PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help

Health Systems and Economics
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Subject Code and TitlePUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics
AssessmentAssessment 2: Case Study
Individual/GroupPart A: Group presentation Part B: Individual written submission
LengthPart A: 20 minute group presentation and submission of presentation Part B: Case Study Summary 1,000 words (+/- 10%)
Learning OutcomesThis assessment addresses the following learning outcomes: Understand the core competencies of public health workers, and how public health competencies can be fosteredUnderstand the rationale for and development of universal health coverage.Analyse public health expenditure estimation strategiesUnderstand the role of government regulation of the healthcare sector
SubmissionPart A: Group Presentation due Week 11 in class Part B: Due Sunday following the end of Module 6.1 in week 11 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT. For 6 week intensive class: Part A: Group Presentation due Week 6 in class Part B: Due Sunday following the end of Module 6.1 in week 6 at 11:55pm AEST/AEDT.
WeightingTotal – 50% consisting of: Part A: 25% Part B: 25%
Total Marks100 marks

Context:

The opportunity to research a particular country’s healthcare system will facilitate understanding of the interdependent relationship between economics, health care and public health. You can begin to get an understanding of the way a country perceives health and well—being by examining the areas to which resources are allocated, how efficiently they are managed, and how effective they are in terms of health care outcomes.

Instructions:

Select a public health system in a country of your choosing (other than your own).

Part A: Group Presentation Assessment Description:

In a small group of 3 to 4 students prepare your presentation, discuss the following issues:

  1. How the public health system is both organised and funded. As part of this, describe the following:
    1. The percentage of Gross Domestic Product spent upon health and how this compares with Australia (or another country);
    1. Where the money to fund this system comes from;
    1. How expenditures for public health services, including prevention programs, are estimated.
    1. What the mix of public and private expenditure and services is;
    1. Whether a proportion of funding comes from development assistance for health or any form of innovative financing;
    1. The underlying trends (demographic, changes in treatment, or technology) which help to explain expenditure;
    1. The extent to which health coverage is universal.
    1. Any economic levers that are used, or could be used, to achieve better health outcomes in your chosen country.
  • How your chosen country performs in terms of the key elements or building blocks of the health system (as identified by WHO 2007; 2009) e.g. are there key workforce shortages in a particular profession and how might imbalances be addressed; and is the workforce appropriately trained to develop core competencies?
  • Explain what cost—benefit analysis and cost—effectiveness analysis are and how they could be used to assist with resource allocation in relation to analysing the health system (you are not expected to perform the analysis, but you are required to understand these key concepts and say how you might go about the analysis). Additionally, describe a potential health system reform you could implement in your chosen country to improve weaknesses in the system.

Part B: Individual Case Study Summary

In 1000 words (+/- 10%), write a summary of the key points from the three sections of Part A. This should include a concise summary of:

  • How the public health system is both organised and funded
  • How your chosen country performs in terms of the WHO’s key building blocks of the health system
  • A potential health system reform you could implement in your chosen country to improve weaknesses in the system

Note: This is an individual assessment and students must work independently to create their own individual work

Submission Instructions:

Submit via the Assessment 2 – link in Assessment on main navigation menu in Blackboard

Other issues

On Campus students:

How will the groups be set up?

Your lecturer will assign the groups. Groups will be formed in blackboard for each group.

Should we submit our presentation on blackboard?

Yes, the presentation slides should be submitted on blackboard after the presentation has been given in class

What if I can’t make it to class when my group are due to present?

If you have any unforeseen circumstances in week 11 (for example, illness or emergency), your group will have the option to give the presentation in week 12.

If these circumstances still prevent you attending in week 12, your group can present

their sections and you can have the option, for your section, of recording your voice to powerpoint slides and submitting this online.

How do we make sure everyone contributes?

You should all contribute evenly to the preparation and delivery of the presentation.

You will be provided with a peer evaluation form which you will submit with your presentation on blackboard.

This forms asks you to specify the contribution of group members.

If you have any concerns prior to this about group member contribution, in the first instance, you should attempt to resolve this in your group.

If this is not successful, speak to your lecturer.

