FAM203A Food as Medicine

FAM203A Food as Medicine
ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleFAM203A Food as Medicine
AssessmentLiterature Review: Research and analyse a selected diet
Individual/GroupIndividual
Length1500 words (+/ – 10%)
Learning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the Subject Learning Outcomes outlined at the bottom of this document.
SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST Sunday of Module 4.2 (Week 8).
Weighting45%
Total Marks100 marks

Context

This assessment is aimed at assessing your understanding of a dietary model selected by your Learning Facilitator: how it aligns with holistic nutrition principles and the role that it may play in contributing to a person’s health and wellbeing.

In completing this assessment, you will have demonstrated your understanding of the importance of nutrition in common diets and identify the potential therapeutic benefits and possible disadvantages to health and wellbeing of the selected diet.

This assessment requires you to critically analyse published literature about the selected diet, further advancing your skills at sourcing, identifying and translating reliable and credible health information. You will further develop your critical writing skills, as you are expected to express your ideas in a coherent and logical manner.

You are being assessed on skills and knowledge that will prepare you for clinical research, your ability to research quality information, and to critically analyse, interpret and apply this information in a clinical health-based setting.

Instructions

Write a Literature Review based on one dietary model selected by your Learning Facilitator. In your Literature Review, you should critically analyse the current peer-reviewed literature.

The following points should be addressed in your Literature Review:

  1. In your introduction, identify and characterise the theory and principles of the selected dietary model.
  • Do these align with the principles of holistic nutrition?
  • Referring to the published literature, critically evaluate the evidence of therapeutic potential and the potential disadvantages of this dietary model to health and wellbeing.
  • Explore the peer-reviewed evidence to identify and discuss the therapeutic benefits of this dietary model
    • Appraise the nutritional composition of the diet, including what macro, micro or phyto-nutrients are over and/or under represented
    • Describe the type of person or population this diet is targeted at. Identify and discuss any challenges an individual might face in following this diet.
  • In your Conclusion, provide an overall statement of efficacy regarding the utilisation of this dietary model in clinical practice.
  • Explain why this dietary model should or shouldn’t be used in clinical practice

For more information on how to structure your Literature Review, please refer to the Academic Writing Guide available from the Torrens Library here

There are two short videos you can view here – Part 1 on the Definition of a Literature Review, and then Part 2 is the Process of writing a Literature Review. Students should understand the difference between the aims of a Literature Review and an Essay. This assessment is not an Essay.

Referencing

A minimum of 15 primary peer-reviewed references should be cited in your Literature Review, and they should align and be correctly contextualized to the statements you make in your submission. Correctly contextualizing your evidence to your discussion forms part of your overall grade for this assessment – see Marking Rubric.

It is essential that you use the correct APA 7 style for in-text citation and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here. Correct APA 7 referencing forms part of your overall grade for this assessment – see Marking Rubric.

Submission Instructions

Submit your final Literature Review as a Word document into the Assessment 2 submission link in the Assessment section, found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. Do not submit your Literature Review in pdf format.

A rubric will be attached to the assessment feedback. Your Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity

Submit your draft through Safe Assign before uploading your Word document to the Assessment 2 submission point. Your Safe Assign report may be reviewed by several Torrens University stakeholders

Ensure all work is your own and does not contravene the Academic Integrity Policy

Academic Integrity is taken very seriously in this subject – we investigate submissions for evidence of the following:

  • Contract Cheating
  • Use of Artificial Intelligence
  • Collusion
  • Self-plagiarism
  • Plagiarism

Academic Integrity investigations follow the Academic Integrity Procedure. There are several levels of penalties that may be applied. Mediation may be provided to students as an opportunity to improve academic writing skills and knowledge.

If there is evidence of an alleged breach of Academic Integrity, the student will be informed that their work is under review via Class Messages or in the Assignment Feedback section of My Grades. The student’s submission will not be graded until a decision is handed down by the allocated Torrens University Academic Integrity Officer. This may result in a delay of several weeks before a final grade is released. Your Learning Facilitator will no longer be responsible for the grading of your work beyond the Results Release Date.

If you are concerned about your ability to navigate Academic Integrity successfully at Torrens University, please go to the Academic Integrity page on the Library website to explore a range of AI learning resources.

It should be remembered that Academic Integrity breaches diminish the value of everyone’s hard- earned undergraduate qualifications and the quality of health practitioners that graduate, potentially undermining the safety and ethics of the general public and the health care industry as a whole.

