COM621 UX Strategy

COM621 UX Strategy

Solent University

Coursework Assessment Submission

Module Name:    UX Strategy

Module Code:    COM621

Module Leader:

Assessment Submission Date:

Student Number:

UX Strategy

Contents

Part 1 – Introduction to System (1K words) 2

1.0 Introduction. 2

1.1       Current SUAA UX Design and Business Model 2

1.2       Academic and Market Research. 3

1.3       Analysis. 3

1.4       Summary. 3

2.0 Essay 2 (1K words) 3

2.1 User research. 3

2.2 User Journey. 3

2.3 Summary. 3

Add web link to (max 5 min) video of User Journey analysis. 3

3.0 Essay 3 (1K words) 3

3.1 Prototype  – Add web link to prototype sample. 3

3.2 Usability Testing. 3

3.3 Summary. 3

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations. 3

5.0 References. 3

Assessment Appendix. 5

Learning Outcomes: Self-Assessment (LOs – mapped for each of the 3 sections. Evidence all 5 are addressed.) 10

Ethics Policy. 11

Part 1 – Introduction to System (1K words)

1.0 Introduction

[ Add LO Number(s) for each section they are addressed ]
What is the context?

Who are the users?

What is the system?

What is the problem?

Why is it important?

Who should benefit from it?

What impact does technology have on that context?

What is the feature list comparison of existing systems?

1.1         Current SUAA UX Design and Business Model

[ Add ]

1.2         Academic and Market Research

[ Add ]

1.3         Analysis

[ Add ]

 

1.4         Summary

[ Add ]

2.0 Essay 2 (1K words)

2.1 User research

2.2 User Journey

2.3 Summary

Add web link to (max 5 min) video of User Journey analysis.

3.0 Essay 3 (1K words)

3.1 Prototype  – Add web link to prototype sample.

3.2 Usability Testing

3.3 Summary

4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations

5.0 References

Harvard Style (Surname, 1st Initial. (Date), ‘Title’ – Publication / Web address <visit date>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Assessment Appendix

Assessment Details

Module Title:UX Strategies
Module Code:COM621
Module Leader:
Level:6
Assessment Title:Solent Alumni Programme System
Assessment Number:AE1
Assessment Type:Report + Prototype
Restrictions on Time/Word Count:3000 words
Consequence of not meeting time/word count limit:It is essential that assignments keep within the time/word count limit stated above. Any work beyond the maximum time/word length permitted will be disregarded and not accounted for in the final grade. *
Individual/Group:Individual
Assessment Weighting:100%
Issue Date:30 Sept. 2021
Hand In Date:21/1/2022
Planned Feedback Date:04/02/2022
Mode of Submission:on-line via SOL
Number of copies to be submitted:1 Copy per student including all parts of assignment
Anonymous Marking  This assessment is exempt from anonymous marking.  

Assessment Task

DESIGN BRIEF AND TERMS OF REFERENCE

This project aims to research and analyse the UX Strategy for the Solent University Alumni Association (SUAA). A project Gantt chart will be needed to produce a work plan for the 3 K word final report. Weekly progress will be shared in each class session and online. Students will do a case study analysis of the Solent University Alumni Association current website and related services / resources. The main university contacts are Mike Toy (SUAA manager) and Mark Humphrys (Marketing Manager). Please coordinate your communication with these staff members so we don’t send too many individual emails. Their support time is limited as our ‘clients’.

This is a summary of the overall assessment tasks:

1. A market research study will be done with at least 1 other university similar to SU.

1. Conduct a review of the Solent University mission, vision, value etc.

statements in light of corporate social responsibility to identify any gaps.

2. Critically compare this to at least 1 comparable UK university.

3. Critically compare this website to at least 1 other UK university alumni

website. NOTE: figures and tables can be put in the report appendix to save

on word count.

2. Review the SUAA website for UX strategy

including the services and resources offered.

3. The data collected and analysed will help inform some recommended changes to

the resources e.g. UX designs.

