71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4

Take Home Examination

Autumn 2021

The following information does not cover everything covered in the Exam Instructions document.


This examination is made available online at 9:30am on Friday, 11 June 2021.

Your completed answer file is due at 9:30pm on Friday, 11 June 2021 and must be submitted online in Canvas in Assignment Task 4: Final Exam – 71116 – Autumn 2021.

There are 7 questions. Your answer to each question attempted should commence on a new page and be appropriately numbered.

The examination is worth 40% of the marks available in this subject. The contribution each question makes to the total examination mark is indicated in marks or as a percentage.

This examination is an open book examination.

This examination is expected to take approximately 2 hours of working time. You are advised to allocate your time accordingly. Your answer file may be submitted at any time before the due time. Please allow time to complete the submission process.

Please submit your file in doc or docx format unless directed otherwise. Please name your file as follows:

EXAM_subject number_student number For example: EXAM_71116_12345678

Word Limit

There is a word limit for each question. References are not included in the word count. The most important thing is to answer the question in a succinct manner. This means that your answer can consist of a word count less than the imposed word limit. A ten percent (10%) leeway per question on word counts is permitted.

References must be used for citation purposes only and not for the development of your arguments.

A bibliography is not required for this assessment task.

Important Notice – Exam Conditions and Academic Integrity

In attempting this examination and submitting an answer file, candidates are undertaking that the work they submit is a result of their own unaided efforts and that they have not discussed the questions or possible answers with other persons during the examination period. Candidates who are found to have participated in any form of cooperation or collusion or any activity which could amount to academic misconduct in the answering of this examination will have their marks withdrawn and disciplinary action will be initiated on a complaint from the Examiner.

Exam answers must be submitted by upload to Canvas. Staff may ask that a student undertake an oral test to ensure they have completed the work on their own and to assess their knowledge of the answers they have submitted.

Students must not post any requests for clarification on the Discussion Boards on Canvas or in Microsoft Teams. Any requests for clarification should be directed by email to Christopher Croese on Christopher.Croese@uts.edu.au.

Where clarification is required, it will be broadcast by email to all students in the exam group. Christopher Croese will be available for the first hour after the exam becomes available, then he will check emails from time to time until 5pm.

Exam commences on next page

Final exam                                                    


Aaron saw that Bevan had advertised a rundown house for sale. Aaron inspected it.

During the inspection, Bevan falsely represented that the house was designed by Christine Cornwall, a famous architect. This statement was not promissory and did not become a term of the contract. It was also not made in trade or commerce.

Bevan knew that, in fact, the house was designed by a student of Christine Cornwall, Dora D’Eath.

Aaron thought himself a specialist in architecture – spoiler alert: he wasn’t – and did his own negligent assessment of the house. His assessment informed his belief that the house was designed by Christine Cornwall. He decided to buy it and restore it to its former glory.

Aaron entered a contract with Bevan to purchase Bevan’s residential home for

$500,000. A house designed by Dora D’Eath in the same condition was worth


The parties settled, Aaron became the registered owner and moved in.

Aaron hired Everyday Builders to restore the house for $20,000. Everyday Builders expressly promised to use original materials in accordance with the materials originally used to construct the house. Aaron paid a $2,000 deposit.

Everyday Builders completed the work. However, they used cheap substitute materials to save money. The finished work looked authentic if not closely inspected.

Aaron paid to Everyday Builders the balance of the price for the restoration work.

Some time later, Aaron noticed that something was not quite right with the materials used to restore the house. Aaron hired Farrelly & Co, another builder, to inspect the work done by Everyday Builders. Farrelly & Co confirmed that Everyday Builders had used cheap substitute materials. Farrelly & Co also informed Aaron that the house was not designed by Christine Cornwall but rather was designed by Dora D’Eath.

Farrelly & Co said that they could remove the work done by Everyday Builders and restore the house with original materials for $45,000.

The house – after the work done by Everyday Builders – was worth $470,000. If Everyday Builders had used proper original materials, it would have been worth


Aaron does not think that he could suffer through another restoration and is seriously considering just selling the property.

Aaron also pulled out of a competition he had entered with the Historical Homes Society for the ‘Best Authentic Restoration Project’ of 2021. His home had been short-listed as one of ten finalists and he could have won $50,000 for the restoration of his home. However, the rules required that the restoration be done with original materials.

Answer the following questions.

