CASE STUDY INFORMATION

CASE STUDY INFORMATION

APPENDIX B:

Overview

The following case study contains the information required to complete Assessment Task 3.

You are required to use the information below, along with reviewing current, relevant, peer-reviewed nursing literature to answer Assessment Task 3.

For the purposes of Assessment Task 3, please choose ONE (1) of the following family members, Danielle, Jack or Maria to assess using the Levett-Jones Clinical Reasoning Cycle (CRC) and the Roper-Logan-Tierney Model of Nursing. You should complete stages 1-4 of the CRC to demonstrate your understanding of the theories.

Case Study

The Demetriou family live in a 2-level home in the suburbs of South-Eastern Sydney. Peter (46 years) and Danielle (44 years) live with their 3 children, Harriet (19), Jack (17) and Lola (12). Peter’s father died 8 years ago from colon cancer and his mother Maria (74) has moved in with the family.

The Demetriou family have booked an appointment at their local multidisciplinary Primary Health Care Clinic for their yearly influenza injection.

Family MemberAgeBackground
Danielle Demetriou44 yearsPrimary school teacher. Works part-time (3 days a week) at the local primary school. Is overweight (BMI 40), is the ‘mum taxi’ driving kids to school and their extra-curricular activities (sport, music etc). Her parents live on a sheep property outside of Cobar, North Western NSW. Mother history of Breast Cancer (Stage 2A) (recovered) and father has early stage dementia.
Jack Demetriou17 yearsFinal year of high school – is good at AFL (plays first division for GWS). School/study is not a priority and he has no plans for a career beyond playing AFL. Has his driver’s licence. He does not drink or take drugs due to sporting commitments and his social circle centres around the AFL club. Jack has a history of generalised anxiety disorder and takes Lexapro daily.
Maria Demetriou74 yearsMaria is a widow who had 4 children and now lives with her son Peter’s family. She migrated with her family from Greece in the mid 1960s and spent most of her time as a mum or working part time in food preparation factories. Maria had a fall at home almost 3 months ago. Although there were no fractures identified, she was diagnosed with osteoarthritis. She was discharged home with anti-inflammatory pain relief and has been provided a walking stick to use during her recovery, which she finds she is still using. As well as the anti-inflammatories for osteoarthritis she is on vitamin D and calcium tablets daily.

ASSIGNMENT 3: Case Study

As well as responding to challenging situations using advanced psychomotor skills, Registered Nurses use sophisticated thinking abilities to apply clinical reasoning as they make decisions about patients with complex and diverse health care needs (Levett-Jones, 2018). There are 3 family members included in this case study that you can choose from. Please review the family information provided to you in the Demetriou family case study located in the Assessment Tile on LEO or in Appendix B of this document.

In written essay format you are required to pick ONE (1) member of the Demetriou family and apply the first FOUR (4) phases of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle to demonstrate how a beginning nurse might plan the care of this one individual.

Due date:                                          Submit before 0900 Wednesday 11th May, 2022

Weighting:                                       40%

Length and/or format:                    1200 words     +/- 10%

Purpose:                                           Each student will submit an essay which demonstrates application of core theories of the unit to a case study. This piece will allow the student to demonstrate their developing skills of identifying health care priorities and person-centred nursing care.

Learning outcomes assessed:    LO4 – explain the contribution of competent, holistic evidence-

based health care to clinical reasoning and decision-making in nursing practice across the lifespan

LO5 – apply the Roper-Logan-Tierney Model of Nursing in planning care for diverse populations across a range of settings LO6 – apply Levett-Jones’s Clinical Reasoning Cycle in identifying health care priorities, and initiation of health management and person-centred nursing care

How to submit:                                Via the appropriate Turnitin dropbox, located on the NRSG138

LEO page, under the Assessment tile.

Return of assignment:                   The assessment, feedback and grade will be returned via the

Turnitin dropbox. As this is the final assessment item for this unit,

the students’ results be available when final grades are released

Assessment criteria:                      The assessment will be marked using the criteria-based rubric

(Appendix C)

WORD COUNT

Writing requires skill and being able to write within a specified word limit is an essential component of professional and academic work. Reading and writing critically are fundamental skills which demonstrate an understanding and an ability to make judgements and solve problems, hence why only 10% of a word count should be direct quotes. That is, if the word count is 1500 words only 150 of those words should be direct quotes. Word counts provide students with an indication of the amount of detail and work required for each assessment item.

