DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms


COURSE: Bachelor of IT
  Unit Code:  DSAA204
  Unit Title:  Data Structure and Algorithms
  Type of Assessment:  Assessment 4- Reflective Journal
  Length/Duration:  2500 words
    Unit Learning Outcomes addressed:Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of data structures and algorithms.Demonstrate reasoning about efficiency of algorithms.Assess and apply suitable recursive data structures and algorithms to IT systems and applications.
  Submission Date:  Week 14
  Assessment Task:Students are required to analyse the lecture materials of Weeks 1 to 11 and create concise content analysis. This will include summaries of the theoretical concepts contained in the course lecture slides, covering definitions, analysis and examples.
  Total Mark:  40 Marks
  Weighting:  40%
    Students are advised that submission of an Assessment Task past the due date without a formally signed approved Assignment Extension Form (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> FORM – Assignment Extension Application Form – Student Login Required).   More information, please refer to (Kent Website MyKent Student Link> POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Student Login Required)


Students are required to write a Reflective Journal in which they reflect on unit content and learning experiences between weeks 1 and 11. In this assignment you

should describe an interesting or important aspect of each week’s content/experiences, analyse this aspect of the week critically by incorporating and discussing academic or professional sources,

and then discuss your personal learning outcomes. The document structure is as follows (2500 Words):

1.      Title Page

  • Introduction (150 words)
    • Introduce the focus of the unit and the importance of the unit to your chosen professional area. Provide a preview of the main experiences and outcomes you discuss in the body of the assignment

3.      Body

Reflective paragraphs for each week from week 1 to week 11 (1 paragraph per week, ~200 words per paragraph).

In each reflective paragraph:

  1. DESCRIPTION (~50 words): Describe the week
    1. Generally, what was the focus of this week’s lecture and tutorial?
    1. What is one specific aspect of the week’s learning content that was interesting for

you? (e.g. a theory, a task, a tool, a concept, a principle, a strategy, an experience etc.)? Describe it and explain why you chose to focus on it in this paragraph. (*Note: a lecture slide is not an acceptable choice, but an idea or concept on it is)

  • ANALYSIS (~75 words): Analyse one experience from the week
    • Analyse the one specific aspect of the week you identified above.
    • How did you feel or react when you experienced it? Explain.
    • What do other academic publications or professional resources that you find in your own research say about this? (include at least 1 reliable academic or professional source from your own research). Critically analyse your experience in the context of these sources.
    • OUTCOMES (~75 words): Identify your own personal learning outcomes
      • What have you learned about this aspect of the unit?
      • What have you learned about yourself?
      • What do you still need to learn or get better at?
      • Do you have any questions that still need to be answered?
      • How can you use this experience in the future when you become a professional?
  • Conclusion (100 words)

Summarise the most important learning outcomes you experienced in this unit and how you will apply them professionally or academically in the future.

5.      Reference List

Your report must include:

  • At least 10 references, 5 of which must be academic resources, 5 of which can be reliable, high- quality professional resources.
  • Use Harvard referencing for any sources you use
  • Refer to the Refer to the Academic Learning Support student guide on Reflective Writing and how to structure reflective paragraphs


This assignment should be submitted online in Moodle through Turnitin.

The assignment MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Word format. Other formats may not be readable by markers. Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks until it is presented in Word.

For assistance, please speak to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators, in Sydney (als_syd@kent.edu.au) or in Melbourne (als_mel@kent.edu.au). They can help you with understanding the task, draft checking, structure, referencing and other assignment-related matters