Assessment Rubric

Assessment Attributes Grading schemeFail Fail: 0-49Pass 50-64 FunctionalCredit 65-74 ProficientDistinction 74-89 AdvancedHigh Distinction 90-100 Exceptional
Introduction:   Description and discussion of the theory and principles of the selected dietary model   10%A very limited or no description and discussion of the theory and principles of selected dietary model that demonstrates a lack understanding of the selected topic.A limited description and discussion of the theory and principles of the selected dietary model that demonstrates a narrow understanding of the topic.A well formulated description and discussion of the theory and principles of the selected dietary model that demonstrates a developing understanding of the topic.A comprehensive description and discussion of the theory and principles of the selected dietary model that clearly demonstrates a highly developed understanding of the topic.A comprehensive and sophisticated description and discussion of the theory and principles of the selected dietary model, which clearly demonstrates an insightful and highly developed understanding of the topic.
Review of the Literature:   Critical Discussion and analysis of therapeutic potential and disadvantages           Logical and coherent expression of ideas   40%Minimal or no critical analysis and little to no discussion of the peer- reviewed literature regarding the therapeutic potential.   Minimal or no critical analysis of the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.   Ideas are not expressed in a clear or coherent mannerMinimal critical analysis and limited discussion of the peer reviewed literature regarding the therapeutic potential this model to health and wellbeing.   Minimal critical analysis of the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.     Ideas are not consistently expressed in a clear or coherent mannerA sufficient critical analysis and discussion of the peer reviewed literature regarding the therapeutic potential of this model to health and wellbeing.   A sufficient critical analysis and discussion of the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.   Logical and clear expression of ideas is evidentA detailed critical analysis and discussion of the peer reviewed literature regarding the therapeutic potential of this model to health and wellbeing.   A detailed critical analysis and discussion of the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.   Ideas are expressed clearly and logically throughoutA sophisticated and exhaustive critical analysis and discussion of the peer reviewed literature regarding the therapeutic potential and the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.   A sophisticated critical analysis and discussion of the possible disadvantages of this model to health and wellbeing.   Ideas are expressed clearly, coherently and logically throughout
Statement of Efficacy:   Provision of an overall statement of efficacy regarding the utilisation of this dietary model in clinical practice.   10%A statement of efficacy that does not represent the evidence discussed.A statement of efficacy that is unclear or does not appropriately represent the evidence discussed.A statement of efficacy that is clear and accurately represents the evidence discussed.A statement of efficacy that is well formulated and engaging, and clearly and precisely represents the evidence discussed.A statement of efficacy that is skillfully executed, engaging, and clearly and precisely represents the evidence discussed.
Research skills :   Ability to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information.   Use of quality peer reviewed literature   15%Ability to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information not demonstrated.   Minimal use of peer- reviewed evidence   Citations linked to poor quality websites.Ability to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information demonstrated.   Fewer than 10 examples of peer reviewed evidence utilised.Ability to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information well developed.   Appropriate use of peer reviewed literatureAbility to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information highly developed.   Comprehensive use of peer reviewed literatureSkilful and sophisticated Ability to analyse, interpret and apply evidence-based information.   Exhaustive use of peer reviewed literature
Referencing:   Correct use of APA 7 referencing and contextualizing to student statements.   10%Incorrect use of APA 7 referencing throughout.   There are no in-text citations.Some inconsistencies in the use of APA 7 referencing   There are in-text citations, but they are not correctly contextualized.Some minor errors in Reference List and in-text citations.   In-text citations are poorly contexualised to student statements.Correct use of APA 7 referencing throughout.   Some errors in contextualizing in-text citations to student statements.Correct use of APA 7 referencing throughout.   In-text citations are very well contexualised to student statements.
Formatting to Literature Review style:   Spelling and Grammar:   15%Submission of a pdf instead of Word document as requested.   Formatted and presented as an Essay Style submission, including the use of bullet points and writing in the first person.   Consistent spelling mistakes and grammar issues throughoutSubmission of Word document as requested.     Incorrect Literature Review formatting, including the use of bullet points.   Writes in the third-person     Some spelling mistakes and grammar issues throughoutSubmission of a Word document as requested.     Assessment written in the Literature Review style, not an essay style.   Writes in the third- person   Minimal spelling and grammar issuesSubmission of a Word document as requested.   Assessment written in the literature review style     Writes in the third- person   No spelling and grammar issuesSubmission of a Word document as requested.   Assessment written in the Literature review style.     Writes in the third- person   No spelling and grammar issues
The following Subject Learning Outcomes are addressed in this assessment
SLO a)Critique and describe the origins, dietary principles, philosophies and practices of food as medicine
  SLO b)Investigate and describe the potential of dietary models and specific foods as therapeutic tools for the promotion and maintenance of health and wellbeing
  SLO c)Review and critically discuss the therapeutic function of whole foods and identify their physiological effects, phytochemical constituents, nutritional value, mechanism of action and potential toxicity
  SLO d)Analyse and evaluate the impacts of farming, food preparation, cooking and storage methods, as well as food manufacturing and processing techniques on food quality and the therapeutic function of foods
  SLO e)Apply evidence-based research, dietary principles and cultural traditions for the effective nutritional management of health conditions based on the therapeutic function of specific foods
Order Now

Get expert help for FAM203A Food as Medicine and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (November 2, 2024) FAM203A Food as Medicine. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/.
"FAM203A Food as Medicine." Universal Assignment - November 2, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/
Universal Assignment July 22, 2023 FAM203A Food as Medicine., viewed November 2, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/>
Universal Assignment - FAM203A Food as Medicine. [Internet]. [Accessed November 2, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/
"FAM203A Food as Medicine." Universal Assignment - Accessed November 2, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/
"FAM203A Food as Medicine." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/fam203a-food-as-medicine/. [Accessed: November 2, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?