What is included in a word count?

Essentially, all text within an assessment item from the introduction through to the conclusion is counted in the word count. This includes all in-text citations, direct quotes and headings. The word count does not include the following:

  • •  Title page
  • •  Reference list
  • •  Appendices
  • •  Tables
  • •  Figures and legends

ASSIGNMENTS SUBMITTED JUST BEFORE THE DUE DATE AND TIME

Please note that if you submit your assignment, notice that the similarity index is high but do not have time to revise your assignment before the due date has passed, then you are advised to:

  • ·       contact the Lecturer in Charge and request that your assignment be removed.
    • ·       revise the assignment, submit it within three days of the due date and incur a late submission penalty.
    • ·       submit it into the regular drop box. Do not submit into the extension drop box. Please review the Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy if you choose not to do this.

REFERENCING

This unit requires you to use the APA 7th referencing system.

See the ‘Academic referencing’ page of the Student Portal for more details.

ACU POLICIES AND REGULATIONS

It is your responsibility to read and familiarise yourself with ACU policies and regulations, including regulations on examinations; review and appeals; acceptable use of IT facilities; and conduct and responsibilities. These are in the ACU Handbook, available from the website.

A list of these and other important policies can be found at the University policies page of the Student Portal.

Assessment policy and procedures

You must read the Assessment Policy and Assessment Procedures in the University Handbook: they include rules on deadlines; penalties for late submission; extensions; and special consideration. If you have any queries on Assessment Policy, please see your Lecturer in Charge.

Please note that:

  • any numerical marks returned to students are provisional and subject to moderation;
  • students will not be given access to overall aggregated marks for a unit, or overall unit grade calculated by Gradebook in LEO;

and,

  • students will be given a final mark and grade for their units after moderation is concluded and official grades are released after the end of semester.

Academic integrity

You have the responsibility to submit only work which is your own, or which properly acknowledges the thoughts, ideas, findings and/or work of others. The Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy and the Academic Misconduct Procedures are available from the website. Please read them, and note in particular that cheating, plagiarism, collusion, recycling of assignments and misrepresentation are not acceptable. Penalties for academic misconduct can vary in severity and can include being excluded from the course.

Turnitin

The Turnitin application (a text-matching tool) will be used in this unit, in order to enable:

  • students to improve their academic writing by identifying possible areas of poor citation and referencing in their written work; and
    • teaching staff to identify areas of possible plagiarism in students’ written work.

While Turnitin can help in identifying problems with plagiarism, avoiding plagiarism is more important. Information on avoiding plagiarism is available from the Academic Skills Unit.

For any assignment that has been created to allow submission through Turnitin (check the Assignment submission details for each assessment task), you should submit your draft well in advance of the due date (ideally, several days before) to ensure that you have time to work on any issues identified by Turnitin. On the assignment due date, lecturers will have access to your final submission and the Turnitin Originality Report.

Please note that electronic marking, Grademark, is used in this unit using Turnitin. Turnitin will be used as a means of submitting, marking and returning assessment tasks and so a text matching percentage will appear on your submission automatically.

FIRST PEOPLES AND EQUITY PATHWAYS DIRECTORATE FOR ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER STUDENTS

Every campus provides information and support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Students. Indigenous Knowings are embedded in curricula for the benefit of all students at ACU.

STUDENT SUPPORT

If you are experiencing difficulties with learning, life issues or pastoral/spiritual concerns, or have a disability/medical condition which may impact on your studies, you are advised to notify your Lecturer in Charge, Course Coordinator and/or one of the services listed below as soon as possible.

For all aspects of support please visit ACU Info section in the Student Portal.

  • Academic Skills offers a variety of services, including workshops (on topics such as assignment writing, time management, reading strategies, referencing), drop-in sessions, group appointments and individual consultations. It has a 24-hour online booking system for individual or group consultations.
    • Campus Ministry offers pastoral care, spiritual leadership and opportunities for you to be involved with community projects.

APPENDIX B: CASE STUDY INFORMATION

Overview

The following case study contains the information required to complete Assessment Task 3.

You are required to use the information below, along with reviewing current, relevant, peer-reviewed nursing literature to answer Assessment Task 3.

