Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis

Case Study Critical Analysis

Due Date:         5th of February 2021 9:00 PM

Length:              3000 words maximum

Format: Report (Microsoft Word format) Weighting: 40% of total unit marks Submission: Via BlackBoard Turnitin.

Referencing      Harvard (please provide appropriate in text citations and a reference list)

The task

Consider a major engineered infrastructure asset that you are familiar with or for which you can easily collect information. It can be any engineered asset of a critical nature. For example:

  • Transport infrastructure such as the Hume Highway from Sydney to Melbourne or the Gatimaan Express rail between Delhi and Jhansi.
  • Oil and gas infrastructure such as a platform in the Western Offshore Basin off the Indian Coast or the Timor Sea off Northern Australia.
  • A high-volume international airport such as Kingsford Smith Airport, Sydney or Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai.
  • A specific hospital such as the Gold Coast University Hospital or the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in New Delhi.
  • A critical section of communications infrastructure such as the 5G network currently being commissioned in Australia.
  • A power generation, transmission or distribution facility.
  • A water supply or distribution facility or a waste water treatment facility.
  • Business software for a critical business such as a major bank or critical services infrastructure company (power, water, transport or other critical services infrastructure).
  • Any other engineering asset of your choice.

In this assignment, you are required to conduct a critical analysis of that infrastructure asset from a strategic asset management perspective. The written business style report must demonstrate your ability to design and articulate an appropriate Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) covering the entire asset life cycle of the asset in question.

Hence, you will need to present a critical analysis, explain your chosen methodology and give clear and appropriate advice, based in evidence, on the strategic asset management plan needed in relation to the chosen asset.

Regarding the topic, you must gain the written approval of your Tutor first. You will need to satisfy your Tutor that the chosen topic has sufficient scope and importance such that the development of a suitable SAMP would usually be the responsibility of a dedicated engineering or asset manager.

The Report Structure

The written report shall be no more than 3000 words and conform to the requirements set out below.

Format of business style report

  • The report is to be written with a Cover sheet, Title Sheet, Executive Summary, Table of Contents, Introduction, Methodology, Results and Discussion (with appropriate sub-headings), Recommendations, Conclusion and References.
  • The objective of the structure is to achieve the best possible communication with the reader. Use headings to ‘sign-post’ what is coming and to provide a ‘skeleton’ of report contents.
  • Be sure to attach the standard cover-sheet that SCU requires all students to place on the front of all assignments.
  • Commence your report with a title-page. The title-page is the front page that all authors put on the reports and submissions that they write as professionals. The title-page contains a title, plus your name as author and the submission date.
  • The Header must contain your name and your student number.
  • The Footer must contain the Unit number i.e. MNG92100 and the page number. Page numbering commences after the title-page.

Collaboration posts via the discussion board:

As part of this assignment, you are encouraged to write about this assessment to other participants. The objective is for you to help each other via Discussion Board posts. Each post should be substantial (at least several sentences or a paragraph – a single sentence is insufficient). It should contain meaningful and relevant information that would potentially be of real assistance to the other participants. Alternatively, the posts could be reflective or probing of another post in such a way that it adds value to a previous post via additional relevant information or a new interpretation.

  • Posts can share sources of information including websites and web pages of general interest.
  • Posts can also share useful peer reviewed articles about asset management including “Strategic Asset Management Plans” (SAMPs) and their implementation, asset management strategies for different parts of the asset life cycle, asset management maturity models for organizations seeking to improve the way assets are managed and asset management strategy for particular industries such as Power, Water or Rail.
  • Another way in which participants can earn marks is to begin a particular type of discussion thread. For example, discussions about how to satisfy a particular aspect of the marking rubric. There are many things that can be shared and discussed other than finished work, which never should be shared.
  • Yet another valuable contribution is in the form of an intelligent question. Please be aware that a single sentence question is insufficient. There should be several sentences to frame the context of the question.
  • Note that your Tutor is prepared to answer questions at any stage particularly if there is more than one with the same question. If the Tutor doesn’t respond to the discussion thread, you should email the Tutor.
  • A pass grade in this activity will be a minimum of 3 substantial posts but more posts with more meaningful contributions will earn higher marks. Please refer to the marking rubric for detailed grading information.

