DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms

ASSESSMENT BRIEF

COURSE: Bachelor of IT
  Unit Code:  DSAA204
  Unit Title:  Data Structure and Algorithms
  Type of Assessment:  Assessment 4- Reflective Journal
  Length/Duration:  2500 words
    Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of data structures and algorithms.Demonstrate reasoning about efficiency of algorithms.Assess and apply suitable recursive data structures and algorithms to IT systems and applications.
  Submission Date:  Week 14
  Assessment Task:Students are required to analyse the lecture materials of Weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content analysis. This will include summaries of the theoretical concepts contained in the course lecture slides, covering definitions, analysis and examples.
  Total Mark:  40 Marks
  Weighting:  40%
    Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required).   More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Student Login Required)

ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:

Students are required to write a Reflective Journal in which they reflect on unit content and learning experiences between weeks 1 and 11. In this assignment you

should describe an interesting or important aspect of each week’s content/experiences, analyse this aspect of the week critically by incorporating and discussing academic or professional sources,

and then discuss your personal learning outcomes. The document structure is as follows (2500 Words):

1.      Title Page

  • Introduction (150 words)
    • Introduce the focus of the unit and the importance of the unit to your chosen professional area. Provide a preview of the main experiences and outcomes you discuss in the body of the assignment

3.      Body

Reflective paragraphs for each week from week 1 to week 11 (1 paragraph per week, ~200 words per paragraph).

In each reflective paragraph:

  1. DESCRIPTION (~50 words): Describe the week
    1. Generally, what was the focus of this week’s lecture and tutorial?
    1. What is one specific aspect of the week’s learning content that was interesting for

you? (e.g. a theory, a task, a tool, a concept, a principle, a strategy, an experience etc.)? Describe it and explain why you chose to focus on it in this paragraph. (*Note: a lecture slide is not an acceptable choice, but an idea or concept on it is)

  • ANALYSIS (~75 words): Analyse one experience from the week
    • Analyse the one specific aspect of the week you identified above.
    • How did you feel or react when you experienced it? Explain.
    • What do other academic publications or professional resources that you find in your own research say about this? (include at least 1 reliable academic or professional source from your own research). Critically analyse your experience in the context of these sources.
    • OUTCOMES (~75 words): Identify your own personal learning outcomes
      • What have you learned about this aspect of the unit?
      • What have you learned about yourself?
      • What do you still need to learn or get better at?
      • Do you have any questions that still need to be answered?
      • How can you use this experience in the future when you become a professional?
  • Conclusion (100 words)

Summarise the most important learning outcomes you experienced in this unit and how you will apply them professionally or academically in the future.

5.      Reference List

Your report must include:

  • At least 10 references, 5 of which must be academic resources, 5 of which can be reliable, high- quality professional resources.
  • Use Harvard referencing for any sources you use
  • Refer to the Refer to the Academic Learning Support student guide on Reflective Writing and how to structure reflective paragraphs

ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:

This assignment should be submitted online in Moodle through Turnitin.

The assignment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word.

For assistance, please speak to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators, in Sydney (als_syd@kent.edu.au) or in Melbourne (als_mel@kent.edu.au). They can help you with understanding the task, draft checking, structure, referencing and other assignment-related matters

MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):

