Number of assignment copies required: 1
Assignment to be presented in the following format: On-line submission
This coursework will have a weight of 70% of your final grade.
Task
Design, implement and deploy a deep learning based custom image multi-class classifier. Write a research report of 5000 words in the style of a research paper, including the following:
- The research question(s) you are exploring and the experiments you designed to address these question(s).
- A clear presentation of the methods (implementation, architectures, hyper parameters.) that were used, an outline of how they were deployed, and a justification of your decisions.
- A clear presentation of results, discussion and interpretation of results and conclusions.
- Please follow the marking scheme and to ensure your report includes all required sections.
Datasets
Here are some online dataset repositories, or come up with your own:
- UCI KDD Archive : http://kdd.ics.uci.edu/
- UCI Machine Learning Repository:
- NIST Handprinted Forms and Characters Database https://www.nist.gov/srd/nist-special-database-19
- The mixed National Institute of Standards and Technology (MNIST) data set https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dn754573.aspx
- CIFAR-10: http://groups.csail.mit.edu/vision/TinyImages/
Marking scheme
The marking scheme is as follows:
| Section | Marks | Content |
| Abstract (120 words | 5 | Summary of motivation, method and outcome |
| max) | ||
| Introduction | 5 | Research problem, Objectives, good introduction to what will follow. |
| Methodology | 15 | Architecture, Dataset |
| Implementation | 20 | Algorithm, readable codes |
| Results | 10 | Training, testing, performance |
| Critical analysis | 20 | Decisions, Justifications, Observations, |
| Explanations | ||
| Conclusion | 10 | Summary, future work |
| References | 10 | Correct use spelling and grammar and all the correct Citations and references used? |
| Formatting | 5 | Good use of the formatting tools given by your Text Editor. |
| Total | 100 |
Also, another 30% of your final grade will be awarded by the presentation you will do based on your Coursework.
Please see bellow the Marking Scheme of the Presentation.
Marking Scheme for the Presentation
| Topic | Total Marks | Remarks |
| Content | 50 | Covers topic in-depth with details. |
| Presentation design & layout features, Animations & transitions | 20 | Makes excellent use of fonts, colors, graphics, effects, transitions to enhance the presentation. |
| Length | 10 | Correct use of number of slides, Word Count (1000 words)? |
| Organization | 20 | Students present information in a logical, interesting sequence that the audience can follow. |
| Total | 100 |
Template
See VLE for a template page for the format of the research paper
Turnitin Policy
- We recognise the educational desirability that all of our students should enjoy the opportunity to self-submit their work to Turnitin (before submitting for assessment). We also recognise that Turnitin Originality Reports will sometimes assist in the identification of plagiarised work submitted for assessment.
- We will make Turnitin available to all of our students by way of our virtual learning environment (UELPlus) and we will encourage them to use it to improve their referencing skills.
- All students will be given the opportunity to make multiple submissions of their written work to Turnitin.
- All students will be advised, at the point of enrolment, that their work will be made available to third parties (such as Turnitin) for specified purposes, by way of a clause to be added to the Student Contract (the proposed clause, as suggested by Turnitin UK and JISCPAS, is set out in Annex I) and will be referred to Turnitin’s Questions and Answers for Students *.
A Module Leader may decide, in accordance with the policy of the appropriate School, that all student submissions for a particular component of assessment
How to Submit a Turnitin assignment Harvard Referencing – the guide to citation and referencing
This guide is based on Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2010) Cite them right: the essential referencing guide. 8th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (Palgrave Study Skills). (Quick Guide) for online book
Cite them right is now the standard Harvard referencing style at UEL for all Schools apart from the School of Psychology which uses the APA system. This book will teach you all you need to know about Harvard referencing, plagiarism and collusion.
How to access ‘Cite them right’ online off and on campus
- Open the University of East London website at http://www.uel.ac.uk
- Click on UEL DIRECT 7 o Type in your network username and password e.g.u0256978 and Library1
- Click on UEL PLUS o Under Campus Bookmarks o Click on Cite them right
- The book will load
- See above Quick Guide for a more detailed instruction on how to read the online book
- should be submitted to Turnitin, provided that the relevant Module Guide includes a notice to that effect.
