EBP Viva Voce

  • Introduce your case study, clinical question and evidence found. Did you need to respond to feedback or make changes from Part A (about 1 minute)

My patient:

  • Andrew is an 8-year-old boy
  • Received the diagnosis of ASD when he was 4 years old
  • He encounters difficulty with several activities of daily living however his main inability is struggling to socially interact with peers his age within his school environment.
  • Andrew has difficulty socially interacting with peers, connecting emotionally with others, participating in cooperative play, initiating interactions, reading verbal and non-verbal cues and maintaining eye contact.
  • When arriving at school, Andrew often experiences anxiety such as a racing heartbeat, upset stomach, sweating and tenseness in his muscles.
  • These symptoms are associated with ASD and have restricted and prevented Andrew from participating in meaningful activities within his school environment amongst peers his age.

Responding to feedback/changes from Part A:

  • I was eager to find out whether social group interventions are beneficial and improve social skills in children with Autism spectrum disorder.
  • In my CAT assignment, my clinical question was ‘Do social group interventions help with improving social skills in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder compared to typically developing children.
  • The feedback I was provided with advised that it would be better for me to just focus on the population group children with ASD and not typically developing children. Therefore, my PICO question has changed to: ‘Do social group interventions improve social skills in children with ASD”.
  • After conducting my new search; removing the comparison, I decided that I would still utilise the articles by Cotugno (2009) and Kylliainen et al (2020) as the best evidence being completely relevant to social interventions that help autistic children with their social skills.
  • Discuss with your examiner key points from your evidence appraisal and application to your clinical case. (about 14 minutes)

What is the relevance, recency, strength and consistency of the evidence?

  • Level
  • To begin with, both articles that I selected to use are randomised control trials.
  • These are on level II on the NHMRC level of evidence hierarchy
  • In these studies, the participants were randomly assigned to groups, thus reducing the risk of selection bias, allowing me to determine the effectiveness of the study between the intervention and the outcome. I will be able to decide whether these studies are good to use for Andrew’s intervention.
  • Recency
  • The article by Kylliainen et al (2020) is a recent article allowing it to have good currency which ensures that the article consists of accurate and up to date information relating to my client in the case study and the intervention.
  • The article by Cotugno (2009) is not recent and classified as a ‘older’ article as it was published 13 years ago. Although the article is old, there were many reasons as to why I selected it as the best evidence:
  • Firstly, it answers my PICO question as it thoroughly addresses social group interventions amongst children with ASD.
  •  Also, as I mentioned before, it is of high-level evidence in the NMHRC hierarchy. Other articles I found were of lower evidence. The systematic reviews I did find were not relevant and did not relate to my PICO question.
  • With the articles I also did use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool (CASP) specifically for randomised control trials and the article is seen to have good quality and strength.
  • Relevance
  • Both articles that I selected are relevant to my clinical question which is ‘‘Do social group interventions improve social skills in children with ASD”.
  • The articles by Cotugno (2009) and Kylliainen et al (2020) addressed all PICO terms in my clinical question and also included correct and relevant terms I was searching for which was about social group interventions to improve social skills in children with autism.
  • Unlike the other articles, they did not include the terms I was looking for to answer my question.
  • Consistency
  • In the article by Cotugno (2009), the results were consistent as they increased overtime. This is also seen in the article by Kyllainen et al (2020).
  • In the article by Cotugno (2009), the therapy sessions for the children were constructed to maintain high degree of consistency from session to session therefore resulting in reliable and valid results.
  • In the article by Kyllainen et al (2020) each group session was also structured with programs and activities that promote progress in specific goals towards social competence.
  • The results of both studies match the authors findings and conclusions.
  • Strength/Quality
  • To assess the strength and quality of the article, I utilised the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tool (CASP) specifically for randomised control trials. Many of the criteria was met in both articles.

SECTION A: IS THE BASIC STUDY DESIGN VALID FOR A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL?

  1. Did the study address a clearly focused research question?
  2. The articles by Cotugno (2009) and Kylliainen et al (2020) both clearly addressed a focused issue as they both mention the aim of the study being to assess whether social group interventions are beneficial in improving social skills in children with autism.
  3. Both articles include a population group, intervention, comparison and an outcome which is relevant to my client.
  4. Was the assignment of participants to interventions randomised?
  5. Randomisation was utilised in both of the studies by Cotugno (2009) and Kylliainen et al (2020).
  6. It specifically mentions in both studies, how participants were drawn from a clinical sample and then divided into groups.