4. All ethical guidelines for research and NDA (non-disclosure agreements) or data

protection policies will be followed. e.g. consent forms for current Computing

students will be used to get primary data on the current website and resources,

compared to the student’s recommendations.

5. COM621 students will compile short interview questions for Mike and Mark as part of the business and website review process to submit as a group (not individuals).

6. Any surveys or interviews will done with current students (prospective alumni), not

with SO graduates due to data privacy regulations.

7. A 3K word summary report will be provided based on last year’s assessment to

provide consistency as detailed below.

NB: Recommendations will not be implemented. A summary presentation video will

be made from student submissions.

The project will be broken into four distinctive parts, which are explained below.

The project will be broken into four distinctive parts, which are explained below.

Part 1 – Introduction to System

Deliverable 1000 Words

Part 1 will be the assimilation of relevant information about the functionality of the system and requirements for the interface based on the type of user and frequency of use and clearly defined business goals. This section aims at what stockholders/shareholders want?  An introduction should be provided to introduce your team idea, what solution it solves using context analysis or based on gain and pain model.

Introduction should provide answers to the following questions:

What is the context?

Who are the users?

What is the system?

What is the problem?

Why is it important?

Who should benefit from it?

What impact does technology have on that context?

What is the feature list comparison of existing systems?

Part 2 – User Research Analysis

Deliverable 1000 Words

In UX, it is important to understand who the users are and what are their needs. In order to do that you should utilise a variety of UX methods, minimum required:

  • Contextual Interviews – Enable you to observe users in their natural environment, giving you a better understanding of the way users work.
  • Surveys – A series of questions asked to multiple users of your idea.

You should produce a valid list of user groups (Demographics, Geographic, Psychographic and behavioural) attributes table. You must also produce a list of user needs in a form of a table.

Part 3 – User Journey

Deliverable Poster /Video

At this point, as per part 1 and part 2, you should have two essential UX outcomes available, User Research findings in a form user needs and objectives and a clearly defined business goal. In this section, you are required to produce a fully detailed user journey including all the following elements:

  1. User Persona (Minimum 2 persona representing two typical user groups)
  • User Scenario (Minimum 2)
  • User Goals
  • Flow of Tasks/Information/Screens/IXDs/Contents/Information Architecture
  • Empathy Mapping
  • Usability Metrics

Part 4 – Prototype

Deliverable prototype

Part 4 will be the production of a prototype. You are required to produce the prototype interface using an appropriate prototyping tool. Each team member is responsible for ensuring that their design area is prototyped. Populate your interface prototype with example data sufficient to demonstrate the prototypes functionality.

You will be required to demonstrate your software prototype in your normal Tutorial, times to be advised during class by the unit tutor. Please make sure that your prototype is accessible online. Make sure that when you chose the prototyping tool to consider whether it could be exported and extracted for SOL submission. Alternatively, a web link of the prototype needs to be valid for at least 90 days.

Part 5 – Usability Testing

Deliverable 1000 Words

Part five will be the usability testing. As part of your interface implementation process, you will have to test your interface. Your will be responsible for what UX or Usability testing you carrying out, and accordingly, design the test and have it approved by your tutor. You should recruit participants to test the project, with predefined demographical criteria, you will be responsible to bring them to the lab and test your interface. Data analysis of this part should inform the final design, and this should be documented in 1000 words report supported with heat maps and gaze plots.

Usability testing metrics:

  • Layout: Inability to detect something users need to find; Aesthetic problems; Unnecessary Information.
  • Terminology: Unable to understand the terminology.
  • Feedback: User does not receive relevant feedback or it is inconsistent with what the user expects.
  • Comprehension: Inability to understand the instructions given to users on the site.
  • Data Entry: Problems with entering information.
  • Navigation: Problems with finding users way around the test site/system/software.