- All postgraduate research students will be required to submit their dissertations to Turnitin.
7. Where Turnitin submission is required of work that will contribute to summative assessment and the student fails to submit, s/he will be awarded a mark of 0 for the component in question.
- An Originality Report should never be advanced as the sole reason for suspecting that a piece of work is plagiarised, because the judgement as to whether work is plagiarised must always be an academic judgement.
Plagiarism – A Guidance Note for Students
- Definition of Plagiarism
Our University defines plagiarism and other assessment offences in Part 8 of the UEL Manual of General Regulations (to which all students are referred upon joining UEL), which is reprinted in “The Essential Guide to the University of East London”. In this document, the following example of an assessment offence is given:
(e) The submission of material (written, visual or oral) originally produced by another person or persons without due acknowledgement*, so that the work could be assumed to be the student’s own. For the purpose of these Regulations, this includes incorporation of significant extracts or elements taken from the work of an(other(s), without acknowledgement or reference*, and the submission of work produced in collaboration for an assignment based on the assessment of individual work. (Such offences are typically described as plagiarism or collusion).
The following note is attached:
*Note: To avoid potential misunderstanding, any phrase not the students’ own should normally be in quotation marks or highlighted in some other way. It should also be noted that the incorporation of significant elements of an(other(s) work, even with acknowledgement or reference, is not an acceptable academic practice and will normally result in failure of that item or stage of assessment.
2. Plagiarism in Greater Detail
Work that students submit for assessment will inevitably be building on ideas that they have read about or have heard about in lectures. Students can, however, only demonstrate that they have learnt from their sources by presenting the concepts in their own words and by incorporating their own commentary on the findings.
Where students submit work purporting to be their own, but which in any way borrows ideas, wording or anything else from other source without appropriate acknowledgement of the fact, the students are guilty of plagiarism. Plagiarism includes reproducing someone else’s work whether it be from a published article, book chapter, website, an assignment from a friend or any other source.
When an assignment or report involves outside sources, or information, the student must carefully acknowledge exactly what, where and how he/she has employed them. If the words of someone else are used, they must be put in quotation marks or otherwise identified and a reference as to source appended. See the next section for more guidelines. For advice on actual 9 referencing techniques, and for some helpful tips on how to avoid plagiarism, see “The Study Skills Handbook” by Dr Stella Cottrell, pages 122-125.
Making simple changes to the wording of a section from a book, article, web-site etc. whilst leaving the organisation, content and phraseology intact would also be regarded as plagiarism.
3. Collusion
Collusion is the term used to describe any form of joint effort intended to deceive an assessor as to who was actually responsible for producing the material submitted for assessment. Students may obviously discuss assignments amongst themselves and this can be a valuable learning experience. However, if an individual assignment is specified, when the actual report/essay is produced it must be by the student alone. For this
reason students should be wary of lending work to colleagues since were it to be plagiarised they could leave themselves open to a charge of collusion.
4. When to Reference
Since the regulations do not distinguish between deliberate and accidental plagiarism, the key to avoiding a charge of plagiarism is to make sure that you assign credit where it is due by providing an appropriate reference for anything in your essay or report which was said, written, drawn, emailed or implied by somebody else.
You need to provide a reference:
- when you are using or referring to somebody else’s words or ideas from an article, book, newspaper, TV programme, film, web page, letter or any other medium;
- when you use information gained from an exchange of correspondence or emails with another person or through an interview or in conversation;
- when you copy the exact words or a unique phrase from somewhere;
- when you reprint any diagrams, illustrations, or photographs. You do not need to reference:
- when you are writing of your own experience, your own observations, your own thoughts or insights or offering your own conclusions on a subject; 10
- when you are using what is judged to be common knowledge (common sense observations, shared information within your subject area, generally accepted facts etc.) As a test of this, material is probably common knowledge if – you find the same information undocumented in other sources; – it is information you expect your readers to be familiar with; – the information could be easily found in general reference sources.