For the purposes of Assessment Task 3, please choose ONE (1) of the following family members, Danielle, Jack or Maria to assess using the Levett-Jones Clinical Reasoning Cycle (CRC) and the Roper-Logan-Tierney Model of Nursing. You should complete stages 1-4 of the CRC to demonstrate your understanding of the theories.

Case Study

The Demetriou family live in a 2-level home in the suburbs of South-Eastern Sydney. Peter (46 years) and Danielle (44 years) live with their 3 children, Harriet (19), Jack (17) and Lola (12). Peter’s father died 8 years ago from colon cancer and his mother Maria (74) has moved in with the family.

The Demetriou family have booked an appointment at their local multidisciplinary Primary Health Care Clinic for their yearly influenza injection.

Family MemberAgeBackground
Danielle Demetriou44 yearsPrimary school teacher. Works part-time (3 days a week) at the local primary school. Is overweight (BMI 40), is the ‘mum taxi’ driving kids to school and their extra-curricular activities (sport, music etc). Her parents live on a sheep property outside of Cobar, North Western NSW. Mother history of Breast Cancer (Stage 2A) (recovered) and father has early stage dementia.
Jack Demetriou17 yearsFinal year of high school – is good at AFL (plays first division for GWS). School/study is not a priority and he has no plans for a career beyond playing AFL. Has his driver’s licence. He does not drink or take drugs due to sporting commitments and his social circle centres around the AFL club. Jack has a history of generalised anxiety disorder and takes Lexapro daily.
Maria Demetriou74 yearsMaria is a widow who had 4 children and now lives with her son Peter’s family. She migrated with her family from Greece in the mid 1960s and spent most of her time as a mum or working part time in food preparation factories. Maria had a fall at home almost 3 months ago. Although there were no fractures identified, she was diagnosed with osteoarthritis. She was discharged home with anti-inflammatory pain relief and has been provided a walking stick to use during her recovery, which she finds she is still using. As well as the anti-inflammatories for osteoarthritis she is on vitamin D and calcium tablets daily.

APPENDIX C: MARKING RUBRIC: ASSIGNMENT 3 CASE STUDY

DescriptionHigh Distinction [100-85%]Distinction [84-75%]Credit [74-65%]Pass [64-50%]Unsatisfactory [49-0%]No Attempt [0%]
Structure (10 marks)The content in the essay matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a logical manner so that content flows from one paragraph to the next, and the essay ends with a rational conclusion.The content in the essay mostly matches the outline presented in the introductory paragraph. Most paragraphs are organised in a logical manner, and the essay ends with a rational conclusion.There is a clear introduction, followed by the body of the essay, with a conclusion. However, content within the body and within paragraphs is not always logically sequenced.There is a clear introduction, followed by the body of the essay, with a conclusion. However, there is little evidence of sequential presentation of information.There is not a clear introduction, body and conclusion.There is no sequencing.
Application of knowledge- Stage 1 Consider the patient situation (15 Marks)Demonstrates comprehensive application of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study. Clear identification of all related issues.Demonstrates a very good application of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the majority of related issues.Demonstrates good application of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the main related issues.Demonstrates adequate application of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and some related issues.Little or no application of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study or related issues.No understanding of the first stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study provided.
Application of knowledge- Stage 2 Collect cues/information (20 Marks)Demonstrates comprehensive application of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study. Clear identification of all related issues.Demonstrates a very good application of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the majority of related issues.Demonstrates good application of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the main related issues.Demonstrates adequate application of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and some related issues.Little or no application of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study or related issues.No understanding of the second stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study provided.
Application of knowledge- Stage 3 Process information (15 Marks)Demonstrates comprehensive application of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study. Clear identification of all related issues.Demonstrates a very good application of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the majority of related issues.Demonstrates good application of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the main related issues.Demonstrates adequate application of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and some related issues.Little or no application of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study or related issues.No understanding of the third stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study provided.
Application of knowledge- Stage 4 Identify problems/issues (15 Marks)Demonstrates comprehensive application of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study. Clear identification of all related issues.Demonstrates a very good application of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the majority of related issues.Demonstrates good application of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and the main related issues.Demonstrates adequate application of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study and some related issues.Little or no application of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study or related issues.No understanding of the fourth stage of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle in relation to the case study provided.
Use of Evidence (10 marks)Supported by recent and high-quality scholarly sources.Supported by recent and good quality scholarly sources.Supported by recent and adequate scholarly sources.Supported by some scholarly sources.Minimal relevant or credible academic references or use of non- credible scholarly sourcesNo evidence of credible references.
Mechanics – Grammar, Spelling and Punctuation (10 Marks)Expressed ideas clearly, concisely and fluently. There are no errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, and the meaning is readily discernible.Expressed ideas clearly and concisely. There are minimal errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. However, the meaning is easily discernible.There are some errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. The errors detract, but the meaning is discernible.There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation. The errors detract somewhat, but the meaning is discernible with some effort.There are substantial errors with grammar, spelling and punctuation, such that the errors detract significantly from the meaning.Grammar, spelling and punctuation are such that the reader cannot make sense of the content.
Academic style and referencing (5 Marks)Used appropriate professional language; correctly cited all sources both within the text and reference list; consistently and correctly used APA referencing style.Used appropriate professional language; correctly cited most sources both within the text and reference list; minor errors in the APA referencing style.Used appropriate professional language; correctly cited most sources both within the text and reference list; used APA referencing style with minimal errors.Mostly appropriate professional language used. Correctly cited most sources both within the text and reference list; used APA referencing style with occasional errors.Language used is unprofessional. Not all references are credible and/or relevant. Many inaccuracies with the APA referencing style.There are no references supporting the assignment. APA style has not been used. References do not match citations.
Order Now