Students will be awarded marks based on following criteria

Marking CriteriaFail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Research /10Little evidence of research. Sources are missing. Inappropriat e, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link of sources with analysis.A minimum of 5 academic sources and 5 other professional sources. Basic use of sources to support analysis, generally well- integrated, most sources are credible.Research is generally thorough. Good use of sources to support analysis, mostly well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Very good use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Professional use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.
 Fail (0-29.5)Pass (30- 38.5)Credit (39 -44.5)Distinction (45- 50.5)High   Distinction (51-60)
Content /60 5.5 marks per week     Descriptio n -Analysis OutcomesJournal lacks coherence; is poorly addressed; no proper description of unit content; little analysis. No discussion of personal learning outcomes.Journal is generally coherent; unit content is described generally for all weeks, with occasional focus on relevant aspects; analyses are in reasonable depth with some connections to research. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is very basic.Journal is coherent and flows well; description of unit content focusses on one appropriate aspect of each week; analyses are in considerable depth with good connections to research. There may be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is good.Journal is very coherent and flows well; description of unit content is thorough and focusses clearly on one appropriate aspect of the week; analyses are in very good depth with strong connections made to research. Inconsistencies and weakness with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es) are rare. Discussion of personal learning outcomes is insightful and in depth.Outstanding work. Journal is very coherent and flows well; unit content is described thoroughly with invariably relevant choices of focus in each paragraph; analyses is in great depth and offers excellent discussion of relevant academic/professio nal discourse. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion in paragraphs. Discussion of personal learning outcomes demonstrates excellent ability with reflective analysis.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Structure /10Topic and focus are not clear in introduction. Body content poorly or never structured. No discernible conclusion;Topic and focus are stated with some clarity in introduction. Body content demonstrates some logical paragraph structure with some weaknesses. Conclusion does not clearly summarise journal; links to introduction are not clear.Topic and focus are clearly conveyed in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate good logical structure with few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises journal; may be some weaknesses; generally clear links to intro.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate very good logical structure with very few weaknesses. Conclusion mostly effectively summarises journal; with clear links to introduction.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate excellent logical structure with no weaknesses. Conclusion effectively summarises journal;
 no links to introduction.   with clear links to introduction.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Language /10Poor standard of writing. Word limit may not be adhered to. Incorrect format (e.g. includes Table of contents; bullet points; graphs etc.)A minimum of 1000 words. Basic and sound standard of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Inconsistencies with the formatting.Good standard of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Almost correct format.Very good standard of writing; very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.Professional standard of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Referencin g /10No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference list, mixed styles. No in text citationsBasic and sound attempt to reference sources; may be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Reference list is generally complete with 1 or 2 references missing. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration /application.Good attempt to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed. Some ability emerging with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Very good attempt to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Professional level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Very good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.

GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS

Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.

Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high-quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.

Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.

Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.

Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.

GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING

References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text

references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606

A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw

(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

Order Now
No Fields Found.

Get expert help for DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (June 9, 2023) DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/.
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - June 9, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms., viewed June 9, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/>
Universal Assignment - DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. [Internet]. [Accessed June 9, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - Accessed June 9, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/. [Accessed: June 9, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

MGMT90280 Managerial Decision Analytics Assignment

MGMT90280 Managerial Decision Analytics Assignment 2 – Group Assignment (4,000 words) Assignment 2 Specifications – 30% Many organisations use Business Analytics to explore data, discover patterns and solve critical business problems. This assignment is designed to allow you to demonstrate that you can effectively analyse and solve a business problem

Read More »

Visualization and data processing

Visualization and data processing Total Marks – 50 09 Apr 2023 Assessment 2 The following exercises are designed to assess your understanding of concepts, implementation, and interpretation of topics in Visualization and Data Processing. Some questions may require you to search and use R functions that we have not used

Read More »

B9DA110 Advanced Data and Network Mining

Dublin Business School Assessment Brief Assessment Details Unit Title Advanced Data and Network Mining Unit Code B9DA110 Unit Leader Level: 9 Assessment Title Big Data Mining Process and Application Assessment Number 1 Assessment Type: Individual Assessment Weighting 30% Issue Date: Week of 23 January 2023 Hand in Date: Sunday 11

Read More »

Individual Assignment – Building Your E-Commerce Store

Individual Assignment – Building Your E-Commerce Store (20%) Students will create their own e-commerce store through first completing a situational analysis to determine a GAP in the market and an opportunity to launch and e-commerce store. Students will work with either, Shopify, WIX, BigCommerce or any other Software as Service

