Customer and Supplier Engagement

Assessment Information/Brief 2020-21

To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module.

Information provided should be compatible with the detail contained in the approved module specification although may contain more information for clarity.

Module titleCustomer and Supplier Engagement
CRN52968/52970  
LevelLevel 7
Assessment titleWritten Individual Report of 4000 words
Weighting within moduleThis assessment is worth 65% % of the overall module mark.
Submission deadline date and timeSubmission date: 14th May 2021 before 4.00pm
Module Leader/Assessment set by Dr Susantha Udagedara Maxwell 606b r.m.u.s.udagedara@salford.ac.uk +44 (0)161 295 2782
How to submit Students must submit the written report  to blackboard (e-Submission) assessment folder for written assignment by 14th May 2021 before 4.00pm.
You should prepare a report not exceeding 4000 words.   Select ONE of the supply chain management functions given below and critically evaluate how the selected function of supply chain management is vital in determining the effectiveness of global supply chains and the marketing activities during COVID 19 pandemic. You are advised to select a sector or industry and illustrate your answer with examples. As a guide you should: (a) Critically evaluate the academic literature on ONE of the following functions (60 marks): (i) Demand Forecasting (ii) Inventory management/Lean/JIT (iii) Bullwhip Effect, and determine its role in supporting supply chain and marketing related activities (iv) Transportation and Warehousing (b) Illustrate your answer with examples from retailing supply chains you are familiar with either through drawing on media coverage and/or your industry experience and consider any pertinent ethical and sustainability implications (40 Marks)   Some of the data for this assignment may be ‘live’ for instance a supply chain event and COVID 19 disruptions reported in newspapers or company reports. You should use these sources for information where necessary.  You should use relevant academic as well as practitioner sources to support your arguments and the excellent review of secondary sources of information should be evidenced by the list of references.  
Assessed intended learning outcomes   On successful completion the student will be able to:   Upon successful completion of the module, you will be able to: 3. Critically analyse alternative functional aspects of / typical approaches to Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies in the international business environment. 4. Critically reflect upon issues of ethical / socially responsible and sustainability concern in Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies Transferable Skills and other attributes (maximum of 5)   On completion you will have developed the ability to: 5. Enhance and apply planning, organising, decision-making and time management skills appropriate for use in an organisational context. 6. Experiment and develop personal initiative and responsibility in undertaking complex investigations in the solving of organisational problems and issues. 7. Critically analyse and apply key ideas and concepts via comprehensive research relevant both to the subject area and to professional practice in the field. 8. Use terminology associated with the subject area accurately and in a way which demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and understanding. 9. Develop and enhance individually and/or collaboratively effective written and/or oral communication skills for both specialist and nonspecialist audiences
Module Aims   1. To develop students’ understanding and awareness of key concepts and current trends / challenges in Marketing and Supply Chain Management. 2. To develop students’ critical awareness of the collaborative / integrative synergies between Marketing and Supply Chain Management. 3. To enable students to critically analyse alternative functional aspects of / typical approaches to Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies in the international business environment. 4. To enable students to critically reflect upon issues of ethical / socially responsible and sustainability concern in Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies.
Word count/ duration (if applicable) A Microsoft Word document of no more than 4000 words excluding references, abstract and appendices. Markers will cease considering content for the purpose of grading and feedback once the stated maximum length has been exceeded. Content beyond this point will not contribute to the determination of the awarded mark and will not be commented upon in feedback.  
Feedback arrangements You can expect to receive feedback on your performance for assessed work and this feedback will be available online via Turnitin. The feedback will be available within three weeks of the submission date. Marks will be available on Blackboard. You will need to log into the full site to access the written feedback. The mark and feedback will be released at 4 pm, 04 June 2021Please contact module leader if you want to discuss your results  
Support arrangements You can obtain support for this assessment. There will be an opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding individual written assignment during the lectures, guided studies and seminar sessions.Tutors office hours and contact details (such as emails) are available under Staff Information on BlackboardA reply can be expected within 2 working days if you do not receive a reply please email again stating that the email is a second request for support. Further assignment information is available under Assessment and Module Information (Coursebook) on Blackboard. askUS The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS. Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning. Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously.  You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.   Assessment Information If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.   Personal Mitigating Circumstances If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.     Personal Tutor/Student Progression Administrator If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Personal Tutor or your Student Progression Administrator.
Assessment Criteria The following assessment framework will be used.       Please see the appendix 1 for level 7 grade descriptors Criteria Percentage of mark Use of theory   30% Quality of arguments   30% Use of appropriate examples 20% Conclusions 10% Presentation and evidence of appropriate citations 10%      
  In Year Retrieval Scheme Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval. 
Reassessment If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will need to resubmit on or before (see Blackboard for up to date details) . For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt.  Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes those students who have an accepted PMC request from a previous attempt).   If you need to be reassessed, the school will email you and you will have the opportunity to improve your work as the reassessment will be the same task and you will be informed about the submission date? You will be invited to a reassessment drop-in session to support you through the process.

