Student ID
Student Name
Topic: A benefit program for single mothers struggling through the financial crisis and navigating single parenthood.
Table of Contents
Determination of Successful Project 4
Assumptions, Risks or Obstacles that may affect project Success. 5
Project Title
A benefit program for single mothers struggling through the financial crisis and navigating single parenthood.
Role and Organisation
The Council of Single Moms and their Children is one of the leading groups in Australia that helps single mothers. Since 1969, the CSMC, which maintains its administrative offices in Victoria, has supported and empowered single parents. The non-profit’s only objective is to support single mothers and their kids by offering specialized assistance. Their main goals include flexible study and work schedules, cheap housing and day-care, financial stability, parental support, child support, and family law. The CSMC prioritizes interpersonal relationships, crisis assistance, information and recommendations, and working with other organizations. They primarily assist with this over the phone and via email. The membership-based organization known as the CSMC is founded on the self-help paradigm. You may use their services and get support from the neighbourhood by becoming a member. In my position as this association’s new program coordinator and facilitator, it is my duty to create a program for single mothers who are balancing motherhood and a financial crisis. Their three main service areas are assistance with financial challenges, child support, and domestic violence (Mendes, 2005, pp.121). Their website offers access to services and emergency assistance linkages such Das HS Centrelink, as well as information for women who are in financial need, individuals struggling with domestic abuse, and youngsters who are the victims of cyberbullying. Laws governing child care, child support, and family tax advantages are also covered.
Project Scope
Project Summary
This program attempts to inform single moms about drug usage, its link to mental health, and the criminal justice system as they get ready to become single parents and deal with a financial crisis. There is little to no assistance available in the areas of parenting, mental health, and substance abuse. This curriculum would provide the groundwork for young women’s comprehension by educating them about the importance of these three fundamental components. To do this, the program would be overseen by the following people:
- The initiative would employ rehabilitated single moms who have suffered financially and need assistance to meet their basic needs.
- Senior counsellors with parental experience and financial independence will be consulted, when possible, to discuss topics pertaining to parenting, independence, and help.
- Understanding how mood disorders may impact one’s capacity for emotional regulation and rationality.
- Focusing on intergenerational financial problems and informing people about the information of single parenting and its consequences on children.
Project Goal
Interacting with young single mothers overcoming single parenting and financial difficulties.
Project Objectives
- Educating parents on how their actions affect their children.
- Offering information on parenting and its effects on kids, raising awareness of the risks of financial dependence, and teaching women who are Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander about their practices.
- To take part in a recovery program that places a strong emphasis on financial freedom and independence.
- To appoint experienced facilitators with experience in financial cocounseling parenting programs, and the rehabilitation of former participants in other CSMC programs to staff the program.
- A focus on the CSMC themes of child support and early intervention for single moms.
- To develop appropriate outreach initiatives that individuals may take advantage of as they struggle with finances and strive for independence.
Determination of Successful Project
The admission into the program, intake, and participation from individuals within the pilot program will initially be used to determine success. Participation of the community and users in the aforementioned conceptualization, planning, and evaluation. Peer tenancy support officers, managers, and providers are people who have lived in or raised a family in social housing and who, with further training, can show they have the abilities to assist and encourage self-advocacy (Swain and Howe, 1995, pp. 20). As a result, single moms will be more adept at speaking up for themselves and creating small, local support networks that improve the wellbeing of those living in communal housing (such as shared child care and trips).
- A variety of housing stock that may be accommodated within communities may be quickly developed through partnerships between creative architects, designers, town planners, and community leaders working with people in need of and/or living in social housing.
- A critical first step in creating a stock of respectable social housing that will continue to meet Australian requirements for years to come is mapping needs and resources.
- Even with the rapidly rising available stock, a long-term perspective is vital to provide the necessary funds for family, community, and health services, as well as for social housing.
- Guaranteeing that households headed by single mothers and those who require social housing have access to a sustainable wage.
- For instance, the government moves single mothers to the Newstart payment when their children turn 8, yet this has created such extreme financial hardship that women are unable to feed their family, leading to homelessness, and causing children to skip and switch schools, further harming them.
Assumptions, Risks or Obstacles that may affect project Success
If there are several service delivery options and switching between them is simple, real consumer choice may enable some or many of the desired improvements. We will argue that greater community and service user engagement is necessary at all service levels, from the beginning to the conclusion, even when we are unsure that this is the case. Numerous present-day service consumers are balancing a number of stresses, such as those related to money, health, maternity, insufficient housing, etc. When faced with a shop rack full of 20 options for the same product, choice may frequently seem overwhelming, much like how stressed-out parents or elderly folks might feel (McInnes). We use the employment provider network as an illustration of a situation where single moms complain that their options are limited because of the proliferation of identical models and specifications or because accessing alternatives involves more time and travel.
Project Rationale
According to CSMC, without assured government business and support, the majority of employers could not succeed in any highly competitive market. The available performance reviews do not motivate us. According to CSMC, the government should practice greater stewardship in terms of provider conduct and outcomes because it provides the majority of the money for 63% of single mothers. Instead, we see that when attacking stay-at-home mothers, the government mostly defends its provider network. The CSMC takes note of the news release from ACOSS dated December 5, 2016, which articulates concerns we have in common with them, such as the requirement to base changes to human services on a thorough analysis of the current barriers preventing people from gaining better access and higher-quality services. According to CSMC, such an analysis may make the following crucial questions more explicitly stated:
- How can modifications in human services better guarantee that everyone in Australia can achieve health and well-being?
