contributed to student’s understanding of course concepts.Few, or infrequent, attempts at reflection have been included in the journal OR analysis is either not provided or limited.Reflection has not been attempted.
Marking Rubric for Part 2: Hackathon Presentation – 5 marks
CriteriaHigh (3 marks)Medium (2 marks)Low (1 mark)Not demonstrated (0 marks)
Introduction and demo  The program idea selected for the hackathon is clearly described. A demonstration is madeThe program idea selected for the hackathon is  unclear. AND/OR No demonstration is made.
Personally-Significant Moment The presentation includes identification and discussion of a personally-significant moment during the hackathon.Personally significant moment during the hackathon identified but limited discussion of this event occurs.A personally significant moment during the hackathon is not identified.
Problem Solving TechniquesOne key problem solving technique is identified and discussed in relation to how and why they were used, in  the context of the unique challenge identified. The appropriateness of this technique for this purpose is insightfully analysed.One key problem solving technique is identified and discussed in relation to how and why they were used, in the context of the unique challenge identified. The appropriateness of this for this purpose is analysed but this analysis lacks depth.One key problem solving technique is identified and discussed in relation to how and why they were used, in the context of the unique challenge identified. The appropriateness of this technique is questionable. Problem solving technique not identified and discussed OR Problem solving technique is identified but not discussed as to how and why used  and / or not analysed.

                                                                                                                                                             Page 6 of 6


.

Order Now

Get expert help for Assignment 1 – Design Documentation and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (December 22, 2024) Assignment 1 – Design Documentation. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/.
"Assignment 1 – Design Documentation." Universal Assignment - December 22, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/
Universal Assignment July 25, 2022 Assignment 1 – Design Documentation., viewed December 22, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/>
Universal Assignment - Assignment 1 – Design Documentation. [Internet]. [Accessed December 22, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/
"Assignment 1 – Design Documentation." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 22, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/
"Assignment 1 – Design Documentation." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-1-design-documentation/. [Accessed: December 22, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

NTW 600 Computer Network and Security

Assessment 2 Information and Rubric Subject Code  NTW 600 Subject Name Computer Network and Security Assessment Number and Title Assessment 2: Cyber Security Threats to IT Infrastructure of a real-world Organisation Assessment Type Group Assessment Length / Duration  1500 words Weighting %  30% Project Report: 20% Presentation :10% (Recorded) Total

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?