SECTION B: WAS THE STUDY METHODOLOGICALLY SOUND?

  • • Were the participants ‘blind’ to intervention they were given?
  • In both of the articles, the participants were blinded to the intervention they were given. The participants had no knowledge of whether they were receiving a new intervention or not.

• Were the investigators ‘blind’ to the intervention they were giving to participants? • Were the people assessing/analysing outcome/s ‘blinded’?

  • In the articles by Cotugno (2009) and Kyllainen et al (2020), it was not specifically mentioned if investigators and people analysing and assessing outcomes were blinded.
  • Were the study groups similar at the start of the randomised controlled trial?
  • In the article by Kyllainen et al (2020) the study groups were similar at the beginning of the RCT. The participants age was within a small range and all participants were boys.
  • In the article by Cotugno (2009), the children in the study were also aged within a small range however included both genders.
  • Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is, were they treated equally)?
  • Both of the articles ensured that they outlined the design of the study and clearly described the objectives and the methodology. They also both included detailed information on the social group interventions implemented.

SECTION C: WHAT ARE THE RESULTS

  • Were the effects of intervention reported comprehensively?
  • Yes, both articles comprehensively explain
  • Was the precision of the estimate of the intervention or treatment effect reported?
  •  
  • Do the benefits of the experimental intervention outweigh the harms and costs?
  • Yes, as there was significant improvement in results in both studies.

SECTION D: WILL THE RESULTS HELP LOCALLY?

  • Can the results be applied to your local population/in your context?
  • Yes, the results of both studies can be used with my client. The outcomes of the studies are important, and I believe would be beneficial to my client if he would undergo this intervention. The results display significant changes in children social competence post intervention.
  • One limitation that would affect my decision is that the sample sizes of both articles was fairly small. If they were larger clinical trials it would strengthen the validity of the studies.
  •  

How have you contrasted and integrated the evidence findings of individual articles into one body of evidence?

RESULTS

  • Confidence intervals in both articles:
  • Integration of results of both articles:

INTERVENTION

  • In regard to the intervention, both examined the efficacy of social competence and social skills group programs amongst children, however focused on different categories.
  • The article by Kyllainen et al (2020) specifically addresses 3 main components including improving social competence, reinforcing executive functions and supporting realistic self-image and self-esteem.
  • The article by Cotugno (2009) addressed 3 significant issues related to social interactions including the experience and management of stress and anxiety, joint attention and flexibility transitions
  • Although all categories are relevant and related to social competence and the intervention, they are assessing different things which therefore means different results that cannot be exactly compared but rather contrasted. However, all categories addressed in both articles are related to my client.
  • Cotugno (2009)’s intervention program went for 30 weeks and Kyllainen et al (2020)’s went for 39 weeks.

PARTICIPANTS/INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • In regard to the participants used in both studies, the age range of the participants used are similar.
  • In the article by Cotugno (2009) the participants are aged 7-11 and in the article by Kyllainen et al (2020) the participants are aged 7-12 years.
  • The articles both addressed children with the ASD diagnosis.
  • The inclusion criteria’s for both articles have some similarities and some differences.
  • In the article by Cotugno (2009), the criteria consisted of children between the ages of 7 and 11, have a diagnosis of ASD, have obtained a full scale or verbal scale within the average range,  have no language or communication deficits and have participated in a partial inclusion program in a regular education curriculum.
  • The inclusion criteria by Kyllainen et al (2020) clear symptoms or suspicion of ASD, parental commitment to the intervention and cognitive functioning in the normal or higher range.

OUTCOME MEASURES

  • Different outcome measures were used in both studies.
  • In the study by Kyllainen et al (2020), intervention outcomes were measured with questionnaires for parents/teachers, neuropsychological tests and observations.
  • In the study by Cotugno (2009) outcome measures utilised was the Walker-McConnell Scale of Social competence and Social Adjustment (WMS) and The MGH Youth care Social competency/social skill developmental scale (SCDS) which were both used pre and post treatment.

Although these are differences and similarities when contrasting the two articles, overall, the results of implementing the intervention in both articles portrayed that social group interventions are effective in improving social deficits in children with ASD.          

What is the overall best evidence summary for your original question?

In summary, social group interventions are great and beneficial to be utilised in occupational therapy amongst children with ASD. The evidence portrayed in the articles by Cotugno (2009) and Kylliainen et al (2020) can most certainly be applied to my client Andrew. The articles present good results post intervention, significantly improving children’s social competence and skills, their join attention, ability to be flexible and transition well, anxious symptoms, reaction to peers, recognition skills and social overtures. By examining the level, quality, relevance, currency, strength and consistency of the articles it allowed me to select these articles as best evidence. Although the studies have their own limitations, overall, they provide the strong indication that social competency groups can benefit ASD children with social deficits. 