5. When Might the Charge be one of Unacceptable Academic Practice rather than Plagiarism?
Students occasionally misunderstand the concepts being presented here and submit essays or reports where substantial and significant elements of another author’s work are used and acknowledged. It is clear that such an essay or report cannot satisfy the normal assessment criteria to:
- use your own words;
- provide a critical commentary on existing literature;
- aim for novelty and originality;
- demonstrate your understanding of the subject area by paraphrasing.
It is thus likely in such a case that the outcome will be a fail mark for the particular piece of work concerned
UEL-CN-7023 Final Summative assessment Coursework Submission Link
With the above Link you will submit the Coursework. Please use the below Marking Scheme to assist you in your Work. Marking scheme for module UEL-CN-7023:
| Section | Total Marks | Content |
| Abstract (120 words max) | 5 | Summary of motivation, method and outcome |
| Introduction | 5 | Research problem, Objectives , good introduction to what will follow. |
| Methodology | 15 | Architecture, Dataset |
| Implementation | 20 | Algorithm, readable codes |
| Results | 10 | Training, testing, performance |
| Critical analysis | 20 | Decisions, Justifications, Observations, Explanations |
| Conclusion | 10 | Summary, future work |
| References, Citations | 10 | Correct use spelling and grammar and all the correct Citations and references used? |
| Formatting | 5 | Good use of the formatting tools given by your Text Editor. |
| Total | 100 |
Submission status
Please Follow this marking Scheme for better understanding of how you Report will be graded.
| Abstract (120 words max) Summary of motivation, method and outcome Maximum score 5 |
| Introduction Research problem, Objectives, good introduction to what will follow. Maximum score 5 |
| Methodology Architecture, Dataset Maximum score 15 |
| Implementation Algorithm, readable codes Maximum score 20 |
| Results Training, testing, performance Maximum score 10 |
| Critical analysis Decisions, Justifications, Observations, Explanations Maximum score 20 |
| Conclusion Summary, future work Maximum score 10 |
| References, Citations Correct use spelling and grammar and all the correct Citations and references used? Maximum score 10 |
| Formatting Good use of the formatting tools given by your Text Editor. Maximum score 5 |
You have not made a submission yet.
Previous activity
Next activity
UEL-CN-7023 Final Summative assessment Presentation Submission Link ►
Welcome to the University of East London VLE.
You are logged in as Reuben Settumba Bagenda (Log out)
Reset user tour on this page
Courses
Links
Contact
Email: info@unicaf.com
University of East London. Delivered in partnership with UNICAF © 2022 | All rights reserved
Terms of use
https://vle-uel.unicaf.org/mod/assign/view.php?id=125926 3/3
8/28/22, 8:29 PM UEL-CN-7023-39571: UEL-CN-7023 Final Summative assessment Presentation Submission Link
UEL-CN-7023 Final Summative assessment Presentation Submission Link
Your Presentation of your Coursework should be submitted separately by using the above submission Link. Please use this Marking Scheme for your Presentation
Marking Scheme for the Presentation
| Topic | TotalMarks | Remarks |
| Content | 50 | Covers topic in-depth with details. |
| Presentation design & layout features, Animations & transitions | 20 | Makes excellent use of fonts, colors, graphics, effects, transitions to enhance the presentation. |
| Length | 10 | Correct use of number of slides, Word Count (1000 words)? |
| Organization | 20 | Students present information in a logical, interesting sequence that the audience can follow. |
| Total | 100 |
Submission status
Attempt number This is attempt 1.
Submission status
No attempt
Grading status Not marked
https://vle-uel.unicaf.org/mod/assign/view.php?id=125927 1/2
8/28/22, 8:29 PM UEL-CN-7023-39571: UEL-CN-7023 Final Summative assessment Presentation Submission Link
Grading criteria
Please use this Marking Scheme as a guide for the Presentation
| Content Covers topic in-depth with details. Maximum score 50 |
| Presentation design & layout features, Animations & transitions Makes excellent use of fonts, colors, graphics, effects, transitions to enhance the presentation. Maximum score 20 |
| Length Correct use of number of slides, Word Count (1000 words)? Maximum score 10 |
| Organization Students present information in a logical, interesting sequence that the audience can follow. Maximum score 20 |
Get expert help for CN7023 Artificial Intelligence & Machine Vision and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