Please see the appendix 1 for level 7 grade descriptors

Appendix 1 : Level 7– Generic Descriptors                                                              

   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate  Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
   1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
KnowledgeTotally inadequate demonstration of required knowledge.  Not able to link theory to practice.  No appropriate themes identified.Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated.  Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice.  Very poor identification of key themes.Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge.  Limited and inappropriate  or inaccurate links between theory and practice.  Poor identification of key themes.Limited evidence of knowledge.  Inappropriate links between theory and practice.  Inadequate identification of key themes.Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies appropriate yet basic integration of theory and practice.  Superficial depth or limited breadth with unsatisfactory identification of key themes.Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth of knowledge.  Sound integration of theory and practice with satisfactory identification of key themes.Consistently relevant accurate knowledge with good depth and breadth.  Clear and relevant application of theory to practice.  Good identification of key themes.Comprehensive knowledge demonstrating very good depth and breadth.  Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately.Integrates the complexity of a range of knowledge and excellent understanding of it’s relevance. Excellent depth of knowledge in a variety of contexts.  Coherent and systematic application of theory to practice.Outstanding knowledge.  Theory is linked to practice to an exceptional level and may be used to formulate new questions, ideas or challenges.              
 Extremely  poorVery  poor  PoorInadequateUnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExcellentOutstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Cognitive processes           Cognitive Processes        No demonstration of analysis, evaluation or synthesis.  No evidence of reflection.  Unsatisfactory professional judgementNo meaningful analysis or evaluation.  Unable to identify appropriate issues for reflection.  Arguments presented are inappropriate and very poorly linked.  Very poor professional judgement.Descriptive occasionally attempts to analyse or evaluate material but lacks critical approach.  Confusion and/ or weakness in academic argument.  Identifies issues for reflection but lacks evidence of reflective processes.  Poor professional judgement.Mainly descriptive evidence of analysis, inconsistent critical approach, little evaluation or synthesis.  Follows processes of reflection but fails to demonstrate insight.  Inconsistent and/ or inaccurate  professional judgement. Critical analysis evident, with some evaluation and synthesis, although limited.  Limited evidence of reflection.  Some appropriate academic argument although not well applied and lacking in clarity.  Unsatisfactory professional judgement.Sound critical analysis and evaluation.  Relevant academic argument.  Demonstrates basic ability of synthesise information in order to formulate appropriate questions and conclusions.  Reflective process is utilised, with insight demonstrating planning for future practice.  Integrates relevant information in order to make sound professional judgements.Clear, in depth critical analysis, evaluation and academic argument with synthesis of different ideas and perspectives.  Utilises reflection to develop self and practice.  Aware of the influence of varied perspectives and time frames.  Uses a wide range of sources to inform clinical decision making and prioritises plans.Very good analysis and synthesis of material with evidence of critique and independent thought.  Balanced and mature approach to reflection used to enhance practice and performance in a range of contexts.  Demonstrates ability to make sound decisions in complex and unpredictable contexts.Excellent critical analysis and synthesis.  Arguments handled skilfully with imaginative interpretation of material.  Willingness to challenge self and practice.Outstanding critical analysis and synthesis. Incorporates evidence of original thinking.
 Extremely  poorVery  poor  PoorInadequate  UnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExcellentOutstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Professionalism  Awareness of self and relationships with others and the team not demonstrated.  Lack of insight into scope of practice demonstrated.                      Major limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Very poor knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Very poor awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Poor knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Some awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Some limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Limited knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Inadequate awareness and operation within scope of practice.  Unsatisfactory awareness of self and relationships with others.  Acceptable knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Some awareness of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Awareness of and operation within scope of practice.Satisfactory awareness to self and relationships with others.  