Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals

Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals

Please use these two Journal articles for this assignment (I will provide the PDF):

  1. Title: Association between operational positive depression Symptom screen scores on hospital admission and 30-day Readmissions by Lee DKeller MSFridman RLee JPevnick JM
  2. Title: Reducing Readmission of Hospitalized Patients With Depressive Symptoms: A Randomized Trial by Mitchell SEReichert M;

Example of the assignment

Two journals have been identified as potential options for publishing the results of my quality improvement (QI) project: App-Based Mindfulness Training to Mitigate Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. They are The Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) (Journal of Trauma Nursing, 2024) and The Journal of Emergency Nursing (JEN) (Journal of Emergency Nursing, 2024).

Relevance to Quality Improvement Project

Both JTN and JEN contribute to nursing by publishing articles related to the topic of my QI project. Nursing, emergency departments, quality and practice improvement, trauma care, and patient safety and satisfaction were all among the topics covered in both journals.

Peer-Reviewed Status Described

Both journals state that they are peer-reviewed. The JTN states a double anonymized model for peer review. Articles in print do not appear to have misspelled words, poor writing, or blatantly false or misleading information. This would lead one to believe that they are indeed peer-reviewed and properly edited.

Editorial Board Credibility Evident

The JTN shows a well-rounded editorial board with specialties in trauma, surgery, clinical nursing, critical care, pediatric, military services, pharmacology, and informatics in both the hospital and educational settings. JTN boasts 31 members of their editorial board. The JEN editorial board consists of 54 editorial board members and editors, with professionals from 7 countries, and from both universities and hospitals. The JEN does not specifically state the area of expertise for each member but does list their credentials and where they are located.

Journal Reputation Evident

The JEN is the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association since 1983, is published under the Elsevier company, and has articles indexed in Scopus, Journal Citation Reports – Science Edition, CINAHL, and Web of Science. The JEN reports and Impact Factor of 1.7 with a five year Impact Factor of 2.1 and shows a CiteScore of 3 which means that each article published in their journal will be cited an average of three times.

The JTN is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses, reports an Impact Factor of 1.0, has been publishing under the Wolters Kluwer company since 1995. The JTN provides indexing in CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, SCIE, Embase, INR, JCR, and Scopus.

Publication Bias and Objectivity

Both the JEN and JTN appear unbiased and objective in their publications. It seems logical that the greater the number of editors, the less chance for bias in publications, and since both journals have many editors, it would be less biased than a journal with fewer editors. Articles published in both journals do not seem unusual, inflammatory, or biased.

Publication Frequency

Both the JEN and the JTN consistently publish 6 issues per year. The JTN publishes 4 printed issues and 2 online issues yearly. While the JEN does not specifically state whether their articles are print or online, they do offer CNE contact hours with some of their articles through their website NursingCenter.com.

Clarity and Readability of Articles

All quality improvement articles submitted to the JTN must follow the SQUIRE guidelines, have IRB approval, and follow the APA 7th edition for formatting. Articles submitted to the JEN must conform to the AMA style (11th edition), must include either IRB approval or letter stating IRB approval is not required, and must conform to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for ethics. These guidelines promote the clarity and readability of articles published in both the JTN and the JEN.

Journal Accessibility and Availability

Both journals are easily accessible, free to members of their publishing society or association, and have open access options for authors. The JEN lists a publication fee of $2500 which includes an option for open access. The publication fee for the JTN was between $2580-$3087 depending on differing levels of publication (regular open access, a hybrid model, and a gold model).

Based on the information from both journals, it seems that the JEN would be a better journal to publish my QI project since the publishing fee is lower, it has been published for a longer period, it has a higher Impact Factor, and even currently has a call for papers regarding topics related to the subject of my project.

Assignment 1/Rubric

Selecting a Peer-Reviewed Journal:

100 points: 10%

In this Threaded Discussion board, you will Identify two peer-reviewed journals that would be appropriate for publishing your quality improvement (QI) project. Compare and contrast 2 of your preferred journals using the criteria below, after which you will identify the best journal you would pursue for publishing your manuscript. You will also cross-post to one classmate, offering feedback on your peer’s selected journal.