Assessment criteria

AB CDF
 
Analysis of User experience requirements, usability planning & design (ref L.O. K1,C1,P1) 
       
Able to critically analyse UX     Identification,
problem and conduct a thoroughGood understanding of UXAble to recognise a UXCan identify some keyanalysis, planning of
analysis, plan & design of aanalysis techniques andresearch issues and apply aelements of the HCIa poor standard
development problem, selectmethodologies evidencedseries of stepsproblem and plan a set ofwhich does not meet
effectively between differentby set of UX analyticalin providing a solution to aactions to achieve that taskor address problem
alternatives and provideartefacts. Able to apply ausability & interactionbased upon a given method.area. Does not reach
justification in the context ofsuitable,development problem.Although sufficient has flawsrequired threshold.
problem and in the light oflogical series of stepsHowever, analysis orin elements and/or actions,Doesn’t include UX
existing HCI theory.effectively anddesign may be weak inand/or method. Analysis hasartefact.
To include: User analysis, taskconsistently in providingparts or use of thethe minimum required 
analysis, screena solution to a usabilitymethodology inconsistent.elements that exceed the 
designs, windows hierarchy& interaction/softwareTo include: User analysis,threshold. 
diagrams etc. Moredevelopment problem. Totask analysis, screen  
complete designs will includeinclude: User analysis, taskdesigns, windows hierarchy  
establishment ofanalysis, screendiagrams.  
usability requirements fordesigns, windows hierarchy     
subsequent evaluation.diagrams.     
    
Implementation of Design and Evaluation (ref L.O. K1,C1)    
      
Able to produce a usable andCan implement a designCan implement an HCICan apply visualDoes not reach
robust interface with fullyspec. in full, within aproblem solution from aenvironment design toolsrequired threshold.
functional components from avisual environmentdesign specificationand techniques in solving aImplementation &
given specification fullywell-informed byinformed by evaluation.structured and/or userevaluation
informed by evaluation.evaluation whileThe specification may notrelated problem informed byinadequate.
Demonstrates exceptional skillrespecting goodbe implemented in fullevaluation. However, the 
in the use of the visualprofessional HCIand/or the system may notsolution may be partial or 
development environment.principles and practice.be sufficiently robust.may employ only a subset of 
Comprehensive and thoroughSome robust usabilitySome evaluation / testingthe appropriate techniques. 
evaluation and usability testing.evaluation / testing.will have been carried out.Evaluation superficial, 
     marginal testing. 
Identification and appraisal of key areas of work (ref L.O. C1,P1)  
      
Able to define and conduct aAble to define andAble to define and reflectAble to describe and partlyDoes not reach
rigorous critique of key areas inreflect upon key areas inon key areas in the contextreflect on some keyrequired threshold.
the context of very clearlythe context of well-of recognized HCI issues.elements within the HCIIdentification &
defined HCI issues and todefined HCI issues andSome solid criticalarea. Definition and criticalappraisal of a poor
evaluate the solution and theprovide a criticalevaluation against originalevaluation is superficial.standard which fails
solution strategy with referenceassessment of actionsrequirements though this to reach required
to existing theory. Able totaken. Able to identifycould be extended. threshold.
assess the implications ofalternative solution     
adopting alternative solutionstrategies.     
strategies      
      
Knowledge and Understanding & Contribution (ref L.O. C1,T1)   
   