General guiding information:

  • Start writing early and start posting on the discussion board early.
  • Discuss often with your Tutor and your group.
  • Ensure that you visit the library for assistance in finding the best possible journals and other materials.
  • You must read widely and deeply.
  • Focus mainly on the current academic literature i.e. post 2010.
  • Please use your imagination by providing graphs, tables, charts, and images.
  • References, tables, charts, and appendices are not included in the word count.
  • Please review the attached Marking Rubric so that you meet all the requirements.
  • Have regard to the ‘Grasp of core unit theory’ marking criteria. For the highest marks for that criteria you must demonstrate deep, accurate understanding. To be able to go deeply into issues and still stay within the 3000 word limit you must limit the number of issues upon which you focus and make use of diagrams, tables and figures.
  • Check your work, or have another person check your work, for errors in grammar and even those mistakes all authors make because they have been working on the same paper for ‘too long’.
MNG93100 Marking Rubric: Assignment 3 (Report)
Excellent 85%‒100%Very Good 75%‒84%Good 65%‒74%Satisfactory 50%64%Unacceptable 0%‒49%
Failure to meet the minimum academic references (4) will automatically result in a maximum mark of 40% for the complete assignment
Response to assigned topic, the understanding of relevant theory, explanation of research methods: (about 70% of total mark for the assignment)
Analysis: 10% The Assignment demonstrated exceptional critical analysis techniques.  The Assignment demonstrated very good critical analysis techniques.  The Assignment demonstrated good critical analysis techniques but with some errors.  The Assignment demonstrated critical analysis techniques but with some errors. could have been improved.  The Assignment Demonstrated little critical analysis techniques.
Response to topic: 20% The Assignment responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in an exceptionally balanced manner with no irrelevant material.The Assignment responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a balanced manner with minimal irrelevant material.The Assignment responded directly to the topic and to every separate part of the topic in a reasonably balanced manner. Some irrelevant material included. Some issues not properly developed.Overall the Assignment responded directly to the topic but with some digressions and irrelevancies. One or two key aspects of the topic were not developed properly. Or many less important aspects may have been overlooked.Taken as a whole, the assignment did not respond adequately to the topic. Important aspects were overlooked and/or much of the material was irrelevant.
Grasp of unit theory: 20% The Assignment demonstrated deep, accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts at a very high level of sophistication.  Demonstrated accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts.  Demonstrated accurate understanding of unit principles and concepts, although slightly superficial or flawed.  Mostly sound grasp of unit principles and concepts although one-dimensional and superficial throughout or perhaps a few misconceptions.  One or more important unit concepts or principles seriously misunderstood, or no relevant theoretical framework established.
Discussion board posts: 10% At least 10 substantial posts. Mature reflection and probing of others posts. High quality contribution to the community.There were at least seven substantial and meaningful posts to the discussion board with reflection and probing on others posts.There were at least 5 substantial and meaningful posts to the discussion board.There were at least three substantial and meaningful posts to the discussion board.There were less than three substantial and meaningful posts to the discussion board
Academic Journals: 10% Assignment was supported with appropriate peer reviewed academic journals (12 minimum from 2010 to 2020) and other quality sources.Assignment was supported with appropriate peer reviewed academic journals (10 minimum from 2010 to 2020) and other quality sources.Assignment was supported with appropriate peer reviewed academic journals (7 minimum from 2010 to 2020) and other quality sources.Assignment was supported with appropriate peer reviewed academic journals (4 minimum from 2010 to 2020) and other quality sources.Assignment was not supported with the minimum number of appropriate peer reviewed academic journals. Failure to meet the minimum for academic references will automatically result in a maximum mark of 40% for the complete assignment.
Technical matters (about 30% of total mark for the assignment): Assignment must be in Font 12, 1.5 Spacing, and Times New Roman
Structure and English expression: 15% The Assignment was very comprehensive and had excellent structure with no errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar completely correct.The Assignment was comprehensive and had very good structure with some errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were two or three minor errors.The Assignment had good structure and appropriate content but with some errors. Spelling, syntax and grammar generally correct although there were more than three minor errors.The Assignment consisted of suitable information, had generally suitable structure although some aspects could have been improved. Spelling, syntax and grammar acceptable but there were frequent minor or a few serious errors.The Assignment did not have suitable structure and information. Unacceptably high number of minor and/or numerous serious errors in spelling, syntax and/or grammar.
In-text referencing: 5% Harvard referencing system used with 100% accuracy.Harvard referencing system used with high level of accuracy.Harvard referencing used correctly although with some errors.Harvard or APA referencing used correctly although with some significant errors.No referencing or many serious errors in using Harvard or APA referencing.
Reference list: 10% Reference list comprehensive and had no errors.Reference list comprehensive with no omissions but some minor errors.Reference list had one or two omissions and/or significant errors.Reference list had more than two omissions and/or significant errors (but a small number).Reference list had numerous errors and/or omissions (or is missing).
MNG92100                                                               Strategic Asset Management                                                         Session 3 2020  
Order Now

Get expert help for Case Study Critical Analysis and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (May 20, 2025) Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/.
"Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis." Universal Assignment - May 20, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/
Universal Assignment May 16, 2023 Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis., viewed May 20, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/>
Universal Assignment - Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis. [Internet]. [Accessed May 20, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/
"Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis." Universal Assignment - Accessed May 20, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/
"Assignment 3 Case Study Critical Analysis." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/assignment-3-case-study-critical-analysis/. [Accessed: May 20, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?