Students will be awarded marks based on following criteria

Marking CriteriaFail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Research /10Little evidence of research. Sources are missing. Inappropriat e, poorly integrated or lacking credibility. Lacks clear link of sources with analysis.A minimum of 5 academic sources and 5 other professional sources. Basic use of sources to support analysis, generally well- integrated, most sources are credible.Research is generally thorough. Good use of sources to support analysis, mostly well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Very good use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.Thorough research is indicated. Professional use of sources to support analysis, well integrated, sources are credible.
 Fail (0-29.5)Pass (30- 38.5)Credit (39 -44.5)Distinction (45- 50.5)High   Distinction (51-60)
Content /60 5.5 marks per week     Descriptio n -Analysis OutcomesJournal lacks coherence; is poorly addressed; no proper description of unit content; little analysis. No discussion of personal learning outcomes.Journal is generally coherent; unit content is described generally for all weeks, with occasional focus on relevant aspects; analyses are in reasonable depth with some connections to research. There are some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is very basic.Journal is coherent and flows well; description of unit content focusses on one appropriate aspect of each week; analyses are in considerable depth with good connections to research. There may be some inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es). Discussion of personal learning outcomes is good.Journal is very coherent and flows well; description of unit content is thorough and focusses clearly on one appropriate aspect of the week; analyses are in very good depth with strong connections made to research. Inconsistencies and weakness with balance of discussion (description/analysis/outcom es) are rare. Discussion of personal learning outcomes is insightful and in depth.Outstanding work. Journal is very coherent and flows well; unit content is described thoroughly with invariably relevant choices of focus in each paragraph; analyses is in great depth and offers excellent discussion of relevant academic/professio nal discourse. Very minor, if any, inconsistencies and weaknesses with balance of discussion in paragraphs. Discussion of personal learning outcomes demonstrates excellent ability with reflective analysis.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Structure /10Topic and focus are not clear in introduction. Body content poorly or never structured. No discernible conclusion;Topic and focus are stated with some clarity in introduction. Body content demonstrates some logical paragraph structure with some weaknesses. Conclusion does not clearly summarise journal; links to introduction are not clear.Topic and focus are clearly conveyed in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate good logical structure with few or minor weaknesses. Conclusion summarises journal; may be some weaknesses; generally clear links to intro.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate very good logical structure with very few weaknesses. Conclusion mostly effectively summarises journal; with clear links to introduction.Topic and focus are clearly outlined in introduction. Paragraphs in the body demonstrate excellent logical structure with no weaknesses. Conclusion effectively summarises journal;
 no links to introduction.   with clear links to introduction.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Language /10Poor standard of writing. Word limit may not be adhered to. Incorrect format (e.g. includes Table of contents; bullet points; graphs etc.)A minimum of 1000 words. Basic and sound standard of writing; some errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Inconsistencies with the formatting.Good standard of writing; few errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Almost correct format.Very good standard of writing; very few or minor errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.Professional standard of writing; no errors in punctuation, grammar and spelling. Correct formatting.
 Fail (0 -4.5)Pass (5 – 6)Credit (6.5 -7)Distinction   (7.5-8)High   Distinction (8.5-10)
Referencin g /10No referencing is evident or, if done, is inconsistent and technically incorrect. No or minimal reference list, mixed styles. No in text citationsBasic and sound attempt to reference sources; may be some inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Reference list is generally complete with 1 or 2 references missing. May be weaknesses with paraphrasing or integration /application.Good attempt to reference sources; inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Few inaccuracies in reference list and all references listed. Some ability emerging with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Very good attempt to reference sources; very minor inconsistencies and technical errors in style. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.Professional level of referencing and acknowledgment; no errors of style evident. Thorough and consistent reference list and all references listed. Very good ability with paraphrasing or integration/ application.


Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.

Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high-quality work presented by a student must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System (Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606 and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each Trimester.

Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.

Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.

Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.


References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books, chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text

references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link: http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606

A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources. Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites (Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw

(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).

Order Now
No Fields Found.

