Assessment Task 2 – Written piece (must pass to receive 50% of original grade)
| Assessment Name | Case study |
| Goal | The goal of this task is to integrate and apply knowledge of pathophysiology and safe administration of medication to a patient scenario. This will also incorporate your creative and critical thinking in the application of pharmacotherapeutics and safety concepts into the patient scenario. You will consider the professional, ethical and legal codes, and practice standards relevant to decision- making and safe medication practice. You must demonstrate adequate knowledge for safe practice. |
| Product | 1500-word written piece |
| Length | 1500 words |
| Weighting | 30% |
| Individual/Group | Individual |
| Formative/Summative | Summative |
| How will I be assessed | 6-criterion grading scale using the rubric provided |
| Due Date: | 2 weeks after assignment is sent by Course coordinator |
| Presentation requirements | This assessment task must: Be a written academic response to the case scenario provided as alternative assessment Task 2 in an email from the course coordinatorUse the template provided in the email.Use Times New Roman font, size 12 with 1.5 line spacingAdhere to the word limit (+/-10%)Use APA referencing styleBe submitted within 2 weeks in an electronic format as a word document via SafeAssign into the Task 2 submission area on Blackboard |
| What you need to do | Review the Alternative assessment Task 2 Case study template that includes questions requiring a written response.Access the Task 2 Case study subcutaneous insulin ChartAnswer the questions clearly and precisely using academic writing style. Support the responses with scholarly academic sources that are cited using the APA referencing style in the text and reference list. Use a minimum of two references for each question. Adhere to the recommended word limit (+/- 10%). |
| Suggested Format | Use the template provided in the Alternative Task 2 the email sent from the course coordinator Use the Alternative Task 2 subcutanous insulin chart Respond to the questions on the template and within the word limit Provide at least two references for each question response Describe the medications in detail and support the discussion with references. Use evidence from scholarly health literature and professional standards to support and justify your discussions and strategies. (Intext references are included in the word counts. The reference list is not included in the word count. The word count leniency is +/- 10%) |
| Resources needed to complete task | Alternative Task 2 assessment guide, case template and subcutaneous insulin chartAPA Referencing Guide https://www.usc.edu.au/current-students/student-support/academic-and-study-support/referencing-guides-and-academic-integrity/apaNMBA Registered Nurse Standards of Practice NMBA Midwife Standards for Practice |
RUBRIC
| Criteria | High Distinction | Distinction | Credit | Pass | Fail |
| 1. Application of pathophysiological and pharmacotherapy knowledge to the case study, specific to safe medication administration. (20%) | Meaningful synthesis of the relevant pathophysiology related to the case study. Medication safety discussed in-depth related to the pharmacological concepts in the case study. | Thoughtful and informed discussion of the relevant pathophysiology related to the case study. Medication safety comprehensively related to the pharmacological concepts in the case study. | Clear and coherent discussion of the relevant pathophysiology related to the case study. Medication safety synthesised related to the pharmacological concepts in the case study. | Accurately discusses some of the relevant pathophysiology related to the case study. Medication safety accurately related to the pharmacological concepts in the case study. | Incomplete or superficial discussion of the relevant pathophysiology related to the case study. Medication safety inaccurately related to the pharmacological concepts in the case study. |
| 2. Application of the quality use of medicines concepts to the case study, specific to person-centred care. (40%) | Detailed analysis of the principles of medication safety and the quality use of medicines as described in the NPS MedicineWise online learning modules to the case scenario. | Critical analysis of the principles of medication safety and the quality use of medicines as described in the NPS MedicineWise online learning modules to the case scenario. | Logical links are made regarding the principles of medication safety and the quality use of medicines as described in the NPS MedicineWise online learning modules to the case scenario. | Discussion of the principles of medication safety and the quality use of medicines as described in the NPS MedicineWise online learning modules are satisfactory. | A descriptive account of the principles of medication safety and the quality use of medicines as described in the NPS MedicineWise online learning modules to the case scenario with limited synthesis demonstrated |
| 3. Application of Nursing or Midwifery codes and standards to underpin decision making and safe medication practice. (25%) | Exemplary discussion of the codes and standards demonstrating insightful interpretation of them into practice. Meaningful application of the professional codes and standards to person-centred care. Demonstrates insightful conclusions about client needs. | In-depth discussion of the codes and standards demonstrating accurate knowledge of them in practice. Comprehensive application of the professional codes and standards to person-centred care. Demonstrates balanced conclusions about client needs. | Comprehensive discussion of the codes and standards demonstrating understanding of them in practice. Complete application of the professional codes and standards to person-centred care. Conclusions made about client needs are appropriate. | Description of the codes and standards demonstrating application of them in practice. Application of the professional codes and standards to person-centred care are satisfactory. Relevant conclusions are made about client needs. | Limited evidence of knowledge of the codes and standards related to practice. Codes and standards incorrectly applied. No application of the professional codes and standards to person-centred care. Absence/ Inconsistent conclusions relevance to case scenarios |
| 4. Evidence-based argument and justification of decisions, coherent written expression and presentation (10%) | Exemplary academic communication. All responses are fully and clearly supported by several sources of relevant evidence demonstrating analysis. Eleven or more appropriate references cited in the written response. | Advanced academic communication. All responses are fully and clearly supported by evidence, demonstrating synthesis. Ten or more appropriate references cited in the written response. | Proficient academic communication. Responses are generally supported by appropriate evidence with some synthesis cited. Nine or more appropriate references cited in the written response. | Satisfactory academic communication with minor errors only. Responses are supported by evidence; however, critical analysis of evidence needed synthesis in the responses. Eight or more appropriate references cited in the written response. | Academic communication contains several errors. Limited evidence supports the responses or evidence from sources is treated uncritically. Inadequate number of scholarly sources. |
| 5. Referencing style conforms to APA referencing style used at USC. (5%) | All citations met the APA referencing style No citation errors. | Consistent, accurate and complete referencing style with minor errors. | Consistent and complete referencing style with some errors. | Generally consistent in the referencing technique but needs attention to APA style details. | Incorrect referencing style and technique. |
Get expert help for Assessment Task 2 – Written piece and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