Criteria when comparing two journals:

Relevance to Quality Improvement Project (Consider articles published and if they align with your topic, QI method, population, or other features of your project) (10 points))

Peer-Reviewed Status Described (Consider how transparent the journal identifies being peer-reviewed; evidence exists in articles published that they have been reviewed for quality and scholarship) (5 points)

Editorial Board Credibility Evident: (Board members are content, methodological, etc., experts; for example. Is the journal published by an established publisher or recognized professional society?) (5 points)

Journal Reputation Evident (High impact factor, if available, or known for influence on topics frequently included in the publication schedule; Articles indexed in available databases): (25 points)

Publication Bias and Objectivity (Minimal bias and the journal maintains objectivity) (5 points)

Publication Frequency (Regular and consistent publication schedule) (5 points)

Clarity and Readability of Articles (Articles are clear, well-organized, and easy to understand) (20 points)

Journal Accessibility and Availability (Easily accessible, either open access or through an institution; consider if there is a fee for publishing a manuscript) (5 points)

Logically Identify the “best” journal for publishing your work (make the case) using the above criteria (15 points)

Cross-post to one peer providing feedback on the “best” journal selected (5 points)

Reply to this discussion (one to two paragraphs or less than 100 words)

Two journals have been identified as potential options for publishing the results of my quality improvement (QI) project: App-Based Mindfulness Training to Mitigate Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. They are The Journal of Trauma Nursing (JTN) (Journal of Trauma Nursing, 2024) and The Journal of Emergency Nursing (JEN) (Journal of Emergency Nursing, 2024).

Relevance to Quality Improvement Project

Both JTN and JEN contribute to nursing by publishing articles related to the topic of my QI project. Nursing, emergency departments, quality and practice improvement, trauma care, and patient safety and satisfaction were all among the topics covered in both journals.

Peer-Reviewed Status Described

Both journals state that they are peer-reviewed. The JTN states a double anonymized model for peer review. Articles in print do not appear to have misspelled words, poor writing, or blatantly false or misleading information. This would lead one to believe that they are indeed peer-reviewed and properly edited.

Editorial Board Credibility Evident

The JTN shows a well-rounded editorial board with specialties in trauma, surgery, clinical nursing, critical care, pediatric, military services, pharmacology, and informatics in both the hospital and educational settings. JTN boasts 31 members of their editorial board. The JEN editorial board consists of 54 editorial board members and editors, with professionals from 7 countries, and from both universities and hospitals. The JEN does not specifically state the area of expertise for each member but does list their credentials and where they are located.

Journal Reputation Evident

The JEN is the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association since 1983, is published under the Elsevier company, and has articles indexed in Scopus, Journal Citation Reports – Science Edition, CINAHL, and Web of Science. The JEN reports and Impact Factor of 1.7 with a five year Impact Factor of 2.1 and shows a CiteScore of 3 which means that each article published in their journal will be cited an average of three times.

The JTN is the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses, reports an Impact Factor of 1.0, has been publishing under the Wolters Kluwer company since 1995. The JTN provides indexing in CINAHL, Medline, PubMed, SCIE, Embase, INR, JCR, and Scopus.

Publication Bias and Objectivity

Both the JEN and JTN appear unbiased and objective in their publications. It seems logical that the greater the number of editors, the less chance for bias in publications, and since both journals have many editors, it would be less biased than a journal with fewer editors. Articles published in both journals do not seem unusual, inflammatory, or biased.

Publication Frequency

Both the JEN and the JTN consistently publish 6 issues per year. The JTN publishes 4 printed issues and 2 online issues yearly. While the JEN does not specifically state whether their articles are print or online, they do offer CNE contact hours with some of their articles through their website NursingCenter.com.

Clarity and Readability of Articles

All quality improvement articles submitted to the JTN must follow the SQUIRE guidelines, have IRB approval, and follow the APA 7th edition for formatting. Articles submitted to the JEN must conform to the AMA style (11th edition), must include either IRB approval or letter stating IRB approval is not required, and must conform to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for ethics. These guidelines promote the clarity and readability of articles published in both the JTN and the JEN.

