SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment

SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment Task 5 FINAL PROJECT REPORT

Summary

The Final Project Report is an individual task which builds on teamwork completed earlier in the trimester. This report shall clearly explain and justify the design solution proposed. In this report students you should identify project scope, inputs and constraints, assumptions, and limitations. The design process shall be described in detail and Technical Drawings for tender shall be included.

The Final Project Report should also include a reflection on the Project Team performance.

In this document, the Assessment Task requirements and the Assessment Task Rubric are described in detail. You will find class, seminar and studio content, Unit Site content and the prescribed textbook to be excellent resources for completion of this assignment, along with the feedback from earlier assessment items.

Contents

  1. Introduction and Objectives…………………………………………………………………………. 2
  2. What you need to submit……………………………………………………………………………. 2
  3. Report – Task Requirements Summary…………………………………………………………… 2
  4. Report – Task Requirements Details………………………………………………………………. 3
  5. Report: Format Requirements………………………………………………………………………. 6
  6. Rubric……………………………………………………………………………………………………… 7

1.      Introduction and Objectives

This assignment is designed to assess your ability to apply knowledge from SEJ201 in the project context. This is an individual task which builds on teamwork completed earlier in the trimester. This assignment is designed to assess the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO’s):

ULO 1.      Apply structural engineering fundamental knowledge in conjunction with appropriate tools and resources to analyse and design elements to satisfy user requirements.

ULO 2.      Apply specialised structural knowledge, technical competence and open-ended problem-solving skills in finding appropriate, creative and/or innovative engineering solutions.

ULO 3.      Identify and characterise important issues, justify and apply appropriate simplifying assumptions and propose substantiated solutions.

ULO 4.      Collaborate with others as an effective member of an engineering team and reflect on development of team skills.

ULO 5.      Communicate project outcomes through the use of oral, written and graphical communication to professional and non-professional audiences.

The Final Project Report shall include clear and concise calculations, scale sketches and concise written sections as required to complete each task in the assignment. Calculations shall detail the full solution procedure and design solution for the nominated structural elements. Students are encouraged to include handwritten sketches, but shall use word processing to detail calculation procedures and create written sections of the document. Ensure you clearly identify solution, use appropriate significant figures and SI units at all times.

2.      What you need to submit

  • Student must submit a report (Final Project Report) as a single file via the Unit Site to the respective assignment folder. Submissions must be the student’s own individual work, but can/should include analysis results and loading from the student’s own team submission for Assessment Task 3.

3.      Report – Task Requirements Summary

The Final Design Report shall document the design stages of the structural design project for this unit. A list of the required report components is as follows.

  1. Project Introduction
  2. Constraints, Opportunities & Assumptions
  3. Design Loads Summary
  4. Structural Analysis & Design (nominated elements)
  5. Drawings for Tender Purposes
  6. Team Function Reflection

Further information on each of these design tasks is provided in the following section.

4.      Report – Task Requirements Details

The requirements for each individual task listed in Section 3 is provided in the following subsections to guide students. Students should also refer to the Assessment Rubric in Section 6 for further details on the assessment criteria for these tasks.

IMPORTANT NOTE:
Students should use results from their Assessment Task 3 Team Design Brief submission where possible! Results from your teamwork should be utilised to prevent the need to repeat Assessment 3 tasks. Students with incomplete or grossly erroneous teamwork results are advised to seek guidance from the Unit Chair.

4.1     Project Introduction

Provide a concise introduction to the project, summarising the purpose of the work along with critical project requirements and objectives. The starting point for the project should be explained clearly along with any important requirements or critical changes during the design process.

Notes:

Make a judgement on what is critical (and significant) information and what is superfluous (and insignificant) information. Include only what is relevant to the Introduction in this section.

Make reference to input documents rather than recreating or repeating reference information if appropriate.

4.2     Constraints, Opportunities & Assumptions

Identify ALL relevant constraints and opportunities identified during your project work and provide a concise explanation of the impacts of these constraints, opportunities to the design process and proposed solutions. Clearly identify, explain and justify any assumptions that were made during the analysis and design process.