Get expert help for CASE STUDY INFORMATION and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 20, 2026) CASE STUDY INFORMATION. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/.
"CASE STUDY INFORMATION." Universal Assignment - February 20, 2026, https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/
Universal Assignment December 7, 2022 CASE STUDY INFORMATION., viewed February 20, 2026,<https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/>
Universal Assignment - CASE STUDY INFORMATION. [Internet]. [Accessed February 20, 2026]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/
"CASE STUDY INFORMATION." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 20, 2026. https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/
"CASE STUDY INFORMATION." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/case-study-information/. [Accessed: February 20, 2026]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3 (Group) Unit Code/Description ICT306 – Advanced Cybersecurity Course/Subject Bachelors Semester This Semester Unit Learning Outcomes Addressed a) Evaluate different techniques used by attackers and defenders in cybersecurity, employing both technical knowledge and ethical reasoning.b) Design, implement, and critically evaluate cybersecurity solutions for addressing real-world challenges. Assessment

Read More »

Assignment MECH3780: Computational Mechanics

CRICOS Provider 00025B • TEQSA PRV12080 1MECH3780: Computational MechanicsAssignment II: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis ofGeneralised Cardiovascular Medical DevicesIntroduction:In this assignment, you will develop your CFD capability by analysing a benchmark casefrom a validation study sponsored by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and fundedby the FDA’s Critical Path

Read More »

Assessment Task 1

Assessment Task 1 (30% of the final mark)This Week30 Points PossibleIn ProgressNEXT UP: Submit assignmentUnlimited Attempts AllowedThis WeekAttempt 1 Add commentDetailsAssessment task Assessment 1 – ASSIGNMENTPurposeTo give students the opportunity to produce a well-written piece of formal analysis on a topic inland law. Graduate capabilities GC1,3,7-11 are covered by this

Read More »

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming Challenge

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming ChallengeUnit Code/DescriptionICT313 Big Data for Software DevelopmentCourse/SubjectBachelor of Information TechnologySemesterS1 – 2025Unit Learning Outcomes AddressedULO3: Critically assess and implement advanced data pre-processing and analytics strategies in a software development context, focusing on tasks like data cleansing, transformation, and feature selection.ULO4: Design, develop, and evaluate

Read More »

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection Part 1 Infographic and Part 2 Reflection using the Gibbs Cycle This assessment is worth 35% of your final grade (Infographic 18% + Reflection 17%). Assessment Instructions Part 1: Infographic TOPIC: Create your infographic as a poster (A3 paper size) for your clients to introduce

Read More »

Assignment E-Business and E-Marketing

Module HandbookFaculty of Business, Computing and DigitalIndustriesSchool of Business(On-campus)E-Business and E-MarketingModule.2025-26􀀀ContentsModule Handbook 1Contents 2Module Introduction 3Module Leader Welcome 3Module Guide 5Module Code and Title 5Module Leader Contact Details and Availability 5Module Team Tutors Contact Details and Availability 5Module Teaching 5Module Intended Learning Outcomes 5Summary of Content 6Assessment and Deadlines 6Use