Satisfactory knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Awareness of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Satisfactory awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Good awareness of self and relationships with others.  Good knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Good awareness of group, values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Good awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Very good awareness of self and relationships with others.  Very good knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Very good awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Very good awareness of operation within scope of practice.  Excellent awareness of self and relationships with others.  excellent knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Excellent awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Excellent awareness of operation within scope of practice.  Outstanding awareness of self and relationships with others.  Outstanding knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Outstanding awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Outstanding awareness of operation within scope of practice.      
                         Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate    Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
                                                          Communication                                Presentation is extremely poor.  Work has no structure or clarity.  Extremely poor use of language.        Presentation is very poor.  Work has little discernable structure or clarity.  Very poor use of language.  Presentation is poor.  Work is disorganised and lacks clarity.  Poor use of language.  Presentation is unsatisfactory.  Work is limited in terms of structure, coherence and clarity.  Limitations in academic style.  Presentation of work is unsatisfactory  in terms of structure, coherence, clarity and academic style. Some inconsistencies. Some grammar and syntax errors which detract from the content  Presentation of work is satisfactory in terms of structure coherence, clarity and academic style.  But some inconsistencies in grammar and syntax.  Presentation of work is well organised with good use of language to express ideas/argument.  Very few inconsistencies; grammar and syntax good.  Presentation is of a very good standard, demonstrating a scholarly style. Very good grammar and syntax  Presentation is excellent, well structured and logical.  Demonstrates a scholarly style. Excellent grammar and syntax.  Presentation is outstanding demonstrating a fluent academic style.
   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate    Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Motor skillsUnsafe.  Unable to perform skills.Unsafe.  Very poor application of skill, major limitation in skill performance.  IneffectiveUnsafe.  Poor application of skill, some limitations in skill performance.  IneffectiveUnsafe.  Unsatisfactory application of skills.  Inconsistent in skill performance.Unsafe inadequate application of skill, inconsistent performance of skill with some limitations.Safe, competent application of skills.  Effective performance, demonstrating dexterity and sensitivity.Safe application of skills with good level of competence.  Effective performance with an ability to plan, anticipate and priorities action.Safe application of skills with very good level of competence.  Effective and proficient performance.Safe application of skills with excellent level of competence.  Effective and proficient performance with flexibility and creativitySafe, outstanding application of skills, perceives the situation as a whole.
   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate  Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Referencing and using evidenceNo references.  No attempt to provide evidence of sources used.Lack of ability to source adequate material.  Very poor referencingPoor use of reference material.  Inappropriate or out dated sources with numerous referencing errors.Unsatisfactory referencing with frequent error.  Limited ability to support content with relevant sources.Narrow range of sources.  Referencing in presented work is unsatisfactory with some inconsistencies or inaccuracies.  Over utilises secondary sources.  References used are inappropriate in terms of currency.Satisfactory range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies.  Appropriate use of primary and secondary sources.Good range of sources.  Well referenced, very few inaccuracies.  Good use of primary and secondary sources.Clear evidence of referencing to a wide range of primary and secondary sources which are used effectively in supporting the work.Detailed use of predominantly primary sources which are well referenced and are used creatively to develop the work.Synthesis of reference material from a wide range of sources both within and across professions
Order Now
No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (May 28, 2023) Customer and Supplier Engagement. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/.
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment - May 28, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
Universal Assignment June 29, 2022 Customer and Supplier Engagement., viewed May 28, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/>
Universal Assignment - Customer and Supplier Engagement. [Internet]. [Accessed May 28, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment - Accessed May 28, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/. [Accessed: May 28, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