4.3     Design Loads Summary

Provide a concise summary of all dead, live and lateral loads on the structure, including breakdown and summary of individual dead and live load, using appropriate notations. This section should be prepared such that it is a useful reference section for your calculations.

Note: This section may be transferred from your Team Report if you are satisfied with the quality and content of that submission.

4.4     Structural Analysis & Design

Analysis and design shall be completed for the structural elements nominated in Table 1 using appropriate calculation procedures learned during class, seminar and studio sessions. Calculations for each element shall detail the full solution procedure and shall include clear sketches/figures as required to explain and support the calculation procedure. Address and justify the limitations of your analysis and/or design where appropriate.

Note: Some analysis tasks have been completed during team work on Assessment Task 3. Students are expected to use their team results where appropriate rather than repeating Assessment 3 Tasks – refer to note at the start of this section.

Table 1. Analysis and Design requirements for Project Structural Elements

 Analysis & Design Requirements
ElementStabilityStrengthDeflectionsLateral ActionsSoftware Verification
Crossbeam  
Main Girder 
Backstay   
A-Frame columns   
Stay cables  
Pad footing  

Crossbeams (analysis and design required)

Crossbeams shall be designed for critical ultimate bending and shear actions and for deflection behaviour under serviceability loading.

Main Girder (analysis and design required)

Main Girders shall be designed for critical ultimate bending and shear actions and for deflection behaviour under serviceability loading, for all relevant single span cases. This shall include vertical loading from construction and any relevant lateral loading.

Backstay (design only)

The backstay shall be designed for ultimate axial actions as specified in Table 1. Analysis results from teamwork should be used.

A-Frame columns (design only)

A-Frame column members shall be designed for ultimate axial actions as specified in Table 1. Analysis results from teamwork should be used.

Stay cables (design only)

The specified cables shall be for strength and serviceability as specified in Table 1. Analysis results from teamwork should be used. A prediction of cable extension under load shall be provided along with a brief discussion (max 300 words) on the effect that this cable extension may have on the performance of other elements of the bridge structure.

North Pad Footing

Determine the pad footing dimensions required to satisfy performance requirements for bearing and stability. New constraints introduced in Week 7 must be considered. Appropriate loading and combination load cases shall be applied, with suitable justification provided.

Typically, the analysis and design procedure for each element shall include the following steps:

  • Calculation/identification of loads acting on member being analysed;
    • A free body diagram (FBD) showing all members and reactions, loads and dimensions;
    • Calculation of support reactions for relevant loads;
    • Calculation of internal actions (inc. relevant diagrams);
    • Capacity design for Ultimate Actions;
    • Deflection Check for Serviceability Actions;
    • Summary of design solution, including factor of safety (FoS);
    • Software validated by hand calculations;
    • Critical analysis of proposed solution and recommendations.

Students are encouraged to use Software Analysis to calculate results for different Load Combinations (LCxxx provided in Basis of Design), however, this shall follow software validation with your analytical calculations for critical actions, to ensure your results are appropriate.

4.5     Drawings for Tender Purposes

Provide drawings which clearly describe the tender stage design solution. Drawings may be hand drawn or produced with drafting software, but must include sufficient information for tenderers to prepare a price for the work.

Drawings shall include member sizes, number of members, material grades and dimensions as a minimum for all project elements addressed in the preceding section.

All drawings shall be A3 size with a standard title block which contains:

  • Project Name;
  • Drawing number, title, revision number and date;
  • Prepared By & Date;
  • Approved For, By and Date
  • 4.6     Team Function Reflection (max 500 words)

List the team name and all members. Describe the performance of the team and that of individuals within the team, including your own performance (peer feedback and how you have addressed it may be a good place to start). Address performance aspects including contribution, attendance, responsivity, accountability, reliability and timeliness of input.

Comment on how the Team Charter was used and propose suggestions for improvement to the Team Charter as well as to the team performance in general.