Journal Accessibility and Availability

Both journals are easily accessible, free to members of their publishing society or association, and have open access options for authors. The JEN lists a publication fee of $2500 which includes an option for open access. The publication fee for the JTN was between $2580-$3087 depending on differing levels of publication (regular open access, a hybrid model, and a gold model).

Based on the information from both journals, it seems that the JEN would be a better journal to publish my QI project since the publishing fee is lower, it has been published for a longer period, it has a higher Impact Factor, and even currently has a call for papers regarding topics related to the subject of my project.

Assignment 2/Rubric: Persuasive Communication: Dissemination Plan “Do not start yet” due 1/29

This TD assignment will enhance your dissemination campaign and plan. While sharing your results through several means (PP presentations, Abstracts, Podium, Poster presentations, Manuscripts), sustained improvement goes beyond immediate outcomes. Implementing sustained improvement takes leadership skills that focus on your ability to influence and persuade others to continue the successful processes and eventually embed them into practice settings. This is part of your professional development plan as a DNP graduate.

The Art of Woo provides assessment tools for determining your persuasive abilities and how you apply this to your “bigger” dissemination campaign. The Evidence for Action (E4A) Dissemination Strategy Template is available for you to begin your dissemination plan, which includes the audience(s) that need to know your findings, desired action(s) to take, relationships, communication techniques, and materials required. This begins the dissemination plan, which you will refer to as you progress in the course.

Please utilize this Article to for Art of Woo to help:

Know Square. The Art of Woo: Using Strategic Persuasion to Sell Your Ideas.

Knowledge at Wharton. Podcast. ‘The Art of Woo’: Selling Your Ideas to the Entire Organization, One Person at a Time

Dissemination Strategy Template: Will provide PDF

We chose a TD format for this assignment so you can share your personal and organizational styles and approaches. It is anticipated that many of you are in similar settings (situations) and face the same challenges. Sharing and providing feedback and insights goes far in creating camaraderie with your project team, strengthening your talents and skills, and offering each other insights for the next step in dissemination, knowledge translation, and sustainment. Since many of you face the same challenges with your project team and executive sponsors, we anticipate you will be able to give each other practical feedback for real-world applications.

For example, consider communication channels—your channels and those of your organization–(Interest-based persuasion authority, politics, rationality, inspiration, emotion (vision channel), and relationship) (Shell & Moussa, 2007). Every strategic leader has their communication style, and this allows their natural leadership traits to manifest themselves. The book highlights two approaches to communication (Thomas, 2016): 

  1. Self-Oriented Versus Other-Oriented: Are you more aligned with tailoring your message for your audience? Or unmodified announcements? Some leaders are particularly attuned to their audience’s point of view. They are focused more on social considerations, existing relationships, the political environment, the channel someone may be turned to, or other people’s interests.
  2. Volume Control: Loud or Quiet What volume do you give off in your communication? As the book indicated, you may have noticed people at work who are more active at meetings, dominating the discussion, versus those who prefer to listen and quietly give their views when asked. How do you come across to others in persuasion moments? Are you quietly assertive, loud to the point where everyone needs to hear what you are communicating, or is it a natural transition between the two variables? How might this impact your dissemination plan?

While reading and completing your self-assessment to develop a dissemination plan and campaign, consider your present environment, stakeholders, values, and strategic priorities, and ascertain which communication approach best aligns with your natural persuasive leadership style.

Driver (Higher Volume and Self-Oriented Perspective)

Authority

According to Shell and Moussa, when individuals are high-volume and prefer to announce their perspective without much adjustment for their audience, other people are likely to experience them as demanding. They can be overly one-dimensional and like to persuade people by saying, “Do this my way, the right way, or you can hit the highway.” Of course, variability may change as the situation (and people) evolve.

Commander (Low Volume and Self-Oriented)

Rationality and Authority

A commander speaks from a position of quiet confidence and authority, using expertise combined with finesse to make a point in an understated way. The book describes JP Morgan as conducting himself with quiet trust and credibility. Morgan understood his persuasion style and had great skill in keeping cool in the heart of a crisis.

