MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis

ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF
Subject Code and TitleMIS302 – Agile Business Analysis
AssessmentIndividual Reflection
Individual/GroupIndividual
Length1500 words (+/- 10%)
Learning OutcomesThe Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Analyse organisational requirements as they apply to Agile environments.Apply methods of documenting, maintaining and measuring requirements to meet organisational needs.Identify, select and validate requirements to maximise effectiveness in organisations and promote sustainable business practices.Communicate Agile methods, processes and approaches with stakeholders in order to address organisational requirements.
SubmissionDue by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Module 6.1.
Weighting30%
Total Marks100 marks (100 marks unless it is a quiz assessment)
Task Summary

The assessment task requires you to reflect on your experiences in the subject MIS302: Agile Business Analysis. You will follow a weekly 6-step reflective journaling process to help you gain insights into the work that you have done. As the trimester ends, you will be asked to reflect on your learning experiences by referring to the weekly journals that you have documented from modules 1 – 10 and submit a final reflective report of 1500 words (+/- 10%) that will include the weekly journals in the Appendix.

Context

This individual assessment helps you to track your growth within this subject over the trimester. It complements your learning from class and the understanding you gain from working through the learning materials. This reflective report gives you the opportunity to communicate your understanding of how Agile Business Analysis relates to your career and future.

Task Instructions

During modules 1-10, you will have kept a brief weekly journal to record your learnings each week. Based on these weekly journals, write a 1500-word reflective report about your experience. You will be expected to explore your progressive feelings, how you evaluated and analysed these feelings, what conclusions you drew – and how this led to positive learning outcomes through your development of a weekly action plan for an improved experience the next week. You are required to include a copy of your weekly journals in the Appendix of the report and refer to the Assessment Rubric to ensure that you address all the assessment criteria.

Format for Journal

Agile is an iterative process, and each week you will have a modular learning experience. The aim is

to use Gibb’s Reflective Cycle each week in reflecting on your learning to

You are required to follow the six steps of Gibb’s Reflective Cycle (see Figure 1, below) when writing

your weekly journal to enhance your learning process through actionable insights.

Figure 1. Gibb’s Reflective Cycle

Reference

The University of Edinburgh (n.d.). Gibb’s reflective cycle. Retrieved from https://www.ed.ac.uk/reflection/reflectors-toolkit/reflecting-on-experience/gibbs-reflective cycle#:~:text=Gibbs’%20Reflective%20Cycle%20was%20developed,structure%20to%20learning%20f rom%20experiences.&text=Conclusion%20about%20what%20you%20learned,changes%20you%20 might%20find%20appropriate.

This is an example of the format and structure of the journal for each week – please re-use the template for each week:

MIS302 – Weekly Reflective Journal
Module Week 
Description: What topic did you learn this week? What were the key concepts? Write a brief description each concept.
 
Feeling: How did you feel about the concepts that you learned? Do you feel confident? Uncertain? Clear? Motivated? Frustrated? Pause and take time to consider how you feel.
 
Evaluation: What were the positive areas of your learning? What areas went well, and what areas did not go as well?
 
Analysis: Why did you make good progress in some areas of your learning? Why did it not go as well with other areas of your learning?
 
Conclusion: What did understand about my learning process this week? How could I improve my experience? What skills do I need to develop to become better at the learning process?
 
Action Plan: What will I do differently next week? How will I develop my skills to improve my learning experience?
 
Report Structure

You are required to complete this assessment in a report format using the following headings:

  1. Introduction (~150 words)
  2. Timeline – a graphical representation the topics and associated concepts covered in each week. (no word count allocation)
  3. Feelings – what were you feeling each week? How did your reflection process contribute to our feelings over the course of the modules? What progress did you make? What went well, what did not as well, and what would you do differently next time?
  4. Evaluation, Analysis & Conclusion about the learning experience – how did evaluating and analysing your learning experience allow you to reach conclusions about how your learning was progressing?
  5. Action Planning – how effective was your action planning? Were you able to implement your action plans? On one hand, which actions were more successful, and which were less successful? Why do you think that this is the case?
  6. Conclusion (~150 words)
7.      References
  • Appendices (this must include a copy of each weekly journal that completed)

Very important – simply describing what you have done each week will not be enough to pass this assessment. You are expected to explore and examine have you have felt and examine how evaluating and analysing your experience allowed you to improve via the action planning process on a week-by-week basis.

Format

The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.15 for ease of reading with page numbers at the bottom of each page.

Referencing

It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing

Submission Instructions

Please submit ONE MSWord document (.doc or .docx) via the Assessment 1 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.

Academic Integrity Declaration

We declare that except where I have referenced, the work I am submitting for this assessment task is my own work. I have read and am aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure viewable online at http://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-and-forms

I am aware that I need to keep a copy of all submitted material and their drafts, and I will do so accordingly.

