ENG3003 Engineering management

ENG3003 Engineering management

Assignment 2

Engineering practice case study

DescriptionMarks out ofWtg(%)Due date
Case study 2 Engineering practice30030.00XXX 2022

Objectives

This assignment addresses, in part, some of the following objectives for the course as outlined in the course specification:

  • review and analyse the role of engineers as managers;
  • understand the planning process and distinguish the different types of organisational planning;
  • evaluate the various forms of organisational structure, the principles of organisational design, and the role and functions of human resource management;
  • evaluate the major leadership styles and the characteristics and methods of effective leadership;
  • evaluate the characteristics of effective management control, including elements of operations and financial control, with emphasis on quadruple bottom-line reporting;
  • know and apply the fundamentals of contract law to simple contract cases; describe the common types of contracts used in engineering; and describe the typical documents contained within an engineering contract; select and justify procedures which may be used to achieve a resolution between conflicting parties in a contract;
  • distinguish and discuss the social and legal responsibilities relating to product liability and professional negligence;
  • apply the concept of ethics, and select and justify suitable ethical guidelines for specific situations, using as a basis the Engineers Australia, Code of Ethics (or equivalent).

Special Instructions

This assignment is to be electronically submitted via Study desk assignment drop-box.

Please submit as a generated PDF file or Word file. Do not submit zip files or scanned PDF files.

File name for your assignment may follow the following format: – Student surname (in

capitals) first name_ENG3003_ASS 2_S1_2021

This is not critical but helps in sorting student submissions.

CASE STUDY: Coal Seam Gas and Linc Energy

‘Coal seam gas is a volatile and divisive fuel, dubbed by the industry as a greenhouse hero, but perceived by environmentalists as a water villain.’ In Australia, the rapid expansion of coal seam gas (CSG) mining may risk other important natural resources. The resources at risk include clean, fertile agricultural land; safe, long-term water supplies; and a safe and pleasant countryside. Other risks include uncertain environmental damage, growing social disharmony and a break-down in corporate management regulators and systems that are struggling to keep pace with the development of CSG.

The CSG industry is, at present, thriving across the globe, and with less greenhouse gas emissions and risk of climate change CSG has been widely promoted as a ‘cleaner’ alternative to coal. Yet, recent research has cast doubt on this, stating that gas may be an obstacle rather than a bridge to a cleaner energy future. This doubt therefore places many ethical and social responsibilities on CSG mining organisations. Queensland specifically represents one of the largest economic havens for this profitable resource, and many multinational corporations come from all over the world in order to drill within the Surat and Bowen Basins. These small pockets of energy-rich gas, found within coal seam fracture lines hundreds of metres under the earth, come at an enormous expense to the mining companies that harvest them. In addition, the expense also appears to include the environments that accommodate the gas deposits. At present, these mining magnates in pursuit of CSG are facing many environmental issues. Governments such as the Queensland state government heavily regulate mining operations in order to enforce a strict set of standards that protect both heritage and environmental sustainability. However, with some organisations, the motivation for these ethical responsibilities lies within the continuation of profitable operations and evasion of legislative enforcements. Governments clearly have a responsibility to ensure that these projects do deliver real benefits to local regions and beyond, while minimising harm to the regions via social and environmental damage. Achieving this balance is vital in ensuring the long-term success of a CSG project by organisations.

CSG operations currently involve wells dug hundreds of metres into the earth’s surface to reach pockets of gas. In order to achieve this, large drills are used to bore into the earth’s surface and, in order to keep these drills lubricated and cool, large deposits of toxic water are pumped into drilled wells. At present, this toxic water is then mixed with cuttings of the coal seams and pumped to the surface as a contaminated mud waste. This waste product is then removed and pumped into large sump pits, which are then buried under the earth’s surface at a cost paid to the government. Environmental concerns raised about CSG include the disposal of toxic waste in water, soil and air; as well as the excessive use of water required in the production of CSG. The disposal of toxic waste is a vast issue by itself, impacting on environmental ecosystems and causing groundwater contamination.