The Promoter (Higher Volume and Other-Oriented Perspective)

Interest-Based Persuasion, Relationship, Inspiration, and Emotion (The Vision Channel)

Promoters are outgoing, optimistic, assertive, gregarious, and friendly with a winning personality. When played well, this role features an out-front style and a gift for gaining and maintaining a wide circle of relationships.

The Chess Player:

(Lower Volume and Other-Oriented Perspective) Politics, Interest Base Persuasion, Relationship, Inspiration, and Emotion (The Vision Channel)

According to Shell and Moussa, the chess player style involves plotting moves that bring about the desired outcome. Leaders with this personality type prefer to operate in more intimate settings, quietly managing strategic encounters behind the scenes. A Chess Player is an influential strategist who is less extroverted than the Promoter but shares with the Promoter a keen interest in what makes other people act in ways they do.

The Advocate – Moderate Volume and a Balance Between Self-Oriented and Other-Oriented Perspectives.

Rationality, Inspiration and Emotion (The Vision Channel) and Relationship, Politics

The Advocate uses a full range of tools to get their points across. The Advocate strives for balance-persistence without shouting, mindful of the audience without losing perspective.
As a leader, you need to be self-aware of your strengths and weaknesses before you gain the skills to persuade. You need to understand your preferred communication channels, and likewise, you must consider the dynamics of your environment, organizational values, culture, people, and changing circumstances.

Selected References: 

Shell, G. R. & Moussa, M. (2007). The art of woo: Using strategic persuasion to sell your ideas. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-311404-8

Thomas, G. (2016). The Art of Woo: The 5 Personal Persuasion Styles Every Strategic Leader Must Know.

Dissemination Strategy Template:

Chernitskiy, S. (2023). Designing A Dissemination Strategy: Turning Evidence Into Action

Rubric: TD

The Art of Woo: Disseminating with Persuasion 100 points (15%)

Due: 1/29; Cross-Post: 2/5

This assignment is a TD with one cross-posting. Limit your initial posting (items 1-3 below) to three short paragraphs (200-250 words) and a cross-posting to a 75-word comment. Use the Dissemination Strategy template as a guide for specific elements for creating a dissemination plan. You can attach your plan in the TD with your initial posting,

  1. Using your six-channel assessment survey and other tools from the Art of Woo, describe your persuasion style and how this is similar (or different) from your organization (project site). Armed with these insights, how does your style inform sustainability for your improvement plan? What strategies come “naturally” to you, and how does this align with the organization’s culture, stakeholder, and executive sponsors’ strategic initiatives (as they relate to your project)? What specific actions support your style? A Dissemination Strategy template is provided for you to begin your dissemination plan. (40 points)
  1. Evaluate how strategies you employ (employing) (see above) have been successful in “winning others over.” Have you incorporated these skills and abilities in your project planning and development stages? If so, is your dissemination plan an extension of what you had anticipated from the beginning of the improvement work? If not, what would you do differently? If so, what strategies will you continue to implement? (25 points)
  1. Consider your evaluation methods as they relate to the above. How do you know your dissemination plan is successful (or will be)? Remember, this is not just about positive outcomes from your immediate implementation. For example, reduced infection rates, improved discharge planning time, positive scores on wellness surveys, and other measures are results and findings from your QI project. How are you measuring sustainability to improvement that may have resulted from your project? (25 points)
  1. Cross-post to at least one peer and provide a short (75-word) commentary on their dissemination and sustainability plan. Consider how it follows a logical progression based on the persuasion styles of the student and the organization. What recommendations would you offer? (10 points)

Will provide the cross-post soon

=100 (15%)

Order Now

Get expert help for Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 21, 2024) Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/.
"Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals." Universal Assignment - June 21, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/
Universal Assignment January 14, 2024 Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals., viewed June 21, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/>
Universal Assignment - Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals. [Internet]. [Accessed June 21, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/
"Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 21, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/
"Discussion Board on Peer-Reviewed Journals." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/discussion-board-on-peer-reviewed-journals/. [Accessed: June 21, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Categories

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

BUS7015 Financial Management Assessment

BUS7015 Financial Management Assessment Date for Submission: Please refer to the timetable on ilearn (The submission portal on ilearn will close at 14:00 UK time on the date of submission) Page 1 of 9 [3702] Arden University © reserves all rights of copyright and all other intellectual property rights in