Question 1 (50 words / 1 mark)

What common law cause of action does Aaron have against Bevan for damages? Briefly explain your choice.

Question 2 (275 words / 5.5 marks)

Aaron wishes to sue for damages in the cause of action that you have identified in Question 1. What test of causation and remoteness would you apply? How much would you award him in damages?

Question 3 (450 words / 9 marks)

Assume that when Bevan falsely represented that the house was designed by Christine Cornwall, he did not know that it was in fact designed by Dora D’Eath, but breached a duty of care owed to Aaron by making the statement. Continue to

assume that the statement was not promissory and was not made in trade or commerce.

Aaron wishes to sue for damages. How would your response to Question 2 change? Your response should identify and justify the cause of action, and note any changes to the approach to causation, remoteness, and assessment of damages.

Question 4 (425 words / 8.5 marks)

Aaron sues Everyday Builders for breach of contract. Identify and apply the tests of causation and remoteness that you would apply. Assess the damages that he would receive.

Question 5 (275 words / 5.5 marks)

Aaron decides not to sell the property after receiving the news from Farrelly & Co. Rather, he seeks rescission of the contract. Would he get it? Your response should identify the principle that makes the contract voidable.

Question 6 (250 words / 5 marks)

Assume that, rather than sell the house, Aaron proceeds with hiring Farrelly & Co to restore the house as quoted by them. The parties enter an oral contract, under which Aaron was obliged to pay a deposit up front, then the balance on completion of the work.

Aaron paid a deposit and Farrelly & Co completes the work properly. Farrelly & Co invoiced Aaron for the balance but Aaron refused to pay. Unfortunately for Farrelly & Co, legislation provided that the contract was unenforceable because it was not recorded in writing.

What cause of action does Farrelly & Co have against Aaron and what remedy would be granted?

Question 7 (275 words / 5.5 marks)

Assume that, during the inspection, Bevan promised that the house was designed by Christine Cornwall and agreed to warrant as such in the contract. When Bevan sent instructions to his solicitor, he forgot to advise her to include the warranty. Hence, the signed contract did not contain the term. However, it did contain a term which declared that the signed agreement was the entire agreement between the parties and that no other collateral terms or agreements existed and, if they did, then they were voided and replaced by the signed agreement.

Aaron discovers that the house was in fact designed by Dora D’Eath after Farrelly & Co assessed the quality of Everyday Builders’ work. Aaron thought that he would sue Bevan for breach of contract but, when he checked the signed contract, he was dismayed to find that it did not contain the warranty about the designer of the house. He assumed that this meant that he had no case and did not pursue it.

Two years later, Aaron spoke to his friend, Gabrielle, who was a lawyer. He mentioned that he was still really annoyed because, after discovering the truth about the architect, he checked the contract and realised that Bevan’s promise was not in the special conditions. Otherwise, he would have sued for breach of contract.

Gabrielle says that it is still possible to do this. Is she correct? Do not assess the damages.

End of exam

Order Now

Get expert help for 71116 Remedies Assessment and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (December 10, 2023) 71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/.
"71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4." Universal Assignment - December 10, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/
Universal Assignment October 15, 2022 71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4., viewed December 10, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/>
Universal Assignment - 71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4. [Internet]. [Accessed December 10, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/
"71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4." Universal Assignment - Accessed December 10, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/
"71116 Remedies Assessment Task 4." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/71116-remedies-assessment-task-4/. [Accessed: December 10, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.


Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea

Write 2 articles 1st Topic: 5 Places you must visit in Busan, South Korea 2nd topic: Korean language: various tips and resources to learn Deadline: 10th October 2023 12:00 AM Instructions: Article Structure is given below Meta Description: First, you will start with a meta description of your article in

Read More »

2002HSV Human Services Research

Assessment 2: Written research proposal Worth 45% of final grade Complete your answers in this assignment template Name: xxxxxxx Student ID: xxxxxxx Title: xxxxxxx Exact word count (exc. cover sheets and reference list; max. 2,000 words): x,xxx Please specify the research methodology are you proposing to use: ☐ Quantitative                                    ☐

Read More »

COIT29226 Introduction to IoT

Assessment item 3 – Project Due date: Week 12 (8 October 2023) 11:55 pm AEST Weighting: Length: Submission: 50% There is no word limit for this report Group work (submit via Moodle) Objectives This assessment item relates to the following unit learning outcomes: Learning Outcomes Assessed: Enabling objectives What do

