Assessment Brief 3 – Final SRS Report
| COURSE: Bachelor of Information Technology | |
| Unit: | Capstone Project A B |
| Unit Code: | CPRO 306 |
| Type of Assessment: | Formative Assessment |
| Length/Duration: | 2500 words |
| Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: | Critically analyse the methods and techniques used when seeking to apply information technology at the corporate levelIdentify and present systematically the requirements for an information system in a large and complex organisationDesign, develop, test, and evaluate an appropriate systems solutionIdentify and resolve critical technical issues with minimal supervisionWork effectively as part of a team in the production of an information system and related documentation and reports. |
| Submission Date: | Week 5 |
| Assessment Task: | Final SRS Report |
| Total Mark: | 100 |
| Weighting: | 35% |
| Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required) or previously approved application for other extenuating circumstances impacting course of study, incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated by deduction from the total mark. For example. An Assessment Task marked out of 40 will incur a 2-mark penalty for each calendar day. More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Student Login Required) |
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION
In this part of the assessment task the student needs to identify Systems requirements, business requirements and the user requirements of the system they have proposed in the previous assessment. The report will be named as “software requirement specification” for your proposed project. The report needs to be prepared professionally and presentable to the clients they are working with. The report also will include the hardware and software requirements, detailed user requirements using a use case diagram and from that then the report needs to identify and record functional and non-functional requirements, work breakdown structure, user interface etc. you also need to include technical details of the system which will carried on development of the project based on the project you have chosen and to comply with the functional and non-functional requirements. The report should include your software development environment, files and folder structure, data flow diagram, data dictionary, entity relationship diagram, user interface storyboard etc. The report also needs the test plan and the implementation plan which will be used later for testing and implementing the system. The report will have the following criteria and a sample of software requirement specification is available in the student resources folder as a guide for you to follow:
- An updated scope statement, including more detailed descriptions of key deliverables
- A system architecture will provide the required functionality and meet its non-functional objectives.
- Show that the proposed user interface design will achieve its objectives.
- Suggested changes and improvements are reasonable and useful.
- A summary/sample of completed deliverables under IS requirements and design.
- The system development has been planned and managed.
- Teamwork has been managed.
- The business requirements have been elicited and understood.
- Use case diagram, Data flow diagram
- A database design will provide the necessary data management.
- A user interface design will help and facilitate users to perform their tasks.
- Your responses on the feedback from your Lecturer.
Based on the organization that you and your team has chosen; you have to design the Information System project and prepare the software requirement specification report.
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC) FOR GROUP ASSIGNMENT
Though the nature of this assessment is purely qualitative, your Lecturer will consider the below marking criteria while assessing your report.
| Marking Criteria | Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark) | Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark) | Good (65-74% of the criterion mark) | Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark) | Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark) |
| Criterion -1 (20 mark) Demonstrates good understanding of key concepts | No attempt done for Business description, Project description & problems scenario, Project objectives, purpose describe in | Little attempt of Business description, Project description & problems scenario, Project objectives, purpose describe in | General description of Business description, Project description & problems scenario, Project objectives, purpose describe in | Specifically stated Business description, Project description & problems scenario, Project objectives, purpose describe in | Specifically, and comprehensive ly stated Business description, Project description & problems scenario, Project objectives, |
| detail. Detailed scope definition, New & proposed system design specifications stated, Methodologie s chosen for the project | detail. Detailed scope definition, New & proposed system design specifications stated, Methodologie s chosen for the project | detail. Detailed scope definition, New & proposed system design specifications stated, Methodologie s chosen for the project | detail. Detailed scope definition, New & proposed system design specifications stated, Methodologie s chosen for the project | purpose describe in detail. Detailed scope definition, New & proposed system design specifications stated, Methodologies chosen for the project | |
| Criterion-2 (10 mark) Group cohesiveness | No Team formed or No team works has been distributed and the team members are not aware of their tasks and participation | Team formed, less distribution of team works, and the team members are aware of few of their tasks and participation | Team formed, some team works has been distributed and the team members are aware of some of their tasks and participation | Team formed, almost all team works has been distributed and the team members are aware of all their tasks and participation | Team formed, all team works has been distributed and the team members are aware of all their tasks and participation |
| Criterion-3 (20 marks) Clearly analysed the system | No attempt done for Business requirement, System requirement and System configuration | Has attempted small bits of Business requirement, System requirement, System configuration such as Hardware Configuration , Software Configuration , Little bit of User requirement analysis is done using few use case diagram, use case definition & based on use case definition. Few Functional and Non- functional requirement analysed | Generally analysed the Business requirement, System requirement, System configuration such as Hardware Configuration , Software Configuration , User requirement analysis using use case diagram, use case definition & based on use case definition. Both the Functional and Non- functional requirement analysed | Clearly analysed the Business requirement, System requirement, System configuration such as Hardware Configuration , Software Configuration , User requirement analysis using use case diagram, use case definition & based on use case definition. Both the Functional and Non- functional requirement analysed | Clearly and professionally analysed the Business requirement, System requirement, System configuration such as Hardware Configuration, Software Configuration, User requirement analysis using use case diagram, use case definition & based on use case definition. Both the Functional and Non-functional requirement analysed |
| Criterion-4 (20 marks) Database design completed and cited | Not designed any of the Database requirement, Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) & Class Diagram, Tables, Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | Has attempted few Database requirement, Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) & Class Diagram, Tables, Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | Has attempted some of the Database requirement, Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) & Class Diagram, Tables, Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | Clearly and professionall y designed almost all the Database requirement, Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) & Class Diagram, Tables, Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) | Clearly and professionally designed all the Database requirement, Entity Relationship Diagram (ERD) & Class Diagram, Tables, Data Flow Diagrams (DFD) |
| Criterion-5 (20 marks) User interface design planned | (No attempt) Did not mentioned the User interface design methods, did not created any of the User Interface story board, input data forms, Output report forms, and Web site design concepts and layouts | Mentioned few User interface design methods, created few User Interface story board, input data forms, Output report forms, mentioned few Web site design concepts and layouts | Mentioned some User interface design methods, created some User Interface story board, input data forms, Output report forms, mentioned some Web site design concepts and layouts | Clearly mentioned almost all the User interface design methods, created almost all User Interface story boards, input data forms, Output report forms, clearly mentioned almost all Web site design concepts and layouts | Clearly mentioned all the User interface design methods, created all User Interface story board, input data forms, Output report forms, clearly mentioned all Web site design concepts and layouts |
| Criterion-6 (5 marks) Test plan and system implementati on planned | Did not created a test plan and a system implementati on plan | Created a vague test plan and a vague system implementati on plan | Created a basic test plan and a basic system implementati on plan | Created almost complete test plan and a system implementati on plan covering almost all the scenario | Created a complete test plan and a system implementation plan covering all scenarios |
| Criterion-7 (5 marks) Referencing | One or no academic resources be cited for the investigatio | Two academic resources be cited for the investigation | Three academic resources be cited for the investigation | Four academic resources be cited for the investigation | Five academic resources be cited for the investigation that should be |
| n that should be placed for a particular project | that should be placed for a particular project | that should be placed for a particular project | that should be placed for a particular project | placed for a particular project |
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points, and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high-quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the
“Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors, determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries, and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the
World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw (thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).
Get expert help for CPRO 306 Assessment Brief 3 – Final SRS Report and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
