Customer and Supplier Engagement

Assessment Information/Brief 2020-21

To be used for all types of assessment and provided to students at the start of the module.

Information provided should be compatible with the detail contained in the approved module specification although may contain more information for clarity.

Module titleCustomer and Supplier Engagement
CRN52968/52970  
LevelLevel 7
Assessment titleWritten Individual Report of 4000 words
Weighting within moduleThis assessment is worth 65% % of the overall module mark.
Submission deadline date and timeSubmission date: 14th May 2021 before 4.00pm
Module Leader/Assessment set by Dr Susantha Udagedara Maxwell 606b r.m.u.s.udagedara@salford.ac.uk +44 (0)161 295 2782
How to submit Students must submit the written report  to blackboard (e-Submission) assessment folder for written assignment by 14th May 2021 before 4.00pm.
You should prepare a report not exceeding 4000 words.   Select ONE of the supply chain management functions given below and critically evaluate how the selected function of supply chain management is vital in determining the effectiveness of global supply chains and the marketing activities during COVID 19 pandemic. You are advised to select a sector or industry and illustrate your answer with examples. As a guide you should: (a) Critically evaluate the academic literature on ONE of the following functions (60 marks): (i) Demand Forecasting (ii) Inventory management/Lean/JIT (iii) Bullwhip Effect, and determine its role in supporting supply chain and marketing related activities (iv) Transportation and Warehousing (b) Illustrate your answer with examples from retailing supply chains you are familiar with either through drawing on media coverage and/or your industry experience and consider any pertinent ethical and sustainability implications (40 Marks)   Some of the data for this assignment may be ‘live’ for instance a supply chain event and COVID 19 disruptions reported in newspapers or company reports. You should use these sources for information where necessary.  You should use relevant academic as well as practitioner sources to support your arguments and the excellent review of secondary sources of information should be evidenced by the list of references.  
Assessed intended learning outcomes   On successful completion the student will be able to:   Upon successful completion of the module, you will be able to: 3. Critically analyse alternative functional aspects of / typical approaches to Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies in the international business environment. 4. Critically reflect upon issues of ethical / socially responsible and sustainability concern in Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies Transferable Skills and other attributes (maximum of 5)   On completion you will have developed the ability to: 5. Enhance and apply planning, organising, decision-making and time management skills appropriate for use in an organisational context. 6. Experiment and develop personal initiative and responsibility in undertaking complex investigations in the solving of organisational problems and issues. 7. Critically analyse and apply key ideas and concepts via comprehensive research relevant both to the subject area and to professional practice in the field. 8. Use terminology associated with the subject area accurately and in a way which demonstrates sophisticated knowledge and understanding. 9. Develop and enhance individually and/or collaboratively effective written and/or oral communication skills for both specialist and nonspecialist audiences
Module Aims   1. To develop students’ understanding and awareness of key concepts and current trends / challenges in Marketing and Supply Chain Management. 2. To develop students’ critical awareness of the collaborative / integrative synergies between Marketing and Supply Chain Management. 3. To enable students to critically analyse alternative functional aspects of / typical approaches to Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies in the international business environment. 4. To enable students to critically reflect upon issues of ethical / socially responsible and sustainability concern in Marketing and Supply Chain Management synergies.
Word count/ duration (if applicable) A Microsoft Word document of no more than 4000 words excluding references, abstract and appendices. Markers will cease considering content for the purpose of grading and feedback once the stated maximum length has been exceeded. Content beyond this point will not contribute to the determination of the awarded mark and will not be commented upon in feedback.  
Feedback arrangements You can expect to receive feedback on your performance for assessed work and this feedback will be available online via Turnitin. The feedback will be available within three weeks of the submission date. Marks will be available on Blackboard. You will need to log into the full site to access the written feedback. The mark and feedback will be released at 4 pm, 04 June 2021Please contact module leader if you want to discuss your results  
Support arrangements You can obtain support for this assessment. There will be an opportunity to discuss and ask questions regarding individual written assignment during the lectures, guided studies and seminar sessions.Tutors office hours and contact details (such as emails) are available under Staff Information on BlackboardA reply can be expected within 2 working days if you do not receive a reply please email again stating that the email is a second request for support. Further assignment information is available under Assessment and Module Information (Coursebook) on Blackboard. askUS The University offers a range of support services for students through askUS. Good Academic Conduct and Academic Misconduct Students are expected to learn and demonstrate skills associated with good academic conduct (academic integrity). Good academic conduct includes the use of clear and correct referencing of source materials. Here is a link to where you can find out more about the skills which students require http://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning. Academic Misconduct is an action which may give you an unfair advantage in your academic work. This includes plagiarism, asking someone else to write your assessment for you or taking notes into an exam. The University takes all forms of academic misconduct seriously.  You can find out how to avoid academic misconduct here https://www.salford.ac.uk/skills-for-learning.   Assessment Information If you have any questions about assessment rules, you can find out more here.   Personal Mitigating Circumstances If personal mitigating circumstances may have affected your ability to complete this assessment, you can find more information about personal mitigating circumstances procedure here.     Personal Tutor/Student Progression Administrator If you have any concerns about your studies, contact your Personal Tutor or your Student Progression Administrator.
Assessment Criteria The following assessment framework will be used.       Please see the appendix 1 for level 7 grade descriptors Criteria Percentage of mark Use of theory   30% Quality of arguments   30% Use of appropriate examples 20% Conclusions 10% Presentation and evidence of appropriate citations 10%      
  In Year Retrieval Scheme Your assessment is not eligible for in year retrieval. 
Reassessment If you fail your assessment, and are eligible for reassessment, you will need to resubmit on or before (see Blackboard for up to date details) . For students with accepted personal mitigating circumstances, this will be your replacement assessment attempt.  Students should be aware that there is no late submission period at reassessment (this includes those students who have an accepted PMC request from a previous attempt).   If you need to be reassessed, the school will email you and you will have the opportunity to improve your work as the reassessment will be the same task and you will be informed about the submission date? You will be invited to a reassessment drop-in session to support you through the process.