Read More »

BUSM1008 Assessment 2 Brief Spring 2023

Assessment 2: Individual Report (20%) and Presentation (20%) Background You are appointed as a business consultant, recruited by the company allocated to you in week 6 by your tutor.  Your role is to undertake research on the company, the allocated topic and an issue identified in the media in relation to your company and

Read More »


INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Total Marks 100 | Weighting 25% DUE: 29/09/2023, 11:55pm IMPORTANT INFORMATION: READ BEFORE YOU START SUBMISSION 11.55 pm. A 1-hour grace period is provided to students who experience a technical concern. DOCUMENT PREPARATION REFERENCING UNACCEPTABLE ACADEMIC ACTIVITIES MARKING Question 1 | [12 marks] Download the spreadsheet data that

Read More »


Assessment task 3 Individual Case Study This task is the result of your individual effort, so students must not discuss their work with anyone else, otherwise it may lead to an allegation of collusion. Weight: 15% Due: Before 5 pm on Wednesday 27th September. Late submissions will incur a penalty

Read More »

International Business INBU01-7

Module International Business INBU01-7 (NQF LEVEL 7) FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT – ASSIGNMENT C Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023) Exam Date 20 October 2023 Marks 50 Assignment C (INBU01-7/DLO4 10/2023)   Total: 20 marks SECTION A (10 MARKS) – PARAGRAPH QUESTION Question 1 (10 marks) Coca-Cola is marking its 70th year in Nigeria

Read More »

Summative Assessment Help

Summative Assessment Brief: Learning Outcomes: LO1: Construct a problem/issue/need identified from practice that impacts on individual outcomes LO2: Formulate a focus-based enquiry on the identified problem/issue/need utilising an area of individual learner interest LO3: Critically evaluate the evidence base to support the proposal of the solution focused initiative LO4: Develop

Read More »

EDU30067 Teaching English

Assignment 2: Folio Template INTRODUCTION:         LESSON 1 Lesson title:   Year level: Topic:   Duration of lesson: Curriculum links: Strands & sub-strands Content descriptions       Students background knowledge: What is your starting point – what do the students already know, what have they done

Read More »

Edge Computing Security and Privacy

Proposal Background Title: Edge Computing Security and Privacy Proposal The new computing paradigm in the Internet of Things domain is known as IoT edge computing which functions by processing calculations at the edge of the network (Alli & Alam, 2020). The current technology aided by cloud and fog computing has created

Read More »

Foundations of Communication Assessment 2 Instructions

Discussion task (Total grade – 10%)   Process Work (Steps to complete the task) Answer on the Assessment 2 Submission Document – Do not upload this instruction document. Requirements (important elements to include) lastname_firstname_studentID_COMS_Assess 2_semester_year. Process for Assessment discussion tasks NOTE: If you do not participate in the class discussions then

Read More »

Assessment Two Dos and Don’ts (Internal)

Do: Read the assessment instructions carefully Read the marking rubric carefully Understand the question – break it down Conduct research – record the reference details Read the topic materials about communication theories, forms and factors and refer to them Contribute to the discussions in class or no marks for the

Read More »

Unpacking the Question: Assessment Two

Studying at university requires you to become familiar with strategies to un-pack or breakdown a variety of assessment questions/tasks throughout your studies.  Task Example of integrating the discussion, research and theories. In the group discussion my group members (name them) stated that an advertisement for a beauty product would most

Read More »

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment

MGMT0001 Introduction to Commerce Assessment 2 (worth 30%) Due date:                  2:00pm (AWST) Friday 15th September 2023 Submission:              Via Turnitin assessment submission link (see ‘Assessment 2’ folder in ‘Assessments’ section of Blackboard). Additional Instructions: Part A (42 marks) Nathan is a well-known chef with years of experience cooking various cuisines. After

Read More »

ACCT5011: Accounting Systems in the Digital Age

Practical Assignment Guide, Semester 2, 2023 Due Date for Submission: Monday 11th September 2023 at 5.00 PM Please note that the Folio Assignment for ACCT5011 Accounting Systems in the Digital Age is an individual assessment task worth 30% of your total marks in the unit. Please refer to the online

Read More »

EC229- Review session

Assume two cities, A and B, that can’t trade between them. Each city produces its own coconuts for its local market. If suddenly trade is possible then: D) As we saw in class, the new price will be somewhere between the original price 𝑃_𝐴,𝑃_𝐵. Hence it is impossible for consumers