MQBS7030 Final Assessment Data Analysis and Report

ASSIGNMENT TASK: For this assignment, you need to refer to “Fringe” dataset. Fringe is concerned with the factors that contribute to the fringe benefits of employees. The dataset includes a range of different variables, which allows for a range of different tests to be performed. You should note that our

Read More »

MIS770 Foundation Skills in Business Analysis

MIS770 Foundation Skills in Business Analysis Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics Deakin Business School Faculty of Business and Law, DeakinUniversity Assignment Two Analysis of Click Sales Data Particulars Assurance of Learning This assignment assesses the following Graduate Learning Outcomes and related Unit Learning Outcomes: Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO)

Read More »

ITECH7407 – Real Time Analytics

Assessment Task – Data Analytics Assignment Overview For this assessment task, you will work in a group to analyse a selected data set, and provide recommendations to the leadership of the company based on your findings. Timelines and Expectations Percentage Value of Task: 25% Due: Week 11, Sunday 5pm Minimum

Read More »

BSB123 Data Analysis

BSB123 Data Analysis Research Report Assessment Semester 1, 2021 Due Date: 11:59 30th May The data for the Assignment can be found in the file Research Report Assessment (2021-01).xlsx on Blackboard The Problem FringeTech is an information technology / electrical engineering company that employs thousands of people Australia wide. Recently

Read More »

Final Analysis Assignment Help

Refer to the attached excel file, answer the questions below. Use graph if required. The file that can be accessed through the link below contains data on 100 employees in a particular occupation. Suppose that interest centres on investigating the factors that explain salary differences. The data set contains the following

Read More »

VETS6103 Data Analysis Assignment

Factors influencing milk production in Australian dairy cattle Assignment overview: This assignment involves analysing a dataset, interpreting results, and drawing conclusions based on the analyses. The dataset can be found in the file “practical_assignment_2021.xls” which is on Canvas under the Assignments folder. It is a group task worth 50% of

Read More »

ECON 1030 – BUSINESS STATISTICS

ECON 1030 – BUSINESS STATISTICS 1: Individual Assignment   Instructions: This is an individual assignment with a total of 40 marks. The allocation of marks is as follows: Statistical Analysis     (including excel) 32 Professional Report 8              Total 40 The response to the assignment must be provided in the form

Read More »

Assessment 3: Public Health Data Analysis

Assessment 3: Public Health Data Analysis Weighting: 30 % Details of task: This assignment involves the presentation and interpretation of descriptive statistics and statistical test results. On completion of this assessment task, you will be able to: Word limit: This assessment is 2,500 word equivalent with a focus on calculations

Read More »

Log Book Entry 2: Association and Regression

Submission deadline: 11:59pm, 7th December, 2021. All analytics tasks must be completed using R, and should be reproducible from the R code, which must be submitted as an appendix. This log book entry will focus on using association and regression to examine the relationships between multiple variables. Using the ames_train

Read More »

Assignment 2 (Individual): Data Analysis Project

Assignment 2 (Individual): Data Analysis Project (50%): The retail bank that you work for recently ran a telephone marketing campaign to encourage customers to subscribe to a term deposit. Data was obtained from the marketing campaign, internal systems relating to the characteristics of the customer as well as whether or

Read More »

BI7138: Biodiversity Informatics

Biodiversity Informatics Assessment 1 Biodiversity Informatics Assessment 1 The Red Kite (Milvus milvus) is a scavenging raptor found throughout Europe and native to Britain. Red Kites were once common throughout Britain. During the last century their populations were reduced to just a handful of birds in the Welsh valleys by

Read More »

MGMT Course Assignment Fall 2021

Contents Contents General Information. 2 Rules. 2 Outside sources. 3 Scenario. 3 What you need to do. 4 Part 1 – Exploratory data analysis. 4 Table 1. 4 Part 2 – Training and testing set (sample) 4 Table 2. 5 Part 3 – Simple linear regression. 8 Table 3. 8

Read More »

CM 4223– Company Strategic Planning

SWOT Analysis Project Report Guidelines   Introduction/Overview/Background This section is an introduction of your company. Discuss things such as company history, background, leadership team, and location. Ensure that you mention who you are and what you do. If there are global operations, highlight this as well. Mention any goods and/or

