CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help

CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help

CHEG 6001 coursework

Out 10-10-23

Hand in date : 12-01-23 via blackboard 70+30 % of the total mark

The projec is worth (100%) of your semester grade and is brock down to two parts, Part 1 (70%), and Part 2 (30%)

Part 1 (70%)

Multiple Criteria Decision Making MCDM has become the norm for making decisions that involve complex trade-offs between [seemingly] conflicting criteria and encompasses a wide variety of methods, like: MAUT, AHP, ANP, Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH), PROMETHEE, Goal Programming, and Decision Evaluation for Complex 57 Environmental Risk Network Systems (DECERNS), just to name a few.

The main research activities during the last five years have significantly increased. The main research fields are operation research and sustainable development. The philosophy of decision making in engineering is to assess and select the most preferable solution, implement it and to gain the biggest yield. Preferences are used in a lot of problem situations both in individual and organizational decision-making processes. Several effective decision- making methods that support decisions under conditions of multiple criteria have appeared in the last decade. These methods are traditionally grouped into four categories:

  1. Aggregative approaches;
  2. Outranking approaches;
  3. Goal-oriented, aspiration, and/or reference level approaches; and
  4. Integrated approaches

Ammonia is sustaining the food supply for half the world’s population. Ammonia manufacturing accounts for 1–3% of the world’s energy consumption, 5% of natural gas consumption, and a significant portion (ca. 3%) of greenhouse gas emissions. Ammonia is primarily produced through the Haber-Bosch process due to the availability of cheap, abundant natural gas. A majority of this ammonia (>85%) is used for fertilizer, and therefore shipped by truck or rail from the manufacturing site to agricultural regions. Because ammonia is a toxic gas at ambient conditions, shipping is expensive and hazardous with high associated insurance costs.

Senior management at your organization is seeking recommendations from the engineering department for potential alternatives to the current ammonia production supply chain. Your recommendation should include an analysis of technical, economic, health and safety aspects of the project using MCDM tools to give a more sustainable option to the process.

The design should employ new modular manufacturing methodsthat are becoming more common in the chemical process industry. Modular manufacturing is the concept that complete chemical processes or sub-sections of chemical processes can be prefabricated in a factory setting. By comparison, many existing chemical plants are “stick built,” meaning they were constructed outdoors at the plant site. Modular manufacturing can offer advantages in terms of time-to-market, quality control, construction labour productivity/safety, and economies of mass production.

Please consider the following additional factors when designing report:

  1. The plant may use a “numbering-up” approach that uses smaller unit scale modules that are stacked in parallel to provide the required quantity of throughput.
  2. You may assume the 50 mtpd scale is right-sized for continuous, year-round operation and seasonal variation in fertilizer demand can be levelled out through various off-take agreements (e.g., sales to a neighbouring facility that converts ammonia to other, storage friendly forms of fixed nitrogen outside of the growing season).
  3. Where possible in the design, process intensification (PI) concepts should be used to keep equipment costs low.
  4. The process must have as small a carbon footprint as possible. Please make recommendations on how this can be achieved.
  5. Innovative designs are desired to minimize the amount of background intellectual property (IP) that must be licensed.
  6. Safety, financial/technical risk, and environmental aspects should be considered in decisions and recommendations.
  7. For the purposes of your economic analysis assume the system will have a 20-year useful plant life, and a Minimum Acceptable Rate of Return (discount rate) of 8%.

Your report must include

  1. Cover Page
  2. Table of Contents
  3. Abstract
  4. Executive summery
  5. Introduction
  6. Process specification (from published papers + your own assumptions and calculation)
    1. Process Flow Diagram and Material Balances
    2. Process Description
    3. Energy Balance and Utility Requirements
    4. Equipment List and Unit Descriptions
    5. Equipment Specification Sheets
  7. Equipment Cost Summary
  8. Fixed Capital Investment Summary
  9. Safety, Health, and Environmental Considerations
  10. Process Safety Considerations
  11. Other Important Considerations
  12. Manufacturing/Operation Costs (exclusive of Capital Requirements)
  13. Economic Analysis
  14. MCDM tools for performance indicators
  15. Conclusions and Recommendations
  16. Bibliography
  17. Appendix for all data and assumptions

Part 1 of the course work is worth (70%) of your semester grade and will be graded on the following point scheme:

Pro forma statement: (15 points) Pro forma statements will be evaluated on their numerical accuracy; inclusion of relevant revenue and expense streams (including depreciation and taxes); and the reasonableness of any assumptions made.

Organization and clarity of the spreadsheet presentation will also be a factor in the pro forma statement score.

Written report: (20 points) The written report should be use 12 point Times New Roman font and be no more than 15 pages double-spaced with one-inch margins on all sides. Please pay attention to these formatting instructions, as the instructor will deduct points for failing to follow formatting instructions. Pages should be numbered.

Anexecutivesummary(5points) of no more than one page. The executive summary should provide succinct discussion of the project; the most important results from your quantitative analysis; and a brief summary of qualitative factors that might affect the viability of your project in the future.

A written description (10 points) of how you conducted your pro forma analysis. Your goal here should be that someone with basic knowledge of the industrie and financial practices could reproduce your pro forma statements based on your description.