Read More »

Assignment 1: Case studies of real-life organisations

Assessment 1: The individual essay is due in week 8 and ought to be 2000 words long.You will have the option of two essay questions based on case studies of real-life organisations. Pick option 1 or 2.Option 1. What was the Volkswagen Emissions Scandal?a) Explain the scandal, and if you

Read More »

Operations in Business SCQF 8 LNDN08004

SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND CREATIVE INDUSTRIES Assignment Brief COURSEWORK Session 2023/2024 Module Title Operations in Business Level of Study SCQF 8 Module Code LNDN08004 Programme of Study BA (Hons) International Business Pathways Submission date and time Assessment 1: 19th July 2024 by 2 pm Assessment 2: 12th July 2024 by

Read More »

ARCH7004: Planning and Development Control Assessment 3

Assessment 3: Choose a particular type of commercial, industrial or high-rise development (Class 2-9 building) or subdivision that is currently being considered by a Consent Authority such as a Local Council (court or tribunal) or a State or Federal Government Agency (this may be the site from Assessment 2). Once

Read More »

Promote Person-Centred Approaches in Care Settings:

Remember when you are answering the questions to look at the command words and here is what each of these mean within the questions, below is a table with the meanings of some of the operative words you will see in this unit. Describe Give a clear description that includes

Read More »

Promote equality and inclusion in Care settings:

Remember when you are answering the questions to look at the command words and here is what each of these mean within the questions, below is a table with the meanings of some of the operative words you will see in this unit. Describe Give a clear description that includes

Read More »

Physical Activity, Health and Wellbeing Assignment

 Bsc Public Health and Health Promotion (Top up) June 23 Intake,  LONDON          Physical Activity, Health and Wellbeing Assignment Brief.                  Assessment 1: Poster Design and written presentation of a physical activity intervention (weighted at 20%). 800 words Your aim is to create an intervention that ‘nudges’ students and staff

Read More »

Innovation Proposal | Part 2 – Execution and Change Plan

Instructions:  Part 2 Research indicates that the execution and implementation of innovation is the greatest challenge for leaders. Generating ideas is deemed exciting while implementing change is considered the biggest challenge, which often results in organizational resistance. REQUIREMENTS Top of Form Bottom of Form Submission status Grading criteria Implementation Schedule,

Read More »

Innovation Proposal | Part 3 – Leadership Reflection and Application

Instructions  Part 3  REQUIREMENTS Top of Form Bottom of Form Submission status Grading criteria Analysis (see rubric in syllabus for evaluation guidelines) Beginning (0-55); Developing (56-63); Accomplished (64-71); Exemplary (72-80) Fully developed introspective analysis of how innovation impacts personal leadership. Thoroughly examines the influence of personal faith worldview on pursuing

Read More »

EDUCATORS INQUIRING ABOUT THE WORLD

EDUCATORS INQUIRING ABOUT THE WORLD     ASSESSMENT 1 PROPOSAL PLAN (FORMATIVE) TEMPLATE (20 marks)  Complete the proposal under the following headings as they provide guidelines for the overall format and contents of the proposal.   DECLARATION: By submitting this assessment I declare the following  Remove ALL Blue Writing before submission. Leave

Read More »

Introduction to Sociology

Measurable Objectives Week 7 Materials The materials for the week address the issue of Crime & Deviance. Crime and Deviance are not the same!                                                                                      Crime is a violation of law (local, State, or federal laws).                                                                      Crime is a social construct. Crime is a product of someone’s reality. Deviance Deviance is

Read More »

MBA623 Healthcare Management: Technology Analysis

Assessment 3 Information Subject Code: MBA623 Subject Name: Healthcare Management Assessment Title Technology Analysis Assessment Type: Length: Individual video recording 10 minutes maximum Weighting: 30% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Week 13 Your task Individually, you are required to record a 10-minute webinar discussing My Health Record’s role

Read More »