Other issues include the drawbacks of produced water treatment and the level of salt in the water found in coal seams that comes to the surface. Another important issue is the process of fracking. Fracking occurs when CSG is released with the use of high pressure pumps, sand, water and chemicals. These are injected into bore wells to

fracture rocks and open cracks (cleats) to release natural gas. This process uses significant quantities of water, as extracting CSG relies heavily on reducing groundwater pressure that is absorbed between layers of rock. Due to decreasing levels of water, the salt that was present in the water increases. This is concerning, as the increased levels of salt can flow and resurface into groundwater that will, in turn, affect the drinking water, agriculture and wildlife. This can also impact on stakeholders such as communities, farmers and users of this water.

Contamination of water is a major concern for productive farmlands and communities as they bear the risk of health hazards. Farmlands, in relation to vegetation, livestock and agricultural crops, are also being affected through the contamination of water and soil. In addition to these water management risks, ‘CSG development could also cause significant social impacts by disrupting current land-use practices and the local environment through infrastructure construction and access’.

Communities have therefore raised concerns that many of these projects will have major environmental and social impacts, as large CSG development poses poorly assessed, yet potentially serious, health risks to the community. Consequently, there is the potential for long-term impacts on rural communities and for public health to be affected indirectly or directly through contamination of soil, air or water. Current monitoring, regulation and assessment of CSG impacts on public health, the environment and vulnerable communities may be insufficient in providing confidence of adequate safeguards.

During these uncertain times, the allocation of management teams and expertise will call for the involvement of diverse professions in order to cover a range of responsibilities that are needed to be applied if sustainable decisions are to be made. To Australia, the CSG industry presents important economic benefits. However, at the same time, it risks having long-term, significant impacts on adjacent surface and groundwater systems if not effectively regulated or managed.

A recent case study is Linc Energy and demise of its Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Project near Chinchilla, Queensland. The following links provide some background information on the case.

Linc whistleblower says future CSG royalties prioritised over toxic contamination risk

Government’s own report finds ‘sufficient uncertainty’ about CSG proposal near contaminated site

‘No-one is providing transparency’: Audit questions compliance in Qld CSG regulation

Linc Energy found guilty of serious environmental harm at controversial UCG plant

The Scenario: You are a graduate environmental engineer employed at the main Injune’s site of Lincone Energies, a comprehensive Natural Gas (CSG/UCG) company. You monitor the surrounding properties (and responds) to any environmental changes and ensures that the company are compliant to the

Petroleum and Gas (Production and Safety) Act 2004, and other local environmental regulations.

There has been a steady stream of anecdotal reports from local farmers that there are “toxic” gases emitting from local creeks especially after rainfall. You have received complaints from onsite workers who had treatment for gas burn in the eyes and nose. However, systems data collected do not indicate anything particulars that would be concerning.

You have been asked to investigate and write a report in response but seeking to dismiss and/or explain away the claims, and the data seems to support that “all is good”. This directive came right from the top and it was mentioned that “there is a lot at stake so don’t stuff it up”.

Rusty, your direct supervisor who is a 30yr drilling veteran also share similar concerns about the “leaks”, but is distrustful of government agencies saying, “I reckon we can get to the bottom of this, and sort it out ourselves… nip it in the bud so to speak”. Speaking from experience Rusty lamented, “Those top-cats in Bris-Vegas just looks after themselves, you just watch yourself mate, they will throw you under a bus if it works for them”.

The company’s drilling engineer and senior hydrogeologist are employed on contracts as external consultants, who are only engaged when required. You have met them a few times when they came on site, and you have their business cards on your desk. This scenario places you in a difficult position as an engineer and an employee. What are you going to do?

The Task: Identify and discuss the management (planning, organising, controlling, leading), legal, ethical, liability issues involved in this case. What courses of action would be appropriate for YOU to follow and deploy (starting immediately)? Explain your actions while reflecting on the various issues you identified and discussed.

This case study was adapted from Schermerhorn, John R. 2006, Management, 6th Asia- Pacific Edition, Wiley.

Notes:

  • Marks will be allocated in the following way:

Identification and Discussion of Issues:        Maximum 160 marks

  • Management Issues          40 mark
    • Legal/Contract Issues       40 mark
    • Ethics & Prof Practice     40 mark
    • Product Liability/IP         40 mark

Identification of courses of action:                                                         Maximum 90 marks Written Communication:                                                         Maximum 50 marks

Total                                                               Maximum 300 marks

  • The case should be examined and reported using the guidelines set out in ‘The Case Study’ section of the Introductory Book.
  • The information contained in the Case Study is considered sufficient to adequately answer the question. If, however, you consider that certain

assumptions are required, you may make these assumptions. Any assumptions made will need to be clearly stated. The possible penalty will be that if you make assumptions your mark will be downgraded, and it is likely that the more assumptions you make the greater will be the extent of the downgrading.

