HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition
Assessment Task: 1
Assignment title: Population Nutrition Case Study Analysis
Assignment task type: Short Written Report and Literature Search Strategy
Task details
The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. In this assignment, you will assess the sodium intake among Australian children and adolescents using data from the 2011-12 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS) and critique the dietary data collection methods used.
Assignment Instructions
| 2-3 years | 4-8 years | 9-13 years | 14-18 years | |
| Boys (mg/d) | 1517 | |||
| Girls (mg/d) | 1448 | |||
| All children/adolescents (mg/d) | 1484 |
Tasks
You are required to address the following:
1. Describe and critique population-based dietary data collection methodology:
Describe and critically evaluate the method used to measure sodium intake among
children in the NNPAS. Consider the strengths and limitations of this method that may influence the accuracy of reported sodium intake in this population. (approximate words: 300-350)
2. Locate and interpret population-based dietary data:
Complete the dietary sodium intake table above and compare the reported sodium intake from NNPAS 2011-12 with the Nutrient Reference Values (NRV) for sodium. Here, you should determine and justify which NRV reference values should be used, and how
reported sodium intake levels compare to the reference values. (approximate words: 250- 300)
3. Plan a literature search:
Using the Deakin Library Search tips and planning resource and the search planner , create a literature search strategy to find peer-reviewed original research articles that link high sodium intake with health outcomes in children and adolescents. You will be
provided with feedback on your search strategy that will assist you in finding relevant literature to include in AT2. Please submit the completed search planner with your assignment, noting that it does not contribute to the word count for this assessment task.
How the work will be assessed and expected standard:
Download and review the assessment task criteria in AT1 Marking Rubric .
Purpose:
Nutritionists are required to regularly locate, identify, and critique scientific publications on the association between dietary intake and health risk, critique the methods used to collect the
dietary data, and to be able to appropriately apply the NRVs in the interpretation of intake levels. To help you build these skills, this assessment task will provide an opportunity to
critically evaluate dietary assessment methods used in a national survey, interpret population intake against relevant NRVs and plan a search strategy for finding relevant literature.
ULOs:
Undertaking this assessment task will develop, evidence and assess your development of the following ULOs:
- ULO3: Select and use appropriate technologies to locate, critique and interpret individual and population based dietary data, national nutrient and food based dietary recommendations and peer reviewed nutrition literature.
- ULO4: Apply effective written and oral communication skills to disseminate evidence based nutrition knowledge to specialist and non-specialist audiences.
Assignment resources and support:
Seminar and CloudDeakin resources
In order to assist you in completing this assessment task, a number of exercises and resources will be provided in seminars and on CloudDeakin:
FAQs: Please refer to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for answers to many common questions.
Discussion: If you have additional questions to those answered in the FAQs page, please feel free to ask them on the discussion board .
We encourage you to be proactive and problem-solving to develop your skills in lifelong learning, with the following suggestions:
Read the HSN702 – Unit Guide and all assignment information before posting a question
Explain in your post what you have already done to try to find the information or solve the problem
To avoid duplication, read previous posts before posting a new question as it may already have been answered
Answer other students’ posts when you can!
Deakin resources
Study
Skills for study Academic Skills Active reading
Making digital notes
Time management
Study workload planner
Assignment planner
Assessment
Drafting and proofreading
Reflecting on your feedback
Referencing and academic integrity
Academic integrity
Using generative artificial intelligence
Acknowledging the use of generative AI Referencing Guide : Vancouver .
Literature search and evaluation
Search tips and planning Annotated bibliography Evaluating information Misinformation
Library resources
Library Resource guides
Library resource guides for Health
Health PostGrad adv. Library modules
Using feedback to improve your work
Here is the Deakin guide to reflecting on your feedback .
Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in your work
The use of generative artificial intelligence (e.g., ChatGPT) for any part of this task is not
permitted because accurate interpretation of nutrient intake in comparison to relevant NRVs and critical evaluation of dietary assessment methods are key skills that nutrition
professionals working in public health or clinical settings require.
Technical support
If you encounter technical issues while completing your assessment, please lodge a support ticket through the IT Service Desk online or contact the Service Desk via phone:
Access Plan
If you are a student experiencing a disability, health condition or mental health condition that affects your study, or your participation in university life, contact the Disability Resource Centre
for assistance and to arrange an Access Plan. An Access Plan is a study support plan prepared to minimise the educational disadvantage you may experience as a result of your disability or condition.
Extensions and Special Consideration:
Refer to the HSN702 – Unit Guide for information about:
Extension to Submission Dates
Late Submission of Assessment Tasks Special Consideration
Your responsibility to complete your assignments with academic integrity
Breaching academic integrity in your assessments is cheating and is not accepted at Deakin.
For example, you should not take someone else’s work or ideas and pass them off as your
own. If your work contains material copied from a classmate or an external source, your work will be referred to the Faculty Academic Integrity Committee. If you are found guilty of an academic integrity breach, possible penalties include a zero mark for the assessment task, zero marks for the unit, or expulsion from your course.
Please read more information on ‘Academic Integrity ‘ before finalising your assessment task.
Get expert help for Population Nutrition Case Study Analysis and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