Read More »

Surveying (48320) Final Assignment – Major Project

Surveying (48320)  AUTUMN 2023 Final Assignment – Major Project Weight: 40% Due date: 02/06/2023 Student Name:     ________________   Student Number: ______________ Submission Date: ______________________ Submission Component and Marks Awarded Marks   PLAN:     Find Scale of plan and explain 4   9 Bearing and Distances of three lines 3

Read More »

IAP607BM Independent Critical Analysis Project

ASSESSMENT 2 BRIEF Subject Code and Title IAP607BM Independent Critical Analysis Project Assessment Group Presentation of Preliminary Findings Individual/Group Group Length 10-minute presentation and 10-minute Q&A (+/- 10%) Learning Outcomes This assessment addresses the following Subject Learning Outcomes:   Critically review and synthesise the literature as it applies to the

Read More »

SEO PLAN Assignment Help

SEO PLAN Review the SEO slides, SEO videos, and other SEO resources (word files, examples, templates) before doing the assignment.  Choose a “client”, a small to a medium size company, that does not rank too high on search engines. Follow the step by step process described below and create an

Read More »

CET333 Product Development ePortfolio

UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE MODULE CODE: CET333 MODULE TITLE: Product Development MODULE ASSESSOR:   ASSESSMENT: 1 of 1 TITLE OF ASSESSMENT: Product Development ePortfolio ASSESSMENT VALUE: 100% PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION CAREFULLY. This assignment contributes 100% to your final module mark. Please ensure that you

Read More »

ETF2100/5900 Introductory Econometrics Assignment 2

ETF2100/5900 Introductory Econometrics Assignment 2 — A Case Study on the Birth-weight of Baby Important notes: Notation used in the assignment needs to be typed correctly and properly. Incorrect (or inconsistent) notations are treated as wrong answers. We are interested in studying whether a mother’s smoking affects the birthweight of

Read More »

HA1011 Applied Quantitative Methods Group Assignment

   HOLMES INSTITUTE   FACULTY OF HIGHER EDUCATION Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines Trimester T1 2022 Unit Code HA1011 Unit Title Applied Quantitative Methods Assessment Type Assessment 2 Assessment Title Group Assignment (Min of 2 and maximum of 4 members in a group. Please check the group self-enrollment guide in

Read More »

Practical Assessment 2 Data Wrangling

Practical Assessment 2 Data Wrangling Assessment type: Written report (PDF document) using R Markdown Due date: 26th May 2022, 5 pm Melbourne time Weighting: 30% Word limit: Maximum 25 pages Feedback mode: Feedback will be provided using Canvas marking tool and general text comments. Group assessment You will work on

Read More »

Using aggregation functions for data analysis

Using aggregation functions for data analysis Total Marks 100, Weighting 20% The provided zip file contains the data file [RedWine.txt] and the R code [AggWaFit718.R] to use with the following tasks, include these in your R working directory. You can use the R script [template.R] to organise your code. Clarification

Read More »

EC2509 – Econometrics B

EC2509 – Econometrics B This EC2509 problem set must be handed in via Turnitin by Wednesday 23th February 2022, 23.59 Please submit your answer as a single PDF document. The document should contain the results as well as your written answer to the questions, and an appendix with your full

Read More »

Research Report: Assignment 2

Due Date/Time: 3:00pm (AWST), Friday May 13th, 2022 Marks: This assignment will be marked out of 100 and is worth 40% of your final grade for PSEM. Topic Overview: In this assignment, you will be analysing and interpreting the results of research seeking to investigate whether using diagnostic labels to

Read More »

PSEM: Research Report Data Analysis

PSEM: Research Report Data Analysis The next two weeks of content are essential for your second assessment. You will be analysing and reporting the data collected for your research report assessment (worth 40% of your grade for PSEM). At the end of these two weeks, you should be in a

Read More »

Wage Gaps Major Project

As part of your assessment, you will submit a written project worth 40% of your  final mark. This document sets out the main aspects of this project.  The aim of the project is to integrate the learning from the entire module in the service of  conducting your own exploration of

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?