| ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF | |
| Subject Code and Title | PRO100 Information Systems Project Management |
| Assessment | Consultative Report |
| Individual/Group | Individual/Group |
| Length | 2000/3000 words (+/- 10%) |
| Learning Outcomes | The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include: Differentiate between PM methodologies and discuss relevance for Information Systems (IS)Apply PM concepts to IS projects within various organisations |
| Submission | For 12-week Duration: Due by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT end of Module 4.2 (Week 8) |
| Weighting | 40% |
| Total Marks | 100 marks |
Task Summary
In Assessment 1, you developed a business case and project charter for a real-world scenario project. In this assessment, you will progress the real-world scenario project from Assessment 1 and develop a project plan for that project. You are required to answer questions related to project schedule management, cost management, resource management, risk management, communication management and stakeholder management.
Context
In response to the case study provided, write a consultative report focusing on the various processes in project knowledge areas, including the management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders.
This assessment requires you to apply various tools and techniques you have learned in managing project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to a real-life case scenario.
Assuming the role of the project manager, you will progress the real-world scenario project from Assessment 1. You will be asked to go through a number of processes in the project knowledge areas and generate outputs including subsidiary plans of a project management plan for those processes.
This assessment provides you with an opportunity to view the various processes in managing a project and develop an appreciation of schedule-cost-scope-risk trade-off and the importance of communication in managing stakeholders.
Instructions:
Please read the PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project.
You are required to complete the following tasks for this assessment.
Task 1 (15 marks) – Produce Project Schedule and Cost Management Plans
- Refer PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project Detailed Task Instructions.
Task 2 (10 marks) – Produce a Project Resource Management Plan
- Refer PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project Detailed Task Instructions.
Task 3 (20 marks) – Produce a Project Risk Management Plan
- Refer PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project Detailed Task Instructions.
Task 4 (15 marks) – Produce a Project Stakeholder Management Plan
- Refer PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project Detailed Task Instructions.
Task 5 (20 marks) – Produce a Project Communication Plan
- Refer PRO100_Real-World-Scenario-Project Detailed Task Instructions.
Format
The report should use font Arial or Calibri 11 point, should be line spaced at 1.5 for ease of reading and page numbers on the bottom of each page. If diagrams or tables are used, due attention should be given to pagination to avoid loss of meaning and continuity by unnecessarily splitting information over two pages. Diagrams must carry the appropriate captioning.
Referencing
It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
- It is expected that you reference any course notes and sources used.
- You are strongly advised to read the rubric which is an evaluation guide with criteria for grading the assignment. This rubric will give you a clear picture of what a successful report looks like.
Assessment Criteria
Your answers will be assessed against the following criteria:
- A report that focuses on the various processes in the project knowledge areas and demonstrates application of various tools and techniques in the management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders for the real-world scenario project provided.
- Use of Academic Conventions in APA Referencing style.
Submission Instructions
Please submit ONE Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx) for the Consultative Report and any project files as required in Tasks 1-5 via the Assessment 2 section found in the main navigation menu of the subject’s Blackboard site. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
Academic Integrity
| When submitting their assessment task, students will be asked to declare the academic integrity of their assessment by completing and signing an assignment cover sheet. You can find the assignment cover sheet here. |
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct.
These are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-forms.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
Special Consideration
To apply for special consideration for a modification to an assessment or exam due to unexpected or extenuating circumstances, please consult the Assessment Policy for Higher Education Coursework and ELICOS and, if applicable to your circumstance, submit a completed Application for Assessment Special Consideration Form to your Learning Facilitator.
These documents are available at https://www.torrens.edu.au/policies-forms.
Learning Rubric: Assessment Two
| Assessment Attributes | Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% |
| Knowledge and understanding (Tasks 1–5) Consultative report focuses on various processes in project knowledge areas. Application of various tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders. | Lack of understanding of required concepts and knowledge of various processes in project knowledge areas. Key components of the assignment are not addressed. Lack of application of tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to the case scenario provided. | Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge of various processes in project knowledge areas. Key components of the assignment are partially addressed with limited application of tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to the case scenario provided. | An adequate understanding of the various processes in project knowledge areas. All key components of the assignment are addressed with an adequate level of application of the tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to the case scenario provided. | A thorough understanding of the various processes in project knowledge areas. All key components of the assignment are addressed. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to the case scenario provided. | An exceptional understanding of the various processes in project knowledge areas. All key components of the assignment are addressed. Demonstrates mastery of concepts and application of relevant tools and techniques in management of project schedule, cost, resources, risk, communication and stakeholders to the case scenario provided. |
| 80% | |||||
| Use of academic and discipline conventions Spelling, grammar, sentence construction, appropriate use of credible resources, Correct citation of key resources using APA style of referencing 20% | Poorly written with errors in spelling and grammar. Demonstrates Inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. There are mistakes in using the APA style. | Written according to academic genre and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. There are some mistakes in using APA style. | Written according to academic genre. Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. | Well-written and adheres to the academic genre. Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. | Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre. Demonstrates expert use of high-quality credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading. There are no mistakes in using the APA style. |
Get expert help for Information Systems Project Management and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!