5.      Report: Format Requirements

The report shall include clear and concise calculations, scale sketches and concise written sections as required. Your report must be submitted as a single file in one of two formats: MS Word or PDF (additional files submitted to the assignment folder may not be assessed). Your report must include:

  • Cover Page

On the first page of the submission, teams must include the following items:

  • Unit code and title
    • The title of the assignment/project
    • Your full name, Student ID and team number
  • Calculations

Students must use word processing software to create written sections of the main body of the report, including all relevant formulas and results. Students should use adequate equation editors for writing mathematical formulas. Handwritten calculations can be included only as additional resources (appendices) and may not be assessed.

  • Solutions

Solutions should be clearly identified (e.g. underline answers in calculations) and the steps followed to obtain these solutions, including any geometrical calculations, formulas used and citations to sources.

  • Units

Students shall ensure that they use appropriate significant figures and SI units at all times.

  • Sketches

Hand-drawn sketches are allowed and encouraged; however, students must ensure these are clear and scanned with high-quality. Poor and/or unprofessional-looking images may not be assessed. Examples of poor images include pictures taken with mobile phones, where shades compromise quality of the content.

Free Body Diagrams and similar diagrams must include all relevant information (including appropriate labels).

  • Sources/References

Sources used should be cited in place and full references should be listed at the end of your report in an appropriate section (see Deakin Guide to Referencing for guidelines). Lecture slides, recording, and YouTube videos (or similar) do not require referencing. Information taken from manuals, tables, books, etc, must always be referred to.

You can use your preferred referencing style, provided you use it consistently throughout your report.

  • Technical Drawings

Technical drawings can be hand-drawn or created using CAD software; in both cases, these must be included as part of your report, and not as a separate document, and should be size A3.

  • Formatting

Your report should be presented in a clean and professional format (e.g. page numbering, table of contents, captions, etc). You are encouraged to follow the layout of templates, if provided, but not required to.

