DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms

ASSESSMENT BRIEF

COURSE: Bachelor of IT
  Unit Code:  DSAA204
  Unit Title:  Data Structure and Algorithms
  Type of Assessment:  Assessment 4- Reflective Journal
  Length/Duration:  2500 words
    Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of data structures and algorithms.Demonstrate reasoning about efficiency of algorithms.Assess and apply suitable recursive data structures and algorithms to IT systems and applications.
  Submission Date:  Week 14
  Assessment Task:Students are required to analyse the lecture materials of Weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content analysis. This will include summaries of the theoretical concepts contained in the course lecture slides, covering definitions, analysis and examples.
  Total Mark:  40 Marks
  Weighting:  40%
    Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required).   More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Student Login Required)

ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:

Students are required to write a Reflective Journal in which they reflect on unit content and learning experiences between weeks 1 and 11. In this assignment you

should describe an interesting or important aspect of each week’s content/experiences, analyse this aspect of the week critically by incorporating and discussing academic or professional sources,

and then discuss your personal learning outcomes. The document structure is as follows (2500 Words):

1.      Title Page

  • Introduction (150 words)
    • Introduce the focus of the unit and the importance of the unit to your chosen professional area. Provide a preview of the main experiences and outcomes you discuss in the body of the assignment

3.      Body

Reflective paragraphs for each week from week 1 to week 11 (1 paragraph per week, ~200 words per paragraph).

In each reflective paragraph:

  1. DESCRIPTION (~50 words): Describe the week
    1. Generally, what was the focus of this week’s lecture and tutorial?
    1. What is one specific aspect of the week’s learning content that was interesting for

you? (e.g. a theory, a task, a tool, a concept, a principle, a strategy, an experience etc.)? Describe it and explain why you chose to focus on it in this paragraph. (*Note: a lecture slide is not an acceptable choice, but an idea or concept on it is)

  • ANALYSIS (~75 words): Analyse one experience from the week
    • Analyse the one specific aspect of the week you identified above.
    • How did you feel or react when you experienced it? Explain.
    • What do other academic publications or professional resources that you find in your own research say about this? (include at least 1 reliable academic or professional source from your own research). Critically analyse your experience in the context of these sources.
    • OUTCOMES (~75 words): Identify your own personal learning outcomes
      • What have you learned about this aspect of the unit?
      • What have you learned about yourself?
      • What do you still need to learn or get better at?
      • Do you have any questions that still need to be answered?
      • How can you use this experience in the future when you become a professional?
  • Conclusion (100 words)

Summarise the most important learning outcomes you experienced in this unit and how you will apply them professionally or academically in the future.

5.      Reference List

Your report must include:

  • At least 10 references, 5 of which must be academic resources, 5 of which can be reliable, high- quality professional resources.
  • Use Harvard referencing for any sources you use
  • Refer to the Refer to the Academic Learning Support student guide on Reflective Writing and how to structure reflective paragraphs

ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:

This assignment should be submitted online in Moodle through Turnitin.

The assignment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word.

For assistance, please speak to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators, in Sydney (als_syd@kent.edu.au) or in Melbourne (als_mel@kent.edu.au). They can help you with understanding the task, draft checking, structure, referencing and other assignment-related matters

MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):

Students will be awarded marks based on following criteria

Marking CriteriaFail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Research /10Little evidence of research. Sources are missing. Inappropriat e, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link of sources with analysis.A minimum of 5 academic sources and 5 other professional sources. Basic use of sources to support analysis, generally well- integrated, most sources are credible.Research is generally thorough. Good use of sources to support analysis, mostly well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Very good use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Professional use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.
 Fail (0-29.5)Pass (30- 38.5)Credit (39 -44.5)Distinction (45- 50.5)High   Distinction (51-60)
Content /60 5.5 marks per week     Descriptio n -Analysis OutcomesJournal lacks coherence; is poorly addressed; no proper description of unit content; little analysis. No discussion of personal learning outcomes.Journal is generally coherent; unit content is described generally for all weeks, with occasional focus on relevant aspects; analyses are in reasonable depth with some connections to research. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is very basic.Journal is coherent and flows well; description of unit content focusses on one appropriate aspect of each week; analyses are in considerable depth with good connections to research. There may be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is good.Journal is very coherent and flows well; description of unit content is thorough and focusses clearly on one appropriate aspect of the week; analyses are in very good depth with strong connections made to research. Inconsistencies and weakness with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es) are rare. Discussion of personal learning outcomes is insightful and in depth.Outstanding work. Journal is very coherent and flows well; unit content is described thoroughly with invariably relevant choices of focus in each paragraph; analyses is in great depth and offers excellent discussion of relevant academic/professio nal discourse. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion in paragraphs. Discussion of personal learning outcomes demonstrates excellent ability with reflective analysis.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Structure /10Topic and focus are not clear in introduction. Body content poorly or never structured. No discernible conclusion;Topic and focus are stated with some clarity in introduction. Body content demonstrates some logical paragraph structure with some weaknesses. Conclusion does not clearly summarise journal; links to introduction are not clear.Topic and focus are clearly conveyed in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate good logical structure with few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises journal; may be some weaknesses; generally clear links to intro.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate very good logical structure with very few weaknesses. Conclusion mostly effectively summarises journal; with clear links to introduction.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate excellent logical structure with no weaknesses. Conclusion effectively summarises journal;
 no links to introduction.   with clear links to introduction.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Language /10Poor standard of writing. Word limit may not be adhered to. Incorrect format (e.g. includes Table of contents; bullet points; graphs etc.)A minimum of 1000 words. Basic and sound standard of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Inconsistencies with the formatting.Good standard of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Almost correct format.Very good standard of writing; very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.Professional standard of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Referencin g /10No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference list, mixed styles. No in text citationsBasic and sound attempt to reference sources; may be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Reference list is generally complete with 1 or 2 references missing. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration /application.Good attempt to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed. Some ability emerging with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Very good attempt to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Professional level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Very good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.

GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS

Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.

Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high-quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.

Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.

Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.

Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.

GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING

References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text

references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606

A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw

(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

Order Now
No Fields Found.

Get expert help for DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (October 10, 2024) DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/.
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - October 10, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms., viewed October 10, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/>
Universal Assignment - DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. [Internet]. [Accessed October 10, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - Accessed October 10, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/. [Accessed: October 10, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?