Get expert help for DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 1, 2023) DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/.
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - February 1, 2023, https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
Universal Assignment July 6, 2022 DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms., viewed February 1, 2023,<https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/>
Universal Assignment - DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms. [Internet]. [Accessed February 1, 2023]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 1, 2023. https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/
"DSAA204 Data Structure and Algorithms." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/dsaa204/. [Accessed: February 1, 2023]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Get 90%* Discount on Assignment Help

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

Question 10 – REPORTS

Complete the table below, by listing three types of financial reports that are produced in your workplace. Type of Report Content of Report Frequently of Report                  

Read More »


Work through the following table and indicate whether each record should be kept or destroyed. Detail the reason for your answer and how long the record should be kept (for example, legislation requirement – retain for five years). Record Keep – Yes or No Reasons Suppliers Invoices     Employee

Read More »


Using the following information, complete the Business Activity Statement, you may need to refer to the ATO website to help you complete. Download and complete the Business Activity Statement (BAS). It can be found separately on the course page.

Read More »


AVERAGE Activity 5.1 – Break-even Answers A. B.   Manage 8 Buildings Manage 10 Buildings Manage 15 Buildings Manage 20 Buildings Manage 25 Buildings Income           Less Variable Costs           Less Fixed Costs           Total Cost    

Read More »

Question 3 – Depreciation

You are the Licensee-In-Charge of Hope & Murphy Real Estate and wish to purchase computers for your new office in the CBD. Using the information below: Office fit out                      $120,000 Assets effective Life          4 years Purchase Date                  1st July STRAIGHT-LINE METHOD CALCULATION Years 1 to 4 – JOURNAL ENTRIES DEPRECIATION                                               

Read More »


Please note: Editing has been restricted in this document. From the information provided below, complete the following table: Account Name Classification Profit & Loss or Balance Sheet Amount Pay Superannuation Expense Profit & Loss $117,325 Pay Mobile Phone     $7,500 Pay Office Rent     $65,000 Land & Buildings

Read More »


Worlducation is a social startup that manufactures tablet computers for primary school students. They not only focus on the hardware, but they also have a competitive team creating software, content and activities to better engage and educate the students. Worlducation aims to change the way children learn at school by

Read More »

BSBOPS505 Manage Organisational Customer Service

BSBOPS505 MANAGE ORGANISATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE STUDENTASSESSMENT TASKS QIBA Pty Ltd | CRICOS Provider Code: 01515J | RTO Code: 5304 | ABN: 35 071 667 108  Student Assessment TasksBSBOPS505 Manage Organisational Customer Service     BSBOPS505 Contents Introduction  4 Assessment Task 1: Knowledge questions  5 Assessment Task 1: Checklist 9 Assessment Task 2:

Read More »


BSBOPS505 MANAGE ORGANISATIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE STUDENT VERSION PROJECT PORTFOLIO Contents Student declaration. 3 Section 1: Establish customer service requirements. 4 Section 2: Deliver quality customer service. 9 Section 3: Monitor and assess customer service. 13 STUDENT PROJECT PORTFOLIO COVER SHEET Student declaration This declaration must be completed in full by

Read More »

GBL Final Take Home Exam

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) was meant to be a ground-breaking new agreement by placing 12 economies under a common set of economic norms and regulations. After the US withdrew from the TPP, the remaining 11 signatories continued talks and which led to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans Pacific

Read More »


You will be creating a Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments and pharmacological interventions. This is designed to assist in the development of theoretical and clinical skills in mental health, with a direct connection to your clinical practice as a registered student nurse. The evidence record provides you with the opportunity to showcase your learning

Read More »

NRSG375 Clinical Leadership

Assessment Task 3: Written assignment (45%) Discuss and analyse in more detail 2 of the discussion posts that you submitted for assessment task (AT) 2 and use contemporary literature for support. For the 2 posts that you choose, you are to discuss and analyse professional leadership in nursing in further

Read More »

Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments

PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT 3 You will be creating a Portfolio record specifically focused on mental health assessments and pharmacological interventions. This is designed to assist in the development of theoretical and clinical skills in mental health, with a direct connection to your clinical practice as a registered student nurse. The evidence record provides you with the opportunity to

Read More »