If a student does not contribute at all towards preparing the presentation and does not show up in week 11 or 12 without an adequate reason, they will not receive a mark for the presentation.

How will the marks be distributed?

If all group members contribute evenly towards preparation and delivery of the presentation, they will all receive the same mark.

Variations to this will depend upon whether there is disagreement about the contribution of group members.

Such disagreements should be documented in the peer review form, and discussed with your lecturer. The lecturer will determine mark distribution depending upon relative contribution of group members.

Online students:

How will the groups be set up?

Your lecturer will assign the groups. Groups will be formed in blackboard for each group.

As online students, it is your responsibility to be in contact with each other and organise how to undertake the task

and divide responsibilities.

How should we submit our presentation?

You should submit your presentation on blackboard by Sunday of week 11.

Your presentation should consist of powerpoint slides with voice recordings for each slide. Your recordings should add up to 15 minutes.

Your lecturer can provide some instructions how to record audio material to slides.

You are welcome to explore other ways to add audio and/or video content (optional) to slides. All group members should contribute towards the preparation and delivery (via voice recording) of the presentation.

How do we make sure everyone contributes?

You should all contribute evenly to the preparation and delivery of the presentation.

You will be provided with a peer evaluation form which you will submit with your presentation on blackboard.

This forms asks you to specify the contribution of group members.

If you have any concerns prior to this about group member contribution, in the first instance, you should attempt to resolve this in your group.

If this is not successful, contact your lecturer.

If a student does not contribute at all towards preparing the presentation

and does not contribute to recording audio content for the presentation, they will not receive a mark.

How will the marks be distributed?

If all group members contribute evenly towards preparation and delivery of the presentation, they will all receive the same mark.

Variations to this will depend upon whether there is disagreement about the contribution of group members.

Such disagreements should be documented in the peer review form, and discussed with your lecturer. The lecturer will determine mark distribution depending upon relative contribution of group members.

Assessment criteria:

Demonstrates the ability to interpret and analyse relevant concepts and literature on universal health coverage, health systems, core competencies in public health and cost— benefit analysis and cost—effectiveness analysis. (30%)

Demonstrates the ability to apply knowledge and understanding of health systems and core competencies in public health to a case example. (15%)

Critical analysis of key health system issues for the selected country. (20%)

Demonstrated knowledge and understanding of the principles of health economics including health expenditure estimation, resource allocation issues, economic levers and equity considerations. (10%)

Understanding and analysis of equity principles in health economics. (10%) Addresses

General assessment criteria: (15%)

  • Uses key readings and shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.
  • There is a lucid introduction and clear conclusion or summary
  • Complies with normal academic of referencing and bibliographical details (including reference list, use APA style).
  • Is written clearly with accurate spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction.

Marking Rubric:

  Assessment Attributes0-34 (Fail 2 – F2)   Unacceptable35-49 (Fail 1 – F1)   Poor50-64 (Pass -P)   Functional65-74 (Credit – CR)   Proficient75-84 (Distinction – DN)   Advanced85-100 (High Distinction – HD)   Exceptional
Grade Description (GradingEvidence of unsatisfactoryEvidence ofEvidence of a goodEvidence of a highEvidence of an
Scheme)achievement of one or moresatisfactorylevel of understanding,level of achievementexceptional level of
of the learning objectives ofachievement ofknowledge and skillof the learningachievement of
the subject, insufficientsubject learningdevelopment inobjectives of thelearning objectives
understanding of the subjectobjectives, therelation to the contentsubjectacross the entire
content and/or unsatisfactorydevelopment ofof the subject or workdemonstrated incontent of the course
level of skill development.relevant skills to aof a superior quality onsuch areas asdemonstrated in such
 competent level, andthe majority of theinterpretation andareas as interpretation
 adequatelearning objectives ofcritical analysis,and critical analysis,
 interpretation andthe subject.logical argument, uselogical argument,
 critical analysis skills.Demonstration of aof methodology andcreativity, originality,
  high level ofcommunication skills.use of methodology
  interpretation and and communication
  critical analysis skills. skills.
Knowledge and understandingLimited understanding of required concepts and knowledge.   Key components of the assignment are not addressed.Knowledge/understa nding of the field or discipline.   Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas.   Often conflates/confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated byThorough knowledge/understand ing of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials.   Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevantHighly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s.   Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s.   Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading.
Demonstrated knowledge and
understanding of the principles of
health economics including health
expenditure estimation, resource
allocation issues, economic levers
and equity considerations. (10%)
Understanding and analysis of
equity principles in health
economics. (10%) evidence from the research/course materials.concepts.Well demonstrated capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts.  Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further learning.
Critical reasoning, presentation and defence of an argument and/or position   Critical analysis of key health system issues for the selected country. (20%)Specific position (perspective or argument) fails to take into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment.   Makes assertions that are not justified.Specific position (perspective or argument) begins to take into account the issue(s) or scope of the assignment.   Justifies any conclusions reached with arguments not merely assertion.Specific position (perspective or argument) takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) or scope of the assignment. Others’ points of view are acknowledged.   Justifies any conclusions reached with well-formed arguments not merely assertion.Specific position (perspective or argument) is expertly presented and accurately takes into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment.   Justifies any conclusions reached with well-developed arguments.Specific position (perspective or argument) is presented expertly, authoritatively and imaginatively, accurately taking into account the complexities of the issue(s) and scope of the assignment. Limits of position are acknowledged.   Justifies any conclusions reached with sophisticated arguments.
Analysis and application withLimited synthesis and analysis.DemonstratedWell-developedThoroughlyHighly sophisticated
synthesis of new knowledge analysis and synthesisanalysis and synthesisdeveloped andand creative analysis,
 Limitedof new knowledgewith application ofcreative analysis andsynthesis of new with
 application/recommendationswith application.recommendationssynthesis withexisting knowledge.
Demonstrates the ability to apply knowledge and understanding ofbased upon analysis.  Shows the ability tolinked to analysis/synthesis.application of pretested models  Strong application by
health systems and core interpret relevant and / orway of pretested
competencies in public health to a information and independentlymodels and / or
case example. (15%) literature. developed modelsindependently
    and justifieddeveloped models.
    recommendations linked toRecommendations are clearly justified based
Demonstrates the ability to interpret and analyse relevant concepts and literature on universal health coverage, health systems and core competencies in public health. (20%)   Shows the ability to interpret and analyse relevant information and literature on economic considerations. (10%)   analysis/synthesis.on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases.
Use of academic and disciplinePoorly written with errors inIs written according to academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary) and has accurate spelling, grammar, sentence and paragraph construction.   Demonstrates consistent use of credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Is well-written and adheres to the academic genre (e.g. with introduction, conclusion or summary).   Demonstrates consistent use of high quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop ideas.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Is very well-written and adheres to the academic genre.   Consistently demonstrates expert use of good quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop appropriate arguments and statements. Shows evidence of reading beyond the key reading.   There are no mistakes in using the APA style.Expertly written and adheres to the academic genre.   Demonstrates expert use of high-quality, credible and relevant research sources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows extensive evidence of reading beyond the key reading.   There are no mistakes in using the APA Style.
conventions and sources ofspelling, grammar.
evidence  Demonstrates inconsistent
Addresses General assessmentuse of good quality, credible
criteria: (15%)and relevant research sources
a. Uses key readings and showsto support and develop ideas.
evidence of reading beyond the key reading b. There is a lucid introduction andThere are mistakes in using the APA style.
clear conclusion or summary 
c. Complies with normal academic 
of referencing and 
bibliographical details (including 
reference list, use APA style). 
d. Is written clearly with accurate 
spelling, grammar and sentence and paragraph construction. 
Order Now

Get expert help for Health Systems and Economics and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (November 1, 2024) PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/.
"PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - November 1, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/
Universal Assignment May 9, 2023 PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help., viewed November 1, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/>
Universal Assignment - PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help. [Internet]. [Accessed November 1, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/
"PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help." Universal Assignment - Accessed November 1, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/
"PUBH6003: Health Systems and Economics Assignment Help." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/pubh6003-health-systems-and-economics-assignment-help/. [Accessed: November 1, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?