6.      Rubric

CriteriaWeightExemplarVery goodGoodSatisfactoryNot Satisfactory
  Communication: Report writing    10%  Extremely well-written and structured report which allows the reader to clearly understand the scope, solutions and limitations for the project work.Well-written and structured report which allows the reader to understand the intended scope, solutions and limitations for the project work.Mostly well written and structured report which allows the reader to understand most of the project scope and solutions, but may not have addressed limitations well.Report has issues that may include spelling, grammar or structure. The report allows the reader to gain a basic understanding of the project scope and solutions, but fails to address some important limitations.Extremely poor quality report which does not allow the reader to understand the scope of the project work, nor the solutions or limitations.
  Constraints & Assumptions    10%Explanation of project constraints demonstrates a thorough and in-depth understanding of the project. Well informed assumptions are provided with appropriate justification.Explanation of project constraints demonstrates a very good understanding of the project. Assumptions are realistic and provided with appropriate justification.Explanation of project constraints demonstrates a good understanding of the project. Assumptions are realistic and provided with some justification.Important project constraints have been identified but not explained clearly. Assumptions are realistic but not justified.  Project constraints NOT addressed and / or assumptions either not included, not reasonable or not appropriately justified.
    Structural Analysis   (criteria apply for each nominated structural member)        20%  Thorough analysis completed to relevant level of accuracy, in appropriate units and in accordance with Project requirements. Professional documentation of calculation process, loading, outcomes, explanations and sketches. Excellent use of analysis software to verify results, including concise annotated output from program.Analysis completed to relevant level of accuracy, in appropriate units and in accordance with Project requirements. Very good documentation of calculation process, loading, outcomes, explanations and helpful sketches. Analysis software utilised effectively to verify results, including annotated output from program.  Has completed analysis, but with some minor errors. Calculations are provided, but are without appropriate loading, outcomes, explanations or sketches in places. Analysis software used to verify results, but minor discrepancies or unclear presentation of results.  Has completed analysis, but with some notable errors or inappropriate units. Calculations are provided, but are difficult to follow in some places and / or appropriate loading, outcomes, explanations or sketches not provided. Attempt to use analysis software noted, but with inconclusive results and / or poor presentation of results.  Has NOT completed appropriate analysis, or contains significant errors. The calculations provided are difficult to follow and without appropriate loading, outcomes, explanations or sketches. Analysis software not used or with significant error.
  Structural Design   (criteria apply for each nominated structural member)      35%Appropriate member selection made is efficient AND satisfies performance requirements. Critical actions, load cases and sources of data are stated clearly. Factors of Safety and Deflection checks for each member are accurate and concise.Member selection made satisfy performance requirements, but with some inefficiencies. Critical actions, load cases and sources of data are stated clearly. Factors of Safety and Deflection checks for each member are provided with only minor errors.  Member selection made, but inefficient and / or minor issues with satisfying performance requirements. Critical actions, load cases and sources of data are stated, with only minor exceptions. Factors of Safety and deflection checks provided but with some error.Member selected, but inappropriate in some aspects or not entirely satisfying requirements. Critical actions, load cases and sources of data are stated, but with notable exceptions. Factors of Safety and deflection checks provided but with some error or notable exceptions.  Member NOT selected, or selection NOT satisfying requirements. Critical actions, load cases and sources of data are not stated or with significant error. Factors of Safety and / or deflection checks not provided or with significant error.
Critical Analysis   (criteria apply for each nominated structural member)      10%Clearly demonstrated in-depth understanding of the proposed solutions and project limitations through a detailed critical evaluation that includes a thoughtful analysis of the implications of the proposed design, and recommendations for future work.Clearly demonstrated in-depth understanding of the proposed solutions and project limitations through a critical evaluation that includes a thoughtful analysis of the implications of the proposed design, and recommendations for future work.  Demonstrated understanding of the proposed solutions and project limitations through a critical evaluation that includes an analysis of the implications of the proposed design, and recommendations for future work.Demonstrated some understanding of the project solutions and project limitations through an attempted critical evaluation that includes an analysis of the implications of the proposed design, and recommendations for future work.Has NOT demonstrated an understanding of the project solutions and limitations, or did NOT include a critical evaluation that includes an analysis of the implications of the implications of the proposed design, and recommendations for future work.
    Team Function Reflection    5%Clearly articulated and professional assessment of team function, team charter and team contribution to project outcomes. Excellent suggestions proposed for improving team effectiveness in the future.Insightful assessment of team function, team charter and team contribution to project outcomes. Very good suggestions proposed for improving team effectiveness on next project.  Good assessment of team function, team charter and team contribution to project outcomes. Some positive suggestions noted for improving team effectiveness on next project.  Basic assessment of team function, team charter and / or team contribution to project outcomes. Some suggestions noted for improving team effectiveness on next project.  Team function, team charter or improvements NOT addressed, or addressed in a poor or non- professional manner.
    Communication: Drawings    10%  Extremely well presented and structured drawings, including plans, sections, details and notes which clearly convey design solution to the reader and allow accurate pricing of design solution.Well-presented and structured drawings that include appropriate plans, sections, details and notes which convey the design solution to the reader. Minor errors or exclusions have minimal impact on pricing the design solution.Mostly well-presented and structured drawings, including plans, sections, details and notes which convey the important parts of design solution to the reader. Errors and exclusions have moderate impact on pricing the design solution.Structural drawings are missing plans, sections, details and/or notes but convey most of the design solution. Errors and exclusions have significant impact on the reader’s ability to price the design solution.  Extremely poor quality drawings and/or substantial details of design solution missing. Insufficient information available for reader to price solution.
Deakin University / SEBE / School of Engineering
Order Now

Get expert help for SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 14, 2025) SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/.
"SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment." Universal Assignment - February 14, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/
Universal Assignment September 25, 2022 SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment., viewed February 14, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/>
Universal Assignment - SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment. [Internet]. [Accessed February 14, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/
"SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 14, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/
"SEJ201 Structural Design Assessment." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/sej201-structural-design-assessment/. [Accessed: February 14, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?