     
Demonstrates a detailedComprehensive overallDemonstrates familiaritySatisfactory understandingDoes not reach
recognition and knowledge ofunderstanding of issueswith issues and practice inand identification of HCIrequired threshold.
theory & practice in the context& practice in the contextthe context of human-issues, design capabilities ,Inaccuracies /
of human digital interaction andof human digitaldigital interaction with aevaluation issues andomissions in areas of
an in-depth identification andinteraction with asoftware model.functionally of the interfacetheory & practice may
understanding of concepts.software model. HasReasonable familiarity withand software model butbe substantial with
Has the ability to synthesizeread around the subjectrecommended reading.lacking in depth andirrelevancies.
and apply information in theand is able to integrateSome gaps in significantbreadth. Minor contributionStruggles or fails to
solution of a problem inand organiseareas. Contribution toto group. Poor writtenengage with
conjunction with team. Makes ainformation. Has clearlygroup is acceptablyreflection on workconcepts, issues
full well managed & positiveworked with the teammanaged with some gapscontributed to group withwithin HCI. Very
contribution to work producedand made a significantin depth and breadth.little or no examplelittle or no reflection
by group. Is able to reflect fullycontribution toWritten reflection ofartefacts, poor referencing.on contribution with
on how contribution is madegroup/team work. Ablecontribution is constructed no example artefacts.
with fully referenced clearto reflect on howclearly with some gaps and  
example artefacts.contribution is made withfew example artefacts  
 referenced examples.which may not be clearly  
  referenced.  
Presentation & planning (ref L.O. C1,P1,T1)     
Comprehensive, detailed,Provides a coherentProvides a coherent styleMeets the basic guidelinesDoes not reach
coherent, & consistentclear well plannedand structure for thefor a given presentation andrequired threshold.
throughout with no errors ofwhole. Consistent insubject in hand with somepresentational style.Aspects substantially
rationale reasoning or fact,rationale, reasoning,structural and informationEvidence of planning.unclear, incoherent or
Very well planned.Planning.defects. Well planned. missing

 

Learning Outcomes: Self-Assessment
(LOs – mapped for each of the 3 sections. Evidence all 5 are addressed.)

What you will be able to do after the module: Use the key words of the LOs.

Module Learning OutcomeEvidence (pg #) NotesPersonal Learning Outcome
1. Implement problem solving techniques into designing features and functionalities to produce industry level products.  
2. Compare User Experience principles to accommodate different forms of interaction across multiple touchpoints (physical and/or digital), and to formulate and apply these principles in complex contexts.  
3. Analyze proposed UX design solutions using a range of methodologies and techniques against goals, objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs).    
4. Critically evaluate and validate solutions against goals, objectives and key performance indicators (KPIs) with a view to continuous improvement of the digital product or service.  
5. Apply accessibility principles to digital product design.  

 

Ethics Policy

The work being carried out by students must be in compliance with the Ethics Policy. Where there is an ethical issue, as specified within the Ethics Policy, then students will need an ethics release or an ethical approval prior to the start of the project.

  1. The Ethics Policy is contained within Section 2S of the Academic Handbook:
  2. The British Education Research Association (BERA) research guidelines are useful for your surveys and interviews.
  3. For commercial research, you may want to use a free online NDA (Non-disclosure agreement) such as: I have read and applied the appropriate ethics guidelines for this assessment.
Order Now

Get expert help for COM621 UX Strategy and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (March 9, 2026) COM621 UX Strategy. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/.
"COM621 UX Strategy." Universal Assignment - March 9, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/
Universal Assignment May 30, 2023 COM621 UX Strategy., viewed March 9, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/>
Universal Assignment - COM621 UX Strategy. [Internet]. [Accessed March 9, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/
"COM621 UX Strategy." Universal Assignment - Accessed March 9, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/
"COM621 UX Strategy." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/com621-ux-strategy/. [Accessed: March 9, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assignment Quantitative CASP RCT Checklist

CASP Randomised Controlled Trial Standard Checklist:11 questions to help you make sense of a randomised controlled trial (RCT)Main issues for consideration: Several aspects need to be considered when appraising arandomised controlled trial:Is the basic study design valid for a randomisedcontrolled trial? (Section A)Was the study methodologically sound? (Section B)What are

Read More »

Assignment Qualitative CASP Qualitative Checklist

CASP Checklist: 10 questions to help you make sense of a Qualitative researchHow to use this appraisal tool: Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising a qualitative study:Are the results of the study valid? (Section A)What are the results? (Section B)Will the results help locally? (Section C) The

Read More »