  • The answer should be no more than 3000 words. This is merely a guide and there is no penalty associated with this word count. The final section of the main body of the report should clearly identify the courses of action that Peter should follow. This section will be a major section of the report on which technical content will be judged. The conclusions reached and action recommended, however, will need to be supported by the arguments presented in the previous sections of the report. This final section should be between 200 and 250 words in length.
  • Your report should have a formal format with title page, executive summary, contents page and references. The report should be word processed.
  • The exact number of words in the report, and in the final section, should be reported on the Title Page.
  • Written communication will be assessed in this assignment and will contribute to your overall Communications mark in the course ENG3003 Engineering Management.
  • Please note that if plagiarism or cheating is detected in this assignment it will result in no marks for the assignment. Students should ensure they clearly understand the meaning of plagiarism and cheating. In particular, students should understand that while they may collaborate with other students on the conceptual ideas in their assignments, the final written report submitted by each student must be unique, and must not contain the written material of (a) any other student in the course, or (b) any other person without due acknowledgement.
  • All sources of information used in the preparation of the report should be adequately intext cited and referenced using Harvard AGPS Referencing Style, and you are recommended to consult resources and articles outside of the formal study materials. In particular, you will need to have consulted the Code of Ethics of the Institution of Engineers Australia or equivalent to discern and discuss the ethical issues.
  • If you wish to refer to legislation and/or case law, you may only use such material from either Australia, or the country in which you reside while undertaking this course, and you must adequately reference such material.
Order Now

Get expert help for ENG3003 Engineering management and many more. 24X7 help, plag free solution. Order online now!

Universal Assignment (October 5, 2024) ENG3003 Engineering management. Retrieved from https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/.
"ENG3003 Engineering management." Universal Assignment - October 5, 2024, https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/
Universal Assignment December 27, 2022 ENG3003 Engineering management., viewed October 5, 2024,<https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/>
Universal Assignment - ENG3003 Engineering management. [Internet]. [Accessed October 5, 2024]. Available from: https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/
"ENG3003 Engineering management." Universal Assignment - Accessed October 5, 2024. https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/
"ENG3003 Engineering management." Universal Assignment [Online]. Available: https://universalassignment.com/eng3003-engineering-management/. [Accessed: October 5, 2024]

Please note along with our service, we will provide you with the following deliverables:

Please do not hesitate to put forward any queries regarding the service provision.

We look forward to having you on board with us.

Most Frequent Questions & Answers

Universal Assignment Services is the best place to get help in your all kind of assignment help. We have 172+ experts available, who can help you to get HD+ grades. We also provide Free Plag report, Free Revisions,Best Price in the industry guaranteed.

We provide all kinds of assignmednt help, Report writing, Essay Writing, Dissertations, Thesis writing, Research Proposal, Research Report, Home work help, Question Answers help, Case studies, mathematical and Statistical tasks, Website development, Android application, Resume/CV writing, SOP(Statement of Purpose) Writing, Blog/Article, Poster making and so on.

We are available round the clock, 24X7, 365 days. You can appach us to our Whatsapp number +1 (613)778 8542 or email to info@universalassignment.com . We provide Free revision policy, if you need and revisions to be done on the task, we will do the same for you as soon as possible.

We provide services mainly to all major institutes and Universities in Australia, Canada, China, Malaysia, India, South Africa, New Zealand, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

We provide lucrative discounts from 28% to 70% as per the wordcount, Technicality, Deadline and the number of your previous assignments done with us.

After your assignment request our team will check and update you the best suitable service for you alongwith the charges for the task. After confirmation and payment team will start the work and provide the task as per the deadline.

Yes, we will provide Plagirism free task and a free turnitin report along with the task without any extra cost.

No, if the main requirement is same, you don’t have to pay any additional amount. But it there is a additional requirement, then you have to pay the balance amount in order to get the revised solution.

The Fees are as minimum as $10 per page(1 page=250 words) and in case of a big task, we provide huge discounts.

We accept all the major Credit and Debit Cards for the payment. We do accept Paypal also.

