| ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF | |
| Subject Code and Title | BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations |
| Assessment | Reflective Journal 2: Clifton Strengths Finder by Gallup |
| Individual/Group | Individual |
| Length | 700 words (+/- 10%) |
| Learning Outcomes | Explain the importance of self- awareness and emotional intelligence, and analyse its impact on professional competenciesIntegrate strategies to effectively interact with others in a diverse professional contextIdentify and reflect on own strengths and their application in the business contextReflect on feedback to identify opportunities for self- improvement and professional development |
| Submission | By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of module 3.2 (week 6) For Intensive (6 week) class: by 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 6.2 (Week 3) |
| Weighting | 20% |
| Total Marks | 100 marks |
Context
As you now know, a key to self-directed learning is reflection. Reflection enables the ability to examine situations in order to better understand the surrounding context and identify potential improvements for the future. This assessment task builds on assessment 1 and aims to develop your awareness and reflective learning ability while also assessing your understanding of your Gallup Strengths identified in module 3. As with assessment 1, your journal entry must be written in the first person and you should try to be as open and honest with yourself as you can.
Please also visit the Academic Skills blackboard page for an overview of reflective writing in higher education
Instructions
This assessment task requires you to do the following:
- Read and watch the learning resources in module 3
- Complete the Clifton Strengths Finder Survey by Gallup (learning activity 3.1) If you have completed the survey for another subject, use these results and don’t repeat the test.
- Attend a group coaching session with your Gallup Strengths Coach
- Compose your reflective journal entry addressing the questions listed below
- Include a screenshot of your Gallup Strengths results in your paper
- Identify theoretical concepts reviewed in module 3 that support your ideas
- Include at least three academic references to the module 3 learning resources, to support your ideas
- Follow the APA 6th edition style of referencing to cite your academic resources and provide your reference list
- Include the time and date of your coaching session and your coach’s name at the end of your reference list.
Guiding questions
- What did you learn about yourself from your Clifton Strengths Survey and your group coaching session with your Success Coach?
- Were you surprised by any of your Top 5 talents (signature themes)? Why?
- When you read your Top 5 talents, was there one or more you immediately resonated with? Which one/s? Why?
- How will this improved understanding of your talents/strengths apply to your professional development?
- What do you think the greatest challenges for you will be in reaching your career goals?; and what Talent from your Top 5 could you draw on to assist you?
Submission Instructions
Submit your Reflective Journal 2: Gallup Strengths via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations. The learning facilitator will provide feedback via the Grade Centre in the LMS portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades.
The Learning Rubric below is your guide to how your assessment task will be marked. Please be sure to check this rubric very carefully before submission.
Learning Rubric: Assessment 2- Reflective Journal 2: Gallup Strengths.
| Assessment Attributes | Fail (Unacceptable) 0-49% | Pass (Functional) 50-64% | Credit (Proficient) 65-74% | Distinction (Advanced) 75 -84% | High Distinction (Exceptional) 85-100% | ||||
| Gallup strengths reflection and linkage to theory 30% | Journal entry demonstrates a limited attempt to reflect on the results of the Gallup Strengths Survey, with no/limited attempt to apply theoretical concepts to support ideas. | Journal entry demonstrates a basic attempt to reflect on the results of the Gallup Strengths Survey, with a basic attempt to apply theoretical concepts to support ideas. | Journal entry demonstrates an adequate reflection on the results of the Gallup Strengths Survey, with a critical application of theoretical concepts to support ideas. | Journal entry demonstrates a thorough reflection on the results of the Gallup Strengths Survey, with a critical and in-depth application of theoretical concepts to support ideas. | Journal entry demonstrates an expert reflection on the results of the Gallup Strengths Survey, with an in-depth, critical and meticulous application of theoretical concepts to support ideas. | ||||
| Professional development reflection 20% | Journal entry shows no or limited evidence of reflective thinking in regards to how strengths could be used for student’s professional development. | Journal entry shows some evidence of reflective thinking and generically articulates how strengths could be used for student’s professional development. | Journal entry shows evidence of adequate reflective thinking and generically articulates how strengths could be leveraged for student’s professional development. Entry includes some comments on adverse effects the strengths may have when not applied correctly. | Journal entry shows evidence of thorough reflective thinking and clearly articulates how strengths could be used for student’s professional development. Entry demonstrates sufficient reflection on the adverse effect strengths may have when not applied correctly. | Journal entry shows evidence of thorough and critical reflective thinking and clearly articulates how own strengths could be utilised for future professional development. Entry demonstrates a critical reflection on the adverse effect strengths may have when not applied correctly. | ||||
| Challenges reflection 20% | Journal entry does not identify challenges to achieve career goals. Entry shows no/limited attempt to reflect | Journal entry shows a basic identification of challenges to achieve career goals and a | Journal entry shows an adequate identification of challenges to achieve career goals and a | Journal entry demonstrates a thorough identification of challenges to achieve | Journal entry demonstrates a critical and thorough identification of challenges | ||||
| on how chosen talent could assist student to overcome professional challenges. | satisfactory attempt to reflect on how chosen talent could assist student to overcome professional challenges. | satisfactory reflection on how chosen talent could assist student to overcome professional challenges. | career goals and a critical reflection on how chosen talent could assist student to overcome professional challenges. | to achieve career goals and a critical and detailed reflection on how chosen talent could assist student to overcome professional challenges. | |
| Structure and flow of ideas 20% | Journal entry does not present sufficient information, ideas or evidence. Journal entry lacks logical/clear structure and flow of ideas, making it difficult to understand. Line of reasoning is unclear and difficult to follow. | Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence sufficiently, however these require further logic and clarity. Journal entry has a sufficient structure, however flow of ideas are a challenge and can be difficult to understand. Line of reasoning is passable, however, can sometimes be difficult to follow and requires clarity. | Journal entry presents information, ideas and evidence clearly and logically. Journal entry has a good structure, with a good flow of ideas. Line of reasoning is of a good standard and easy to follow. | Journal entry presents information and arguments in a logical and clear way, which is well supported by evidence. Journal entry has a very good structure, with a strong flow of ideas; opinions and ideas are expressed in a clear and concise manner with obvious connection to topic. Line of reasoning is clear, logical and easy to follow. | Journal entry is expertly presented; descriptive, concise and informative, exceptionally developed and well supported by evidence. Journal entry has an excellent structure, with a strong, clear flow of ideas; engages and sustains the audience’s interest in the topic and the reader can immediately grasp the relevancy. Line of reasoning is excellent; demonstrating a clear, logical flow of ideas and arguments that are easy to follow. |
| Correct citation of key resources 10% | Does not use sufficient sources. Does not include correct references or in-text citations; does not use APA 6th style. | Uses sufficient sources, however can be greatly improved. Attempts to include references or in-text citations, however these are sometimes insufficient for research purposes, or incorrect; uses APA 6th style, however may contain some citation or referencing errors. | Shows good evidence of attempts to source information. Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, however may contain minor citation or referencing errors. | Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence. Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing minimal and or no errors. | Shows evidence of extensive scope for sourcing evidence Includes in-text citations and references from suitable sources; uses APA 6th style, containing no errors. |
Get expert help for BIZ102 Understanding People and Organisations and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!