Read More »

DESIGN DATA REPORT – Answers Form

SHSM024 RESEARCH DESIGN & DATA REPORT ANSWER FORM ETHICS: (approx. 300 words in total) 10 OBTAINING CONSENT: Describe the process that the researchers would have to implement to obtain consent for a pregnant woman to participate in the study. OBTAINING ETHICAL APPROVAL: Describe two other areas of the study procedures

Read More »

Assignment Brief Sheet1

Assignment Brief Sheet1Module Tutor:Dr Dennis PeppleModule NameStudy Skills and Personal Development PlanningModule CodeCBU401Title of Coursework:Assessment 1: Written Assignment (1500 words)Weight: 50%Title of Coursework:Assessment 2: Reflective (PDP) Report (1500 words)Weight: 50%Feedback detailsThe university policy is that you will receive prompt feedback on your work within 2 weeks of the submission date.

Read More »

BMM6582 E-Business eMarketing Module Handbook

Module Handbook Faculty of Business, Computing and Digital Industries School of Business (On-campus) E-Business and E-Marketing Module. 2025-26 Contents Module Introduction Module Leader Welcome Hello A very warm welcome to the E-Business and E-Marketing module. I hope that you find this Module Handbook helpful in supporting your studies and that

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research Essay – details

Assessment 2: Research Essay – details Goal The goal is to promote the development of critical reflective skills to analyse specific global issues, considering diverse perspectives and heterogeneous stakeholders in cross-national contexts that are shaped by global forces. Your analysis and themes In this essay, you will write a case

Read More »

Assessment 3: Reflective Journal

Assessment 3: Reflective Journal Student details: Workshop day/time: This Week, 12 pm Student name: None Student number: 00000000 Reflective Journal Template: Week / date of entry Journal Entry Week 5: Accomplishments: We worked on the team contract and made some rules and deadlines for our assignment tasks. Challenges: There were

Read More »

Assessment 3 – Digital Strategy Report

3 Attempts Allowed Brief: The Final Project Report demonstrates the capstone knowledge and practical skills of digital system managers’ organisational and communication abilities. It will combine and reflect on your learning journey, including lessons learned and progress outputs, particularly from Modules 7 to 11.  You will incorporate feedback and peer-review

Read More »

Assignment SHSM024 RESEARCH DESIGN & DATA REPORT

ANSWER FORM ETHICS: (approx. 300 words in total) 10 OBTAINING CONSENT: Describe the process that the researchers would have to implement to obtain consent for a pregnant woman to participate in the study. OBTAINING ETHICAL APPROVAL: Describe two other areas of the study procedures (not including ‘obtaining consent’) that a

Read More »

Assignment Brief Sheet

Assignment Brief Sheet1Module Tutor:Dr Dennis PeppleModule NameStudy Skills and Personal Development PlanningModule CodeCBU401Title of Coursework:Assessment 1: Written Assignment (1500 words)Weight: 50%Title of Coursework:Assessment 2: Reflective (PDP) Report (1500 words)Weight: 50%Feedback detailsThe university policy is that you will receive prompt feedback on your work within 2 weeks of the submission date.

Read More »

Assignment Faculty of Business, Computing and Digital Industries

Module Handbook Faculty of Business, Computing and Digital Industries School of Business (On-campus) E-Business and E-Marketing Module. 2025-26 Contents Module Introduction Module Leader Welcome Hello A very warm welcome to the E-Business and E-Marketing module. I hope that you find this Module Handbook helpful in supporting your studies and that

Read More »

Assignment Brief BMM6422: Business and Management Strategies

Assignment Brief BMM6422: Business and Management StrategiesComponent numberAssignment 1Assignment typeReportLearning outcomes for this assessment(Please see module Handbook for all learning outcomes)Upon completion of this module students should be able to:1 Evaluate the benefits to organisations of strategic planning within the business environment.2 Employ specific techniques, methods and models used in

Read More »

ASSIGNMENT Business and Management Strategy

Module Handbook Faculty of Business, Computing and Digital Industries School of Business (On-campus) Business and Management Strategy BMM6422 2025-26 Contents Module Introduction Module Leader Welcome Welcome to Business and Management Strategy Hello I hope that you find this Module Handbook helpful in supporting your studies and that it provides you

Read More »

BMM6302 Entrepreneurship and Creativity 

Assignment Brief – Cohort 06 BMM6302 Entrepreneurship and Creativity  Component number Assignment 2 Assignment type 02 Dragon’s Den Presentation (Live Presentation) Learning outcomes for this assessment (Please see module Handbook for all learning outcomes) Compare and contrast a variety of strategic models to develop and critically evaluate business start-up ideas.