Quantitative analysis (25 points)of the financial viability of your project under a base-case set of market assumptions, plus the results of two sensitivity and/or threshold analyses where you investigate the impacts of alternative market assumptions on the project financial viability.

Qualitative analysis (25 points) of institutional, regulatory, or policy drivers that you have not quantified but which could materially affect project financial viability in the future such as Process Safety Considerations, Safety, Health, and Environmental Considerations, supply chain, etc….

Part 2 (30%)up to 1000 word maximum a reflective report on how MCDM has enhanced or hindered your chemical engineering design in part 1

Instructors for the course work

  1. This course work should be submitted to blackboard assignment
  2. Your final submission should contain
    • Work that is wholly/partly plagiarized will be subject to University disciplinaryprocesses.
    • All work should conform to the submission guidelines. In particular, your report should be word-processed, using a 12-point font and 1.5 spacing. You should include a title page with your student numbers, the name of your instructor – and of course name as well as the reports.
  3. Marking and feedback
    • The unit team aim to achieve reliable, consistent and reproducible judgements on your work. In accordance with University regulations, each assessment is marked against a scheme that distinguishes between different levels of achievement.
    • You can expect the following feedback on assessments undertaken for this unit.
      • Marks are normally expressed as a percentage.
      • The major shortcomings of your work.
      • Ways in which that mark can be improved.
      • You will also receive feedback during classes and through the Blackboard site, and additional opportunities to receive feedback are available from the unit team.
    • Your assessments are evaluated relative to the criteria outlined in Table 1. These provide a consistent reference point to distinguish between different levels of achievement. You should always take these criteria into consideration when preparing for any assessment on this unit.

Table 1 Marking criteria

GradeCriteria
distinctio nAs below plus: Excellent work – able to express an original reasoned argument in a lucid manner by reviewing & critiquing a wide range of material. | Original, critical thinking based on outstanding insight, knowledge & understanding of material. | Material contributes to current understanding & is of potentially publishable quality in terms of presentation and content. | Wide reaching research showing breadth & depth of sources.
MeritAs below plus: Clear, balanced coherent critical & rigorous analysis of the subject matter. | Detailed understanding of knowledge & theory expressed with clarity. | Extensive use of relevant & current literature to view topic in perspective, analyse context & develop new explanations and theories.
PassAs below plus: Detailed review and grasp of pertinent issues & a critical contextual overview of the literature. | Thorough knowledge of theory and methods & uses this to underpin arguments and conclusions. | Confidence in understanding and using literature.
40-49Demonstrates grasp of key concepts & an ability to develop & support an argument in a predominately descriptive way with valid conclusions drawn from the research. | Familiarity with key literature which is cited and presented according to convention. | Logical & clear structure, well organised with good use of language and supporting material.
30-39Some knowledge of relevant concepts & literature but significant gaps in understanding and/or knowledge. | Little attempt at evaluation, conclusions vague, ambiguous & not based on researched material. | Limited or inappropriate research. | Deficits in length, structure, presentation &/or prose
0-29. No serious attempt to address the question or problem, and/or manifests a serious misunderstanding of the requirements of the assignment. Acutely deficient in all aspects.

How the REFERENCES should be

The references should be cited in the main text in passing [1] or explicitly as in [2] with large brackets not in superscript or subscript. The full references should be given as below in the order in which they are cited. A complete reference should comprise the following:

An Article in a journal

Author’s Initials Surname, Title of Paper, NameofJournal(initalic), year(bold), volume, issue, page no.

[1] K L Wong and J Y Wu, Single-Feed Small Circularly Polarized Square Microstrip Antenna, Electronics Letters, 33, 1997, 1833-1834.

An Article in a Conference

Author’s Initials, Surname, Title of Paper, NameofConference(initalic), Place, year(bold), page no.

  1. V Sharma, Dual Band Circularly Polarized Modified Rectangular Patch Antenna for

Wireless Communication, IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation andUSNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Charleston, USA, 2009, pp. 786.

A Book

Author’s Initials, Surname, Titleofbook(initalic), Edition, Name of Publisher, Place of publication, year of publication (bold).

  1. RL Ashley, InLaboratoryDiagnosisofViralInfections, 3rd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York,

1999.

A Thesis

  1. Author’s Initials, Surname, TitleofThesis(initalic), University, Country, yearofpublication (bold)).

RJ David, My Knowledge about Research, Edinburgh University, UK, 1998.

Patents

  1. Patents: AB Inventor1, CD Inventor, (Holder), Country Code and Patent Number (registration year (bold)).

Online document

  1. J Cartwright, Big stars have weather too, IOP Publishing Physics, Web. http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/11/6/16/1, 2007.
Order Now

Get expert help for CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 14, 2025) CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/.
"CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - February 14, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/
Universal Assignment December 31, 2022 CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help., viewed February 14, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/>
Universal Assignment - CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help. [Internet]. [Accessed February 14, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/
"CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 14, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/
"CHEG6001 Coursework Assignment Help." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/cheg6001-coursework-assignment-help/. [Accessed: February 14, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?