- How can we build an extensive system of housing, employment, transportation, and healthcare services that maximizes efficiency and minimizes wasting and duplication?
- How can we ensure that everyone, regardless of geography or financial condition, has access to high-quality, fairly priced services that improve people’s lives?
More than one in five homes with dependent children in Australia are single-parent households, one of the family types with the greatest growth rates. Nine out of ten children who have experienced parental separation live with moms, who make up the majority of single parents. Parental separations are mostly to blame for the growth in single-parent homes, and violence is regarded as a major factor in failed partnerships. Recent Australian research on the causes of divorce found that women’s top reasons for divorcing were violence and addictions, with general communication breakdown coming in second. Data from the ABS (1996) research on women’s safety suggest that single women with an ex-partner were most likely to have suffered violence and that the ex-partner was most likely the offender, providing statistical support for this line of reasoning. In a survey of the general public, 23% of adult women who had ever been in a relationship reported having experienced physical violence from either their current or former partner. Although they were more likely to be assaulted, single women who had previously been in a relationship reported suffering violence 42% of the time (McHugh and Millar, 2013, pp. 149). According to data from family courts, violence or abuse is a factor in 66% of child custody disputes.
The data in the submission came from a PhD study conducted in South Australia in the 1990s that compared single mothers who had left violent relationships with those who had not in terms of their family transition experiences. Interviews were conducted with 36 single mothers, including those who were divorced, separated, or who had given birth outside of marriage. 18 of the 29 single mothers who were questioned indicated their relationships terminated violently after they failed (Harper, 1976, pp.46). The respondents’ stories of abuse indicated that there was both routine physical violence and sporadic sexual, social, financial, and emotional abuse. Instead of being a single explosive incident, the violence generally occurred as part of a relational dynamic in which the mother and children lived in daily fear and worry.
The dangers of unemployment for single parents are increased by the current family policy. By providing FTB B to single-income families without a means test, the present family policy rewards mothers in couple of families who leave their jobs more generously. For mothers to keep receiving a support payment for a subsistence income while they are unpartnered, new participation criteria apply. Since the current family policy rewards some women to stop working while requiring other moms to start working, it is contradictory and illogical. Making it feasible for all parents, whether they are in a couple or alone, to enter and depart the job market in a methodical manner as caregiving demands vary over the course of their life is the best way to prevent unemployment for single parents (Schlesinger, 1973, pp.58). Considerations for this include maternity and paternity leave, top-notch, reasonably priced child care, retraining programs, and entitlements to subsidies for carers who return to the workforce.
The job position of women with dependent children at the time of separation had the greatest influence on how actively they participated in the workforce after their divorce. Particularly after the birth of their second child, women who had worked for a living throughout their marriage were more likely to do so in the future. Women with greater professional experience were more devoted to their work and more likely to do it in secure settings (Grahame and Marston, 2012, pp.73). These findings were reinforced by Funder, who also made it clear that decisions made regarding the division of paid work and family responsibilities during marriage had a big influence on women’s chances for a successful career following a divorce.
Time Schedule Gantt chart
| Project Activities | Time in Weeks | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | |||
| Conduct scope at local community centres | |||||||||||||||||||
| Identification of potential program participants | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team roles allocation and selection | |||||||||||||||||||
| Create a program plan that includes sufficient materials for the weekly motifs. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Before the program begins, the team gets together to review safety procedures for mother and children. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Produce documentation for interventions, assessments, channels for complaints and comments, and progress updates. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Make a database to keep account of programs and employee access. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Set up assessments with clients who are eligible for courses on financial stability. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Enrolment of participants | |||||||||||||||||||
| 12 weeks of program execution and course content | |||||||||||||||||||
| Program Interval Reports | |||||||||||||||||||
| Acquiring Feedback from program participants | |||||||||||||||||||
| Analysis of feedback received | |||||||||||||||||||
| Final program reports are due. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team progress and comments discussion | |||||||||||||||||||
| Create evaluation summaries | |||||||||||||||||||
| Report to the facility, the supervisor, and the funding source | |||||||||||||||||||
| Team celebration on completion of program | |||||||||||||||||||
Legend:
Yellow = Initiation
Green = Planning
Orange = team engagement
Blue = Execution
Purple = Monitoring, control and assessment
Red = Closi
References
Grahame, T. and Marston, G., 2012. Welfare-to-work policies and the experience of employed single mothers on income support in Australia: Where are the benefits? Australian Social Work, 65(1), pp.73-86.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.604093
Harper, P., 1976. National Council for the Single Mother and her child: National Conference. Children Australia, 1(3), pp.46-48.
10.1017/S0312897000017227
McHugh, M. and Millar, J., 2013. Single mothers in Australia: Supporting mothers to seek work. In Single Mothers in an International Context: Mothers or Workers? (pp. 149-178). Routledge.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315072708/single-mothers-international-context-mothers-workers?refId=83218098-cb00-4b3d-bcf8-6e702284bece&context=ubx
McInnes, E., National Council of Single Mothers and their Children Inc.
http://www.ncsmc.org.au
Mendes, P., 2005. The history of social work in Australia: A critical literature review. Australian Social Work, 58(2), pp.121-131.
10.1111/j.1447-0748.2005.00197.x
Schlesinger, B., 1973. Unmarried mothers in Australia: a review. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 8(1), pp.58-69.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.1973.tb00505.x
Swain, S. and Howe, R., 1995. Single mothers and their children: Disposal, punishment and survival in Australia (No. 20). Cambridge University Press.
Get expert help for Benefit program for single mothers struggling through the financial crisis and navigating single parenthood and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