Read More »

Coursework (Project) Help

        Deadline: 04 June 2023, 11:59 am The coursework will consist of a report based on a group project (2,500 ± 5% words no leeway). You have a choice of two group projects, select ONE. Topic 1: Perfumes Part A: Discuss the different motivations identified in the literature for the

Read More »

Nursing Informatics Assignment Help

Note: The Learning Objective for the module is for the student to Demonstrate competency in the transformation of data into information and use the acquired knowledge in decision-making and the delivery of health care services. (AACN 7,8) The learning objective has been derived from the AACN Essentials. To achieve the learning objective,

Read More »

Marketing Analysis Assignment Help

NOTE: Review the class discussion on marketing and complete the required readings/viewings before beginning this assignment.  Identify two organizations (one can be yours, but only if you can view it without bias) that compete for the same business.  First, for each organization, provide the information requested below: Second,  compare and

Read More »

MBA502 Company Diversity Award Presentation

Assessment 1 Information Subject Code: MBA502 Subject Name: Emotional Intelligence, Cultural Intelligence and Diversity Assessment Title: Company Diversity Award Presentation Assessment Type: Video and PowerPoint Slides Word Count: 5–7 minutes Weighting: 40% Total Marks: 40 Submission: MyKBS Due Date: Tuesday 11.55pm Week 13 Your Task The Australian HR Institute (AHRI)

Read More »

MBA 402 Assessment 3 Case Study

MBA 402 Assessment 3 Case Study You are an independent consultant, counselling companies on corporate governance issues. You have been engaged by JKM Renew Pty Ltd (JKM) to advise them on their corporate governance structures. JKM is a land remediation business. You are unfamiliar with this industry, and decide to

Read More »

DATA4500 Social Media Analytics

Assessment 4: Information Subject Code: DATA4500 Subject Name: Social Media Analytics Assessment Title: Write a report about SMA and crisis management; Present a comprehensive Social Media Strategy to the Board Assessment Type: Creation and presentation of the strategy using PowerPoint or a similar application Word Count: 500-word report and 3

Read More »

BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management

School of Economics, Finance and Marketing Master of Finance BAFI 3257 – Corporate Financial Management ASSESSMENT TASK 3 – INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Semester 1 – 2021 Marks Due Date Submission Instructions Objective In this assignment, you are required to apply techniques and concepts acquired in this course to analyse and provide

Read More »

MMP742 – Investment Valuation

MMP742 – Investment Valuation Trimester 1, 2021 Assessment Task 2 DUE DATE AND TIME:                        Week 10, 17/05/2021, 8PM (AEST) PERCENTAGE OF FINAL GRADE:        25% WORD COUNT:                                   2,500 words Learning Outcome Details Unit Learning Outcome (ULO) Graduate Learning Outcome (GLO) ULO 1: Collect, evaluate and interpret market data relevant to property

Read More »

Initial Instructions: Research Report

General Information For this assignment, the class will participate in a simple research project which you will write up as a research report with the following sections: Abstract, Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion and References. In order to successfully complete this assignment, you will need to I encourage you to work

Read More »

LST3LPC Policy Proposal

Due: Tuesday October 26 (11:59pm) Size: 1500 words Worth: 40% Submission: Turnitin Description Students are required to produce a policy proposal, including the discussion of a social issue, policy options and recommendations. To support students to complete this task comprehensively and in accordance with expectations for policy proposals produced outside

Read More »

HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing

Assessment 2: Literature Review- Evidence-Based Practice HLT54115 Diploma of Nursing CHCPOL003 Research and apply evidence to practice Instructions for Student Instructions Select one of the topics below and undertake a literature review using evidence-based Practice (EBP).   Topics The impacts of effective hand hygiene practices in nursing.Improvements in nursing interventions

Read More »