Please see the appendix 1 for level 7 grade descriptors

Appendix 1 : Level 7– Generic Descriptors                                                              

   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate  Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
   1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
KnowledgeTotally inadequate demonstration of required knowledge.  Not able to link theory to practice.  No appropriate themes identified.Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated.  Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice.  Very poor identification of key themes.Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge.  Limited and inappropriate  or inaccurate links between theory and practice.  Poor identification of key themes.Limited evidence of knowledge.  Inappropriate links between theory and practice.  Inadequate identification of key themes.Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies appropriate yet basic integration of theory and practice.  Superficial depth or limited breadth with unsatisfactory identification of key themes.Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth of knowledge.  Sound integration of theory and practice with satisfactory identification of key themes.Consistently relevant accurate knowledge with good depth and breadth.  Clear and relevant application of theory to practice.  Good identification of key themes.Comprehensive knowledge demonstrating very good depth and breadth.  Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately.Integrates the complexity of a range of knowledge and excellent understanding of it’s relevance. Excellent depth of knowledge in a variety of contexts.  Coherent and systematic application of theory to practice.Outstanding knowledge.  Theory is linked to practice to an exceptional level and may be used to formulate new questions, ideas or challenges.              
 Extremely  poorVery  poor  PoorInadequateUnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExcellentOutstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Cognitive processes           Cognitive Processes        No demonstration of analysis, evaluation or synthesis.  No evidence of reflection.  Unsatisfactory professional judgementNo meaningful analysis or evaluation.  Unable to identify appropriate issues for reflection.  Arguments presented are inappropriate and very poorly linked.  Very poor professional judgement.Descriptive occasionally attempts to analyse or evaluate material but lacks critical approach.  Confusion and/ or weakness in academic argument.  Identifies issues for reflection but lacks evidence of reflective processes.  Poor professional judgement.Mainly descriptive evidence of analysis, inconsistent critical approach, little evaluation or synthesis.  Follows processes of reflection but fails to demonstrate insight.  Inconsistent and/ or inaccurate  professional judgement. Critical analysis evident, with some evaluation and synthesis, although limited.  Limited evidence of reflection.  Some appropriate academic argument although not well applied and lacking in clarity.  Unsatisfactory professional judgement.Sound critical analysis and evaluation.  Relevant academic argument.  Demonstrates basic ability of synthesise information in order to formulate appropriate questions and conclusions.  Reflective process is utilised, with insight demonstrating planning for future practice.  Integrates relevant information in order to make sound professional judgements.Clear, in depth critical analysis, evaluation and academic argument with synthesis of different ideas and perspectives.  Utilises reflection to develop self and practice.  Aware of the influence of varied perspectives and time frames.  Uses a wide range of sources to inform clinical decision making and prioritises plans.Very good analysis and synthesis of material with evidence of critique and independent thought.  Balanced and mature approach to reflection used to enhance practice and performance in a range of contexts.  Demonstrates ability to make sound decisions in complex and unpredictable contexts.Excellent critical analysis and synthesis.  Arguments handled skilfully with imaginative interpretation of material.  Willingness to challenge self and practice.Outstanding critical analysis and synthesis. Incorporates evidence of original thinking.
 Extremely  poorVery  poor  PoorInadequate  UnsatisfactorySatisfactoryGoodVery GoodExcellentOutstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Professionalism  Awareness of self and relationships with others and the team not demonstrated.  Lack of insight into scope of practice demonstrated.                      Major limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Very poor knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Very poor awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Poor knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Some awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Some limitations in awareness of self and relationships with others and the team.  Limited knowledge of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Inadequate awareness and operation within scope of practice.  Unsatisfactory awareness of self and relationships with others.  Acceptable knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Some awareness of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Awareness of and operation within scope of practice.Satisfactory awareness to self and relationships with others.  Satisfactory knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Awareness of group values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Satisfactory awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Good awareness of self and relationships with others.  Good knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.  Good awareness of group, values, beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Good awareness of and operation within scope of practice.  Very good awareness of self and relationships with others.  Very good knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Very good awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Very good awareness of operation within scope of practice.  Excellent awareness of self and relationships with others.  excellent knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Excellent awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Excellent awareness of operation within scope of practice.  Outstanding awareness of self and relationships with others.  Outstanding knowledge of the team and their contribution to it.   Outstanding awareness of group values beliefs, ethical and political issues.  Outstanding awareness of operation within scope of practice.      