Popular Assignments

ECON20001 Assignment #2

Assignment #2 Due Monday September 30th 2pm AEST The assignment is marked out of 25 points. The weight for each part is indicated following the question text. Style requirements: This assignment requires the submission of a spreadsheet. Please keep THREE decimal places in your answers and include your spreadsheet as

Read More »

RES800 Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review

Subject Title Business Research Subject Code RES800 Assessment Title Assessment 1 – Research Question and Literature Review Learning Outcome/s     Utilise critical thinking to analyse managerial problems and formulate relevant research questions and a research design   Apply research theories and methodologies to assist in developing a business research

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan

Assessment Task 2 Health advocacy and communication plan Rationale and multimedia plan presentation Submission requirements Due date and time:         Rationale: 8pm AEST Monday 23 September 2024 (Week 11) Multimedia plan presentation: 8pm AEST Monday 30 September 2024 (Study Period) % of final grade:         50% of overall grade Word limit: Time

Read More »

MLI500 Leadership and innovation Assessment 1

Subject Title Leadership and innovation Subject Code MLI500 Assessment Assessment 1: Leadership development plan Individual/Group Individual Length 1500 words Learning Outcomes LO1 Examine the role of leaders in fostering creativity and innovation LO5 Reflect on and take responsibility for their own learning and leadership development processes Submission   Weighting 30%

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 2 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,000 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 2 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the wdue

Read More »

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1

TCHR5001 Assessment Brief 1 Assessment Details Item Assessment 1: Pitch your pedagogy Type Digital Presentation (Recorded) Due Monday, 16th September 2024, 11:59 pm AEST (start of Week 4) Group type Individual Length 10 minutes (equivalent to 1500 words) Weight 50% Gen AI use Permitted, restrictions apply Aligned ULOS ULO1, ULO2,

Read More »

HSH725 Assessment Task 2

turquoise By changing the Heading 3 above with the following teal, turquoise, orange or pink you can change the colour theme of your CloudFirst CloudDeakin template page. When this page is published the Heading 3 above will be removed, but it will still be here in edit mode if you wish to change the colour theme.

Read More »

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection

Evidence in Health Assessment 2: Evidence Selection Student name:                                                                    Student ID: Section 1: PICO and search strategy Evidence Question: Insert evidence question from chosen scenario here including all key PICO terms.       PICO Search Terms                                                                                                                                                                                                          Complete the following table.   Subject headings Keywords Synonyms Population  

Read More »

Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation

ASSESSMENT TASK INFORMATION: XNB390 Assessment 1 – Lesson Plan and annotation This document provides you with information about the requirements for your assessment. Detailed instructions and resources are included for completing the task. The Criterion Reference Assessment (CRA) Marking Matrix that XNB390 markers will use to grade the assessment task

Read More »

XNB390 Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan

XNB390 Template for Task 1 – Professional Lesson Plan CONTEXT FOR LESSON: SOCIAL JUSTICE CONSIDERATIONS: Equity Diversity Supportive Environment UNIT TITLE:    TERM WEEK DAY TIME 1   5           YEAR/CLASS STUDENT NUMBERS/CONTEXT LOCATION LESSON DURATION         28 Children (chl): 16 boys; 12

Read More »

A2 Critical Review Assignment

YouthSolutions Summary The summary should summarise the key points of the critical review. It should state the aims/purpose of the program and give an overview of the program or strategy you have chosen. This should be 200 words – included in the word count. Critical analysis and evaluation Your critical

Read More »

PUN364 – Workplace activity Assignment

Assessment 1 – DetailsOverviewFor those of you attending the on-campus workshop, you will prepare a report on the simulated simulated inspection below. For those of you who are not attending, you will be required to carry out your own food business inspection under the supervision of a suitably qualified Environmental

Read More »

FPC006 Taxation for Financial Planning

Assignment 1 Instructions Assignment marks: 95 | Referencing and presentation: 5 Total marks: 100 Total word limit: 3,600 words Weighting: 40% Download and use the Assignment 1 Answer Template provided in KapLearn to complete your assignment. Your assignment should be loaded into KapLearn by 11.30 pm AEST/AEDT on the due

Read More »

Mental health Nursing assignment

Due Aug 31 This is based on a Mental health Nursing assignment Used Microsoft word The family genogram is a useful tool for the assessment of individuals, couples, and families.  It can yield significant data and lead to important, new patient understandings and insights as multigenerational patterns take shape and