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation

Assessment 2 – Narrated Presentation Assessment Type Narrated Presentation of an Educational Resource Description: Teaching and Learning Outline.  In this assessment item you are required to: 1. Topic is: Blood Glucose level management and subcutaneous insulin application for patients with type 2 diabetes. 2. Conceptualise an educational resource that will

Read More »

FOOD PANDA Case Study

FOOD PANDA Question 2 – Delivery performance measure Delivery Performance is the level at which an organization’s provision of products and services meets the criteria anticipated by its consumers. To achieve maximum client happiness, service providers must focus on quality. The top 2 approaches performance measure to evaluate their food

Read More »

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021

BUSN3003 Exam – Session 2, 2021 Instructions: Please save this document onto your computer. Type your answers into the document, saving the document as you go – you don’t want to lose any answers! Once complete, upload the final document via the Turnitin Exam Submission Link on the Blackboard site

Read More »

Hospitality Services Management

Hospitality Services Management Group members: each doing 7 marks worth Chloe Kate Tori Gideon Assessment 2 Group Task – (using a Wiki) A Group Task, using a Wiki, to create a new service organisation Related Topics: 3, 4, 5 & 6. You have been assigned to a group drawn from

Read More »

Development and Construction – Assignment 3

Development and Construction – Assignment 3 Marking Guide This is a guide to help you with the structuring of your report and highlighting what specific information should be included in your report. You should use information from your previous assignments, including designs and the feasibility study, as the basis for

Read More »

Case Analysis Sarita

Sarita due Sunday 12 September 2021 2500 words ± 10% You will be marked against the criteria in the marking rubric for Case analysis. Theme  5 Stress response in health and illness and theme 6 Immunology concepts Weighting: 50% referenced using APA style. • ll written assessments are to be

Read More »

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay

Assignment 1: Argumentative Essay Topic Healthcare professionals have an ethical responsibility to always advocate for the introduction of new treatments and technologies into healthcare. Instructions In relation to your selected topic: • Consider the application of the bioethical principles. • Consider the application of ethical theories and other ethical concepts.

Read More »

Healthcare Ethics Argumentative essay

ASSESSMENT INFORMATION   Assessment Title   Argumentative essay     Purpose The purpose of this assessment is for students to demonstrate the capacity to develop an ethical argument/s based around the four bio-ethical principles: autonomy, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Students will use their chosen topic to develop a sound ethical

Read More »

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection

Marking Guide for Assessment 1 Part B: Reflection Reflection (Total of 30 marks) – Due 31st October 2021 Reflect on the desirable qualities of counselling and how these qualities shape your approach and values to counselling and/or developing a therapeutic professional relationship. Reflect on your PART A reflection and consider

Read More »

Critical Reflection scenario-based essay

Purpose: The purpose of this assessment is to deepen student’s understanding of the characteristics of leadership styles and the dynamic relationship of leadership with workplace communication and culture. Aim: This assessment provides the student the opportunity to apply and evaluate leadership styles in a scenario involving making changes to improve workplace

Read More »

MBA621 Healthcare Systems

Assessment 2 Information Subject Code: MBA621 Subject Name: Assessment Title: Assessment Type: Length: Case Study Slide Deck Individual PowerPoint presentation slides with notes 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) 20 slides with 100 words per slide Weighting: 35% Total Marks: Submission: 100 Online Due Date: Weeks 7 Your task Develop

Read More »

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference

MATH7017: Probabilistic Models and Inference, Project 2023                    (total: 40 points) Conditional Generation with Variational Autoencoders and Generative Adversarial Networks Overview In this project, you will work with Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). You will build and train conditional versions of these models to generate MNIST digits given

Read More »

Surveying Plan Assignment Help

Submission Component and Marks Awarded Marks   PLAN:     Find Scale of plan and explain 4   9 Bearing and Distances of three lines 3 Plan Presentation 2 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT     Deflection Angles 4   18 Curve Elements 4 Chainages along the Road 10 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT:    

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?