Can you estimate a clinical effect size, or range of effect from the evidence? If not, why? 

What is your clients minimal important difference (MID) for the intervention?

  • I have decided to utilise the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure with my client in order to gather the minimal importance difference for the intervention.
  • I worked collaboratively with my client and had discussions about what his goals are with therapy.
  • Andrews main occupational performance problem is his inability to socialise.
  • He scored an 8/10 in importance, demonstrating how important it is for Andrew to improve this problem he encounters difficult in. He rated his performance in socialising currently a 3 and a satisfaction score of 2.
  • My client mentioned that they want to be able to socially interact with peers, connect emotionally with others, participating in cooperative play, initiate interactions, have the ability to read verbal and non-verbal cues and maintaining eye contact. He also mentioned that he wants to be able to reduce the anxious symptoms he experiences.
  • At the end of the intervention I’ll be reconducting the Canadian Occupational Performance to examine whether Andrews satisfaction and performance levels improved.

How does this effect size compare to the MID?

What implications does this have for your client?

  • Implementing a social group intervention for Andrew will be effective and beneficial.
  • When reflecting on the results and data, implementing these interventions have been seen to significantly improve children’s social skills, those who have a diagnosis of ASD.
  • The implications may be:
  • That the intervention will be overwhelming for Michael as he is currently used to occupational therapy sessions being one on one and not a group setting.
  • Another implication is that Michael will miss out on schoolwork as he will need to take time to be involved in the intervention.
  • Finally, the intervention is costly which may be an implication for Andrews parents.

Are there any ICF contextual factors to be considered in clinical reasoning for this client?

Are there any professional or values-based influences to be considered in clinical reasoning for this client? How might you communicate your evidence-based reasoning recommendations to your client during shared decision making?

Order Now

Get expert help for EBP Viva Voce and many more. 24X7 help, plag-free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (February 14, 2025) EBP Viva Voce. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/.
"EBP Viva Voce." Universal Assignment - February 14, 2025, https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/
Universal Assignment October 8, 2022 EBP Viva Voce., viewed February 14, 2025,<https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/>
Universal Assignment - EBP Viva Voce. [Internet]. [Accessed February 14, 2025]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/
"EBP Viva Voce." Universal Assignment - Accessed February 14, 2025. https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/
"EBP Viva Voce." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/ebp-viva-voce/. [Accessed: February 14, 2025]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

STM1001: Assignment 3 for Science/Health Stream Students

STM1001: Assignment 3 Science/Health Stream Students Only Academic Integrity Information In submitting your work, you are consenting that it may be copied and transmitted by the University for the detection of plagiarism. If you are unsure of your academic integrity responsibilities, please check the information provided in the Assessment Overview

Read More »

ACCG1000 Accounting for Decision Making Xero Assignment

1ACCG1000Accounting for Decision MakingXero AssignmentInformation packSession 2 2024Due Date: Friday 18th October 2024 at 11.55pm2Xero AssignmentIntroductionThe Xero assignment is designed to provide introductory accounting students with an overview of the Xero Accounting Software by completing a one-month accounting cycle for a fictional business. This is an online assignment worth 20%

Read More »

WRIT1001 Assessment Notification 2

6Final Essay: Rhetorical analysisDue: Friday 18 October 2024 at 23:59 (Sydney time)Length: 1500 words, worth 40% of the overall grade for the unitSubmit: as a Word document or PDF, via Canvas AssignmentMain question:● Present a scholarly essay that analyses the rhetoric used in arguments about thecontentious topic you have been

Read More »

WRIT1000 Assessment Four

Title: Self-ReflectionDue: Friday October 18 by 11:59PM.Length: 500 words (+/- 10%)Weight: 10% of the total gradeFormat: Times New Roman, double-spaced, 12pt. Your project should have the title“WRIT1000 Assessment Four – Self Reflection for xxxxxxx” where “xxxxxxxx” is yourstudent number. Please only submit Word documents (.doc or .docx). Turnitin doesnot recognise

Read More »

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives

Written Assessment – Psychosocial Research Perspectives TRIGGER WARNING: This is a case study of a real person. Katherine Knight was the first woman in Australia to receive a life sentence without parole after she decapitated and cooked her lover. If you think that you will have problems reading about this

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?