Read More »

Assessment 2: Research and Policy Review

Length: 2000 words +/- 10% (excluding references)For this assessment, you must choose eight sources (academic readings and policy documents) as the basis of your Research and Policy Review. You must choose your set of sources from the ‘REFERENCES MENU’ on the moodle site, noting the minimum number of sources required

Read More »

HSN702 – Lifespan Nutrition

Assessment Task: 2 Assignment title: Population Nutrition Report and Reflection Assignment task type: Written report, reflection, and short oral presentation Task details The primary focus of this assignment is on population nutrition. Nutritionists play an important role in promoting population health through optimal nutritional intake. You will be asked to

Read More »

Written Assessment 1: Case Study

Billy a 32-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a suspected overdose of tricyclic antidepressants. He is obese (weight 160kg, height 172cm) and has a history of depression and chronic back pain for which he takes oxycodone. On admission to the emergency department, Paramedics were maintaining

Read More »

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence

Assessment Task 8 – Plan and prepare to assess competence Assessment Task 8 consists of the following sections: Section 1:      Short answer questions Section 2:      Analyse an assessment tool Section 3:      Determine reasonable adjustment and customisation of assessment process Section 4:      Develop an assessment plan Student Instructions To complete this

Read More »

Nutrition Reviews Assignment 2 – Part A and Part B

This assignment provides you with the opportunity to determine an important research question that is crucial to address based on your reading of one of the two systematic reviews below (Part A). You will then develop a research proposal outlining the study design and methodology needed to answer that question

Read More »

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT

NUR332 – TASK 3 – WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT for S2 2024. DESCRIPTION (For this Task 3, the word ‘Indigenous Australians’, refers to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples of Australia) NUR332 Task 3 – Written Assignment – Due – WEEK 12 – via CANVAS on Wednesday, Midday (1200hrs) 16/10/2024. The

Read More »

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study

NUR100 Task 3 – Case study To identify a key child health issue and discuss this issue in the Australian context. You will demonstrate understanding of contemporary families in Australia. You will discuss the role of the family and reflect on how the family can influence the overall health outcomes

Read More »

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster

NUR 100 Task 2 Health Promotion Poster The weighting for this assessment is 40%. Task instructions You are not permitted to use generative AI tools in this task. Use of AI in this task constitutes student misconduct and is considered contract cheating. This assessment requires you to develop scholarship and

Read More »

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY

BMS 291 Pathophysiology and Pharmacology CASE STUDY Assessment No: 1 Weighting: 40% Due date Part A: midnight Friday 2nd August 2024 Due date Part B: midnight Sunday 29th September 2024 General information In this assessment, you will develop your skills for analysing, integrating and presenting information for effective evidence-based communication.

Read More »

Assessment Task: Health service delivery

Assessment Task Health service delivery is inherently unpredictable. This unpredictability can arise from, for example, the assortment of patient presentations, environmental factors, changing technologies, shifts in health policy and changes in division leadership. It can also arise from changes in policy within an organisation and/or associated health services that impact

Read More »

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment

LNDN08002 Business Cultures Resit Assessment Briefing 2023–2024 (Resit for Term 1) Contents Before starting this resit, please: 1 Assessment Element 1: Individual Report 1 Case Report Marking Criteria. 3 Assessment Element 2: Continuing Personal Development (CPD) 4 Guidance for Assessment 2: Reflection and Reflective Practice. 5 Student Marking Criteria –

Read More »

Assessment Task 2 – NAPLAN Exercise

Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items Assessment Task 2 (35%) – Evaluation and discussion of test items AITSL Standards: This assessmeAITSL Standards: This assessment provides the opportunity to develop evidence that demonstrates these Standards: 1.2        Understand how students learn 1.5        Differentiate teaching to meet with

Read More »

EBY014 Degree Tutor Group 2 Assignment

  Assignment Brief Module Degree Tutor Group 2 Module Code EBY014 Programme BA (Hons) Business and Management with   Foundation Year Academic Year 2024/2025 Issue Date 6th May 2024 Semester Component Magnitude Weighting Deadline Learning outcomes assessed 2 1 2000 words Capstone Assessment 100% 26th July, 2024 1/2/3/4 Module Curriculum

Read More »

Can't Find Your Assignment?

Open chat
1
Free Assistance
Universal Assignment
Hello 👋
How can we help you?