Assignment Topics

PS3002 Assignment TopicsDear studentsPlease choose one of the topics below. Please note that if you are repeating this subject, you cannot choose the same topic that you did previously in this subject.patellar tendinopathyinstability of the lumbar spinehamstring strainperoneal tendinopathyhip – labral tear.hip osteoarthritispatellofemoral instabilityankylosing spondylitisanterior cruciate ligament rupture (conservative management)quadriceps

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Report

Assessment 2 – Report (1200 words, 30%)PurposeTo demonstrate an understanding of the purpose and application of evidence-based dietary advice and guidelinesLearning objectives1.Review and analyse the role and function of macronutrients, micronutrients and functional components of food in maintaining health2.Understand digestion, absorption and metabolism of food in the human body and

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

Southern Cross Institute,Level 2, 1-3 Fitzwilliam Street, PARRAMATTA NSW 2150 & Level 1, 37 George Street PARRAMATTA NSW 2150Tel: +61 2 9066 6902 Website: www.sci.edu.auTEQSA Provider No: PRV14353 CRICOS Provider No: 04078ªPage 1 of 16HRM201 Human Resources ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 2 – Individual Case Study Analysis ReportSubmission Deadline: This Week,

Read More »

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF HPSYSD101 The Evolution of Psychology

HPSYSD101_Assessment 2_20240603 Page 1 of 7ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEFSubject Code and TitleHPSYSD101 The Evolution of PsychologyAssessment TaskAnnotated BibliographyIndividual/GroupIndividualLength2,000 words (+/- 10%)Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:b) Examine the significant figures, events and ideas present in the history of psychology.c) Identify and relate the

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report

HOS203 Contemporary Accommodation ManagementSemester 1, 2026Assessment 1 – Individual Case Study Analysis Report (10%)Submission Deadline: This Week, at 11:59 pm (Week 4)Overview of this AssignmentFor this assessment, students are required to analyse an assigned case study about hospitality industry relevant regulations and/or operational and accreditation failures of a hospitality organisation.

Read More »

Assessment Brief PBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS

Assessment BriefPBHL1003FOUNDATIONS OF HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE SYSTEMSTitleAssessment 2 TypeEssay Due DateWeek 6 Monday 14 April 2025, 11:59pm AEST Length1000 words Weighting60% Academic IntegrityNO AI SubmissionUse Word Document – submit to Blackboard / Assessments Tasks & Submission / Assessment 2 Unit Learning OutcomesThis assessment task maps to the following Unit

Read More »

Assignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station Design

CIVL5550: Civil Infrastructure DesignAssignment 4 – Intersection Upgrades and Interchange Station DesignDue: This WeekSubmission Instructions:1.Submit a report of approximately 10 pages, covering the following:Part 1: Intersection Upgrade Design•Propose upgrade schemes for two sign-controlled intersections and one signalized intersection•Use SIDRA to evaluate the performance of both the original and upgraded intersections•Use

Read More »

Assessment Brief 1

1 of 14Assessment Brief 1Assessment DetailsUnit Code Title NURS2018 Building Healthy Communities through Impactful PartnershipsAssessment Title A1: Foundations of Community Health Promotions ProjectAssessment Type ProjectDue Date Week 4, Monday, 22nd of September 2025, 11:59pm AESTWeight 40%Length / Duration 1200 wordsIndividual / Group IndividualUnit Learning Outcomes(ULOS)This assessment evaluates your achievement of

Read More »

Assignment 1 – Digital Stopwatch

Assignment 1 – Digital StopwatchThis assessment is an individual assignment. For this assignment, you are going to implement the functionality for a simple stopwatch interface as shown above. The interface itself is already provided as a Logisim file named main.circ . Your assignment must be built using this file as

Read More »

Assessment Background Country Profile

BackgroundCountry ProfileKiribati is an island nation situated in the central Pacific Ocean, consisting of 33 atolls2 and reef islands spread out over an area roughly the size of India (see Figure 1).i Yet, Kiribati is also one of the world’s smallest and most isolated country. A summary of Kiribati’s key