Assessment Rubric
  Assessment AttributesFail (Yet to achieve minimum standard) 0-49%Pass (Functional) 50-64%Credit (Proficient) 65-74%Distinction (Advanced) 75-84%High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100%
Visual appeal, writing style and presentation of content   Title page   Font, spacing and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief   Appropriate use of paragraphs, sentence construction, spelling and grammar   Adheres to the word count requirement   30%No title page is included.   Incorrect font and size is used with poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination or tables, or diagrams run over onto the next page unnecessarily.   No introduction attempted.   Conclusion not attempted.   Report is written as a block of text with no breaks in between ideas. Separate ideas cannot be clearly discerned.   Many errors in spelling or grammar obscure meaning of what student has written.   Does not adhere to the word count requirementTitle page is included but is missing most information.   Either incorrect font and size is used or poor line spacing and large gaps in pagination.   Introduction attempted but very generic does not clearly state the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.   Conclusion attempted but does not include summation of key concepts discussed in the report and/or key conclusions or recommendations.   Paragraphs are used but large blocks of text with long sentences make it difficult to understand the ideas being conveyed.Title page is included but is missing key information.   Some errors in font use and line spacing. Some pagination problems.   Sound use of the introduction but does not clearly state either the purpose of the report or what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.   Sound use of the conclusion and succeeds in either the summation of key concepts discussed, or key conclusions or recommendations, but not both.   One idea or concept per paragraph. Some paragraphs could be more succinctly written.Title page is included with most required information.   Minor errors in font, spacing and format.   Good use of the introduction which clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.   Good use of the conclusion and succeeds in summation of key concepts discussed and key conclusions or recommendations.   One idea or concept per paragraph with 3-4 well constructed sentences per paragraph.   No errors in spelling or grammar.Title page is included with all required information.   Font, spacing and format are in accordance with the requirements of the assignment brief.   Excellent use of the introduction which secures the attention of the reader, clearly states the purpose of the report and what the reader should expect to find in the body of the report.   Excellent use of the conclusion which succeeds in confident summation of key concepts and conclusions and gives the reader a clear sense of next steps required.   Expert use of paragraphs with 3-4 well constructed sentences per paragraph
 of 1500 words (greater than +/- 20%)Spelling or grammar has errors but meaning remains clear.   Does not adhere to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 20%)Minor spelling or grammar errors.   Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%)Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 10%)which follow logically from each other.   No errors in spelling or grammar.   Adheres to the word count requirement of 1500 words (+/- 5%)
Knowledge and understanding   Understanding of the principles of agile practice in a context of business analysis   30%Low or no understanding of the ethical principles of responsibility evidenced in the report   Demonstrates little capability to understand the principles of accountability   Shows low or no understanding on the importance of accuracy of information in group collaborationUnderstands the fundamentals of the ethical principles of responsibility but no examples are included   Grasps the fundamentals of accountability but does not show ability to manage accountability of a group collaboration setting   Understands the value of accuracy but is less clear about how it is achieved in practice.Sound understanding of ethical principles of responsibility and consequence   Grasps the fundamentals of accountability and reflects an example of an attempt to achieve accountability.   Sound understanding of the value of accuracy of information to the group but offers only one or two examples that require greater clarity.Very good understanding of ethical principles of responsibility and consequence   Good perspectives on accountability setting, and how this allows the group to succeed   Good understanding of accuracy of information and the value it creates for the groupExcellent understanding of the ethical principles of responsibility and consequence   Well developed perspectives on accountability setting and how it facilitates excellent group outcomes   Deep understanding of the principles of authenticity, fidelity and correctness of information and the impact of accuracy on outcomes of group collaboration.
Depth of Reflection and reference to own experiences   Demonstrates capacity for reflection and analysis of personal insightsAn inadequate, unclear, unfocussed or overview which does not include analysis or personalization or express meaningful insights   Minimal evidence of any reflective and analyticalUses some examples to support claims. Examples require further development to align to the requirements of the assignment brief   Demonstrates a limited understanding of the reflective task. MostlyUses relevant examples from experience to support claims. Makes applicable connections between ideas   Demonstrates a thoughtful understanding of the reflective take and subject matter.Reflection and analysis of own experiences is consistently personalized, demonstrates independent thinking and expresses meaningful insights   Analysis of experiences demonstrates a high levelReflection and analysis of own experiences is consistently personalized, demonstrates independent thinking and expresses meaningful insights   Excellent analysis of experiences demonstrates
40%skills with sparse expression of unjustified views and opinions. Descriptive without any analysis of thoughts or feelings.descriptive with little analysis of thought or feelings. of independent thinking and expresses meaningful insights. Views and opinions are readily expressed.a high level of independent thinking and expresses meaningful insights. Views and opinions are readily expressed.
Order Now

Get expert help for MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (December 7, 2024) MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/.
"MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis." Universal Assignment - December 7, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/
Universal Assignment July 28, 2022 MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis., viewed December 7, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/>
Universal Assignment - MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis. [Internet]. [Accessed December 7, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/
"MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 7, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/
"MIS302 – Agile Business Analysis." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/mis302-agile-business-analysis/. [Accessed: December 7, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?