The aetiology of mrs simpsons pain Assignment Help

Length: 1800 words Group Assessment: No Submission method options: EASTS (online) TASK back to top This assessment task requires you to analyse the case study provided below.  In the case study,  a patient is experiencing a range of health challenges. You are required to read the case study carefully and complete the following

Read More »

The Dangers of a Single Story Assignment Help

Narrative Essay Instructions Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s TED Talk titled “The Dangers of a Single Story” recounts instances where one perspective can lead to assumptions, conclusions, and/or decisions that may incomplete or lead to misunderstandings (e.g., think about the story of Fide or how Adichie’s roommate was shocked to learn how

Read More »

LAW1101 21F – Fundamentals of Law

LAW1101 21F – Fundamentals of Law Assignment 1:  Legislative interpretation Due date: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 at 3:00pm Instructions: You are to read two excerpts from legislation and then answer questions about each of them.  The questions are weighted differently and the marks for each question are included.  There are

Read More »

A Work Based Quality Improvement Project

Project Title: Impact of educational intervention on nurses knowledge of hand hygiene in aged care setting: A Work Based Quality Improvement Project Executive Summary: (100- 150 words) Background: Hand hygiene is one of the most important strategies for preventing infections in healthcare settings and healthcare-associated infections, which affect hundreds of

Read More »

Community Health and Development

Part A :  Assessment event 3(a) details Assessment Task 3(a): Apply a problem-solving approach to a social issue in your local community by using the Community Health and Development (2017b) 10-point process. Word count: 2000 Weighting: 35% It is recommended that you: Criteria Fail <17.5 Pass 18- Credit 20 – 22 Distinction 23– 25 High Distinction 

Read More »


In this assignment, you are asked to pick ONE of the following case studies and answer a series of questions about the particular health situation that is described. In each case study, you are asked to examine the significance of the issue for Australia, explore the condition from a very broad policy

Read More »


FINAL EXAM – SPRING SESSION 2021 School of Law EXAM INSTRUCTIONS Read all the information below and follow any instructions carefully before proceeding. Clearly indicate which question you are answering.   UNIT NAME: Building Law UNIT NUMBER: 200292 NUMBER OF QUESTIONS: 4 VALUE OF QUESTIONS: Question 1 (10 marks) Question

Read More »

MGMT8055 Brief Case Writeup Bauing Construction Holding Group

Why do you think Bauing Indonesia was so successful? Suggestions government, cost, and competitive Main proof-points The first factor behind this decision was increasing competition in the building and decoration industry in China. In 2016, most public companies in this industry in China experienced decreasing gross margins due to increased

Read More »

MGMT8055 Case Writeup Xiaomi

After recognising numerous global opportunities, Xiaomi in Beijing charted its overseas market strategy in 2013. However, opportunities came with challenges, and during the internationalization process, Xiaomi encountered many problems. After three years of hard work, Xiaomi had gained more experience than profits. Compared with Xiaomi’s domestic success, Xiaomi’s internationalization strategy

Read More »

LNG11120 Developing Intercultural Competence in the Workplace

Edinburgh Napier University Academic Year 2021-22 Trimester 1 Assessment Brief 1.  Module number   LNG11120 2.  Module title   Developing Intercultural Competence in the Workplace 3.  Module leader   4.  Assessment Coursework 1: Group report – an ‘intercultural training’ plan (see Section 10 below for more details) 5.  Weighting  

Read More »

Knowledge, Individual, and Society

Essay 1 Assignment To be submitted via Turnitin on LMS. Assignment: Write a 1,200 word (not including references or footnotes) essay answering ONE of the following questions: 1) What is the Gettier problem and can we solve it? Address this question by carefully explaining and evaluating 1-2 responses to the

Read More »

9014 NPD New Product Design

Summary In the 2000-word written report, students are required to develop some specific aspects of the initial three phases of a new product (service or idea) development process. Students are expected to apply the relevant design thinking tools and ideas in this assessment. Referencing is Australian Harvard (AGPS) and outlined

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?