Read More »

Assessment 3: PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGY

PHAR2001 INTRODUCTORY PHARMACOLOGYAssessment 3: Case StudyASSESSMENT 1 BRIEFAssessment Summary Assessment titleAssessment 3: Case study Due DateThursday Week 6, 17 April at 11:59 Length•The suggested number of words (not a word limit) for the individual questions within the case study is as indicated at the end of each individual question. Weighting50%

Read More »

Assessment Module 1 Healthcare Systems Handout

Module 1Healthcare Systems HandoutGroup AgendasHealth Professionals: You got into health to help people. However, as an owner and operator of a multidisciplinary practice, you need to see many patients to cover the cost of equipment, technology, office and consumables, and pay your staff. The Medicare benefit doesn’t cover the rising

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTH COMMUNITIES

NURS2018: BUILDING HEALTHCOMMUNITIES THROUGH IMPACTFULPARTNERSHIPSAssessment 1 Template: Foundation of Community Health Promotion projectOverall word count excluding the template wording (63 words) and reference list:Introduction to health issue:The case study, increase breast screening in Muslim women living in Broadmeadows,Melbourne, focuses on addressing the low participation rates in breast cancer screening amongMuslim

Read More »

Assessment EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)

EGB272: Traffic and Transport Engineering (2025-s1)ashish.bhaskar@qut.edu.auPage 1 of 8Assessment 1A (15%) Cover PageIndividual component: 5%Group component: 10%You are expected to submit two separate submissions:Individual Submission (5%): Each student must submit their own individual report. Details of the individual report are provided in Section 3.1, and the marking rubric is in

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubric

Unit: NUR5327 – Management and leadership in healthcare practice – S1 2025 | 27 May 2025Assessment 3 – Essay: Assessment 3 Essay rubricLearning Objective 5:Differentiate drivers forchange and proactively leadhealth professionalresponses to changing anddynamic environmentsFails toidentify aclear plannedchange ordoes not linkit to thestrategic plan.0 to 7 pointsIdentifies aplannedchange, butthe link

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis 

Assessment 2 – Case study analysis  Description  Case study analysis  Value  40%  Length  1000 words  Learning Outcomes  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Due Date  Sunday Week 9 by 23:59 (ACST)  Task Overview  In this assessment, you will choose ONE case study presenting a patient’s medical history, symptoms, and relevant test

Read More »

Assessment 1 PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)

Term 1, 2025PPMP20009 (Leading Lean Projects)1Assessment 1 – DescriptionAssessment title Case study reportAssessment weight 40% of the unit marksReport length 3000 wordsMaximum 8 pages excluding references and appendicesReport format MS Word or PDFSubmission type IndividualSubmission due by Friday, Week 6Assessment objectiveThe purpose of this assessment item is to help you

Read More »

Assignment Maternity – Paramedic Management

Title-Maternity – Paramedic ManagementCase Study – Home Birth Learning outcomes1. Understand the pathophysiology and prehospital management of a specific obstetric condition.2. Develop a management plan for a maternity patient.3. Examine models of care available for maternity patients.4. interpret evidence that supports paramedic care of the maternity patient and neonate.5. Demonstrate

Read More »

Assignment Guidelines for Cabinet Submissions

Guidelines for Cabinet SubmissionsGENERALThe purpose of a Cabinet submission is to obtain Cabinet’s approval for a course of action. Ministers may not have extensive technical knowledge of the subject matter -and may have competing calls on their time. It is, therefore, important that Cabinet submissions are presented in a consistent

Read More »

Assignment Secondary research structure

Dissertation – Secondary Research – Possible Structure and Content GuideA front cover stating: student name, module title, module code, Title of project moduleleader, supervising tutor and word count.Abstract (optional and does not contribute to your word count)This should be an overview of the aim of the critical review, the methodology

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀Contents Module Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines

Read More »

Assignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminology Worksheet 1 This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topic The topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because:

Read More »

ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before the Supreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?