                         Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate    Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
                                                          Communication                                Presentation is extremely poor.  Work has no structure or clarity.  Extremely poor use of language.        Presentation is very poor.  Work has little discernable structure or clarity.  Very poor use of language.  Presentation is poor.  Work is disorganised and lacks clarity.  Poor use of language.  Presentation is unsatisfactory.  Work is limited in terms of structure, coherence and clarity.  Limitations in academic style.  Presentation of work is unsatisfactory  in terms of structure, coherence, clarity and academic style. Some inconsistencies. Some grammar and syntax errors which detract from the content  Presentation of work is satisfactory in terms of structure coherence, clarity and academic style.  But some inconsistencies in grammar and syntax.  Presentation of work is well organised with good use of language to express ideas/argument.  Very few inconsistencies; grammar and syntax good.  Presentation is of a very good standard, demonstrating a scholarly style. Very good grammar and syntax  Presentation is excellent, well structured and logical.  Demonstrates a scholarly style. Excellent grammar and syntax.  Presentation is outstanding demonstrating a fluent academic style.
   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate    Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Motor skillsUnsafe.  Unable to perform skills.Unsafe.  Very poor application of skill, major limitation in skill performance.  IneffectiveUnsafe.  Poor application of skill, some limitations in skill performance.  IneffectiveUnsafe.  Unsatisfactory application of skills.  Inconsistent in skill performance.Unsafe inadequate application of skill, inconsistent performance of skill with some limitations.Safe, competent application of skills.  Effective performance, demonstrating dexterity and sensitivity.Safe application of skills with good level of competence.  Effective performance with an ability to plan, anticipate and priorities action.Safe application of skills with very good level of competence.  Effective and proficient performance.Safe application of skills with excellent level of competence.  Effective and proficient performance with flexibility and creativitySafe, outstanding application of skills, perceives the situation as a whole.
   Extremely  poor  Very  poor    Poor  Inadequate  Unsatisfactory  Satisfactory  Good  Very Good  Excellent  Outstanding
 1-910-1920-2930-3940-4950-5960-6970-7980-8990-100
Referencing and using evidenceNo references.  No attempt to provide evidence of sources used.Lack of ability to source adequate material.  Very poor referencingPoor use of reference material.  Inappropriate or out dated sources with numerous referencing errors.Unsatisfactory referencing with frequent error.  Limited ability to support content with relevant sources.Narrow range of sources.  Referencing in presented work is unsatisfactory with some inconsistencies or inaccuracies.  Over utilises secondary sources.  References used are inappropriate in terms of currency.Satisfactory range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies.  Appropriate use of primary and secondary sources.Good range of sources.  Well referenced, very few inaccuracies.  Good use of primary and secondary sources.Clear evidence of referencing to a wide range of primary and secondary sources which are used effectively in supporting the work.Detailed use of predominantly primary sources which are well referenced and are used creatively to develop the work.Synthesis of reference material from a wide range of sources both within and across professions
Order Now
No Fields Found.
Universal Assignment (May 24, 2025) Customer and Supplier Engagement. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/.
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment - May 24, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
Universal Assignment June 29, 2022 Customer and Supplier Engagement., viewed May 24, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/>
Universal Assignment - Customer and Supplier Engagement. [Internet]. [Accessed May 24, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment - Accessed May 24, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/
"Customer and Supplier Engagement." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/customer-and-supplier-engagement/. [Accessed: May 24, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual Assessment

MIS202 –Managing Data and Information – Trimester 1 2025Assessment Task 1– SQL Report – Individual AssessmentDUE DATE: Friday, 4 April, by 8:00pm (Melbourne time)PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE: 30%WORD COUNT: Maximum 2000 wordsDescriptionPurposeThis task provides you with opportunities to learn the knowledge (GLO1 & ULO1) and skills (GLO 3 & ULO2;GLO4

Read More »

Assessment Category Infographic

Assessment # Title Assessment 1Assessment Category InfographicWeight 50%Length / Duration 500 words (excluding reference list)Individual / Group IndividualLearning OutcomesThis assessment evaluates your achievement of the following Unit Learning Outcomes:

Read More »

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?