Read More »

BMM6302 Entrepreneurship and Creativity 

Assignment Brief – Cohort 07 BMM6302 Entrepreneurship and Creativity  Component number Assignment 1 Assignment type 01 Business Idea (Video Presentation – Panopto) Learning outcomes for this assessment (Please see module Handbook for all learning outcomes) Compare and contrast a variety of strategic models to develop and critically evaluate business start-up

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching Criminology

LCRM301 Researching CriminologyTopic: Introduction to theoryand the research processand undertaking acriminological literaturereviewAcknowledgement ofcountryPART ONE: Preparingcriminological research(Weeks 1-5)In the first part of the unit, we focus on preparing criminologicalresearch and decision-making processes. This includes deciding onthe topic you want to focus on, the kinds of methods to use and thetypes of

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching criminology

LCRM301 Researching criminologyWorksheet 1This worksheet will be disseminated to students in Week 3 and will assist them in the planning and development of the second assessment task: literature review. PART 1: Refining your topicThe topic I am interested in is: I am interested in this topic because: This is an

Read More »

LCRM301 Researching Criminology

LCRM301 Researching CriminologyTopic: Planningcriminological research andformulating effectiveresearch questionsAcknowledgement ofcountryLecture structure Example?How do police perceptions of their own organization influence their views of the public,specifically their trust of people in the areas they patrol?How do women with insecure migration status experience and seek help for family violenceand what are their experiences

Read More »

ASSESSMENT NO.2 – COURT APPLICATION FACT PATTERN

FACULTY OF LAW AND BUSINESSThomas More Law SchoolLAWS201: CIVIL PROCEDURE & ADRSEMESTER TWO, 2025 – NATIONAL –ASSESSMENT NO.2 – COURT APPLICATION FACT PATTERN(AND THE FACT PATTERN FOR THE PLEADINGS WORKSHOP IN WEEK 5)BackgroundRachel Richardson is a printer by trade although she currently works in art design fora fashion magazine based

Read More »

Assessment 2: Court Application

02/09/2025, 20:3430 Points PossibleAssessment 2: Court ApplicationAssessment 2: Court ApplicationDetailsAssessment task 2: Court Application (worth 30% of the final total mark for this unit)Add commentA simulated court application will be run in weeks 6 and 7 of semester on selected topics from the first five weeks of the unit. Your

Read More »

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION

APPENDIX B: ASSESSMENT TASK 2 – COURT APPLICATION (30% OF FINAL MARK)General informationThis Assessment task is worth 30 marks of your final mark.The task is either making (Applicant) or opposing (Respondent) an application before theSupreme Court in your respective state based on a fact scenario, which will be uploaded on

Read More »

Assessment task Assessment 1 – ASSIGNMENT

Assessment Task 1 (30% of the final mark)This Week30 Points PossibleIn ProgressNEXT UP: Submit assignmentUnlimited Attempts Allowed11/08/2025Attempt 1 Add commentDetails Assessment task Assessment 1 – ASSIGNMENTPurpose To give students the opportunity to produce a well-written piece of formal analysis on a topic inland law. Graduate capabilities GC1,3,7-11 are covered by

Read More »

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming Challenge

Assessment Brief- Assessment 3- Map-Reduce Programming Challenge Unit Code/Description ICT313 Big Data for Software DevelopmentCourse/Subject Bachelor of Information TechnologySemester S1 – 2025Unit Learning OutcomesAddressedULO3: Critically assess and implement advanced data pre-processing andanalytics strategies in a software development context, focusing on tasks like datacleansing, transformation, and feature selection.ULO4: Design, develop, and

Read More »

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection

Assessment 2 Infographic and Reflection Part 1 Infographic and Part 2 Reflection using the Gibbs CycleThis assessment is worth 35% of your final grade (Infographic 18% + Reflection 17%). Assessment InstructionsPart 1: InfographicCreate an A3 size infographic (portrait layout).Submit as a .pdfTOPIC:Create your infographic as a poster (A3 paper size)

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?