Read More »

Computing Theory COSC

Computing Theory COSC 1107/1105 Assignment 1: Fundamentals Assessment Type Individual assignment. Submit online via Canvas → As- signments → Assignment 1. Marks awarded for meeting re- quirements as closely as possible. Clarifications/updates may be made via announcements/relevant discussion forums. Due Date Week 6, Sunday 27th August 2023, 11:59pm Marks 125

Read More »

BE279 Applied Statistics and Forecasting

Strategy, Operations, & Entrepreneurship Group Essex Business School Module Code BE279 Module Title Applied Statistics and Forecasting Assessment Type Individual Report (2,000 word) Academic Year 2022/23, Spring Term Submission Deadline Refer to FASER Task Specific Guidance Please note that: Module Learning Outcomes On successful completion of the module, students will

Read More »

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds

Learning Design Tool: Little Learners Level 1 sounds. Prepared by Sara Hart Date 30th August, 2023 (feel free to leave this date as it is the AT2 due date) Brief description of Learning Design   Chooseit Maker: Create, edit and play personalised learning activities that can be used in your

Read More »


HUMN1041 PEOPLE, PLACE AND SOCIAL DIFFERENCE ASSIGNMENT 1 TEMPLATE This assignment is made up of three (3) parts, plus a reference list and appendix. Marks are allocated for each section, as follows: – 1 mark Please ensure that you provide your answers in this template, and provide a Reference list

Read More »

Model 3 Launch in Australia

Client Information Company Name Tesla Contact Name   Email   Phone Number   Address Level 14, 15 Blue St. North Sydney, NSW 2060 Australia Ad link & image Project Information Project Title Model 3 Launch in Australia Project Description (100 words) Highlight the uniqueness of the car. Show the superior

Read More »

MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience

School of Business, Law and Entrepreneurship Assessment Task – Assignment 2  MKT10009 Marketing and the Consumer Experience Semester 2, 2023. Assessment Type Analytical Report Associated Unit Learning Outcomes (ULO’s) 2, 3, 4 Group or Individual task Individual Value (%) 25% Due Date Monday 20th September at 10:00 AET – Enterthis

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation

ASSIGNMENT – 1st Evaluation Date of Submission- 4TH SEP 2023 25 MARKS COMPARATIVE PUBLIC LAW Q. You are the new Central Minister for Urban Development who is keen to make major Indian cities as smart cities. You visit different countries like USA, UK, European Countries, Japan and other developed countries

Read More »

Corporate & Financial Due Diligence Report

[Name of the company] Note: Students should keep in mind that application of legal provisions (including Securities Regulations) and analysis of the same is important. Merely putting the facts and figures won’t fetch even a decent mark. Note: Students should only mention the broad area of business. This part should

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – Marking Guidance and FAQs on GTP

Students will be marked on the extent to which they specifically answer the question and provide clear, logical, well-reasoned and sufficient explanations. Here is a summary breakdown of how marks are allocated in this GTP: Part 1 [15 marks] §  Providing relevant observations from the information provided in the articles

Read More »

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief

ECON1000 S2 2023 – GTP Brief A.  Context and Overview The Game Theory Presentation (GTP) is worth 30% of the final mark. GTP is a ‘take-home’ exercise with a set of tasks to do. The GTP is based on Lecture Topics: L1 and L2. You will have twenty (21) days

Read More »

Order #35042 Human Rights Research Essay

Draft due 26th Aug 2,500 words (excluding references and bibliography) Instructions: Structure: Title – The Tigray War: A Critical Analysis of What the Future Holds for Human Rights in the Region What can be done to ensure human rights violations will cease and be prosecuted? Expand on different actors and

Read More »

PMC1000: Applied Pathology

Assessment Task Sheet: Poster Presentation Date: Thursday 31st August 2023 | Weighting: 30% Assessment Task 2 You are required to develop a handout style resource (pamphlet or brochure) on a selected pathological condition which is aimed at first year student paramedics. You will need to use high quality peer reviewed

Read More »

Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment

Indigenous Peoples, Law and Justice Detailed Information: Reflective Assignment Due Date:                   Tuesday 5th September 2023 at 4:00 pm (AWST). Marks:                       30% of the total marks for this unit. Assignment:              The assignment will comprise two questions. Students must answer all parts of both questions. Examinable topics: The cultural immersion exercise and/or

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?