ARCH7004: Planning and Development Control Assessment 4

Assessment 4: Due on: 14 June 2024 NSW Students: The NSW Coast is considered of great importance in terms of its protection, conservation and development opportunities for the State. Describe the elements on the NSW Coastal Management Framework and the key aspects for development control within the State? What is

Read More »

EDM9780M CEEL Summative Assignment 2023-2024

Below you will find instructions on completing each of the four parts of your final summative assignment. Part 1 – Personal/professional area of interest in education (1000 – 1,500 words max) For this part of the assignment, you will need to: How to complete this part (Part 1): 1. Choose

Read More »

AT1 PREPARATION REFLECTION TEMPLATE

Weighting: 5 marks (10%) of the assignment. COMPLETE & SUBMIT INDIVIDUALLY. This is the second of THREE documents required for submission for the assignment. Complete the following, describing and reflecting upon your involvement with the preparation for the Group Presentation, including your interaction with other members of your team in

Read More »

SUMMATIVE ASSIGNMENT – Mathematics for Science

IMPORTANT INFORMATION 1 Electric power is widely used in industrial, commercial and consumer applications. The latter include laboratory equipment for example water baths, spectrophotometers, and chromatographs. If you have 17.3 kA and 5.5 MV, what is the power? Give the appropriate unit.                                                                                                               (3 marks) 2 Oil immersion objective lenses

Read More »

Assignment CW 2. Foundations of Biology

The instructions in RED are the ones which are mark-bearing and need to be answered as part of the assignment. The instructions in BLACK tell you how to carry out the simulation Diffusion simulation: Results table Use Excel to calculate the mean and standard deviation. The functions are AVERGAGE and

Read More »

MA Education Dissertation Proposal

Student Name Click here to enter text. Student ID                       Proposed title of research project Click here to enter text.       State the background references on which your research is based (ideally 4 or 5) Click here to

Read More »

Assignment: Implement five dangerous software errors

Due: Monday, 6 May 2024, 3:00 PM The requirements for assessment 1: Too many developers are prioritising functionality and performance over security. Either that, or they just don’t come from a security background, so they don’t have security in mind when they are developing the application, therefore leaving the business

Read More »

LNDN08003 DATA ANALYTICS FINAL PROJECT

Business School                                                                 London campus Session 2023-24                                                                   Trimester 2 Module Code: LNDN08003 DATA ANALYTICS FINAL PROJECT Due Date: 12th APRIL 2024 Answer ALL questions. LNDN08003–Data Analytics Group Empirical Research Project Question 2-The project (2500 maximum word limit) The datasets for this assignment should be downloaded from the World Development Indicators (WDI)

Read More »

Microprocessor Based Systems: Embedded Burglar Alarm System

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF 2023/24 Microprocessor Based Systems   Embedded Burglar Alarm System Learning Outcomes This assignment achieves the following learning outcomes:   LO 2 -Use software for developing embedded systems in ‘C’ and testing microcontroller systems including the use of design tools such as Integrated Development Environments and In Circuit Debugger.

Read More »

Imagine you are an IT professional and your manager asked you to give a presentation about various financial tools used to help with decisions for investing in IT and/or security

Part 1, scenario: Imagine you are an IT professional and your manager asked you to give a presentation about various financial tools used to help with decisions for investing in IT and/or security. The presentation will be given to entry-level IT and security employees to understand financial investing. To simulate

Read More »

DX5600 Digital Artefact and Research Report

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES BRUNEL DESIGN SCHOOL DIGITAL MEDIA MSC DIGITAL DESIGN AND BRANDING MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (3D ANIMTION) MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (MOTION GRAPHICS) MSC DIGITAL DESIGN (IMMERSIVE MIXED REALITY) DIGITAL ARTEFACT AND RESEARCH REPORT                                                                 Module Code: DX5600 Module Title: MSc Dissertation Module Leader: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Assessment Title:

Read More »

Bsc Public Health and Health Promotion (Top up) LSC LONDON

Health and Work Assignment Brief.                 Assessment brief: A case study of 4,000 words (weighted at 100%) Students will present a series of complementary pieces of written work that:   a) analyse the key workplace issues; b) evaluate current or proposed strategies for managing them from a public health/health promotion perspective

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?